Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvote or not to jvote]
So, what was the answer to the question below? If we really do need two +1s for a nomination, then I have some campaigning to do! (Unless someone else wants to go ahead and +1 me, if only to shut me up. ;) - Original Message - From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:51 PM Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote ARE two +1 votes necessary? That was not mentioned in the original email Announcement: JakartaPMC elections for 2002. (Just to stave off any potential debate here, the ASF-appointed administrator gets to decide how elections are run. It's not our call.) - Original Message - From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PM Subject: RE: To jvote or not to jvote Thanks Dirk. But then, from what I can see in the general list, only Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional +1s all sent to jvote. How should this be fixed? This is what I see in general: (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.) - Ted Husted The 3rd +1 did not get to jvote. - Stefan Bodewig - Conor MacNeill Nothing went to jvote. (I think that both are still missing votes.) - Scott Sanders Only the nomination went to jvote. - Sam Ruby Nothing went to jvote. - Peter Donald Nothing went to jvote. - Paulo Gaspar Nothing went to jvote. - Morgan Delagranje Only his acceptance went to jvote. - Geir Magnusson Enough votes went to jvote. - Diane Holt Only the nomination went to jvote. - Craig McClanahan Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. - Costin Manolache Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: To jvote or not to jvote
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To jvote or not to jvote
Thanks Dirk. But then, from what I can see in the general list, only Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional +1s all sent to jvote. How should this be fixed? This is what I see in general: (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.) - Ted Husted The 3rd +1 did not get to jvote. - Stefan Bodewig - Conor MacNeill Nothing went to jvote. (I think that both are still missing votes.) - Scott Sanders Only the nomination went to jvote. - Sam Ruby Nothing went to jvote. - Peter Donald Nothing went to jvote. - Paulo Gaspar Nothing went to jvote. - Morgan Delagranje Only his acceptance went to jvote. - Geir Magnusson Enough votes went to jvote. - Diane Holt Only the nomination went to jvote. - Craig McClanahan Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. - Costin Manolache Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To jvote or not to jvote
Thanks Dirk. But then, from what I can see in the general list, only Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional +1s all sent to jvote. How should this be fixed? This is what I see in general: (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.) - Ted Husted The 3rd +1 did not get to jvote. - Stefan Bodewig - Conor MacNeill Nothing went to jvote. (I think that both are still missing votes.) - Scott Sanders Only the nomination went to jvote. - Sam Ruby Nothing went to jvote. - Peter Donald Nothing went to jvote. - Paulo Gaspar Nothing went to jvote. - Morgan Delagranje Only his acceptance went to jvote. - Geir Magnusson Enough votes went to jvote. - Diane Holt Only the nomination went to jvote. - Craig McClanahan Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. - Costin Manolache Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: To jvote or not to jvote
ARE two +1 votes necessary? That was not mentioned in the original email Announcement: JakartaPMC elections for 2002. (Just to stave off any potential debate here, the ASF-appointed administrator gets to decide how elections are run. It's not our call.) - Original Message - From: Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PM Subject: RE: To jvote or not to jvote Thanks Dirk. But then, from what I can see in the general list, only Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional +1s all sent to jvote. How should this be fixed? This is what I see in general: (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.) - Ted Husted The 3rd +1 did not get to jvote. - Stefan Bodewig - Conor MacNeill Nothing went to jvote. (I think that both are still missing votes.) - Scott Sanders Only the nomination went to jvote. - Sam Ruby Nothing went to jvote. - Peter Donald Nothing went to jvote. - Paulo Gaspar Nothing went to jvote. - Morgan Delagranje Only his acceptance went to jvote. - Geir Magnusson Enough votes went to jvote. - Diane Holt Only the nomination went to jvote. - Craig McClanahan Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. - Costin Manolache Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: To jvote or not to jvote
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: But then, from what I can see in the general list, only Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional +1s all sent to jvote. How should this be fixed? I fear by having to be manually be going through the archives careully. Thanks for compiling the checklist below ! As an extra safeguard - the 3 volunteers will send out a message to general@ with what they think is the proper list on the 7th. With a 48 hours to correct exactly this sort of thing. Dw This is what I see in general: (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.) - Ted Husted The 3rd +1 did not get to jvote. - Stefan Bodewig - Conor MacNeill Nothing went to jvote. (I think that both are still missing votes.) - Scott Sanders Only the nomination went to jvote. - Sam Ruby Nothing went to jvote. - Peter Donald Nothing went to jvote. - Paulo Gaspar Nothing went to jvote. - Morgan Delagranje Only his acceptance went to jvote. - Geir Magnusson Enough votes went to jvote. - Diane Holt Only the nomination went to jvote. - Craig McClanahan Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. - Costin Manolache Only the nomination and one vote went to jvote. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote: From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not. Why? What are the rules? See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it is clearer. What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list - and in particular those messages from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to be run in the election. Dw. T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation from the nominee being received. - Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short description about who you are, what you want to accomplish. - Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar message confirming that you are accepting the nomination - with again - some details about yourself. - PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming he or she would consent of course.) - The board volunteers handling the vote cannot be nominated. - The nomination must include the email address of the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
