On Feb 29, 2004, at 5:57 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
the generated html does not contain an explicit license just a copyright. am i right in thinking that now it would be better to publish them under the apache license 2?
also, am i right in thinking that all the source documentation should have license notices added?
Might as well make it explicit
- robert
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
