Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.keywords-compatible snippets when stabilizing multiple packages
Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 19:19 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. a écrit : On 2/14/11 9:13 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: And http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349053#c1 ? I tried to provide a clue howto get usable p.keywords list easy. IMHO it's in the middle. I still have to do a manual step, but at least it's pretty straightforward. Anyway, I think a list that can be blindly copy-pasted makes things even easier. I don't think making a list for each arch is going to make anything any easier for maintainers requesting stabilization, which means those list we need more time to generate before being released. You just move the problem to another place. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org Gentoo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.keywords-compatible snippets when stabilizing multiple packages
W dniu 14.02.2011 18:52, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. pisze:
On 2/14/11 3:07 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Same does x11 team...
Example:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354237
I think this does not need any policy, most teams can use brains and
fill the bugs quite conveniently :)
Well, that's the entire point. For the bug you cited, and - for another
example - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353434 I can't just
copy-paste something to my package.keywords file.
The table is indeed pretty, and it has value, but I'm just asking for a
bit more convenience.
bugz attachment 262031 -v | grep ' ppc ' | awk '{print =$1}' -
/mnt/ppc32/etc/portage/package.keywords
bugz attachment 262031 -v | grep ' ppc64 ' | awk '{print =$1}' -
/mnt/ppc64/etc/portage/package.keywords
Erhm, how more convinient it can be?
Cheers,
Kacper
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/ant*-1.8.1
1.8.1 has been stable for quite some time so let's get rid of 1.7.x +# Vlastimil Babka cas...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2011) +# Masked for removal of all versions older than 1.8.1 in few weeks. +dev-java/ant-core-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-antlr-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-bcel-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-bsf-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-log4j-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-oro-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-regexp-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-resolver-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-apache-xalan2-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-commons-logging-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-commons-net-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-jai-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-javamail-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-jdepend-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-jmf-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-jsch-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-junit-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-junit4-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-nodeps-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-swing-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-testutil-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-trax-1.8.1 +dev-java/ant-1.8.1
[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 94 bugs
Our bug queue has 94 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click one of the following links: http: http://bit.ly/bsHeJt https: http://bit.ly/8Z4xUU Thanks!
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64 (retry)
Hi, since Betelgeuse didn't actually commit the news item in November, here's my try. Slightly reworded the text, comments welcome. Otherwise I plan to commit this on Friday. Thanks, Vlastimil On 11/14/2010 08:36 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: Any improvements to the text are welcome. Regards, Petteri Title: Pending Removal of Java support on ia64 Author: Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org Author: IA64 Arch Team i...@gentoo.org Author: Vlastimil Babka cas...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2011-02-18 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Keyword: ia64 Display-If-Installed: dev-java/java-config Since the IA64 arch team does not have the resources to maintain Java support, we have agreed that ia64 keywords will be dropped from Java packages, and the java USE flag masked on ia64, unless more manpower becomes available. If you are willing to help with the maintenance, please contact i...@gentoo.org. If there is no interest, the removal of Java support well be done during the second half of March 2011. The removal is tracked in bug #345433.
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64 (retry)
On 02/15/2011 05:15 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Hi, since Betelgeuse didn't actually commit the news item in November, here's my try. Slightly reworded the text, comments welcome. Otherwise I plan to commit this on Friday. Thanks for picking this up again. Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Dropping Java support on ia64 (retry)
The sentence If there is no interest, the removal of Java support well be done during the second half of March 2011. seems to have some bugs. I suppose well be done was meant to be will be done? ^ But maybe the removal [..] will be done could use re-writing, too. How about this: If there is no interest, Java support will be removed from IA64 during the second half of March 2011. Best, Sebastian
[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: xfce4-xkb-plugin and qbankmanager
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2011) # Upstream discontinued qbankmanager. Use kmymoney or gnucash # for hbci support. Masked for removal in 30 days per bug 314077. # Missing aqbanking-5 support. app-office/qbankmanager # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2011) # Too unstable to use wrt bugs 351546 and 354953. No upstream for # this plug-in either. Masked for removal in 30 days. xfce-extra/xfce4-xkb-plugin
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.keywords-compatible snippets when stabilizing multiple packages
On 09:10 Tue 15 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 19:19 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. a écrit : On 2/14/11 9:13 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: And http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349053#c1 ? I tried to provide a clue howto get usable p.keywords list easy. IMHO it's in the middle. I still have to do a manual step, but at least it's pretty straightforward. Anyway, I think a list that can be blindly copy-pasted makes things even easier. I don't think making a list for each arch is going to make anything any easier for maintainers requesting stabilization, which means those list we need more time to generate before being released. You just move the problem to another place. Why would you need to do that? Can't you just make a single list that either has keywords for every arch or a ** ? Presumably every arch needs a certain set of packages stable, and it doesn't matter if you redundantly specify packages that are already stable. -- Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Blog: http://dberkholz.com pgpWdbo9YIcLx.pgp Description: PGP signature
