Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.


On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:


Hi,

Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.


Why?  W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense.  For example,  
the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and  
for Harmony, to DB and XML!  Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive  
projects, has no connection to anything else...


geir




If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at [2]. :-)

[1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png




BR,

Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Thomas Vandahl
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 Why?  W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense.  For example, the
 Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for
 Harmony, to DB and XML!  Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
 projects, has no connection to anything else...
 
I agree with Geir. The graph that includes Jakarta looks much more
realistic than the other one.

Bye, Thomas.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/16/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
 projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
 dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.
 If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at [2]. :-)

snip/

Nice pictures, thanks for sharing. FWIW, I like the one with Jakarta
(and Incubator).

-Rahul


 [1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/
 [2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png

 BR,

 Jukka Zitting


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.


On Nov 18, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:


On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:


Hi,

Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta  
excluded.


Why?  W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense.  For example,
the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and
for Harmony, to DB and XML!  Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
projects, has no connection to anything else...


Ant as a piece of software is pervasive - but are the Ant committers
pervasive?


I'd guess certainly more than an island.


Jukka's cloud shows community/commiter relationships rather
than software. The Jakarta one is interesting as it shows so much of
JavaLand at the ASF sprang from Jakarta. I agree with Jukka though -
it distorts the landscape.


But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...

geir





Niall


geir



If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at  
[2]. :-)


[1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png




BR,

Jukka Zitting


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Nov 18, 2007 12:07 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Nov 16, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:

  Hi,
 
  Earlier today I did some graphs on cross-pollination among Apache
  projects and blogged a summary at [1]. Jakarta always ended up
  dominating the graphs, so the version on my blog has Jakarta excluded.

 Why?  W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense.  For example,
 the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and
 for Harmony, to DB and XML!  Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
 projects, has no connection to anything else...

Ant as a piece of software is pervasive - but are the Ant committers
pervasive? Jukka's cloud shows community/commiter relationships rather
than software. The Jakarta one is interesting as it shows so much of
JavaLand at the ASF sprang from Jakarta. I agree with Jukka though -
it distorts the landscape.

Niall

 geir

 
  If you're interested, there's a version with Jakarta in it at [2]. :-)
 
  [1] http://jukkaz.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/the-apache-cloud/
  [2] http://people.apache.org/~jukka/2007/asf5.png
 

  BR,
 
  Jukka Zitting

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 
 But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
 

Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
cross-polination (as I understand it)... So yes, since most
committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since
those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think
that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation
of the real dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of
Jakarta.

Of course, I could be wrong :)
-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war  ~ John Adams

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 
  But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
 

 Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
 cross-polination (as I understand it)...

then you'd expect Harmony and Geronimo would connect with Velocity via Geir...

i'm not sure what cross-pollination this graph refers to.  Jukka,
could you clarify?

 So yes, since most
 committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since
 those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think
 that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation
 of the real dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of
 Jakarta.

 Of course, I could be wrong :)
 --
 ===
Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
 Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war  ~ John Adams


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Nathan Bubna
On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
  
   But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...
  
 
  Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
  cross-polination (as I understand it)...

 then you'd expect Harmony and Geronimo would connect with Velocity via Geir...

 i'm not sure what cross-pollination this graph refers to.  Jukka,
 could you clarify?

ah.  i RTFA.  a connection requires 5 committers in common.  i'd be
curious to see the graph with the threshold set to 3 (as that is more
of a magic number in Apache community stuff). :)



  So yes, since most
  committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since
  those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think
  that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation
  of the real dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of
  Jakarta.
 
  Of course, I could be wrong :)
  --
  ===
 Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
  Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war  ~ John Adams
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.


On Nov 18, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:


On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:


But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...



Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*


I don't think that anyone confused codebase and committer.  I thought  
that many of the ant committers had much influence in what followed,  
since ant was one of the early arrivals in Jakarta as it was the build  
system for tomcat...  therefore the linkages are meaningful, IMO.


I think that the jakarta node represents meaningful information.

For example, Velocity came from core Turbine people, and you can't get  
any sense of that from the Jakarta-free graph.  Maybe that's the  
problem - that history isn't represented in current committer lists,  
and thus when you drop Jakarta, information is lost.




cross-polination (as I understand it)... So yes, since most
committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since
those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think
that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation
of the real dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of
Jakarta.


I guess it comes down to what Jukka's trying to show


geir


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Martin van den Bemt
Jukka is not subsribed, but the reason there are 5 is to kind of limit the size 
of the image (1
results in a huge image)

Mvgr,
Martin

Nathan Bubna wrote:
 On Nov 18, 2007 1:14 PM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Nov 18, 2007 1:10 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 01:58:29PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
 But that's the fact - that most of JavaLand sprang from jakarta...

 Jukka's graph shows committer cross-polination, not *codebase*
 cross-polination (as I understand it)...
 then you'd expect Harmony and Geronimo would connect with Velocity via 
 Geir...

 i'm not sure what cross-pollination this graph refers to.  Jukka,
 could you clarify?
 
 ah.  i RTFA.  a connection requires 5 committers in common.  i'd be
 curious to see the graph with the threshold set to 3 (as that is more
 of a magic number in Apache community stuff). :)
 
 
 So yes, since most
 committers for most ASF java projects were in Jakarta (since
 those projects were *in* Jakarta, after all), I still think
 that the non-Jakarta page provides a more accurate representation
 of the real dynamics, by removing the artifical aspects of
 Jakarta.

 Of course, I could be wrong :)
 --
 ===
Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
 Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war  ~ John Adams


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-18 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Nov 18, 2007 10:20 AM, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
  Why?  W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense.  For example, the
  Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB (!), and for
  Harmony, to DB and XML!  Ant, arguably one of the most pervasive
  projects, has no connection to anything else...
 
 I agree with Geir. The graph that includes Jakarta looks much more
 realistic than the other one.


It also pretty clearly illustrates what happens when splitting up
Jakarta was a deliberate choice, not a random activity.  In other
words, the resulting connectivity afterwards is more of the well,
duh variety.  It is effect, not cause.

Craig


 Bye, Thomas.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]