Re: questions license for site documents

2004-02-29 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr. 
On Feb 29, 2004, at 5:57 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:

the generated html does not contain an explicit license just a 
copyright. am i right in thinking that now it would be better to 
publish them under the apache license 2?

also, am i right in thinking that all the source documentation should 
have license notices added?
Might as well make it explicit

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Geir Magnusson Jr   203-247-1713(m)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[wiki] Jakarta wikis set up

2004-02-29 Thread Leo Simons 
Dear Jakarta PMC,

I have set up MoinMoin wikis for Jakarta at

   http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta
   http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene
   http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tomcat
   http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry
Please take a look at the README file in /www/wiki.apache.org on 
minotaur, http://wiki.apache.org/gump/HelpContents and 
http://moin.sf.net for more information about MoinMoin.

I have also attempted to migrate all content from the UseMod wiki 
installation to the appropriate places in the new MoinMoin wiki 
installation. Since the migration script is not perfect, some pages may 
be missing and/or looking awkward. You will need to fix these manually.

Specifically, page where copied over as follows:

*Jakarta*   ->   /jakarta
*Lucene*->   /jakarta-lucene
*Tomcat*->   /jakarta/tomcat
this means that a lot of pages for jakarta subprojects have not been 
migrated to a new final location on the MoinMoin installation yet, and 
are hence located (immutable) at

http://wiki.apache.org/old/

We can set up more subwikis for the jakarta subprojects and migrate 
those pages, or we can copy those pages to the /jakarta subwiki. Just ask.

Note that cvs-style commit messages for changes made to the wiki will be 
sent to the appropriate mailing lists as has been requested (the 
moderator for those mailing lists will likely need to make some changes 
to allow these to go through).

Please contact us on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list if you 
have any questions (prefix the e-mail subject with '[wiki]').

best regards,

- Leo Simons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

licensing javadocs...?

2004-02-29 Thread robert burrell donkin 
it seems to me that the javadocs are distributed just like everything 
else in the release. so, it seems to me that we need to alter our 
builds so that the apache license 2 is included. we could do this by 
setting the license as a header or footer (or something) in the javadoc 
build.

anyone have any opinions about the best practice for this?

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

questions license for site documents

2004-02-29 Thread robert burrell donkin 
the generated html does not contain an explicit license just a 
copyright. am i right in thinking that now it would be better to 
publish them under the apache license 2?

also, am i right in thinking that all the source documentation should 
have license notices added?

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]