Re: [gentoo-amd64] World packages
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:29:26 +0500 Verm verm...@gmail.com wrote: Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com писал(а) в своём письме Tue, 13 Jan 2009 04:26:29 +0500: Hi all, I have a few packages listed in /var/lib/portage/world that I was wondering whether they needed to be in there? Thanks in advance, 1) Emulation stuff app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-java app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-qtlibs Nothing seems to depend on them. Can I remove them? emerge -a --depclean depclean will not touch packages listed in the world file -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] LILO?
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:38:48 -0500 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No go. This is what I get: octavian ~ # equery depends sys-boot/lilo [ Searching for packages depending on sys-boot/lilo... ] octavian ~ # Try something useful then: emerge -ptuvDN world and check what pulls lilo in -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Can not compile gcc
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:02:19 -0400 Mansour Al Akeel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any idea ? Enable IA32_EMULATION in your kernel -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] amd64codecs masked
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:57:42 +0100 Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the bug doesn't really seems very bad from the bug descrition. you could just manually unmask the package as i did. the alternative is to use -real and to not compile any realcodecs but you won't be able to play wmv and rm files anymore. if you don't have that sort of files you could just use -real and remove the amd64codecs. ffmpeg has support for several windows media and I think even real codecs, you don't need amd64codecs to play those. amd64codecs doesn't contain any WMV codecs AFAIK. -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] local not started?
On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:37:53 +0100 Raffaele BELARDI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # /etc/init.d/local start * WARNING: local has already been started. try /etc/init.d/local restart and look for errors just note that this will also run /etc/conf.d/local.stop iirc -- Christoph Mende Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Lead and Release Engineering GPG: EE2A 454A 6A3B A2D8 E43B FF45 2A19 C3B3 6DA0 C1AF signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel 2.6.25
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:50:51 -0400 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of curiosity, what's taking so long with releasing the .25 kernel to stable? I don't recall any kernel before taking this long to be released. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218127 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Wine on amd64 - is it'32-bit'?
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:10:29 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % file =wine /usr/bin/wine: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Wine on amd64 - is it'32-bit'?
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:01:35 -0500 Chris Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christoph Mende wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 17:10:29 -0800 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % file =wine /usr/bin/wine: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped This doesn't seem to work ... for my at least ... That most likely means you don't use zsh and thus gotta write something like $(which wine) instead of =wine signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] gcc 4.2.1 unstable?
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 14:09:30 -1000 Joshua Hoblitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, The reason I ask is that there are alot of people (i.e., my users) eager for a version of gcc that supports openmp (like gcc 4.2.1+) and many of the specialized openmp compilers (like onmi) won't build on amd64. gcc-4.2.0 and gcc-4.2.1 both support openmp and are in the normal tree. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:48:32 +0100 Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd quite like to get a copy of the vmware overlay. You can also just get it without layman: svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/vmware/trunk vmware-overlay signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Java Firefox plugins
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:44:12 +0100 Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any ideas on why I get (-nsplugin) on all these? I have USE=nsplugin in /etc/make.conf, but it's being overridden. What's doing that? Have I inadvertently got no-multilib somehow? I've followed the java upgrade guide and its friends, but they shed no light on this one. They are (-nsplugin) because they're masked on amd64, for the 32bit browser plugin use emul-linux-x86-java. Blackdown had a 64bit plugin, it still exists, but is masked too because of security issues. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problem emerge x11-libs/guile-gtk-2.0
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:56:20 -0700 Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do **NOT** send bugs to the list. file them at http://bugs.gentoo.org Again, do **NOT** file bugs on the list. And a small addition: File them with an English locale signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Ndiswrapper - short question
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:23:20 +0200 Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's the onboard USB-WLAN-adapter on my ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe mainboard. A native driver exists ( net-wireless/rtl8187 ) but it is hardmasked. It's not. Put net-wireless/rtl8187 ** in /etc/potage/package.keywords and emerge it. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] win32codecs on AMD64?
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:17:12 -0700 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, with mplayer-bin I am able to play the files I was interested in however I've not heard of amd64codecs before. Is there some way to link this into mplayer as a replacement for win32codecs? The Gentoo Online database page for amd64codecs just points to mplayer so it seems it's intended for this but I don't see an amd64codec flag when I look at emerging mplayer. It's pulled in with USE=real (and -bindist -livecd). signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] win32codecs on AMD64?
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:53:32 +0200 Isidore Ducasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It _is_ 64 bits. Besides, vlc can use your hardware acceleration chipsets, whereas mplayer can't (it's a software-rendering player). And confirming what you mention, I was surprised to notice that vlc can play wma and such without the need for win32codecs. The only thing I'm using mplayer for, is re-encoding tecplot's avi exports, which don't seem to work with vlc. mplayer can do that too and since they both use pretty much the same libraries, they can play the same stuff ;) signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] win32codecs on AMD64?
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 19:26:43 -0700 Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway to enable win32codecs on my AMD64 machine? I tried adding it in package.use but it still shows up like (-win32codecs) when I loko at emerging a package like mplayer. Maybe there is some way to build mplayer as a 32-bit app and be able to use it? Most of the stuff is natively supported by mplayer, beside that there is amd64codecs. If you're missing something important then there's mplayer-bin which is 32bit. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] test
On Thu, 24 May 2007 07:48:14 -0500 Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 You fail. :P signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-amd64] chipset temperatures?
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 15:42 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: Hi, I have an Asus A8N-E motherboard which had a motherboard chipset fan go bad yesterday. After doing some reading I found many folks have had this same problem and switched successfully to Zalman passive heat sinks so I did the same thing today. The machine has been up for about 4 hours with no problems. So far so good My question is how can I monitor chipset temp from my my desktop to watch this for awhile? If I drop into BIOS I see a temperature listed and had to turn off boot time warnings about the chipset fan going to slow so it seems the BIOS knows what's going on. Is there a way for me to do this in Gnome? Thanks in advance, Mark emerge lm_sensors ; there's probably some plugin for gdesklets too, dunno if there's something for the panel -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] More portage fun
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:32 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: However, when I run emerge -upD world, these packages do not show up as having an upgrade available. Sounds like an inconsistent world file to me, try running `regenworld` as root. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Quick Portage How to
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 14:45 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Is there a way I can get portage to show me all the listed kernel sources I've installed? eix -cI \-sources lists all kernel sources emerge -P gentoo-sources removes all gentoo-sources, except the one you installed at last signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Why isn't emerge -uN world updating timezone-data?
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:32 -0400, list-catcher wrote: Why isn't emerge -uN world updating timezone-data? Because you have to use emerge -uDN world signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Interrupting portage gracefully
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 18:21 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: Does anyone here know of a signal I can pass to portage to make it stop at the end of the current package? Quite often I find I'm emerging quite a lot of packages, and I'd like to shut the machine down for the night and resume in the morning. (I have been running it all night, but it's getting to be a bit noisy in the fan department.) You could ^C out of the current process and emerge --resume the next day signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-amd64] New ATI proprietary driver
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 00:56 -0500, Chris Traylor wrote: Has anybody tried the new ATI driver? I'm running 8.30.3 here for some time now, didn't have any crashes, only time when I used OpenGL was video playback though. Oh, and first time I installed them glxinfo segfaulted, didn't investigate further, just downgraded, after upgrading to 8.30.3 again, the problem was gone magically ;) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Gnupg doesn't build
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 11:56 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: I've tried everything over the last couple of days to upgrade gnupg and I get the same thing: octavian ~ # emerge -u gnupg Calculating dependencies... done! Auto-cleaning packages... No outdated packages were found on your system. * GNU info directory index is up-to-date. And it never gets upgraded. Has anyone else seen this? Yeah, I get this on every package that's already up-to-date ;) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2.6.18 kernel
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 00:42 +, Duncan wrote: FWIW, I handle my kernel stuff directly, downloading from kernel.org, not thru portage. Thus, I care not one whit about Gentoo's kernel stabilizing. echo sys-kernel/vanilla-sources ~arch /etc/portage/package.keywords emerge vanilla-sources does exactly the same, difference is that you don't have to check kernel.org for new released, emerge -u world does it. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Problems after Xorg 7.1.1 upgrade
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 07:30 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: I upgraded my system to Xorg 7.1.1 yesterday and when I booted this morning KDE doesn’t start. In the Xorg.0.log just after loading the kbd_drv.so module I get: (EE) No Drivers Available Are there any errors above that? Did you upgrade xf86-input-keyboard? BTW there is no Xorg 7.1.1, only 7.1 which uses xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 ;) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] XMMS and Mplayer
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 23:20 -0300, Mauro Maroni wrote: Does anyone know if audacious is able to open cue sheets? I have a lot of CDs in single flac files. Any other player capable of that? Don't know about the cue sheets, but since audacious has a flac USE flag, I think it's able to open those files - just emerge with USE=flac -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] what causes this?
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 23:33 -0700, Steve Herber wrote: configure: error: There is something wrong. Please check config.log for more information. Please do this ;) If you still need help with the information in config.log give us the relevant part of it. The file is in somewhere /var/tmp/portage/php-5.1.6-r6/work/ -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 15:03 +0200, Lorenzo Milesi wrote: I've heard of aging compilation times... :) Well, it's getting better, this is with -j1 (forced by ebuild, didn't set WANT_MP) on my Athlon64 3000+: Sat Oct 14 08:01:44 2006 app-office/openoffice-2.0.4 merge time: 4 hours, 49 minutes and 49 seconds. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] First Impressions
One thing that I think wasn't mentioned yet, while -fPIC is needed for libraries, it must be disabled for binaries (don't know if that's true for prelink), as portage says, it might break things and your binaries are most likely becoming slower when you compile them with -fPIC. 2006/9/27, Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, everyone! It's my first mail to this list. I hope the community here is as friendly as the one at the general gentoo-user list ;-) Please, forgive me if open some threads about already discussed issues until I catch up with rhythm of the list. So let me start a with 2 newbie questions caused by my first impressions from the x86_64 world: 1) I use CFLAGS=-march=athlon64 -mfpmath=sse -msse -msse2 -msse3 -m3dnow -mmmx -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fpic. Portage complains with *red letters* about the fpic flag. Every time I emerge something it says that fpic breaks things, but I haven't met a single breakage so far. Is that a bug? Actually there was an ebuild which could not be compiled if mysql was compiled w/o fpic. I'm not 100% sure but AFAIR it was dev-perl/DBD-mysql. 2) I see too many flags that are disabled by the profile - the kind with the parenthesis around them, like (-3dnow). Why? As I mentioned above I enable some of these through my CFLAGS - e.g. (-mmx), (-mmxext), (-sse) and (-sse2) and everything works perfect. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] How To Play WMV?
Latest stable version of ffmpeg is supposed to support wmv (at least ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20060816 has working wmv for me here), which is imho a better solution. 2006/9/27, Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello, My google digging wasn't helpful this time. Perhaps I can't find the right search keywords. ;-( On a 32bit gentoo system appropriate codec comes with media-libs/win32codecs and such movies can be played by mplayer. On amd64 mplayer can't be emerged with USE=win32codecs, because the flag is disabled by the profile. Please, advise me how to set up an amd64 based system to play clips of *.wmv format or send me a link to some information on this subject. Thanks in advance! -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X
Are you using pc104 or pc105 as XkbModel (xorg.conf)? 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have a mysterious problem, I can't write @ | when I'm in x-terminal or in Gnome. someone know where to edit?(my keyboard layout is swedish) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X
Set it to pc105 and you're problems are most likely fixed 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am using pc104 - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:08 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Are you using pc104 or pc105 as XkbModel (xorg.conf)? 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have a mysterious problem, I can't write @ | when I'm in x-terminal or in Gnome. someone know where to edit?(my keyboard layout is swedish) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X
Well, you have to restart X. 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I did, it didn't work, do I have to run some update or what? - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:29 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Set it to pc105 and you're problems are most likely fixed 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am using pc104 - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:08 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Are you using pc104 or pc105 as XkbModel (xorg.conf)? 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have a mysterious problem, I can't write @ | when I'm in x-terminal or in Gnome. someone know where to edit?(my keyboard layout is swedish) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X
Don't know what exactly you mean, but the unicode use flag doesn't cause any problems. Here's my keyboard section in xorg.conf, maybe it helps: Section InputDevice Identifier Generic Keyboard Driver kbd Option CoreKeyboard Option XkbModel pc105 Option XkbLayout de Option XkbVariant nodeadkeys Option XkbOptions nodeadkeys EndSection You have to change the XkbLayout, of course :) 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Of course, did that, doesn't help thoughdoes it have to do with unicode? - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:50 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Well, you have to restart X. 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So I did, it didn't work, do I have to run some update or what? - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:29 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Set it to pc105 and you're problems are most likely fixed 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I am using pc104 - Original Message - From: Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:08 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't write certain characters in X Are you using pc104 or pc105 as XkbModel (xorg.conf)? 2006/9/26, Patric Douhane [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have a mysterious problem, I can't write @ | when I'm in x-terminal or in Gnome. someone know where to edit?(my keyboard layout is swedish) -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
DRI is hardware accelerated 3D rendering. You don't need it for music apps, but you most probably need it for your Windows games, without direct rendering you will use software rendering and get most likely get 5 fps in OpenGL games. It may be nice to have direct rendering for xine too, since xine can output its videos through OpenGL - don't know about MythTV though. 2006/9/23, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 9/22/06, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, onFri, 22 Sep 2006 12:35:47 -0700: It turns out that for me the problem was the ati-drivers package. Switching to the radeon driver today lowered the CPU usage back to the 9% range that I was used to: Thanks!Always nice to see freedomware win. =8^)I agree Duncan.Now, the one issue left for complete world domination would be tobetter understand how to get DRI working with this video adapter. Am I correct that DRI==3D? Or does DRI go further than just basic 3D andhelp other things like MythTV or something else I'm not thinking of atall?I do see these messages in xorg.0.log:(**) RADEON(0): RADEONSaveMode returns 0x709390 (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support*** Direct rendering support is highly experimental for Radeon 9500*** and newer cards. The 3d mesa driver is not provided in this tree.*** A very experimental (and incomplete) version is available from Mesa CVS.*** Additional information can be found on http://r300.sourceforge.net*** This message has been last modified on 2005-08-07.drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK)I do NOT do ANY Linux-based 3D stuff today. My workload is Mainlymusic applications - Ardour, etc., which do not care about 3D, webbrowsing, MythTV and Xine to watch movies.Do I / should I care about DRI?I do occasionally play Windows games under Cedega. Would DRI ever helpthat sort of application?Anyway, things seem to be in pretty good shape. Maybe I should justleave good enough alone. ;-) Cheers,MarkP.S. - I'm still curious about trying your compiler flags but nowthere is no pressing timeframe to do it in on this machine. - MWK--gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Boot time font size question
Framebuffers only affect the virtual terminals (ttys, or as you call it, main console)2006/9/22, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Christoph. I'll go check that out.Does the vesafb have any impact on my current X environment or is is it something that only effects the main console?Thanks,MarkOn 9/22/06, Christoph Mende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can change the resultion used on boot time with a framebuffer, using vesafb in kernel and video=vesafb:ywrap,mtrr:2 vga=792 (792 = 1024x768) as grub options works for me. 2006/9/22, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Hi, Where do I learn aboutchanging the size of the font used at boot time so that I can see more lines while booting, and more lines when a kernel crash occurs? Thanks, Mark -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
