[RESULT][VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi all, Thanks to everyone who participated in the vote. The voting is now closed and it has passed with 8 binding +1, 12 non-binding +1, and no 0 or -1 bindings votes. two -1 non-binding votes are answered. +1 bindings: Thomas Weise Ted Liu tison Justin Mclean Willem Jiang Duo Zhang Junping Du Stephan Ewen +1 non-bindings: Zhuoyu Chen Qingrong wang shaokang lv benjobs Sherlock Homles hulk 郭宁 Kelu Tao Xiao Yu Dominik Riemer Jia Fan Jiafeng Zhang -1 non-bindings: tksonjk tk Zur Aviem Best, tison.
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1(binding) Best Regards --- Apache DolphinScheduler PMC Chair & Apache SeaTunnel PPMC David Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidzollo Twitter: @WorkflowEasy <https://twitter.com/WorkflowEasy> --- On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 12:15 AM tison wrote: > Thanks for your participation! I'm closing this voting thread now and > summarizing the result. > > Best, > tison. > > > Jiafeng.Zhang 于2022年8月31日周三 22:12写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > > > Jiafeng.Zhang > > Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org > > > > Jia Fan 于2022年8月31日 周三18:38写道： > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Good luck! > > > > > > hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Good luck! > > > > > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > > > > > > > > > Best of luck with the project! > > > > > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would > like > > > to > > > > > call > > > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please > check > > > out > > > > > the > > > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > > Incubator > > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > - *Hulk Lin* > > > > > > > > > -- > > 张家峰 > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Thanks for your participation! I'm closing this voting thread now and summarizing the result. Best, tison. Jiafeng.Zhang 于2022年8月31日周三 22:12写道： > +1 (non-binding) > Good luck! > > Jiafeng.Zhang > Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org > > Jia Fan 于2022年8月31日 周三18:38写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > > > hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Good luck! > > > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > > > > > > > Best of luck with the project! > > > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like > > to > > > > call > > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check > > out > > > > the > > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > Incubator > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > - *Hulk Lin* > > > > > > -- > 张家峰 >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Jiafeng.Zhang Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org Jia Fan 于2022年8月31日 周三18:38写道： > +1 (non-binding) > Good luck! > > hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good luck! > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > > > > > Best of luck with the project! > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like > to > > > call > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check > out > > > the > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > Incubator > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards, > > - *Hulk Lin* > > > -- 张家峰
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! hulk 于2022年8月31日周三 16:28写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > > > Best of luck with the project! > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > call > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > the > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > [2] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > -- > Best Regards, > - *Hulk Lin* >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 16:26, Stephan Ewen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! > > Best of luck with the project! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Best Regards, - *Hulk Lin*
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Thank you for kicking off this interesting project! Best of luck with the project! On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) - good luck! Dominik -Original Message- From: Yu Xiao Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 1:25 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator + 1 non-binding Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu 俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14:33写道： > > +1 (binding). Good luck! > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like > > to call a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, > > please check out the StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care > > either way [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, > > because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Pro > > posal > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+ 1 non-binding Best wishes! Yu Xiao Apache ShenYu 俊平堵 于2022年8月30日周二 14:33写道： > > +1 (binding). Good luck! > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding). Good luck! tison 于2022年8月24日周三 11:56写道： > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 I feel the same with Willem that we have almost finished an incubator release :) Thanks. Willem Jiang 于2022年8月30日周二 11:00写道： > > +1 binding. > After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. > I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. > > Willem Jiang > > Twitter: willemjiang > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 binding. After reviewing the latest proposal and third party License issue. I have a feeling we can do the first incubator release quickly. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:56 AM tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
The voting thread looks fragmented in some mail clients (like Gmail). I'd like to make a summary of the current state so that we don't deadlock here: +1 bindings: Thomas Weise Ted Liu +1 non-bindings: Zhuoyu Chen Qingrong wang shaokang lv benjobs Sherlock Homles hulk Jiafeng.Zhang 郭宁 Kelu Tao -1 bindings: Justin Mclean -1 non-bindings: tksonjk tk Zur Aviem All concerns thrown by -1s are answered. I'd like to learn if there're still some blockers. Also, cc the nominated mentors to help with voting in this thread. Best, tison. tison 于2022年8月30日周二 10:37写道： > +1 (binding) > > Best, > tison. > > > Liu Ted 于2022年8月24日周三 23:08写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> Best regards,, >> >> Ted Liu >> >> 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks, >> Thomas >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: >> >> > +1 (non-binding) >> > >> > Good Luck! >> > >> > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to >> > call >> > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check >> out >> > the >> > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. >> > > >> > > Please cast your vote: >> > > >> > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator >> > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way >> > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... >> > > >> > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the >> > Incubator >> > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > tison. >> > > >> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 >> > > [2] >> > > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >> > > >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > >> > >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, +1 (binding) - best of luck! Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Best, tison. Liu Ted 于2022年8月24日周三 23:08写道： > +1 (binding) > Best regards,, > > Ted Liu > > 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Thomas > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Good Luck! > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > call > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > the > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > [2] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
A few additional comments here: 1. As Justin said, you can select which one you want to choose (and ALv2 is a good choice!). Some projects take extra measures to explicitly state which of the two options they elect. 2. The ALv2 + LGPL option is common, primarily to accommodate projects under GPLv2 which consider the additional patent terms of ALv2 incompatible. The LGPL alternative is generally offered as an alternative to permit GPLv2 projects to use the project as a dependency. For those of us who want to make our libraries accessible to anyone, we're stuck with either MIT or dual ALv2/LGPL licensing. Projects choosing to go ALv2 only are going to be incompatible to be used as a dependency with GPLv2 projects. On 8/29/22, 12:26 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: Hi, > hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found > that many of them are dual protocol, for example > > org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. > 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 > 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 Jackson looks to be dual licensed [1] so you can select which license of the two you want to use. (Hint you would select ALv2.). Not all code bases with multiple licenses work that way. In each case you'll need to look at them to see if they are dual licensed or if they contain code under both licenses. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/codehaus/jackson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, > hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found > that many of them are dual protocol, for example > > org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. > 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 > 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 Jackson looks to be dual licensed [1] so you can select which license of the two you want to use. (Hint you would select ALv2.). Not all code bases with multiple licenses work that way. In each case you'll need to look at them to see if they are dual licensed or if they contain code under both licenses. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/codehaus/jackson - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
@Justin Mclean hi，In the process of sorting through all the X class dependencies, we found that many of them are dual protocol, for example org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-xc is dual-licensed. 1) GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Version 2.1 2) The Apache Software License, Version 2.0 How is this finally classified, and does it comply with apache rules? Best, Zhuoyu Chen. Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道： > Hi, > > There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as > another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to > discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each > other or even if possible reuse code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi Zhuoyu, The mailing list cannot render images embedded. You can attach the file or send a link to CDN for images. If it's a screenshot for some content, you can just paste the content which is better for reading and (partial) referencing. Best, tison. 陈卓宇 于2022年8月29日周一 11:27写道： > The Streampark development community reacted quickly to the compliance > issues and now looks to have converged on completion, which is something we > should see. > [image: 图片.png] > > > Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道： > >> Hi, >> >> There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as >> another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to >> discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each >> other or even if possible reuse code. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Justin >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
The Streampark development community reacted quickly to the compliance issues and now looks to have converged on completion, which is something we should see. [image: 图片.png] Justin Mclean 于2022年8月29日周一 10:45写道： > Hi, > > There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as > another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to > discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each > other or even if possible reuse code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, There is no issue in having a project that does something similar as another project, that in itself is no reason to vote -1. It is useful to discuss overlap and perhaps work out were projects could complement each other or even if possible reuse code. Kind Regards, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
@tksonjk tk What is the logic of merging products that have the same functionality? You make a search product and you ask Google search to go merge with your project? tksonjk tk 于2022年8月29日周一 01:30写道： > -1, > > @tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does > it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? > and how does it differentiate to what Apache Inlong does? These are all > handle stream calculation, > why not expand the function and create a new project instead? >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
hi Dave Fisher，[image: 图片.png] The streampark development community was quick to respond and address this, which is something we should see. Dave Fisher 于2022年8月29日周一 05:00写道： > Hi Julian, > > This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having > explicit plans on removing LGPL/GPL dependencies. Following Apache Release > policy is a to do to learn during Incubation. The real question is if the > community accepts that their release cycle will be slowed. > > Best, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 28, 2022, at 1:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that > > StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid > > reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. > > > > The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick > > technologies, it builds communities. There are many examples of > > 'overlapping' projects that have built their own communities and > > flourished (HTTP Server vs Tomcat, Spark vs Flink, Druid vs Pinot, ORC > > vs Parquet). > > > > Julian > > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:17 PM Zur Aviem wrote: > >> > >> -1, > >> > >> Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data > that > >> provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. > >> InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, > >> which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other > >> real-time applications based on streaming data. > >> > >> The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use > stream > >> processing application development framework and one-stop stream > processing > >> operation platform. > >> > >> From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub > >> projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? > >> > >> And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the > >> discussion email[3]. > >> > >> Kind Regards, > >> Beam, Aviem Zur > >> > >> [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ > >> [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark > >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > >> > >>> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > >> call > >>> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > >> the > >>> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > >>> > >>> Please cast your vote: > >>> > >>> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > >>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way > >>> [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > >>> > >>> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > >> Incubator > >>> PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> tison. > >>> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > >>> [2] > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > >>> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
@Zur Aviem 1. first streampark do is the fact that computing operations support functions, while Apache InLongt is a data integration framework. Data integration and operation and maintenance support are completely different areas 2. The growth of a software product can not be separated from the competition, we should not have protectionist ideas, full product competition, more conducive to the growth of the product, in order to give birth to more world-changing projects Zur Aviem 于2022年8月29日周一 03:17写道： > -1, > > Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that > provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. > InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, > which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other > real-time applications based on streaming data. > > The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use stream > processing application development framework and one-stop stream processing > operation platform. > > From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub > projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? > > And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the > discussion email[3]. > > Kind Regards, > Beam, Aviem Zur > > [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ > [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Thanks for your reply :) I second what Julian and Dave said. IIRC in the Uniffle proposal, Justin had a similar statement[1]. StreamPark has its own users and the developers want to build a better community around it under sponsoring and mentoring of the Apache Incubator. This is good and why convinces me to act as the champion. I don't recognize the -1s for why not merge to project X, but let me talk about some technology here: 1. For StreamPipes, I replied several times that StreamPark doesn't focus on IoT scenarios and for technical people, while StreamPipes clearly writes that it's optimal for IoT scenario and for non-technical people. 2. For InLong, I'm one of the PMC members of InLong since the first day when it joined the Incubator. InLong describes itself as a one-stop integration framework for massive data. It's aimed at a good scenario while StreamPark provides a platform for packaging, deploying, and monitoring streaming applications. InLong is previously TubeMQ, I suggest you read the original proposal thread and especially the part of comparation of other messaging queues/streaming systems[2]. Softwares do have some overlaps with different focuses. I like JB's comment asking about the difference between StreamPark with other related projects and helping people to understand the project better. It's not a reason to object to the incubator proposal, though. To @Julian & @Dave: You're welcome to comment on the discussion thread about anything that is still a concern from accepting the proposal. You're welcome to vote in the voting thread. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/747tdt8hfmtzcpwqhll27l8k5n8pdhrl [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2o8zygdtg6nm56ld9kf3hlqtbnzjx3gj Dave Fisher 于2022年8月29日周一 05:00写道： > Hi Julian, > > This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having > explicit plans on removing LGPL/GPL dependencies. Following Apache Release > policy is a to do to learn during Incubation. The real question is if the > community accepts that their release cycle will be slowed. > > Best, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 28, 2022, at 1:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > > > A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that > > StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid > > reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. > > > > The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick > > technologies, it builds communities. There are many examples of > > 'overlapping' projects that have built their own communities and > > flourished (HTTP Server vs Tomcat, Spark vs Flink, Druid vs Pinot, ORC > > vs Parquet). > > > > Julian > > > > > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:17 PM Zur Aviem wrote: > >> > >> -1, > >> > >> Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data > that > >> provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. > >> InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, > >> which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other > >> real-time applications based on streaming data. > >> > >> The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use > stream > >> processing application development framework and one-stop stream > processing > >> operation platform. > >> > >> From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub > >> projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? > >> > >> And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the > >> discussion email[3]. > >> > >> Kind Regards, > >> Beam, Aviem Zur > >> > >> [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ > >> [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark > >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > >> > >>> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > >> call > >>> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > >> the > >>> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > >>> > >>> Please cast your vote: > >>> > >>> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > >>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way > >>> [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > >>> > >>> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > >> Incubator > >>> PMC ar
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi Julian, This is very true. I’m also dismayed by -1 votes based on not yet having explicit plans on removing LGPL/GPL dependencies. Following Apache Release policy is a to do to learn during Incubation. The real question is if the community accepts that their release cycle will be slowed. Best, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 28, 2022, at 1:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that > StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid > reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. > > The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick > technologies, it builds communities. There are many examples of > 'overlapping' projects that have built their own communities and > flourished (HTTP Server vs Tomcat, Spark vs Flink, Druid vs Pinot, ORC > vs Parquet). > > Julian > > >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:17 PM Zur Aviem wrote: >> >> -1, >> >> Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that >> provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. >> InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, >> which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other >> real-time applications based on streaming data. >> >> The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use stream >> processing application development framework and one-stop stream processing >> operation platform. >> >> From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub >> projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? >> >> And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the >> discussion email[3]. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Beam, Aviem Zur >> >> [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ >> [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark >> [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 >> >>> On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to >> call >>> a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out >> the >>> StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. >>> >>> Please cast your vote: >>> >>> [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator >>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way >>> [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... >>> >>> The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the >> Incubator >>> PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. >>> >>> Best, >>> tison. >>> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 >>> [2] >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >>> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
A few people on this thread are voting -1 with the rationale that StreamPark is similar to existing projects. This is not a valid reason. Apache does not try to ensure that projects don't overlap. The 'community over code' mantra holds true: Apache does not pick technologies, it builds communities. There are many examples of 'overlapping' projects that have built their own communities and flourished (HTTP Server vs Tomcat, Spark vs Flink, Druid vs Pinot, ORC vs Parquet). Julian On Sun, Aug 28, 2022 at 12:17 PM Zur Aviem wrote: > > -1, > > Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that > provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. > InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, > which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other > real-time applications based on streaming data. > > The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use stream > processing application development framework and one-stop stream processing > operation platform. > > From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub > projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? > > And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the > discussion email[3]. > > Kind Regards, > Beam, Aviem Zur > > [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ > [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
-1, Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other real-time applications based on streaming data. The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use stream processing application development framework and one-stop stream processing operation platform. >From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project? And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the discussion email[3]. Kind Regards, Beam, Aviem Zur [1] https://inlong.apache.org/ [2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
-1, Apache InLong[1] is a one-stop integration framework for massive data that provides automatic, secure and reliable data transmission capabilities. InLong supports both batch and stream data processing at the same time, which offers great power to build data analysis, modeling and other real-time applications based on streaming data.The streamxhub[2] aims to make stream processing easier! easy-to-use stream processing application development framework and one-stop stream processing operation platform.From my side, the planning and design of Apache Inlong and streamxhub projetc is consistent. Is it necessary to create a new project?And there are still many problems that have not been solved in the discussion email[3].Kind Regards,Beam, Aviem Zur[1] https://inlong.apache.org/;>https://inlong.apache.org/[2] https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark;>https://github.com/streamxhub/streampark[3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3;>https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3;>https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal;>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal https://maas.mail.163.com/dashi-web-extend/html/proSignature.html?ftlId=1=aviemzury%40gmail.com=aviemzury%40gmail.com=https%3A%2F%2Fmail-online.nosdn.127.net%2Fqiyelogo%2FdefaultAvatar.png=%5B%22%E9%82%AE%E7%AE%B1%EF%BC%9Aaviemzury%40gmail.com%22%5D; style="display:block;background:#fff; max-width: 400px; _width: 400px;padding:15px 0 10px 0;text-decoration: none; outline:none;-webkit-tap-highlight-color:transparent;-webkit-text-size-adjust:none !important;text-size-adjust:none !important;"> https://mail-online.nosdn.127.net/qiyelogo/defaultAvatar.png; /> aviemz...@gmail.com 邮箱：aviemz...@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
-1, @tison, sorry, I can't get your point, please describe it again. how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? and how does it differentiate to what Apache Inlong does? These are all handle stream calculation, why not expand the function and create a new project instead?
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Thanks, mysql-connector has been changed to optional. about GPL/LGPL dependancies has also been updated to StreamPark Proposal [1] 1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal Best, benjobs Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道： > HI, > > -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these > will be dealt with. > > Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did > it most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be > including GPL licensed- code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/ > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
回复：Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Best regards,, Ted Liu 2022 年 8 月 24 日周三 21:12，Thomas Weise 写道： +1 (binding) Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Good Luck! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (binding) Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 3:08 AM Kelu Tao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Good Luck! > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good Luck! On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Fwd: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
-1, (non-binding) Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in detail, thanks. and if you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Justin Mclean 于2022年8月24日周三 14:12写道： > HI, > > -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these > will be dealt with. > > Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did > it most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be > including GPL licensed- code. > > Kind Regards, > Justin > > 1. https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/ > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
HI, -1 (binding) because of GPL/LGPL dependancies and it’s unknown how these will be dealt with. Note the "FOSS exception license” no longer applies [1] and even if it did it most likely would not be allowed in ASF project and you would be including GPL licensed- code. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://www.mysql.com/about/legal/licensing/foss-exception/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! Jiafeng.Zhang Email: jiafengzh...@apache.org hulk 于2022年8月24日周三 13:34写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > Good luck! > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > > > > > Best, > > benjobs. > > > > > > ---- Replied Message ---- > > From tison > > Date 08/24/2022 11:56 > > To Incubator > > > Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > -- > Best Regards, > - Hulk Lin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- 张家峰
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) Good luck! On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:04, benjobs wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator > > > > Best, > benjobs. > > > Replied Message > From tison > Date 08/24/2022 11:56 > To Incubator > Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal -- Best Regards, - Hulk Lin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a wonderful project. I have used it in production environment for a long time. Best wishes and Many thanks. Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道： > > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > > > Best, > > Zhuoyu Chen > > > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion > > > thread: > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose > > > slogan writes: > > > > > > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users > > > >> to > > > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > > > > > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not > > > > specifically > > > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and > > > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming > > > applications. > > > > > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > > > > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read > > > through it: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > tksonjk tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > > > > > > > -1, (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain > > > in > > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for > > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not > > > > company-related? > > > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > > > call > > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check > > > > > out > > > > the > > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > Incubator > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) we are looking forward to StreamPark joining the Apache incubator Best, benjobs. Replied Message >From tison Date 08/24/2022 11:56 To Incubator Subject [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a nice project. Good luck! Best, Shaokang Lv Qingrong wang 于2022年8月24日周三 12:43写道： > +1 (no-binding) > > StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! > > 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > > > Best, > > Zhuoyu Chen > > > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion > thread: > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) > whose > > > slogan writes: > > > > > > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical > users to > > > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > > > > > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not > specifically > > > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and > > > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming > applications. > > > > > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > > > > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please > read > > > through it: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > tksonjk tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > > > > > > > -1, (non-binding) > > > > > > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you > explain > > > in > > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for > > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not > company-related? > > > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would > like to > > > > call > > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please > check out > > > > the > > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > > Incubator > > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (no-binding) StreamPark is a very greate project. Good luck! 陈卓宇 于2022年8月24日周三 12:40写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! > > Best, > Zhuoyu Chen > > tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > > > Hi, > > > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose > > slogan writes: > > > > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to > > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > > > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically > > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and > > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications. > > > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read > > through it: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > > > tksonjk tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > > > > > -1, (non-binding) > > > > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain > > in > > > detail, thanks. and if you work for > > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > > call > > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > > the > > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > > Incubator > > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > tison. > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
+1 (non-binding) StreamPark is a nice name. Good luck! Best, Zhuoyu Chen tison 于2022年8月24日周三 12:33写道： > Hi, > > I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose > slogan writes: > > > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to > connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically > focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and > management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications. > > > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read > through it: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > Best, > tison. > > > tksonjk tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > > > -1, (non-binding) > > > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain > in > > detail, thanks. and if you work for > > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > > call > > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > > the > > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > > Incubator > > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > > [2] > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi, I already replied to the comment about StreamPipe in the discussion thread: > Hi Chris, > > I checked out the official site of Apache StreamPipe (Incubator) whose slogan writes: > >> A self-service (Industrial) IoT toolbox to enable non-technical users to connect, analyze and explore IoT data streams. > > Basically, StreamPark is for technical users and it does not specifically focus on IoT scenarios. It's a streaming application development and management platform mainly supporting Flink & Spark streaming applications. > Do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? I think this topic was also answered in the discussion thread. Please read through it: https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 Best, tison. tksonjk tk 于2022年8月24日周三 12:26写道： > -1, (non-binding) > > Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in > detail, thanks. and if you work for > a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? > > On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to > call > > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out > the > > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > > > Please cast your vote: > > > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the > Incubator > > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > > [2] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal > > >
Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
-1, (non-binding) Hmmm how does it differentiate to what StreamPipes does? Can you explain in detail, thanks. and if you work for a company, do you need to prove that this project is not company-related? On 2022/08/24 03:55:26 tison wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call > a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the > StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. > > Please cast your vote: > > [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator > [ ] +0, I don't care either way > [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... > > The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator > PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal >
[VOTE] Accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator
Hi all, Following up on the [DISCUSS] thread on StreamPark[1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept StreamPark into the Apache Incubator, please check out the StreamPark Proposal from the incubator wiki[2]. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring StreamPark into the Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care either way [ ] -1, do not bring StreamPark into the Incubator, because... The vote will open at least for 72 hours, and only votes from the Incubator PMC are binding, but votes from everyone are welcome. Best, tison. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ns5n6ozl1mdvdbhmkfol67lt163m74v3 [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/StreamPark+Proposal
