Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-31 Thread Brock Noland
I missed  antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link:

http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html

As such, the vote passes with:

4  +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M,  antelder, Brock Noland
0  -1

Patrick Hunt, Chrs M,  antelder are all members of the IPMC

Cheers,
Brock

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
 chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:

 Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member.  Is there a list
 somewhere?  I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
 someone else.

 Aside from Chris and myself Nigel Daley is listed as a mentor. Best to
 check in with him.

 Patrick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-25 Thread Brock Noland
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:

Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member.  Is there a list
somewhere?  I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
someone else.

Cheers,
Brock

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-25 Thread ant elder
Looks good to me, +1

   ...ant

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
 chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:

 Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member.  Is there a list
 somewhere?  I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
 someone else.

 Aside from Chris and myself Nigel Daley is listed as a mentor. Best to
 check in with him.

 Patrick

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-24 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 Hi,

 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
 chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:

 Great! We only need one more +1 from an IPMC member.  Is there a list
 somewhere?  I bothered Tom White last time so I'd prefer to bother
 someone else.

Aside from Chris and myself Nigel Daley is listed as a mentor. Best to
check in with him.

Patrick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-23 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Brock,

I'm -1 on this release. 

checksums check out:

mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz   
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.sha1  mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.md5
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc   mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip  
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.sha1
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.md5   mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.asc
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% ls -al
total 576
drwxr-xr-x  10 mattmann  staff 340 Jan 23 10:52 ./
drwxr-xr-x  30 mattmann  staff1020 Jan 23 10:52 ../
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  109300 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff 836 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  32 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.md5
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  40 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.sha1
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  158705 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff 836 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.asc
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  32 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.md5
-rw-r--r--   1 mattmann  staff  40 Jan 23 10:52 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.sha1
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% $HOME/bin/verify_md5_checksums 
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz: OK
mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip: OK

But, the GPG SIGS don't for whatever reason:

[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% $HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs 
Verifying Signature for file mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan  7 13:57:38 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Verifying Signature for file mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan  7 13:57:38 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% 

It looks like the releases were signed with key 8E991CC5:

Looking at:

http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrunit/KEYS:

[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% gpg --import  KEYS
gpg: key 901791C2: Eric Sammer esam...@apache.org not changed
gpg: key B4AE10F8: Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org not 
changed
gpg: Total number processed: 2
gpg:  unchanged: 2
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% ls

I don't see a key for either you or for Eric that match the key that was used 
to sign the 
releases. Am I missing something?

Cheers,
Chris



On Jan 20, 2012, at 5:30 PM, Brock Noland wrote:

 I am +1 as well. I verified the signatures, checksums, and unit tests.
 
 Does anyone else have a few minutes to vote the on the release?
 
 Brock
 
 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.
 
 It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
 (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
 other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
 artifact. You could then create convenience artifacts off that.
 
 I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are  exactly the
 same, just differing archiving tools.
 
 Patrick
 
 On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
 
 It fixes the following issues:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359
 
 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
 
 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.
 
 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0
 
 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/
 
 The tag to be voted upon:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/
 
 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS
 
 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.


++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-23 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
OK, I switch my VOTE to +1. The update worked perfectly:

[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% curl -O 
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrunit/KEYS
 % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time  Current
Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft  Speed
100  5950  100  59500 0  56767  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 87500
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% gpg --import KEYS
gpg: key 901791C2: Eric Sammer esam...@apache.org not changed
gpg: key 8E991CC5: public key Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) 
br...@apache.org imported
gpg: key B4AE10F8: Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org not 
changed
gpg: Total number processed: 3
gpg:   imported: 1  (RSA: 1)
gpg:  unchanged: 2
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% $HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs 
Verifying Signature for file mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan  7 13:57:38 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
gpg: Good signature from Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 2847 DD2B 26E1 A3D8 1949  C883 9DC2 7AFB 8E99 1CC5
Verifying Signature for file mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-dist.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made Sat Jan  7 13:57:38 2012 PST using RSA key ID 8E991CC5
gpg: Good signature from Brock Noland (CODE SIGNING KEY) br...@apache.org
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 2847 DD2B 26E1 A3D8 1949  C883 9DC2 7AFB 8E99 1CC5
[chipotle:~/tmp/mrunit-0.8.0] mattmann% 

Thanks Brock!

Cheers,
Chris


On Jan 23, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Brock Noland wrote:

 Hi,
 
 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
 chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
 Hi Brock,
 
 
 I don't see a key for either you or for Eric that match the key that was 
 used to sign the
 releases. Am I missing something?
 
 Yep, my fault. I created my original key on my laptop while traveling
 and then my laptop died before I could copy it to my home machine. As
 such, I had to generate a new key. Looks like I missed uploading this:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS
 
 to here:
 
 http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/mrunit/KEYS
 
 I have now done so, but I think it takes an hour or two before the
 public site updates.
 
 Brock


++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
 btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification
 simpler).

 Yes.

 The source archive(s) should also be checked against the SVN tag.

How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
better/easier?

Patrick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 18:44, Patrick Hunt phu...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
 btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification
 simpler).

 Yes.

 The source archive(s) should also be checked against the SVN tag.

 How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
 manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
 better/easier?

I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
directory, and then use a Gui difference tool (WinDiff) to show the
differences.
Have to ignore SVN directories and (perhaps) EOL differences.

The biggest problems come from different directory layouts in SVN and
the archive.
Also the SVN $Date variable is locale-dependent so causes spurious
differences; don't use it!

 Patrick

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
  How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
  manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
  better/easier?
 
 I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
 directory, and then use a Gui difference tool (WinDiff) to show the
 differences.
 Have to ignore SVN directories and (perhaps) EOL differences.
 
I use svn export to avoid the .svn directories, then diff -ur on the Unix
command line, optionally with --strip-trailing-cr when checking .zip
archives.

Marvin Humphrey


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
  How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
  manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
  better/easier?

 I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
 directory, and then use a Gui difference tool (WinDiff) to show the
 differences.
 Have to ignore SVN directories and (perhaps) EOL differences.

 I use svn export to avoid the .svn directories, then diff -ur on the Unix
 command line, optionally with --strip-trailing-cr when checking .zip
 archives.

I also normally do a check on the SVN tag to verify that that
appropriate SVN properties have been set; that does not work on an
exported copy.
It's easy enough to ignore the SVN directories (especially since the
1.7 change to the working copy format).

 Marvin Humphrey


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Checking release archive against VCS tag (was [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating)

2012-01-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
 On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
   How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
   manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
   better/easier?
 
  I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
  directory, and then use a Gui difference tool (WinDiff) to show the
  differences.
  Have to ignore SVN directories and (perhaps) EOL differences.
 
  I use svn export to avoid the .svn directories, then diff -ur on the 
  Unix
  command line, optionally with --strip-trailing-cr when checking .zip
  archives.
 
 I also normally do a check on the SVN tag to verify that that
 appropriate SVN properties have been set; that does not work on an
 exported copy.
 It's easy enough to ignore the SVN directories (especially since the
 1.7 change to the working copy format).

What svn props do you look for?  I'm curious if I'm missing anything.

There's eol-style of course, but that's per file, so there's no way I'm 
checking it on a giant source tree.  And the actual release archive is an svn
export (all this assumes svn and not git of course), so whatever svn props
were there, they're gone now!  It seems like svn props are a development
issue rather than a release issue, no? 

Besides, I don't actually care about line endings when performing this QC step
-- I just want to see that the archive really was exported from the VCS tag.

Marvin Humphrey


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Checking release archive against VCS tag (was [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating)

2012-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2012 12:35, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26:49PM +, sebb wrote:
 On 12 January 2012 12:08, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
  On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37:18AM +, sebb wrote:
   How is this most easily accomplished? Checkout tag from SVN then
   manually diff against the artifact, or some other way is
   better/easier?
 
  I checkout the SVN tag and explode the archive(s) in the same parent
  directory, and then use a Gui difference tool (WinDiff) to show the
  differences.
  Have to ignore SVN directories and (perhaps) EOL differences.
 
  I use svn export to avoid the .svn directories, then diff -ur on the 
  Unix
  command line, optionally with --strip-trailing-cr when checking .zip
  archives.

 I also normally do a check on the SVN tag to verify that that
 appropriate SVN properties have been set; that does not work on an
 exported copy.
 It's easy enough to ignore the SVN directories (especially since the
 1.7 change to the working copy format).

 What svn props do you look for?  I'm curious if I'm missing anything.

 There's eol-style of course, but that's per file, so there's no way I'm
 checking it on a giant source tree.

I don't check it manually!

 And the actual release archive is an svn export

Depends on the build process; it may be repacked from a clean checkout
of the tag.

 (all this assumes svn and not git of course), so whatever svn props
 were there, they're gone now!  It seems like svn props are a development
 issue rather than a release issue, no?

Yes, but if the eolstyle is missing or incorrect, it causes problems
when developers use OSes with different EOLs.
Not only can it make it harder for the developer to use the file, it
can also affect the SVN diff messages, showing diffs where there are
none.

Similarly if binary files don't have the correct mime-type; there have
been occasions when PDFs have been treated as text, which causes diff
messages to be huge and may cause some mail clients to bork.

 Besides, I don't actually care about line endings when performing this QC step
 -- I just want to see that the archive really was exported from the VCS tag.

There's no point for my use-case to both checkout the tag and export
it; once is enough.

 Marvin Humphrey


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.

It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
(one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
artifact. You could then create convenience artifacts off that.

I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are  exactly the
same, just differing archiving tools.

Patrick

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359

 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.

 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0

 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/

 The tag to be voted upon:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/

 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.

 It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
 (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
 other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
 artifact. You could then create convenience artifacts off that.

Having multiple archive types is very common in other ASF projects.

 I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are  exactly the
 same, just differing archiving tools.

Or possibly also differing in EOL setting, e.g.
Windows more commonly has zip support, so source may have EOL=CRLF
Un*x systems more commonly support tar/gz, so source may have EOL=LF.

 Patrick

 On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359

 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.

 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0

 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/

 The tag to be voted upon:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/

 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread Patrick Hunt
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.

 It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
 (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
 other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
 artifact. You could then create convenience artifacts off that.

 Having multiple archive types is very common in other ASF projects.


Ok, but that means that we need to verify/vote on both, correct? (we
can do them together, I'm just saying that it requires more reviewer
work than just verifying the single artifact).

 I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are  exactly the
 same, just differing archiving tools.

 Or possibly also differing in EOL setting, e.g.
 Windows more commonly has zip support, so source may have EOL=CRLF
 Un*x systems more commonly support tar/gz, so source may have EOL=LF.

In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification
simpler).

Patrick

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2012 18:06, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:59 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 11 January 2012 17:49, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
 +1 sig/xsum match up, tested clean and RAT reports fine.

 It's a bit odd to me that there are two source release artifacts here
 (one archived with tar/gz the other with zip), I've not seen that for
 other projects. Typically you want to have a single source release
 artifact. You could then create convenience artifacts off that.

 Having multiple archive types is very common in other ASF projects.


 Ok, but that means that we need to verify/vote on both, correct? (we

yes.

 can do them together, I'm just saying that it requires more reviewer
 work than just verifying the single artifact).

 I verified that the contents of the two artifacts are  exactly the
 same, just differing archiving tools.

 Or possibly also differing in EOL setting, e.g.
 Windows more commonly has zip support, so source may have EOL=CRLF
 Un*x systems more commonly support tar/gz, so source may have EOL=LF.

 In this case the files are exactly the same, there is no difference
 btw the contents of the two archives (which makes verification
 simpler).

Yes.

The source archive(s) should also be checked against the SVN tag.

 Patrick

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-10 Thread Brock Noland
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359

*** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
for convenience.

Source and binary files:
http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0

Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/

The tag to be voted upon:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/

MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-10 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2012 23:52, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359

 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].

 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.

 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0

 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/

 The tag to be voted upon:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/

NOTICE says:
Copyright 2011 The Apache Software Foundation

If you have made any substantial changes this year, surely that ought
to be changed?

 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS

 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release MRUnit version 0.8.0-incubating

2012-01-10 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Sebb,

There have indeed been some changes. This is something that IMHO 
can be updated on the next release. I've filed a JIRA issue to track it.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRUNIT-52

And will fix it.

Cheers,
Chris

On Jan 10, 2012, at 6:06 PM, sebb wrote:

 On 9 January 2012 23:52, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
 This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version 0.8.0-incubating.
 
 It fixes the following issues:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311292version=12316359
 
 *** Please download, test and vote by [3 working days after sending].
 
 Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided
 for convenience.
 
 Source and binary files:
 http://people.apache.org/~brock/mrunit-0.8.0-incubating-candidate-0
 
 Maven staging repo:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemrunit-031/
 
 The tag to be voted upon:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/tags/release-0.8.0-incubating/
 
 NOTICE says:
 Copyright 2011 The Apache Software Foundation
 
 If you have made any substantial changes this year, surely that ought
 to be changed?
 
 MRUnit's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/mrunit/dist/KEYS
 
 Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote upon the release after a
 successful PPMC vote before any release can be made official.
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org