Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:10:30AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: We shouldn't do anything (besides adapting repoman to the $Id$ format) without some discussion first. However... Do we really need to have ANY keywords in our files? Keyword expansion was just a PITA all-around with cvs. Do we really need to embed them in our git files? At least git doesn't expand them in the actual repository. I'm not really a big fan of any kind of in-band signaling. I guess the one advantage of this is that if you find a file OUTSIDE of a repository you know where it came from, but how important is that? The expansion is ONLY for the rsync export, so that we can identify the version of the file on a user's system. When previously discussed, that was a strongly requested item, as developers DO sometimes ask users to please test rev 1.xyz of an ebuild. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: Hi all! please don't top post Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx ebuild.badheader 1 sys-cluster/open-mx/open-mx-1.5.4.ebuild: Malformed CVS Header on line: 3 So may be its better to drop $Id: $ completely? it should look like: # $Id$ We shouldn't do anything (besides adapting repoman to the $Id$ format) without some discussion first. However... Do we really need to have ANY keywords in our files? Keyword expansion was just a PITA all-around with cvs. Do we really need to embed them in our git files? At least git doesn't expand them in the actual repository. I'm not really a big fan of any kind of in-band signaling. I guess the one advantage of this is that if you find a file OUTSIDE of a repository you know where it came from, but how important is that? -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!
On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: Hi all! please don't top post Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx ebuild.badheader 1 sys-cluster/open-mx/open-mx-1.5.4.ebuild: Malformed CVS Header on line: 3 So may be its better to drop $Id: $ completely? it should look like: # $Id$ but even then, yes, we should just trim the line -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!
Mike Frysinger писал 09-08-2015 15:43: On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: Hi all! please don't top post Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx ebuild.badheader 1 sys-cluster/open-mx/open-mx-1.5.4.ebuild: Malformed CVS Header on line: 3 So may be its better to drop $Id: $ completely? it should look like: # $Id$ but even then, yes, we should just trim the line -mike Since repoman do comparison with header.txt which contains alexxy@x240 ~/Gentoo/gentoo $ cat header.txt # Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: $ So we can change last line to $Id$ or since it dont actualy needed we can simply drop it. -- Best Regards, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov Best Regards, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov, PhD Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics FSBI Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute, Leningrad region, Gatchina, Russia Gentoo Team Ru Gentoo Linux Dev mailto:alexx...@gmail.com mailto:ale...@gentoo.org mailto:ale...@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
