Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GWN -portage-2.1 announcement.

2006-06-12 Thread Andrew Gaffney

Brian wrote:

Did I understand it wrong or did they get this mixed up in the GWN
announcement:

/etc/portage/package.unmask/kde, /etc/portage/package.unmask/xorg

Shouldn't it be:

/etc/portage/kde/package.*, /etc/portage/xorg/package.*


You understood it wrong. /etc/portage/package.unmask/foo is correct.

--
Andrew Gaffneyhttp://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer   Installer Project
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GWN -portage-2.1 announcement.

2006-06-12 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:18:44 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 2006-12-06 at 18:58 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
  Brian wrote:
   Did I understand it wrong or did they get this mixed up in the GWN
   announcement:
   
   /etc/portage/package.unmask/kde, /etc/portage/package.unmask/xorg
   
   Shouldn't it be:
   
   /etc/portage/kde/package.*, /etc/portage/xorg/package.*
  
  You understood it wrong. /etc/portage/package.unmask/foo is correct.
  
  -- 
  Andrew Gaffney  
 
 Thanks.  I'm glad now I didn't have the time to add that to porthole
 yet.  Might have been a quick fix anyway though.

Haven't looked at porthole code, but if you use portage_util.grab* the
fix is trivial (just add a recursive=1 parameter).

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GWN -portage-2.1 announcement.

2006-06-12 Thread Brian
On Tue, 2006-13-06 at 02:38 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
 On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:18:44 -0700
 Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2006-12-06 at 18:58 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
   Brian wrote:
Did I understand it wrong or did they get this mixed up in the GWN
announcement:

/etc/portage/package.unmask/kde, /etc/portage/package.unmask/xorg

Shouldn't it be:

/etc/portage/kde/package.*, /etc/portage/xorg/package.*
   
   You understood it wrong. /etc/portage/package.unmask/foo is correct.
   
   -- 
   Andrew Gaffney  
  
  Thanks.  I'm glad now I didn't have the time to add that to porthole
  yet.  Might have been a quick fix anyway though.
 
 Haven't looked at porthole code, but if you use portage_util.grab* the
 fix is trivial (just add a recursive=1 parameter).
 
 Marius
 

Thanks.  If I recall we were using grab_file(). I need to re-work it, as
it currently treats it only as a file.  I'll have to bring up a dialog
showing the subfile options when someone wants to add a package to one
of the package.* directories.

I also just did a man portage and the man page did not appear to be
updated for this change.

-- 
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] GWN -portage-2.1 announcement.

2006-06-12 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:20:16 -0700
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I also just did a man portage and the man page did not appear to be
 updated for this change.

I guess quite a few docs aren't up to date in 2.1. Anyone wanna work on
that?

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature