Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list
Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 13:50:43 schrieb hasufell: So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support on most of those converted ebuilds. PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. ... of those converted ebuilds, because ! For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the consequence that ... This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter Yes you do. No you dont. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list
Andreas K. Huettel: Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 13:50:43 schrieb hasufell: So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support on most of those converted ebuilds. PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. ... of those converted ebuilds, because ! For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the consequence that ... This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter Yes you do. No you dont. This is getting really silly. It was explained ~5 times in this thread and the explanation was linked 2+ times here. Yet no one cares to read up on the issue. People who randomly post here without knowing what they talk about DONT behave productively on the list. You are blaming the wrong people.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list
Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 14:04:00 schrieb hasufell: I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support on most of those converted ebuilds. PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. ... of those converted ebuilds, because ! For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the consequence that ... This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter Yes you do. No you dont. This is getting really silly. It was explained ~5 times in this thread and the explanation was linked 2+ times here. Yet no one cares to read up on the issue. Link to it again. It costs you 10sec at most. You make your point much more clearly. Also, the examples do help. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Behaving productively on the list
Andreas K. Huettel: Am Sonntag, 27. Juli 2014, 14:04:00 schrieb hasufell: I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support on most of those converted ebuilds. PLEASE, everyone, don't just make statements like the the one above ^ but instead explain what has happened and best bring up a real-world example. ... of those converted ebuilds, because ! For example, see ... which you just changed as follows: ... This has the consequence that ... This will hopefully also cut down the pointless chatter Yes you do. No you dont. This is getting really silly. It was explained ~5 times in this thread and the explanation was linked 2+ times here. Yet no one cares to read up on the issue. Link to it again. It costs you 10sec at most. You make your point much more clearly. Also, the examples do help. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92053 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92055 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92043 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92138 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/92259 I think that's enough for now. And it cost me a few minutes to go through the thread which is what people should do when they respond here.
