Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs keywording.

2005-09-20 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
 On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:38 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alec Warner wrote:

Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
stable[1].  Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
marked stable on arch's.  I would like to know why this is so.

./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~amd64
./games-fps/blackshades-cvs/blackshades-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86
~ppc ~amd64
./dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs/sdcc-cvs-2.4.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~ppc amd64
./games-fps/avp-cvs/avp-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86

This was just a hacked up search I did on the tree while in class, and
is no way inclusive of all packages breaking policy.  If you want bugs
for them, I 'll make them.

[1]
http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=3#doc_chap1_sect9

;-)
 
 
 The two games listed are CVS snapshots, not live CVS builds.  A live CVS
 build should never be stable.  A snapshot is a known set of files, and
 can be marked stable.  It is usually a known-good working set of files,
 taken from CVS, but not tied to an actual release version, and added
 to our mirrors by the package maintainers.
 
Indeed I suck at this :)  Sorry games team ;)

The other two packages I checked by hand ( and not a craptastic script )
to make sure they were live cvs ebuilds.  I have filed bugs [1,2] for them.

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106663
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106662
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=2lVV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] cvs keywording.

2005-09-19 Thread Alec Warner
Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked 
stable[1].  Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are 
marked stable on arch's.  I would like to know why this is so.


./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~amd64
./games-fps/blackshades-cvs/blackshades-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 
~ppc ~amd64

./dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs/sdcc-cvs-2.4.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~ppc amd64
./games-fps/avp-cvs/avp-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86

This was just a hacked up search I did on the tree while in class, and 
is no way inclusive of all packages breaking policy.  If you want bugs 
for them, I 'll make them.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs keywording.

2005-09-19 Thread Alin Dobre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alec Warner wrote:
 Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
 stable[1].  Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
 marked stable on arch's.  I would like to know why this is so.
 
 ./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~amd64
 ./games-fps/blackshades-cvs/blackshades-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86
 ~ppc ~amd64
 ./dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs/sdcc-cvs-2.4.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~ppc amd64
 ./games-fps/avp-cvs/avp-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86
 
 This was just a hacked up search I did on the tree while in class, and
 is no way inclusive of all packages breaking policy.  If you want bugs
 for them, I 'll make them.

[1]
http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=3#doc_chap1_sect9

;-)
- --
Alin DOBRE
Romanian Lead Translator
Gentoo Documentation Project: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/
Gentoo.RO Community:  http://www.gentoo.ro/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDLvesmG51ym6Hu9gRAhPdAKCrID8Dit2/XsitxYl9gWDZy2AqeQCeP0nd
FRSrdBcQHAd2p32oMsqeCV0=
=569V
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs keywording.

2005-09-19 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:38 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Alec Warner wrote:
  Official policy states that CVS ebuilds should never be marked
  stable[1].  Yet many ebuilds that are based on cvs sources and are
  marked stable on arch's.  I would like to know why this is so.
  
  ./net-misc/netcomics-cvs/netcomics-cvs-0.14.1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~amd64
  ./games-fps/blackshades-cvs/blackshades-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86
  ~ppc ~amd64
  ./dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs/sdcc-cvs-2.4.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86 ~ppc amd64
  ./games-fps/avp-cvs/avp-cvs-20031110.ebuild:KEYWORDS=x86
  
  This was just a hacked up search I did on the tree while in class, and
  is no way inclusive of all packages breaking policy.  If you want bugs
  for them, I 'll make them.
 
 [1]
 http://devrel.gentoo.org/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=3#doc_chap1_sect9
 
 ;-)

The two games listed are CVS snapshots, not live CVS builds.  A live CVS
build should never be stable.  A snapshot is a known set of files, and
can be marked stable.  It is usually a known-good working set of files,
taken from CVS, but not tied to an actual release version, and added
to our mirrors by the package maintainers.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part