[gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag
There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm Found here: # equery u tor [ Legend : U - final flag setting for installation] [: I - package is installed with flag ] [ Colors : set, unset ] * Found these USE flags for net-misc/tor-0.2.6.1_alpha: U I - - bufferevents : Use libevent's buffered IO implementation (unstable, buggy) + - nat-pmp : Enable NAT Port Mapping Protocol + - scrypt: Use libscript for the scrypt algorithm + - seccomp : Enable seccomp for system call filtering + - stats : Enable tracking of how much of each kind of resource we download - - test : Workaround to pull in packages needed to run with FEATURES=test. Portage-2.1.2 handles this internally, so don't set it in make.conf/package.use anymore + - tor-hardening : Compile tor with hardening on vanilla compilers/linkers + - transparent-proxy : Enable transparent proxying + - upnp : Enable UPnP port mapping support - - web : Build a tor2web service instead of a tor client signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag
On 02/11/14 11:41 AM, Marco Ziebell wrote: There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people (assuming that subscriber count is around the same as #gentoo-dev users, which is probably a severe underestimate). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag
Le 02/11/2014 17:48, Alex Xu a écrit : so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people (assuming that subscriber count is around the same as #gentoo-dev users, which is probably a severe underestimate). Alex: no need for a snarky comment. A simple a bug is fine, please do open one would have been enough. Marco: thank you for your contribution, however small. Bugzilla is indeed the proper place for any and all ebuild improvements. Cheers, Rémi
Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag
Am Sun, 02 Nov 2014 17:56:02 +0100 schrieb Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org: Le 02/11/2014 17:48, Alex Xu a écrit : so... instead of emailing 4 people (three bug-wranglers plus one maintainer), you email around 300 people (assuming that subscriber count is around the same as #gentoo-dev users, which is probably a severe underestimate). Alex: no need for a snarky comment. A simple a bug is fine, please do open one would have been enough. Marco: thank you for your contribution, however small. Bugzilla is indeed the proper place for any and all ebuild improvements. Cheers, Rémi I agree with Alex. You reach less people by opening a bug-report and not everyone who's on the list. But my email received far more attention than it should. My idea was to hit everyone, so 99% of the list could easily ignored it and only the 1 person with enough time and commit-rights could silently change it. There are enough bug-reports around in the whole of community which should gain some attention. ... this report would be none of it. Be as it may. Thanks for your time. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in scrypt USE-Flag
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 17:41:12 +0100 Marco Ziebell ziebell_ma...@posteo.de wrote: There's a typo in the scrypt USE-FLAG. A bug-report seemed to big for that. Correct would be scrypt: Use libscrypt for the scrypt algorithm Found here: # equery u tor ... + - scrypt: Use libscript for the scrypt algorithm Nice catch! Pushed as: 02 Nov 2014; Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org metadata.xml: Fix USE typo noticed by Marco Ziebell. To be most efficient that kind of emails should go directly to maintainer written in metadata.xml for a package. Thanks! -- Sergei signature.asc Description: PGP signature
