[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-14 Thread Davor Bonaci 
I'm happy to announce that the Apache Incubator has unanimously approved
this release.

There are 6 approving votes, all of which are binding:
* Sergio Fernández
* Jakob Homan
* Julian Hyde
* Justin Mclean
* Jean-Baptiste Onofré
* Seetharam Venkatesh

There are no disapproving votes.

We'll proceed with this release as staged, and will make sure we address
all feedback before the next release.

Thanks everyone!

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Davor Bonaci  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
> 0.1.0-incubating!
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1],
> and
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].
>
> This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].
>
> The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
> [6].
>
> Please vote as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted
> by a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If
> approved, we will proceed with the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Davor
>
> [1]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
> [4]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [5]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [6]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-14 Thread Davor Bonaci 
This vote is now complete. We'll summarize the results and next steps in
the [RESULT] thread.

Thanks everyone!

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Jakob Homan  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> + sigs look good
> + LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good
> + licenses in source and xml files look good.
> + tests compile and pass, mvn package compiles
>
> -Jakob
>
> On 13 June 2016 at 12:13, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 13, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> >>
> >>> But I imported
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS
> >>> <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS>
> >>> easily enough.
> >>
> >> Bundling PGP keys inside a package is worse than worthless -- an
> attacker can
> >> just bundle spoofed keys with a bogus distort!
> >
> > My mistake — thanks for the correction!
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Jakob Homan 
+1 (binding)

+ sigs look good
+ LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER look good
+ licenses in source and xml files look good.
+ tests compile and pass, mvn package compiles

-Jakob

On 13 June 2016 at 12:13, Julian Hyde  wrote:
>
>> On Jun 13, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
>>
>>> But I imported
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS
>>> 
>>> easily enough.
>>
>> Bundling PGP keys inside a package is worse than worthless -- an attacker can
>> just bundle spoofed keys with a bogus distort!
>
> My mistake — thanks for the correction!
>
> Julian
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 

Hi Julian,

good point for the DISCLAIMER, I will do that.

For rat, rat is part of the release execution: the exclusion is for this 
profile. I will add this as part of pluginManagement.


Regards
JB

On 06/13/2016 08:37 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:

+1 (binding)

Checked hashes, license, notice, disclaimer. Built on JDK 1.8, OS X.

Nice work, and good luck.

Remarks:

0. I noticed .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md … nice!

1. The DISCLAIMER file is sufficient for the purposes of a source release. But for 
the github audience, reaching https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam 
, there is no disclaimer. I think 
there should be a disclaimer on README.md, and at least the first reference to beam 
should read “Apache Beam (incubating)”.

2. It’s customary (required?) for there to be a KEYS file in 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/ 
. Maybe include it next 
release? But I imported 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS 
 easily 
enough.

3. “mvn apache-rat:check” failed due to DEPENDENCIES and 
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Please add headers or exclusions next time.

Julian



On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Sergio Fernández  wrote:

+1 (binding)

So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts,
matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE
and LICENSE files, license headers (two test files from the Project
Gutenberg don't have it) build sources in a clean environment (Maven 3.3.9,
OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64).

The issue with the "Project Gutenberg license" needs to be clarified, as
Justin already pointed it out. Although license looks to affect only test
resources, this may need legal@apache check.

Good work, guys! Happy to sea Bean moving forward.



On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Davor Bonaci 
wrote:


Hi everyone,
Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
0.1.0-incubating!

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
[1],
and
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].

This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].

The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
[6].

Please vote as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If approved,
we will proceed with the release.

Thanks,
Davor

[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
[4]

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[5]

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[6]

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E





--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co





--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 

Hi Marvin,

thanks for the feedback. I will push the KEYS on dist.a.o.

Regards
JB

On 06/13/2016 09:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:


2. It’s customary (required?) for there to be a KEYS file in
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/
. Maybe include it
next release?


The KEYS file is required, by Release Distribution Policy.

   http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums

   Projects MUST publish a "KEYS" file in their distribution directory which
   contains all public keys used to sign artifacts.

   Signing keys used at Apache MUST be published in the KEYS file and SHOULD be
   made available through the global public keyserver network. [...]

Since the KEYS file is not part of the artifacts being voted on, there's no
reason to wait to resolve this issue by committing the keys file to the
following location:

   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/beam/KEYS


But I imported
https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS

easily enough.


Bundling PGP keys inside a package is worse than worthless -- an attacker can
just bundle spoofed keys with a bogus distro!  Keys need to be made available
from a highly reliable, separate server: Download the main package from a
mirror, get PGP keys from apache.org, pgp.mit.edu, etc. and verify.

The KEYS file within the Beam source tree should be deleted.

(This doesn't block the release.)

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Julian Hyde 

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey  wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:
> 
>> But I imported
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS
>> 
>> easily enough.
> 
> Bundling PGP keys inside a package is worse than worthless -- an attacker can
> just bundle spoofed keys with a bogus distort!

My mistake — thanks for the correction!

Julian


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Marvin Humphrey 
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Julian Hyde  wrote:

> 2. It’s customary (required?) for there to be a KEYS file in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/
> . Maybe include it
> next release?

The KEYS file is required, by Release Distribution Policy.

  http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums

  Projects MUST publish a "KEYS" file in their distribution directory which
  contains all public keys used to sign artifacts.

  Signing keys used at Apache MUST be published in the KEYS file and SHOULD be
  made available through the global public keyserver network. [...]

Since the KEYS file is not part of the artifacts being voted on, there's no
reason to wait to resolve this issue by committing the keys file to the
following location:

  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/beam/KEYS

> But I imported
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS
> 
> easily enough.

Bundling PGP keys inside a package is worse than worthless -- an attacker can
just bundle spoofed keys with a bogus distro!  Keys need to be made available
from a highly reliable, separate server: Download the main package from a
mirror, get PGP keys from apache.org, pgp.mit.edu, etc. and verify.

The KEYS file within the Beam source tree should be deleted.

(This doesn't block the release.)

Marvin Humphrey

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Seetharam Venkatesh 
The signature checks are fine.

+1 (binding)

Good job folks on your first release.

Thanks!
Venkatesh

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM Julian Hyde  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Checked hashes, license, notice, disclaimer. Built on JDK 1.8, OS X.
>
> Nice work, and good luck.
>
> Remarks:
>
> 0. I noticed .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md … nice!
>
> 1. The DISCLAIMER file is sufficient for the purposes of a source release.
> But for the github audience, reaching
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam>, there is no disclaimer. I
> think there should be a disclaimer on README.md, and at least the first
> reference to beam should read “Apache Beam (incubating)”.
>
> 2. It’s customary (required?) for there to be a KEYS file in
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/ <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/>. Maybe include it
> next release? But I imported
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS <
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS>
> easily enough.
>
> 3. “mvn apache-rat:check” failed due to DEPENDENCIES and
> .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Please add headers or exclusions next
> time.
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Sergio Fernández 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file
> layouts,
> > matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE
> > and LICENSE files, license headers (two test files from the Project
> > Gutenberg don't have it) build sources in a clean environment (Maven
> 3.3.9,
> > OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64).
> >
> > The issue with the "Project Gutenberg license" needs to be clarified, as
> > Justin already pointed it out. Although license looks to affect only test
> > resources, this may need legal@apache check.
> >
> > Good work, guys! Happy to sea Bean moving forward.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Davor Bonaci 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
> >> 0.1.0-incubating!
> >>
> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> >> [1],
> >> and
> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].
> >>
> >> This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control,
> [3].
> >>
> >> The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4],
> [5],
> >> [6].
> >>
> >> Please vote as follows:
> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
> adopted by
> >> a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If
> approved,
> >> we will proceed with the release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Davor
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
> >> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
> >> [4]
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> [5]
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >> [6]
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w: http://redlink.co
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Julian Hyde 
+1 (binding) 

Checked hashes, license, notice, disclaimer. Built on JDK 1.8, OS X.

Nice work, and good luck.

Remarks:

0. I noticed .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md … nice!

1. The DISCLAIMER file is sufficient for the purposes of a source release. But 
for the github audience, reaching https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam 
, there is no disclaimer. I think 
there should be a disclaimer on README.md, and at least the first reference to 
beam should read “Apache Beam (incubating)”.

2. It’s customary (required?) for there to be a KEYS file in 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/ 
. Maybe include it next 
release? But I imported 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/blob/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3/KEYS 
 
easily enough.

3. “mvn apache-rat:check” failed due to DEPENDENCIES and 
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Please add headers or exclusions next time.

Julian


> On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Sergio Fernández  wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts,
> matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE
> and LICENSE files, license headers (two test files from the Project
> Gutenberg don't have it) build sources in a clean environment (Maven 3.3.9,
> OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64).
> 
> The issue with the "Project Gutenberg license" needs to be clarified, as
> Justin already pointed it out. Although license looks to affect only test
> resources, this may need legal@apache check.
> 
> Good work, guys! Happy to sea Bean moving forward.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Davor Bonaci 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
>> 0.1.0-incubating!
>> 
>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>> [1],
>> and
>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].
>> 
>> This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].
>> 
>> The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
>> [6].
>> 
>> Please vote as follows:
>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>> a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If approved,
>> we will proceed with the release.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Davor
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
>> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
>> [4]
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [5]
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [6]
>> 
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-13 Thread Sergio Fernández 
+1 (binding)

So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts,
matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE
and LICENSE files, license headers (two test files from the Project
Gutenberg don't have it) build sources in a clean environment (Maven 3.3.9,
OpenJDK 1.8.0_91 64-Bit, Debian amd64).

The issue with the "Project Gutenberg license" needs to be clarified, as
Justin already pointed it out. Although license looks to affect only test
resources, this may need legal@apache check.

Good work, guys! Happy to sea Bean moving forward.



On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 1:54 AM, Davor Bonaci 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
> 0.1.0-incubating!
>
> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
> [1],
> and
> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].
>
> This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].
>
> The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
> [6].
>
> Please vote as follows:
> [ ] +1, Approve the release
> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>
> As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
> a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If approved,
> we will proceed with the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Davor
>
> [1]
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
> [3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
> [4]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [5]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [6]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-11 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré 

+1 (binding)

We will address the LICENSE and NOTICE points mentioned by Justin for 
next release.


Thanks

Regards
JB

On 06/12/2016 01:54 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote:

Hi everyone,
Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
0.1.0-incubating!

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1],
and
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].

This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].

The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
[6].

Please vote as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If approved,
we will proceed with the release.

Thanks,
Davor

[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
[4]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[5]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[6]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E



--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-11 Thread Justin Mclean 
Hi,

+1 (binding)  IMO license issue need to be fixed for the next release.

I checked:
- file name of release contains incubating
- while signature checks out, there’s no KEYS file in the list area and there 
seems to be no key on file for the release manager [1] However there is a KEYS 
file in github.
- hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE file contain unneeded text (i.e mentions  Apache v2.0 licence). There 
no need to generally mention Apache 2.0 licences in NOTICE [2]
- LICENSE is missing a few items [3][4]
- All files have Apache headers
- No binary files in release
- Can compile from source

I suggest you also check [3][4] with legal discuss as the Project Gutenberg 
license is not listed in any of the Apache license categories [5] as from a 
casual glance [3] adds a non-commercial restriction. i.e. “NO CHARGES MAY BE 
MADE FOR *ANY* ACCESS TO THIS MATERIAL”. Both license are different versions 
and look to have different restrictions which is also different to the latest 
license. [6]

Also it’s best to sign the release with an Apache email address rather than a 
Google one

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
3. ./runners/spark/src/test/resources/pg1112.txt
4. ./runners/spark/src/test/resources/pg2264.txt
5. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
6. https://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Gutenberg:The_Project_Gutenberg_License
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache Beam, version 0.1.0-incubating

2016-06-11 Thread Davor Bonaci 
Hi everyone,
Here's the first vote for the first release of Apache Beam -- version
0.1.0-incubating!

The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
* the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org [1],
and
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [2].

This corresponds to the tag "v0.1.0-incubating-RC3" in source control, [3].

The Apache Beam community has unanimously approved this release, [4], [5],
[6].

Please vote as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)

As customary, the vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
a majority approval with at least three PMC affirmative votes. If approved,
we will proceed with the release.

Thanks,
Davor

[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/beam/0.1.0-incubating/RC3/
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1002/
[3] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/tree/v0.1.0-incubating-RC3
[4]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68bf80b386dde080126b51ddf3497c6801015903a705411d435d64a1@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[5]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/32c991987e0abf2a09cd8afad472cf02e482af02ac35418ee8731940@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[6]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/e6ffcba94ef4514e8cf5c6fed39100ee359b954c4876d3275b1bc33a@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E