[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-fs/openafs: openafs-1.4.8_pre2.ebuild

2008-10-09 Thread Stefaan
Thanks for pointing this out.  I've just updated the ChangeLog now.

Stefaan

2008/10/9 Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 09:59:02PM +, Stefaan De Roeck (stefaan) wrote:
 stefaan 08/10/08 21:59:02

   Added:openafs-1.4.8_pre2.ebuild
   Log:
   Version bump to 1.4.8_pre2
   (Portage version: 2.2_rc11/cvs/Linux 2.6.26-gentoo x86_64)
 You did not include any ChangeLog entry.
 Please add a ChangeLog entry, and remember to include the sub-header for
 a new ebuild '*${P} (${DATE}' (that header is used for bump detection
 packages.g.o).

 (There is a check for this in repoman, it's just not released yet).

 --
 Robin Hugh Johnson
 Gentoo Linux Developer  Infra Guy
 E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85




Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages needing new maintainers, redux

2008-02-01 Thread Stefaan
On 14/01/2008, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:49:02PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
  Software, I picked up maintenance of autofs when the previous maintainer 
  went
  AWOL several years ago, and ran with it because I needed AutoFS-LDAP. I 
  don't
  have access to any AutoFS-LDAP setups anymore, and upstream has moved on. 
  There
  is a 7Kb init.d script that badly needs complete rewriting due to upstream 
  and
  kernel changes:
  net-fs/autofs
 This is badly in need of a maintainer. if somebody wants to take the
 main parts of it, I can help them with the LDAP section of it.

Mine now! :)  Seems the newer version doesn't require a lengthy init script...

Stefaan
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2008-01-14 Thread Stefaan
  - media-libs/libdc1394
  - media-video/coriander

I'm picking up these two at least...

Stefaan
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Cédric Krier

2006-11-12 Thread Stefaan

It's nice to see someone from nearby join Gentoo. (I live in Leuven)
Welcome to the project!!  I suppose we'll see you at the next FOSDEM? :)

Stefaan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: bbj

2006-04-04 Thread Stefaan
Welcome, oh newly baptised tree tweaker.  May your wary steps leave
lasting footprints on our tree.  And may your research progress
quicker than mine :-p

Just kidding, I hope you'll find fun in developing for Gentoo.  And,
while a bit caution is advised, don't be _overly_ careful to not screw
anything up, or you'll end up doing nothing. :)

Thanks for joining us on our quest,
Stefaan

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] ebuilds creating mountpoints

2006-01-07 Thread Stefaan
Hi!

I'm having an issue with the openafs-ebuild, and I don't see a
solution for the moment. I wondered if someone on the list would:

Prerequisite:
The ebuild needs to create the /afs directory, and remove that same
directory when it is uninstalled.

The obvious solution seems to do keepdir, so portage would attempt
to make the directory and put a .keep file in there.  I say attempt,
because the following problem will occur during an re-merge or
upgrade, while the mountpoint is in use:
!!! Cannot write to '/afs'.
!!! Please check permissions and directories for broken symlinks.
etc.
(This is related to bug #9849, if I'm not mistaken)

The currently implemented solution is to do
pkg_prerm()
{
  rmdir /afs 2 /dev/null
}
pkg_postinst()
{
  mkdir /afs 2 /dev/null
}
which works fine when remerging an already emerged ebuild.  That's
because pkg_prerm is ran first, and pkg_postinst afterwards.
However, during an upgrade, pkg_prerm of the old version is ran
_after_ pkg_postinst of the new version.  This results in the
directory disappearing, and therefore afs failing to start.

Any input is greatly appreciated,
Thanks,
Stefaan

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuilds creating mountpoints

2006-01-07 Thread Stefaan
On 1/7/06, Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Why not just create the directory in ${D} or ${IMAGE} and let Portage
 handle the rest?  Do you really want to be removing /afs unconditionally
 on unmerge?

Because this results in this: (directory /t existed and /dev/cdrom was
mounted to it while merging this)

 Merging sys-apps/test-0.2 to /

!!! Cannot write to '/t'.
!!! Please check permissions and directories for broken symlinks.
!!! You may start the merge process again by using ebuild:
!!! ebuild /usr/portage/sys-apps/test/test-0.2.ebuild merge
!!! And finish by running this: env-update

You suggest keeping the /afs dir, this would be an easy solution of
course, but it does seem untidy, doesn't it? (Makes me think of the
windows uninstallers saying not all files could be removed, have a
nice day)

Stefaan

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuilds creating mountpoints

2006-01-07 Thread Stefaan
On 1/7/06, Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Stefaan wrote:
  The obvious solution seems to do keepdir, so portage would attempt
  to make the directory and put a .keep file in there.  I say attempt,
  because the following problem will occur during an re-merge or
  upgrade, while the mountpoint is in use:

 Strange that I haven't seen any problems with pmount which does keepdir
 for /media.

I don't use pmount myself, but my guess is that /media is just a
directory that contains mountpoints, and which remains at all time
writeable for root. /afs is not writeable when mounted, just like
/dev/cdrom etc...

Stefaan

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list