Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-18 Thread sebb 
On 18/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi Sebb,


  The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
  contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.


 I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is 
 licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0. You can look at 
 https://facelets.dev.java.net/ for further information.


Nevertheless, IMO it still needs to be mentioned in the LICENSE file.

For example, add something like:

jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar is released under the terms of the Apache
License, version 2.0 which is included at the start of this file.

  The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
  Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.


 I updated my KEY to include my apache account. 
 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index contains 
 gerdo...@apache.org


OK, I guess I need to refresh my keyring.

  Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.

 As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary


  Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
  have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
  blocker, but please consider for the next release).


 From the 2 points of above comments, we got advices our mentor while we were 
 releasing
  the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and 
 its name.

  Sure, I can remove all packages from the next release.

  Thanks;

  --Gurkan




  
  From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
  To: general@incubator.apache.org
  Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:52:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)


  On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.
  
OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts 
 and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 
 2008.
  
There
are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.
  
  
Plugins repository
--

 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

  The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
  contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.

Distribution content


 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

  The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
  This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
  NOTICE or LICENSE.
  IMO this is a blocker.

  The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
  Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

  The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
  an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
  removing for the next release)

  Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
  As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
  to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
  stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
  source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
  worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
  review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
  all archive was dropped ...).

  Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
  have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
  blocker, but please consider for the next release).

SVN Tag


 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

  Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* 
 +1
votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
  
[VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
  
More information about the project can be found here:
  
[Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
[Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
[Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Niall Pemberton 
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There
 are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.

IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Niall

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]            : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]               : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]                    : http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb 
On 17/09/2009, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
  gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
   Hi;
  
   This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.
  
   OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts 
 and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
   defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
  
   There
   are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
   to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


 IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
  don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Surely votes are *always* for a specific (immutable) set of artifacts
- otherwise what's the point?

  Niall


   Plugins repository
   --
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans
  
   Distribution content
   
   
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/
  
   SVN Tag
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/
  
   The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
   votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.
  
   [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html
  
   More information about the project can be found here:
  
   [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
   [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
   [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
   [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/
  
   This vote is open for 72 hours.
  
   Thanks;
  
   -- Gurkan
  
  
  
  


 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread sebb 
On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

  OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
  defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

  There
  are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
  to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
removing for the next release)

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
all archive was dropped ...).

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

  More information about the project can be found here:

  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  This vote is open for 72 hours.

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu 
Hi Sebb,

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

I removed it from the NOTICE file because it appears that JSF Facelet is 
licensed under Apache License, Version 2.0. You can look at 
https://facelets.dev.java.net/ for further information.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

I updated my KEY to include my apache account. 
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Gurkan+Erdogduop=index contains 
gerdo...@apache.org

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

From the 2 points of above comments, we got advices our mentor while we were 
releasing
the our first milestone (M1) about how we create distribution bundles and its 
name.

Sure, I can remove all packages from the next release.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 2:52:31 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On 17/09/2009, Gurkan Erdogdu gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

  This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

  OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
  defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

  There
  are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
  to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.


  Plugins repository
  --
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

The several (all?) of the war files in the samples directory tree
contain jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

  Distribution content
  
  
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

The binary jar contains a war file which contains jsf-facelets-1.1.14.jar.
This does not appear to be ASF software, but is not mentioned in
NOTICE or LICENSE.
IMO this is a blocker.

The signing key does not have an ASF e-mail address.
Not a blocker, but please fix for the next release candidate.

The source archive has a slightly odd directory structure, as it has
an extra src/ directory in the path (not a blocker, but consider
removing for the next release)

Not quite sure what the point of the -all archives is.
As far as I can tell it's just binaries + source; IMO it's unnecessary
to provide a combined archive. And because of the combined archive
stores the source under src/, it contains two copies of all the sample
source files that are in the binary archive. Not a blocker, but is it
worth all the extra disk space (not to mention additional time to
review releases)?  it might make getting votes easier next time if the
all archive was dropped ...).

Also, while I think of it - do the archive names (and top-level dirs)
have to include -distribution-? It makes the name rather long. (not a
blocker, but please consider for the next release).

  SVN Tag
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

Trivial typo in NOTICE.txt: This products  = This product 

  The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
  votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

  [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

  More information about the project can be found here:

  [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
  [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
  [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
  [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

  This vote is open for 72 hours.

  Thanks;


  -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread Gurkan Erdogdu 
IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Ok. I will create a second round VOTE on dev.

Thanks;

--Gurkan





From: Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 1:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hi;

 This is the second try of releasing the OpenWebBeans M3. I have corrected 
 Sebb's concerns.

 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299: Contexts and 
 Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.

 There
 are two *binding*  +1 VOTEs from openwebbeans-...@..  We still require
 to get an one more binding IPMC Member +1 VOTE  to publish M3 release.

IMO a second RC requires another vote on openwebbeans-...@. Votes
don't carry over (well mine never does) IMO.

Niall

 Plugins repository
 --
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/plugins/org/apache/openwebbeans

 Distribution content
 
 http://people.apache.org/~gerdogdu/staging-repo/OWB/1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/distribution/org/apache/openwebbeans/apache-openwebbeans-distribution/1.0.0-incubating-M3/

 SVN Tag
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.0.0-incubating-M3-rc2/

 The release vote on the openwebbeans-dev mailing list resulted in *five* +1
 votes and no 0 or -1 votes from podling PMC members.

 [VOTE Thread] : 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org/msg01228.html

 More information about the project can be found here:

 [Incubation Status Page ] : 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openwebbeans.html
 [Project Page]: 
 http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html
 [Wiki Page]   : http://cwiki.apache.org/OWB/
 [Blog]: http://blogs.apache.org/OWB/

 This vote is open for 72 hours.

 Thanks;

 -- Gurkan





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Relese OpenWebBeans M3- (Second Try)

2009-09-17 Thread David Crossley 
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
 
 OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
 Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
 defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008. 

(This issue is not a release blocker.)

The phrase ASL-licensed is not correct.

The old license was The Apache Software License, Version 1.1
so i suppose that is where the ASL thing came from.

The current license is Apache License, Version 2.0.

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org