[gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
While talking about herds etc... Please, stick your addy into the relevant eclass if you are actually a maintainer or at least a person to contact about the given eclass. Examples of eclasses that just let me clueless and digging in the logs when a bug/problem arrives: cvs.eclass - ??? db-use.eclass - pauldv? db.eclass - pauldv? eutils.eclass - ??? flag-o-matic.eclass - ??? gems.eclass - ruby, are you taking bugs for this? pythonhead's been MIA for ages, not much useful as a maintainer contact gnat.eclass - ??? gnatbuild.eclass - ??? gnuconfig.eclass - ??? latex-package.eclass - ??? mercurial.eclass - agriffis, mind sticking your addy there? :) mount-boot.eclass - ??? myspell.eclass - app-dicts? subversion.eclass - pretty popular wrt bugs, anyone but hattya touching this one? tla.eclass - meh, does anyone use it? versionator.eclass - anyone to take over after ciaranm? Thanks. -- jakub signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 12:26, Jakub Moc wrote: gems.eclass - ruby, are you taking bugs for this? pythonhead's been MIA for ages, not much useful as a maintainer contact I'll try to learn how it works and see to take this over for ruby herd. -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE pgpNDr5S1vIWY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:48:30 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: While talking about herds etc... Please, stick your addy into the relevant eclass if you are actually a maintainer or at least a person to contact about the given eclass. Examples of eclasses that just let me clueless and digging in the logs when a bug/problem arrives: latex-package.eclass - ??? That's for text-markup, I added the relevant stamp. Thanks, /Alexandre -- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature. pgpZzMIJNitxg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:26:01 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: versionator.eclass - anyone to take over after ciaranm? I can most likely take care of this one. Should be low enough maintenance anyway since for the most part it Just Works. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 06:26, Jakub Moc wrote: cvs.eclass - ??? i'll take over while the main guy is out eutils.eclass - ??? it depends highly on the function, but generally base-system flag-o-matic.eclass - ??? base-system / hardened gnuconfig.eclass - ??? this is dead as it's been integrated into portage mount-boot.eclass - ??? base-system as only boot-loaders use it subversion.eclass - pretty popular wrt bugs, anyone but hattya touching this one? i can help out hattya if he wants -mike pgpMrj2mgvHyL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is dead as it's been integrated into portage Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE pgpUZcaWFduQ7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
четвер, 15. червень 2006 12:26, Jakub Moc Ви написали: Please, stick your addy into the relevant eclass if you are actually a maintainer or at least a person to contact about the given eclass. May be its a time for some kind of metadata for eclasses? (No, that's just an idea, not a proposal of a particular realisation :)). gnat.eclass - ??? gnatbuild.eclass - ??? These are for the Ada compilers and libs (in reverse order). I just added Author and herd info to them. George -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? Yes, because base/make.defaults includes FEATURES=autoconfig and no profile turns it off. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 11:21, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is dead as it's been integrated into portage Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? yes, i'll update the func to complain about being deprecated -mike pgpyGEoVEX3Sj.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:10, Daniel Drake wrote: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? Yes, because base/make.defaults includes FEATURES=autoconfig and no profile turns it off. actually, portage doesnt even respect that anymore ... it just updates the files :) -mike pgpSG2dd2L7bm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 11:21, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is dead as it's been integrated into portage Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? yes, i'll update the func to complain about being deprecated Should it be removed from old ebuilds too, then? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:48, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 11:21, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is dead as it's been integrated into portage Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? yes, i'll update the func to complain about being deprecated Should it be removed from old ebuilds too, then? of course ... i didnt say anything to indicate otherwise ... -mike pgpSC4Yewihq1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:25:10PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:48, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 11:21, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:50, Mike Frysinger wrote: this is dead as it's been integrated into portage Can gnuconfig_update calls go away from new ebuilds, then? yes, i'll update the func to complain about being deprecated Should it be removed from old ebuilds too, then? of course ... i didnt say anything to indicate otherwise ... The question was explicitly about new ebuilds, so your answer concerning only new ebuilds is the reasonable assumption without an indication otherwise. Anyway, gnuconfig removed from sawfish now. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:39, Harald van Dijk wrote: The question was explicitly about new ebuilds, so your answer concerning only new ebuilds is the reasonable assumption without an indication otherwise. I limited to new for backward compat... but as portage updates them anyway now, I'll drop it from video and sound and other ebuilds later now. -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE pgp9pDbbfqlHr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses maintainers - raise your hands please
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:39, Harald van Dijk wrote: The question was explicitly about new ebuilds it was ... when i first read the question though i missed the new portion -mike pgp7yhdPvFdIb.pgp Description: PGP signature
