Re: XML Beans advertised on Jakarta ... Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 03:01 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: On 7/7/03 2:09 PM, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: XMLBeans feels (to me) like a jakarta component but if xml are happy to manage it, i'd say that it'd probably work out easier that way. there isn' t any reason why XMLBeans couldn't be visible on the jakarta website and as part of the jakarta community (which seem to be the main advantages which components see in joining jakarta) whilst being managed by the xml pmc (which would host their site and primary link). I'd object to that personally. We link projects which were in Jakarta historically and have become top level projects, but we do not link all of the XML projects. I'd object to that not only on practical concerns but with the logic Then I'd like POI linked from the XML site ;-) why shouldn't POI be linked from the XML site as well as the jakarta one? - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] XMLBeans to enter XML incubation [was: Re: Vote forXMLBeans proposal in the XML Project (was RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal)]
Please cast your vote on the acceptance of the XMLBeans project for incubation in the XML.Apache project: [ ] I agree with and support this proposal (+1) +1 Tom Copeland (Maven) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] XMLBeans to enter XML incubation [was: Re: Vote for XMLBeansproposal in the XML Project (was RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal)]
Steven Noels wrote: Dear committers, as outlined in the xml.apache.org charter (section 6.2), and in collaboration with the Incubator (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/STATUS?rev=HEAD) Subject to: - relicensing of the XMLBeans codebase using the ASL 1.1 license (http://xml.apache.org/LICENSE) - copyright transfer from BEA to the ASF as described in http://incubator.apache.org/process.html [1] - each initial XMLBeans committer sending in a Contributor's License Agreement (http://incubator.apache.org/forms/ASF_Contributor_License_2_form.pdf) - furthermore, I would strongly suggest the XMLBeans code should only be moved into Apache CVS once the outstanding LGPL BEA-licensed code dependency issues have been resolved. Please cast your vote on the acceptance of the XMLBeans project for incubation in the XML.Apache project: --- vote ballot -- Name: [ ] I agree with and support this proposal (+1) +1 thanks, alek ([EMAIL PROTECTED], PMC memeber of Web Services) -- If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough. Mario Andretti - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [vote] XMLBeans to enter XML incubation [was: Re: Vote for XMLBeansproposal in the XML Project (was RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal)]
+1 I am planning to meet Cliff Schimdt in person at OSCon later this week. I will also be happy to be the official shepherd during incubation. Ted Berin Lautenbach wrote: +1. Subject to committer issues previously discussed being worked through in the incubator. Would it be worth each of the PMC reps putting this into the -dev lists? Am not sure if all committers are subscribed to general@ and it might make the logistics a bit easier? Am happy to help out on the logistics side, and I think Ted has also indicated he is happy to be the official shepherd. Cheers, Berin --- vote ballot -- Name: [ x ] I agree with and support this proposal (+1) [ ] Indifference (-1 x +1) [ ] I object and suggest a way to address my reservations (-1) -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vote for XMLBeans proposal
Thanks to all of you for the many offers to help us get things started with XMLBeans. It sounds like it might be easier for everyone if we now pick one project that we believe would be the best fit for XMLBeans. From talking with a few committers, I think we are leaning towards the XML project, but I would like verify that with each of the others. I should be able to confirm this preference in the next 12-16 hours. Thanks again to everyone for being so willing to help make this work. BTW, I'll be at OSCON all week, if anyone would like to discuss any issues further. Cliff On Sunday, July 06, 2003 7:57 AM, Aleksander Slominski wrote: Subject: Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal Berin Lautenbach wrote: Ted Leung wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If XML.Apache is willing, as it seems, to cater for this project, I'll wait for a vote from them, an ACK from the Bea guys, and start preparing the hatcher :-) I'm happy to invest some time in helping XMLBean get throught the incubator -- speaking with my XML PMC and ASF member hat on. The idea of moving XMLBeans to incubation under the XML project and with the assistance of Ted gets a +1 from me with some caveats : 1. Current XMLBeans committers need to be comfortable with this resting with the XML project in the first instance. Note that I would hope that the umbrella project could be changed prior to exit from incubation if the feeling from the committers was that it should be. If the initial preference is Jakarta then please indicate! I'm definitely not trying to push a line here, and it's easy to switch the vote over to the Jakarta PMC :. 2. Committer issues that have previously been discussed will need to be worked through during incubation (although that's really what incubation is about :). +/- from other XML PMC members welcome. Further discussion also welcome! hi, based on what I have seen when looking on XMLBeans source code and (limited) design documentation I beleive that this project is very interesting and useful for Web Services so I have CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list too. It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more mementum and I am willing to help with it (even though I am not Apache XML commiter) thanks, alek - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal
On 6/07/2003 16:56 Aleksander Slominski wrote: It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more mementum and I am willing to help with it (even though I am not Apache XML commiter) This proposal is still lacking a better mix of BEA- and non-BEA committers, so it seems like your offer to help comes at a good time. ;-) FWIW: I would suggest XMLBeans to be incubated inside the XML project, although Jakarta would be equally fine as well. If Cliff is able to communicate BEA's preference, and the LGPL Piccolo issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting new committers is easier when the project is already under incubation. /Steven -- Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.orgstevenn at apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal
If Cliff is able to communicate BEA's preference, and the LGPL Piccolo issue is resolved, it seems like we're heading somewhere. Attracting new committers is easier when the project is already under incubation. Agreed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vote for XMLBeans proposal
Ted Leung wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If XML.Apache is willing, as it seems, to cater for this project, I'll wait for a vote from them, an ACK from the Bea guys, and start preparing the hatcher :-) I'm happy to invest some time in helping XMLBean get throught the incubator -- speaking with my XML PMC and ASF member hat on. The idea of moving XMLBeans to incubation under the XML project and with the assistance of Ted gets a +1 from me with some caveats : 1. Current XMLBeans committers need to be comfortable with this resting with the XML project in the first instance. Note that I would hope that the umbrella project could be changed prior to exit from incubation if the feeling from the committers was that it should be. If the initial preference is Jakarta then please indicate! I'm definitely not trying to push a line here, and it's easy to switch the vote over to the Jakarta PMC :. 2. Committer issues that have previously been discussed will need to be worked through during incubation (although that's really what incubation is about :). +/- from other XML PMC members welcome. Further discussion also welcome! Cheers, Berin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vote for XMLBeans proposal
Berin Lautenbach wrote: Ted Leung wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: If XML.Apache is willing, as it seems, to cater for this project, I'll wait for a vote from them, an ACK from the Bea guys, and start preparing the hatcher :-) I'm happy to invest some time in helping XMLBean get throught the incubator -- speaking with my XML PMC and ASF member hat on. The idea of moving XMLBeans to incubation under the XML project and with the assistance of Ted gets a +1 from me with some caveats : 1. Current XMLBeans committers need to be comfortable with this resting with the XML project in the first instance. Note that I would hope that the umbrella project could be changed prior to exit from incubation if the feeling from the committers was that it should be. If the initial preference is Jakarta then please indicate! I'm definitely not trying to push a line here, and it's easy to switch the vote over to the Jakarta PMC :. 2. Committer issues that have previously been discussed will need to be worked through during incubation (although that's really what incubation is about :). +/- from other XML PMC members welcome. Further discussion also welcome! hi, based on what I have seen when looking on XMLBeans source code and (limited) design documentation I beleive that this project is very interesting and useful for Web Services so I have CCed [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list too. It seems that BEA folks are willing to solve all remaining problems and I think that it would be good if this project quickly gained more mementum and I am willing to help with it (even though I am not Apache XML commiter) thanks, alek -- If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough. Mario Andretti - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
