Re: [gentoo-dev] portage locations
* William Hubbs schrieb am 01.08.11 um 19:49 Uhr:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:22:15PM +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > everything about portage is very specific and should be separated, I
> > would like to see an addition of one root directory "gentoo" where
> > ${PKGMANAGER} keep all it's stuff.
> > Some of these are already moveable with ${*DIR} variables in
> > make.conf, others are not
>
> I don't agree that we should create a "gentoo" root directory; however,
> to be technical, /usr/portage is wrong.
That was exactly my point in one of my mails in the /usr-Thread.
I disagree with introducing a non-FHS dir on the rootfs,
>
> I will list what My thoughts would be below your suggestions. Keep in
> mind that this is just being thrown out there without thinking about the
> details all that much.
>
> > 20K /gentoo/tmp
>
> Maybe /tmp?
Depends on which "kind" of tmp data this is. Should it survive a
system reboot? If yes /var/tmp is better.
I agree with the rest.
-Marc
--
8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
pgprwsugoDw98.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage locations
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:49:41 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> > 20K /gentoo/tmp
>
> Maybe /tmp?
/var/tmp was there for a reason. On all my systems /tmp is tmpfs, and
it is not suitable for larger builds.
> > 20K /gentoo/overlays
>
> This isn't on everyones system, so I think it is up to the user and
> what you are putting in it. Maybe /var/cache/portage/overlays?
I personally use ${PORTDIR}/local, to keep it in the same fs as
portdir (same file formats).
> > 639M/gentoo/portage
>
> /var/cache/portage/gentoo-portage
Doesn't fit in the definition nicely. It's more like read-only dir,
fitting /usr well.
> > 3.1G/gentoo/distfiles
>
> /var/cache/portage/distfiles?
+1.
> > 4.1M/gentoo/var/log
>
> /var/log/portage? They are logs so they should go where all other logs
> are.
And that's where they go. I don't see why are you referring to a random
stupid idea instead of the current state.
> > 2.7M/gentoo/packages
>
> /var/cache/portage/packages?
This one depends on a particular config, I guess. Sometimes people just
'cache' binpkgs, sometimes they serve 'em.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] portage locations
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:22:15PM +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> everything about portage is very specific and should be separated, I
> would like to see an addition of one root directory "gentoo" where
> ${PKGMANAGER} keep all it's stuff.
> Some of these are already moveable with ${*DIR} variables in
> make.conf, others are not
I don't agree that we should create a "gentoo" root directory; however,
to be technical, /usr/portage is wrong.
I will list what My thoughts would be below your suggestions. Keep in
mind that this is just being thrown out there without thinking about the
details all that much.
> 20K /gentoo/tmp
Maybe /tmp?
> 20K /gentoo/overlays
This isn't on everyones system, so I think it is up to the user and what
you are putting in it. Maybe /var/cache/portage/overlays?
> 639M/gentoo/portage
/var/cache/portage/gentoo-portage
> 3.1G/gentoo/distfiles
/var/cache/portage/distfiles?
> 4.1M/gentoo/var/log
/var/log/portage? They are logs so they should go where all other logs
are.
> 36K /gentoo/var/lib/portage
/var/lib/portage is ok for this I think.
> 43M /gentoo/var/db/pkg
/var/db/pkg is fine for this I think.
> 940K/gentoo/var/cache/edb
Maybe /var/cache/portage/edb?
> 2.7M/gentoo/packages
/var/cache/portage/packages?
What do you think?
William
pgpvKpMP608O3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
