Re: [gentoo-user] Going to X.org

2005-04-03 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 03 April 2005 09:24, Sami Samhuri wrote:
 You will most likely have problems with transparency since it is still a
 new extension and is _not_ stable, yet. You may experience lock ups, but
 the worst effects for me are mplayer troubles (-vo x11 won't let me go
 full screen, boo) and weird drawing of my panel sometimes. (resizing
 usually brings out that effect)

Biggest problems I have (in KDE3.4) is the huge amount of memory X comsumes 
(512MB and 300 odd of swap after a few days is possible), wierd window 
resizing errors (windows, and some widgets, aren't redrawn properly), on 
occasion *all* windows can become transparent (including the window in 
focus), and mplayer not working right (but -vo x11 just fixed that).

-- 
Mike Williams


pgprjFVDtPluE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel-3.1.6 fails for my situation

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Saturday 02 April 2005 20:37, Yuan MEI wrote:
 well, make such a good initrd file each time along with the upgrading
 of kernels is quite time consuming, so I choose genkernel to do it for
 me.  What I have to do, is copy a .config to /etc/kernel.  This goes
 well till genkernel-3.1.1b, but the newest version 3.1.6 fails.  The
 new initrd finds the usb device, but it cannot drive it as a scsi
 drive.  Here, I didn't alter the .config file, so modules and kernel
 configuration should be good, thus the genkernel must be wrong.

Wouldn't it just be easier to compile all the required drivers into the 
kernel?

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpBVwyOwpliG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Going to X.org

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Saturday 02 April 2005 14:07, Ian K wrote:
 Yes, its hard to believe, but Im sadly still on XFree.
 Can someone tell me in simple terms how to convert?
 KDE 3.4 has the genuine transparency thing, right?

emerge unmerge xfree
emerge xorg-x11
/etc/init.d/xdm restart

I then added the following to get proper transparency on my laptop

Section Extensions
Option Composite Enable
Option RENDER Enable
EndSection


-- 
Mike Williams


pgpzy8vjoE9V5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Host, Schmost!

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Saturday 02 April 2005 22:26, John Lowell wrote:
 and *route -n *...

 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
 Iface 192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0      
  0 eth0 127.0.0.0       127.0.0.1       255.0.0.0       UG    0      0    
    0 lo

 There is very clearly a problem with the Gateway number and, perhaps, the
 Destination as well? A kernel problem, perhaps?

I ignored the original thread, but have read your original message.
The problem is clear. You have no default route. Nowhere for the kernel to 
send packets to which match no other route.

Set the gateway variable in /etc/conf.d/net

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpQxeoHIsAbd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 03 April 2005 01:37, Jerry McBride wrote:
   Keep in mind that it probably still has some bugs that  have not been
   fixed, hence the unstable label.
 
  Well, is there an expectation on when it will 'stablize'?

 As far as KDE.org goes, it is stable. I've been using it since it's been
 available. No problems

~arch is for unstable ebuilds, NOT unstable software (at least, not KNOWN 
unstable software)
Packages normally stay in ~arch for a few weeks, just to make sure they play 
nice with the rest of the tree.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpU37sFZ8Vy2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Host, Schmost!

2005-04-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 03 April 2005 03:10, John Lowell wrote:
 # For setting the default gateway
 #
 gateway=192.168.1.1

gimli root # tail /etc/conf.d/net
#
#broadcast_eth0=192.168.0.255 192.168.0.255
#netmask_eth0=255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0


# For setting the default gateway
#
#gateway=eth0/192.168.0.1
#gateway=eth0/192.168.128.1

(I use DHCP)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpBmeBl64fsC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] smartcl: probing individual drives in a 100% hardware raid array?

2005-03-30 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 18:04, fire-eyes wrote:
 I'm using smartctl which lets me access S.M.A.R.T. data.

 I'm also using 100% hardware raid. So the system sees each array as a
 single disk, even though it's several disks.

 I'd like to probe each individual disk, however right now I can only
 probe an individual array.

 How might I do this?

If the system can only see the array, then you can't.
Many (most?) hardware raid solutions will give you a way to monitor the health 
of the array, and drives making it.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp2Lu0dfqxhe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] suggestions: buying a new computer

2005-03-30 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 17:25, daniel wrote:
 Just one additional question regarding video cards.  I've had  a chat with
 some of the hardware guys at my job and they've reccomended the ATI X800XL
 or the ATI X800Pro.  Does this play nice with Linux?  Also, what about
 PCI-Express?  I understand that it's included in 2.6.11, but how stable is
 that?  I want a good video card so I can continue to play good 3d games on
 my windows partition.

I have a GeForce 6600 PCI-e card, and it runs Doom3 and UT2004 for extended 
periods at 1280x1024 with all the detail turned up just fine.
However, I would not even consider an ATi card, their Linux drivers are (or at 
least were a few weeks ago) friggin' terrible.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpOIl82xu3A5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia proprietary + pci-x

2005-03-24 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 24 March 2005 14:53, Iain Buchanan wrote:
 Has anyone had any luck with the nvidia module and pci-x cards?  Does it
 just work?  Cause mine ain't workin!

 vanilla kernel 2.6.11.4
 nvidia-kernel 1.0.7167-r1 (the only ~x86 on an otherwise x86 system,
 because 6629-r1 won't work with 2.6.11)
 nvidia geforce 6200 pci-x (by PALiT - I never heard of them either :):)

You mean PCI-e?
PCI-X is basically a faster PCI, normally 64bit rather than 32bit.
PCI-e is a different beast entirely.

Yes, the nvidia drivers work just fine with PCI-e.
I'm on 2.6.10 with a 6600 PCI-e, running 6629-r1.
My laptop has an FX Go 5200, on 2.6.11 using 6629-r4.

Try loading the module manually *before* starting X.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpLX6EgRsbPb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] 2005.0 available?

2005-03-24 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 24 March 2005 06:21, Colin wrote:
 I think I speak for everyone when I say, Woo!  Is there a list of the
 major changes from the previous version?  I'm downloading it anyway, but
 I need something to read while I download two CD's worth of Gentoo over
 56k... :-):-)

You do realise that the release numbers *only* refer to the installation 
media?
Outside of the CD ISOs, they mean little more than squat.

Sync often, update your profile, and you're upto date.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpcaj8eTO5Uf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] 2005.0 available?

2005-03-24 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 24 March 2005 18:38, Colin wrote:
 You do realise that the release numbers *only* refer to the installation
 media?
 Outside of the CD ISOs, they mean little more than squat.
 
 Sync often, update your profile, and you're upto date.

 I couldn't get the 2004.3 LiveCD to boot on any of my systems (x86
 doesn't like my drive controller and PPC has no SCSI support), so
 downloading 2005.0 and trying that would work, so I do need the ISO's.  
 I might just bite the bullet and buy the LiveCD's and packages, too...
 emerge --sync over dial-up would take forever.

Ahh, then you want new installation media...
I'll shut up :)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpSgKnQtaoY2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Partition resize trouble

2005-03-07 Thread Mike Williams
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 02:21, Jerry McBride wrote:
 I never had to do this... so I'm curious. In step 2, you delete the
 partition via fdisk and then specify a new size. Doing this doesn't destroy
 the data in the partition?

Nope.

 Amazing.

Not especially, once you realise there really isn't actually any relation 
between partitions and filesystems, it makes sense.
If the filesystem is inside the partition and starts at (at, or just near?) 
the beginning, mount should have no trouble finding the superblock (which 
designates the size and structure of said filesystem) and mounting the 
filesystem even if it extends over the end of the partition (that last bit 
could get a bit messy)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp9yBDihmJvY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Coldplug Mounting confusion!!!

2005-03-04 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 04 March 2005 16:03, James Nicolson wrote:
 I have a usb caddy which I wish to mount using fstab. Although I can
 not mount it until after coldplug has started!!! How can I get it to
 mount usb when reading fstab. I also have a sd card reader writer which
 I would like to mount as swap.

 I want to mount the hard drive caddy as /var. How can I mirror /var
 onto the hard drive caddy so it will work?

 Thank You. I am very confused.

 I use 2.6 kernel with udev

Either compile the drivers you need into the kernel, or add the modules 
to /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp35SYnEwkaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Coldplug Mounting confusion!!!

2005-03-04 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 04 March 2005 19:27, James Nicolson wrote:
 i have compiled usb mass storage driver into the kernel. it only seems
 to mount once coldplug is started.

How about scsi support?

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpJZjUbu4wZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] fsck

2005-03-03 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 03 March 2005 23:05, A. Khattri wrote:
 You can also force a full fsck every time you boot by creating the file
 /forcefsck (e.g. touch /forcefsck) when shutting down - the next time
 you restart it will do a full fsck of all disks.

Not quite. You need to set the last field of each partition line in fstab to a 
number greater than 1, otherwise the forcefsck won't touch them.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpPxWW5RLLAe.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] mdadm help?

2005-03-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 17:27, A. Khattri wrote:
 Have I missed out a step along the way?

I believe you need a DEVICE specification per array.

One of my boxes has an mdadm config, due to an external kernel module for one 
of the controllers, the others have no need as the kernel autodetects them.
This is the config

DEVICE partitions
ARRAY /dev/md0 uuid=8ef83d67:79b230ba:6cc967c3:208b9224

DEVICE partitions
ARRAY /dev/md1 uuid=16bd46c0:45df33c2:7349932f:4381b8c8


All the important information is in the superblock, so I don't need to give it 
anymore.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpA6Lcj6zdd2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] mdadm help?

2005-03-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 18:06, A. Khattri wrote:
  I believe you need a DEVICE specification per array.

 Yes, I have DEVICE and ARRAY lines in mdadm.conf - see the grep commands
 at the end of my previous post.

per array :)

 I have managed to get something working but its not quite right.

[snip]

 So I 
 ran fdisk on the install disk, marked the partitions as Linux RAID auto
 and then tried to add them to the array.

Perfect. Compile the raid and scsi drivers in, and you can forget about 
mdadm.conf.

 Right now, I can assemble the array but the added disk is marked as a
 spare instead of a mirror:

 livecd dev # mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1
 mdadm: /dev/md0 has been started with 1 drive and 1 spare.

 livecd dev # cat /proc/mdstat
 Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [raid6] [raid10]
 md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
   56128 blocks [1/1] [U]

 unused devices: none

Right, so the arrays you created in fact only had one partition in?
Now you're trying to re-assemble those arrays, but using 2 partitions?
If I'm understanding you correctly, that won't work. But if you create an 
array using the partition that is/was in an array it should sync the data 
already on it over to the next one.

 I tried stopping the device and editing my mdadm.conf to reflect the
 changes I made (see grep lines in previous post) but this doesn't work. I
 think I need to do an additional step to get this working?

The superblock contains all the information needed to assemble arrays, so 
perhaps it's overriding you configuration?

 (Im doing it this way because I dont want to have to do a Gentoo install
 all over again on the RAID drives...).

I sucesssfully converted my /home partition into a mirror like this.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpekAKz6oQJq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] mdadm help? [FIXED!]

2005-03-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 19:30, A. Khattri wrote:
 OK, I bit the bullet and ran the create command again like this:

 mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1
 /deb/sdb1

 It reported that it found an ext2fs on the partition and then proceeded
 to rebuild the array. I did the same for the other devices and all got
 rebuilt and luckily it looks like it preserved all the file-systems too:

Gah, should read a whole thread before replying!

Knew I was right too :o)

Clever that mdadm, isn't it.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpW0qiu6anLC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with PCI express and Gentoo Linux?

2005-03-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 02 March 2005 23:20, Praise wrote:
 I am going to buy a new PC, but I am worried about hardware compatibility
 between Pci Express and Linux.
 Anybody is willing to share experience about it?

Yep, it Just Works.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpioANoGkVVa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Experiences with PCI express and Gentoo Linux?

2005-03-02 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 03 March 2005 01:25, Damian Kolkowski wrote:
 Cool, SATA works to, but:

 .~. # hdparm -t /dev/hda /dev/sda

 /dev/hda:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  174 MB in  3.03 seconds =  57.38 MB/sec

 /dev/sda:
  Timing buffered disk reads:  152 MB in  3.02 seconds =  50.37 MB/sec
 HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl
 for device .~. #

gandalf root # hdparm -t /dev/hde /dev/sdc

/dev/hde:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  156 MB in  3.02 seconds =  51.73 MB/sec

/dev/sdc:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  170 MB in  3.01 seconds =  56.41 MB/sec

hdparm is for IDE drives, not SCSI, so you can't really expect it to work 
properly.
I get a HDIO_GET_MULTCOUNT error when I view the current settings of a SATA 
disk.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp3GnO3H9hLt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] The Internet as a big subnet

2005-03-01 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 17:14, Mike Williams wrote:
 I'm running 2.6, so no ipsecX virtual interfaces :(

Got it, and this was the problem.

Essentially, what I was doing was correct. It was the KAME ipsec code in 2.6 
that was screwing me around.
Moved back to 2.4 headers, un-nptl'isd glibc, compiled a gentoo-sources 
kernel, and after rebuilding openswan it magically worked!

It's also nice to have ipsecX virtual interfaces, makes routing far nicer.
Does anyone use openswan 2.3 yet? It's supposed to use their KLIPS code in 
place of KAMEs.

Cheers

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpiVO7vUfrU7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] [OT] The Internet as a big subnet

2005-02-28 Thread Mike Williams
Hey,

I have a problem. That should be fairly easily resolvable. But it isn't. The 
available documentation sucks. And my head hurts.

http://wiki.openswan.org/index.php/The%20Internet%20as%20a%20big%20subnet

I have an office, I have a datacentre.
If office accesses the internet it must not appear to come from the office.
The office can appear to the internet as the datacentre.

So, I thought I'd stick up a VPN with the remote subnet as 0.0.0.0/0 on the 
office firewall, and the local subnet as 0.0.0.0/0 on the datacentre 
firewall.
I removed the office firewalls default route, and added a specific host route 
to the datacentre firewall.

The VPN establishes itself fine, and openswan creates 2 new routing rules on 
the office firewall:

0.0.0.0   xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   128.0.0.0   UG0  00 eth2
128.0.0.0   xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx   0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth2

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the office firewalls nexthop.
I'm running 2.6, so no ipsecX virtual interfaces :(

Now two things change.
1) I can access the internet from the office firewall, but I appear as the 
office, not the datacentre. Which shouldn't happen, as I removed the default 
route out it's own router, and set up one via the datacentre with openswan.
2) I can't access anything on it's internal interface, and machines behind it 
can't access it. Seems like openswan is trying to send *everything* out the 
internet connection.

Is there anyone who can tell/show me how to create a default route over a 
subnet-subnet ipsec vpn, without screwing up internal access?

Cheers

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpiY38FPx3Qs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] The Internet as a big subnet

2005-02-28 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 21:47, Jonathan Wright wrote:
 I've not really done much with VPNs, at least not in the way you're
 trying to configure it. I'm not sure how to have two 'catch-all'
 gateways, 'cause the one for the VPN would override the original one for
 the internet, and then the VPN would be trying to send though itself.

Ahh, that's why I purposely removed the default route, and added a host route 
to the datacentre firewall, before bringing the VPN up :)

 Looking at it though, why don't you setup the PCs on the local network
 to use a gateway on the Datacenter network (say 'firewall' on the
 Datacenter bit). 'West' would then act as a router sending the data
 though East, into the firewall and out?

Now then, that's an idea!

 OR, what about setting up a general firewall rule on West, so that any
 connections which would go 'out' onto the internet be routed though the
 VPN?

In theory, I shouldn't need any firewall rules on west, at least no MASQ or 
SNAT rules.
The PCs would be directly routable by both firewalls, due to the VPN.

 I'm not even sure any of this is workable - just thought I'd throw out
 some ideas? :)

Ideas are always welcome, especially those which point me in a new direction!

Thanks.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpqw8ZXH7nOH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] The Internet as a big subnet

2005-02-28 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 22:52, Mike Williams wrote:
  Looking at it though, why don't you setup the PCs on the local network
  to use a gateway on the Datacenter network (say 'firewall' on the
  Datacenter bit). 'West' would then act as a router sending the data
  though East, into the firewall and out?

 Now then, that's an idea!

Engage brain - type.

That's won't work, the office PCs have to use the office firewall as their 
gateway.


I think what I really need, is a way to exclude subnets from the subnet 
declaration in ipsec.conf.
As openswan is overriding *all* routing with the 0.0.0.0/0 subnet. The local 
PCs can't even ping it when it's running. A normal subnet-to-subnet VPN 
works as expected.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpF86ynYb6Up.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Getting SCSI devices before USB devices

2005-02-27 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 00:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
  How can I specify that my SCSI drives get recognized first? Or, how
  can I force them to be sda and sdb?

 Compile usb-storage as a module. then the USB drives won't be recognised
 when the kernel first boots.

That, or learn how to use mdadm, and ditch raidtab.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpTkKihshqUu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] djbdns and Gentoo

2005-02-27 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 01:22, Grant wrote:
 I'm setting up DNS services for my domains on my server.  I'm looking
 at http://www.lifewithdjbdns.com/ but I wonder how much of the Simple
 setup applies with Gentoo.  Does anyone have any advice on djbdns
 with Gentoo?

Install it, and follow the instructions the ebuild gives you.

I'd also suggest you install supervise-scripts, 'svc-restart blah' is so much 
easier than 'svc -d /service/blah;svc -u /service/blah' :)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpOitiGDGlHh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] moving along . . .

2005-02-27 Thread Mike Williams
On Monday 28 February 2005 01:57, maxim wexler wrote:
 Thanks for all your help. A coherent system is
 starting to emerge.

 speaking of which: when I try to emerge xorg it gags
 when it has to go online to download a distfile. This
 has got me hopping back and forth between my XP and
 gentoo systems(forgot to compile PPP support in
 kernel)because emerge xorg keeps missing more
 distfiles.

 Is there a list of all files(dependencies?) needed for
 each package to save all this back and forth?

emerge package packages package -pf

pretend, fetch.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpnswHZhsr2Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Dependencies are broken

2005-02-27 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 27 February 2005 22:32, Marc Ballarin wrote:
  What am I missing?

 Hard to tell, based on you information ;-)

 Check the output of emerge -pe dvdrip. It should be sth like the
 following (depends on you USE flags):

e? Isn't an emptytree a bit excessive?
A plan ole 'emerge dvdrip -pv', possible with a tree (like Neil suggested), 
would be just fine.

 BTW: If you enter emerge gtk+, portage will emerge the latest version of
 gtk+, ie. gtk-2.x. To get gtk+1.x, do emerge -p gtk+-2 . This should
 not be necessary, though.

BTW2: Second guessing portage by emerging a dependency individually to add 
extra functionality (like someone at work assuming that emerging gd would add 
gd support to php) will rarely ever work.
Find the USE flag which enables the functionality you want, and re-emerge the 
package in question, not it's dependency! This is pretty much the reverse of 
binary distros, like debian.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpMnRxqA7xoi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Cant mount raid with liveCD

2005-02-26 Thread Mike Williams
On Saturday 26 February 2005 01:48, Adam Carter wrote:
 I've stuffed my installation (p3 march seems broken on my coppermine
 cel900), so i need to mount the raid1 devices that have my boot and root
 partitions to fix it. I've booted from the 2004.3 live cd, modprobed the
 raid1 module and mknoded /dev/md0, but mount reports that it can read
 the superblock. What have i missed?

 mdadm -E submirror device shows good info on the mirror, and i havent
 touched it since last boot.

cat /proc/mdstat
Anything?

If not
mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/hdbleh /dev/hdblah

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp75inPsSs4N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] No sda, sda1 etc in /dev

2005-02-26 Thread Mike Williams
On Saturday 26 February 2005 16:09, Luigi Pinna wrote:
 Have you installed udev? It makes device for you...

So does devfs.
Just like it has since it's inception, before Gentoo started.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpHTzIVzeRaW.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] problem with df

2005-02-25 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 25 February 2005 04:21, Rui Silva wrote:
 i'm having kinda of a problem with df

 the output of df id

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ df
 Filesystem   1K-blocks  Used Available Use% Mounted on
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
   10241084   4328040   5913044  43% /
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6
   30353852   1214776  29139076   5% /home
 none516768 0516768   0% /dev/shm


 instead of showing me the partitions like /dev/hda5 it shows
 /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5

 why ???

What does `mount` output?
What does your fstab look like?

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpzURtjBVWuq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Reply-To: header seems broken

2005-02-23 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:21, John Myers wrote:
  Reply to list? That would be a great thing, if I/Thunderbird had that.
  Which mail client has that?

 KMail does. If you press 'L' on a list message, it does reply-to-list.

KMail also seems to get the reply to address right anyway.
(I don't have anything setup to tell it gentoo-user is in this folder, except 
a list-id filter to put messages here)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpLLTAcjvsZd.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: many ext3 filesystem errors on SW raid5

2005-02-21 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 20 February 2005 07:44, Francesco Talamona wrote:
  Yes. But it involves lots of copying, and disk space :)

 I'm surprised you didn't suggest convertfs...

 There was a thread about ext-reiser migration early this year (was:
 convert ext3 to reiserfs).

A thread which I participated in too...
hohum, that's what you get for posting at 1:55am, after a 12 hour sunday at 
work.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpNStEuuGAFv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] raid info

2005-02-20 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 20 February 2005 21:46, Nick Smith wrote:
 im about to try to convert my existing setup to a raid 1
 mirrored setup via the email i got a while ago on this list, i
 just had a quick question about raids in general.  if a drive
 does happen to fail, where would it alert me at? just the
 regular syslog? would it email me somehow or is it my job to
 just regularly check the logs for such an incident?

mdadm does this.

mdadm --monitor --help

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp8zsRvr60pp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] many ext3 filesystem errors on SW raid5

2005-02-19 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 17 February 2005 23:09, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
  Problem with ext3.
  Been here, done this.
  Switch to reiserfs, problem will disappear.
  Reiser is also more suitable for lots of small files too.

 Aha ok, I will check that out. Do you know why this happens -- is ext3
 unstable? Why is ReiserFS better than ext3? Any good links to that topic?

ext2 is rock solid, ext3 doesn't seem quite so, even if it isn't much more 
than a journalling system on top of ext2.
The Oracle admin at work won't touch it due to continual errors, mount same 
partition, same format as ext2, errors disappear (I don't remember the 
errors).
As for why this is better than that, google is your friend.

 Greetings, Matthias

 PS: Is it possible to convert my ext3 based raid array w/o data loss to
 ReiserFS?

Yes. But it involves lots of copying, and disk space :)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpSKqX0u9pld.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT - genkernel and NFS

2005-02-17 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 17 February 2005 03:01, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 Do genkernels have NFS support turned on by default?

Yes, compiled in.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp4Q6PKfPsMa.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] many ext3 filesystem errors on SW raid5

2005-02-17 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:41, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
 Now I do not really know where to search for the problem. Is it Linux's
 software raid5 implementation, which is buggy? Is it one or more of the
 IDE disks? Or is this normal for large (~400gb) ext3 partitions?

 Where do I get infos about this? Do you guys have some experiences to 
 share? Hope you can help me, I am somewhat lost here :(

Problem with ext3.
Been here, done this.
Switch to reiserfs, problem will disappear.
Reiser is also more suitable for lots of small files too.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpMTEpu4GB1x.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Software Raid and Grub problem?

2005-02-15 Thread Mike Williams
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:30, Rick Lapp wrote:
 Am at Linuxworld in Boston. At the Linux System Administration Tutorial,
 the speaker, Josh Jensen (Cisco, RH, IBM), declared that Grub doesn't
 support software raid on /boot. Because of this we should NOT use grub
 with Raid, rather we should use lilo. Lilo does understand /boot is
 mirrored.

 I am planning to raid1 my server and was going to follow the gentoo howto
 for raid which suggests grub and doesn't mention lilo.

Grub doesn't, I'm fairly sure, support raid on /boot, but that does not mean 
you can't use it with mirroring, I do.

Make your mirror in which ever way you like, then install grub onto all 
partitions involved in the mirror. But, here's the key, you can re-map grub 
devices to real devices.
Here is the interesting bit from a hacked about systemimager script for 
network installing of boxes (they have 2 hard drives, and all partitions are 
mirrored over the drives)

chroot /a /sbin/grub --batch --no-floppy EOT
device (hd0) /dev/hda
root (hd0,0)
setup (hd0)
device (hd0) /dev/hdc
root (hd0,0)
setup (hd0)
quit
EOT


-- 
Mike Williams


pgpUqaRJJSObH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Remote Desktop

2005-02-15 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 00:59, Alan wrote:
 No experience with NX here, but there's a really nice article on the
 gentoo wiki about setting up a gentoo terminal server using some vnc and
 gdm tricks.  Check out:
 http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Xvnc_terminal_server

NX is a great product, and free to use for a single user (no licence 
required).

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp76Wz7cLcGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] nvidia 6600GT

2005-02-11 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 11 February 2005 15:20, Tamas Sarga wrote:
 I'd like to buy an Nvidia 6600GT card. Will it works with binary nvidia
 driver?
 Any experience?

I have a 256MB, 6600, PCI-E card, on a stock 2.6.10 kernel and it works just 
fine.
Installed the nvidia drivers, setup xorg to use it, and off I went.

Plays UT2004 and Doom3 very nicely.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpg1cpVOgoJV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] [OT] 2 quick 3ware question

2005-02-10 Thread Mike Williams
Hey guys,

3ware 7506-8, any good as a *non-raid*?
Can it in fact be use as a straight, non-raid, ide controller?

Thinking of putting a bunch of IDE drives already in a software raid array 
onto a single controller.

Ta

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpRzkHPLp7RA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] xorg.conf with more than one mouse synaptics

2005-02-09 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 14:02, Vittorio wrote:
 Why doesn't it seem to recognize the Synaptics touchpad whilst at boot time
 it does?
 Are the options device of the kind /dev/misc/psaux, /dev/misc/mice, etc
 in my xorg.conf (see below) correct?
 And the InputDevice(s)?

I've just been and done this.
Here are the relevant sections of my config.

Section Module
Loadsynaptics
EndSection

Section InputDevice
   Identifier  USB Mouse
   Driver  mouse
   Option  Protocol ExplorerPS/2
   Option  Device /dev/input/mice
   Option  ZAxisMapping 4 5
  Option  Resolution 1200
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Mouse1
Driver mouse
Option ProtocolIMPS/2
Option Device  /dev/psaux
Option Emulate3Buttons
EndSection

Section InputDevice
Identifier  Synaptics
Driver synaptics
Option ProtocolIMPS/2
Option Device  /dev/input/event0
Option Protocol  event
Option SHMConfig on
Option Emulate3Buttonsyes
EndSection

Section ServerLayout
Identifier  Simple Layout
Screen Screen 1
InputDevice USB Mouse CorePointer
InputDevice Mouse1 CorePointer
InputDevice Synaptics AlwaysCore
EndSection

They key is the evdev kernel module/driver.
You need to turn on Event interface in Input device support.

I'm quite happily using both a USB wheel mouse, and my touchpad at the same 
time.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp07vcJTgC4N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Software RAID 1 - Not all devices started in the array.

2005-02-08 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 00:15, Mr. Adam ALLEN. wrote:
 It looks as though the kernel is making the decisions on the devices
 rather than any userspace tools. For some reason it isn't considering
 any thing on hdc.

With the drivers compiled in, it does.
It finds devices to consider based on partition type.
Set all participating partitions to type fd (linux raid autodetect).

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpsi6TjYaqMU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] install dvds for a mobile sempron: to 64bit, or not to 64bit?

2005-01-26 Thread Mike Williams
Subject covers the basics.

http://torrents.gentoo.org/ has a dvd install iso for amd64, but nothing else.
If I download it, can I use it?
If not, is there a dvd iso for x86 I can download?

Ta

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpQrF1CDwUz5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Searching for mysqlcc replacement

2005-01-23 Thread Mike Williams
On Sunday 23 January 2005 19:22, Stoian Ivanov wrote:
 I'm looking for good replacement of mysqlcc not only because it is no
 longer mentained but because it began to break recently (rebuilding does
 not help). I've tried gmysqlclient which has the needed functionality but
 brakes too easy (sometimes even can't login before a seg fault)...I've even
 try a wine-ed mysqlcc but it has some UI problems... so if anyone is using
 something he/she finds good please share!

dev-db/mysql-administrator

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpNtZBYNm6R1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] emerging app-admin/fam-2.7.0-r2 fails

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 16:30, Nicolas Saurbier wrote:
 Don´t think so. Here´s my /etc/make.conf:

It is.

 CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
 CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
 CXXFLAGS={$CFLAGS}

${CFLAGS}

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpdLiLnFiVuI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] K3b

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 17:16, Tony Boom wrote:
 Yes I can, it works perfectly if I login as root. I have run the setup
 program and updated permissions, that was the first thing I did when I
 installed it.

 I was told I didn't belong to the burning group so I tried to add me to
 it but was told there wasn't one.

 I tried to create a new burning group but was told there was no
 /etc/gshadow file so I created one, added a burning group, added me as a
 user to that group and it was all accepted without question. When I log on
 as a user I get the same errors and it refuses to work at all.

/etc/gshadow ? What the hell is that?
I'd add yourself to the cdrom group (which should already exist), 
edit /etc/group and add your username to the end of the cdrom line, and rerun 
k3bsetup with that group.

 And the name  Mike Noble rings a very loud bell, do I now you?

Isn't he the Thrust SSC guy?
Or the car maker...

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpPtXiLv36ng.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] K3b

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:15, Mike Noble wrote:
 What kernel version are you running?   2.4.x worked fine, but with 2.6.x
 there are some problems with burning as a user.  I have heard people say
 that is was fixed, but I have not seen it yet. YMMV.

I've burnt a CD from an ISO today as myself, using a non-suid cdrecord, and 
development-sources-2.6.10-r1. Suid-root cdrecord would not work.
Have also done a DVD-RW, with a suid-root growisofs/dvd+rw-*, and the same 
kernel.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp0TPQhiTeuG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] K3b

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:49, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
 With one exception: if I eject a dvd with eject, I can not burn any other
 dvd or cd, because 'operation media removal prevention not allowed' or so..

Setting the suid-root bit on growisofs and/or dvd+rw-* will get rid of that.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpxQoGjVnr6b.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo install - stuck at first emerge --sync step

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 19:41, Mark Knecht wrote:
    rsync.gentoo.org resolves on my other machines, and the new machine
 has the same DNS addresses in it. The new machine was on the network
 before chrooting into the new environment. The new machine can ping my
 gateway, but it cannot ping www.intel.com, so clearly it's a
 nameserver issue.

You've left the new machine by chrooting.
Copy the resolv.conf into your Gentoo install, then chroot to it.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpwWC9RU0Lzc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] K3b

2005-01-12 Thread Mike Williams
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 20:37, Tony Boom wrote:
 I've always been a SuSE fan and Gentoo has come as bit of a shock, I've
 never really delved under the bonnet before, other than basic stuff. I must
 admit though, I'm thoroughly enjoying the vertical learning curve.

Give *that* man a drink! :)

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpSsywBIcQQ7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Seeking recommendation for new graphics card...

2005-01-08 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 07 January 2005 18:23, Dave Nebinger wrote:
 Okay folks, I've had enough of my Nvidia card.

 I need to get a new card that will be more compatible with Gentoo Linux.

 Here's the basic requirements:

 1. PCI based (as the nvidia is using agp and it's onboard :-(
 2. Completely compatible and dependable with the 2.6+ series of kernels.
 3. Capable of driving monitor at 1600x1200.

 I don't use the box for gaming or image processing.  It's strictly for
 developing code, browsing, document editing, and other simple tasks.

 Please send me your recommendations for brand, memory, etc.

One word: Matrox

A G400 will do you. 16MB is fine, but 32MB is nicer. Matrox are, or at least 
were for a long time, the outright kings of 2D.
I'm using my own 6-7 year old AGP G400MAX at work, and it's perfect, driving a 
19 monitor at 1280x1024, and a 17 at 1024x768.
They do come in PCI versions.
Their linux drivers rock too, are xfree/xorg modules, as apposed to kernel 
modules.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp1nZsXvSK5i.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo using a lot of disk space

2005-01-07 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 07 January 2005 09:21, Francesco Talamona wrote:
  du -sk --max-depth=1
  That will tell you where the most space is taken up, then go into
  that directory, and run the command again, and again, and again.
  There is probably a better way ( I normally only use that on 200mb
  home directories at work ).

 Did you test this command? :-)

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~]$ du -sk --max-depth=1
 du: warning: summarizing conflicts with --max-depth=1
 Try `du --help' for more information.

du -hx --max-depth=1 /

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpnmKWAH3fZh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Qmail relay dor single host

2005-01-07 Thread Mike Williams
On Friday 07 January 2005 13:28, Reno Romanin wrote:
 I have emerged qmail/vpopmail, everything is working fine except the relay
 for a single host I added to tcp rules.

 To add the host I put

 host ip:allow,RELAYCLIENT=

 In /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.qmail-smtp and then ran tcprules tcp.qmail-smtp.cdb
 tcp.qmail-smtp.tml  tcp.qmail-smtp

 A restart of qmail, and I thought it would be working...no such luck.

 Did I miss something?

At which file does the -x option to tcpserver point?

-- 
Mike Williams


pgpjqNuxtX5Gj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] KMail functionality

2004-02-26 Thread Mike Williams
On Thursday 26 February 2004 20:10, Nick Dutton wrote:
 Hello

 I've just about made the switch to Gentoo, but I'm suffering a bit on
 the mail front.

 As a long-time TheBat! user I'm having trouble giving up some of its
 features.  One in particular is the ablilty to delete messages from
 the POP3 server from within a filter.
 Specifically, I want to be able to leave important messages on the
 server while removing list and SPAM content. KMail seems to only let
 me do this as a global setting

 Thanks in advance...

Aren't the 'POP3 Filters' there to do that? On the Tools menu.
Never used them myself.

-- 
Mike Williams


pgp0.pgp
Description: signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Mail confirmation requests

2004-02-15 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 15 February 2004 17:42, Jeff Smelser wrote:
 On Sunday 15 February 2004 10:13 am, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
  If you have shell access at your ISP (with about 6MB free space) you
  could turn on Bayes Learning with Spam Assassin.  That might require a
  little work on your part to train it and perhaps some scripts to
  automate some useful processes, but that is what I use and my false
  positive rate is 0% and my false negative rate is about 3% (meaning it
  catches 97% of the spam).

 What Bayes filter is good for this?? My Spamassissin isn't catching all my
 spam.

spamassassin.
It does bayes by itself, if it's learnt enough. A few thousand hand picked 
spam and ham should suffice.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAL7REInuLMrk7bIwRAv6gAJ9coOhri3L/LTcON2vxSJArrCy8GACePATT
totGJY5WN4lVRJg830nLuLk=
=g51s
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Win NT 2k

2004-02-14 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 14 February 2004 01:39, Grendel wrote:

 Again it is a myth that windows is not secure as linux, I bet if you take
 the bug reports of the systems and componenets (linux+apache+ssh etc vs
 window and components) you will probably find the same number of bugs.

 We too have had our horrible bugs which people seem to be conviniently
 forgetting, that bug which made every kernel prior to 2.4.23 able to be
 rootkitted which was exploited to corrupt the debian servers. There was a
 same bug in the 2.2.x releases which also did the same thing. There still
 are a lot of people running kernels older that 2.4.22 unaware of the above
 and still waiting to be rooted.

 If you take the componenets, sendmail was(is?) buggy as hell for years and
 a major security risk, as was named, ssh etc.

Yes OSS has had some quite serious bugs, sendmail and bind are horrible pieces 
of insecure crap (are/were ?), but their source code has always been 
available.
People have managed to find as many, if not more, bugs in Windows without the 
source code. What will happen now that some/most/all of that is now 
available?

Microsoft can no longer hide behind 'security through obscurity'.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFALghpInuLMrk7bIwRAoCqAJ0WoYrEG2/JPXT9ITneLqDnJhf+awCgmWLX
vq8cyyDr0qpiugEeIVbv/4A=
=LwiO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Annoying messages with emerge

2004-02-11 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 09:28, David Gethings wrote:
 Hi,

 I recently changed my cron daemon from vcron to fcron (via vixie-cron).
 Now with every emerge I get the following output:

  * Caching service dependencies...
  *  Service 'fcron' already provide 'cron'!;
  *  Not adding service 'vcron'...
  *  Service 'fcron' already provide 'cron'!;
  *  Not adding service 'vixie-cron'...

 Any clues on how to remove this. I've unemereged both vcron and
 vixie-cron and neither are started or running.

The init scripts for both vcron and vixie-cron are still in /etc/init.d.
emerge won't remove them as /etc is CONFIG_PROTECT'd (CONFIG_PROTECTED ?)
Just delete them and run depscan.sh.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFAKgfAInuLMrk7bIwRAonjAJYyrad3mpx6jqLhlc3HVrH2vK1uAJ47yQ5C
f7Pz0ceddOPrGdtQLlJDKg==
=GMjH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] dev-php/mod_php-4.3.4-r4

2004-02-11 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 12:16, Ryan wrote:
 Hi all

 im trying to emerge dev-php/mod_php-4.3.4-r4

 but i keep getting the same error


 checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ -O3 -mcpu=i686 -funroll-loops -pipe
 -L/us r/lib -ldb-4.1  -Wl,-rpath,/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib
 -Wl,-rpath,/opt/inter base/lib -L/opt/interbase/lib
 -Wl,-rpath,/usr/qt/3/lib -L/usr/qt/3/lib) works... no
 configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C++ compiler
 cannot cre ate executables.

 !!! ERROR: dev-php/mod_php-4.3.4-r4 failed.
 !!! Function econf, Line 339, Exitcode 1
 !!! econf failed

What does the config.log say?
Look for the error that configure printed out, and the few line above and 
below may point you in the right direction.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKiV0InuLMrk7bIwRAi/7AJ9YjRwYV++c2ROLnJnHGnsbjmUIhgCgid2o
6Z0EjFtqeuamGFlGZECC5bI=
=L/WM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] dev-php/mod_php-4.3.4-r4

2004-02-11 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 11 February 2004 15:56, Ryan wrote:
 hi sorry but i cant find a cofig.log
 anywhere

That's because it's config.log :) (sorry)
emerge mod_php, and when it's failed look 
in /var/tmp/portage/mod_php-4.3.4-r4/work/something-i-can't-remember/

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKjXyInuLMrk7bIwRApNBAKCsEFAaII1vaq62gG1+gregxjhfKACfTjny
4XtnoEUbJKlSL1fPiviEKhQ=
=Rtt2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] New to Gentoo - general questions

2004-02-09 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 09 February 2004 10:37, Alexandre Aractingi wrote:

 - I have been a (very happy) Mandrake user for some time now, and I
 particularly like their PLF site (rpm repository of legally
 problematic packages - for example libdvdcss). Is there such a thing
 for Gentoo?

Gentoo doesn't 'need' something like that

(sauron root # emerge -s libdvdcss
Searching...
[ Results for search key : libdvdcss ]
[ Applications found : 1 ]

*  media-libs/libdvdcss
  Latest version available: 1.2.8
  Latest version installed: 1.2.8
  Size of downloaded files: 204 kB
  Homepage:http://developers.videolan.org/libdvdcss/
  Description: A portable abstraction library for DVD decryption
  License: GPL-2
)

But, http://www.breakmygentoo.net has some ebuilds (unsupported obviously), 
and the forums (http://forums.gentoo.org, again unsupported) generally have a 
few.

 - Is there some distribution-specific scripts/apps to handle addition
 and removal of hardware (scanner, printer...)?

Not to my knowledge.

 - Does Gentoo use devfs?

Yes. It doesn't have to either. It's also perfectly possible to use udev.

 - Does Gentoo use automount/supermount?

If you want it to.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJ2JCInuLMrk7bIwRAjVtAJ47mJPTHJ4jR3DW/rV0/CXDueXYyQCgq6nv
oUqvSiSmrWzHZVmmGgRM6Jg=
=YCg/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2 and gentoo installation

2004-02-09 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 09 February 2004 18:25, Leonid Podolny wrote:
 Hi,
 I'm going to perform a fresh installation of gentoo on my new box. I'll be
 using mm-sources-2.6.2 as my system kernel and LVM2 for most of my
 partitions. Does someone have any positive experience with LVM2 on gentoo?
 Is there LiveCD out to support it, i.e. to hold the kernel and tools for
 performing the initial partitioning at the installation process? Any
 pitfalls I should be aware of? Cheers, L.

I've been using LVM12 since late 2.5, and installed with LVM1 on 2.4, and 
later converted to LVM2 on 2.6. Been very impressed by the way 'it just 
works', even when transferring an LVM1 drive to a box with 2.6 and LVM2.
No problems that haven't been cured by a vgcfgbackup and vgcfgrestore (never 
did find out why).

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJ9wfInuLMrk7bIwRAkt8AJ4qwUyhh1Nq6+I01LR7RuQ34KldKQCZAVA7
zjvCAcpHA7erfPyyLGq6l2U=
=vZsZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] any problems with gcc 3.3?

2004-02-09 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 09 February 2004 23:29, Alan wrote:
 I noticed that gcc 3.3 snuck into stable for x86 a few days ago with no
 fanfare...

 [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.2-r5 [3.2.3-r3]

 Can I assume that upgrading is painless?  The move from 3.1 to 3.2 was
 pretty bad IIRC due to binary incompatibility or something, but I'd like
 to know if it's safe to upgrade without b0rking my server.

If you do get any bad behaviour, run ldconfig.
All fine here.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAKBivInuLMrk7bIwRApJnAJ4rYGs+9CrF/DqrWL9vFfmtGsETVgCfT5wD
GRj7x9TodIVWVGJ7coVmXB8=
=rPFj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Where is mod_python update?

2004-02-07 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 08 February 2004 00:38, rd wrote:
 There is a security update to mod_python.  GWN said to issue the
 following command after an emerge sync:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] # emerge -pv =dev-python/mod_python-2.7.10

  These are the packages that I would merge, in order: 

 Calculating dependencies
 !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy =dev-python/mod_python-2.7.10 have
 been masked.

 !!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct.
 

 What's up?  I am running apache 1 not 2.  Here is the content of my
 personal mask/unmask files

I presume you are already using mod_python?

redshat root # emerge -pv =dev-python/mod_python-2.7.10

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

With my upto date portage (2.0.50), I get this:

Calculating dependencies
!!! all ebuilds that could satisfy =dev-python/mod_python-2.7.10 have been 
masked.
!!! possible candidates are:
- - dev-python/mod_python-2.7.10 (masked by: ~keyword)
- - dev-python/mod_python-3.0.4-r1 (masked by: ~keyword)
- - dev-python/mod_python-3.0.4-r2 (masked by: ~keyword)
- - dev-python/mod_python-3.0.4 (masked by: ~keyword)

!!! Error calculating dependencies. Please correct.

I don't have mod_python installed.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAJYV1InuLMrk7bIwRAukEAKCn1s07o+jc2mr5xVc9k0BC785D1ACdF6rv
YOTZNE5KMUiVYSzJqDOBHYQ=
=W5SJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] requirements of an installed package

2004-02-06 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 06 February 2004 10:49, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 How can I find the packages that were required
 during the installation of a package?

 This question arose when unmerging a package
 that possibly required several other packages
 when it was installed. I would like to unmerge
 packages that were installed as a requirement
 and are not needed.

emerge depclean -p
CHECK THE OUTPUT, and take heed of the warning
emerge depclean
ONLY IF OK! Otherwise unmerge manually.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAI5J2InuLMrk7bIwRArvfAKChPFdrjgXpuU8DjhWoJsWdkK5IswCffuaC
ZfTilgv/jF6zPaRF6XXkLEQ=
=eG/9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible mysql performance on gentoo (SOLVED - myisamchk to the rescue!)

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 03:59, Alan wrote:

 *sigh*
 Never mind, still sucks.  Turns out I forgot to restart the mysql server
 after running the above command, and ab and wget happily returned pages,
 just ones that had no data on them.

 Oh well, back to looking

I'd go for a nice vanilla kernel next.
Then check for query logging, the extra IO could be hurting it.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIPT3InuLMrk7bIwRAhNZAJ9ETV/Hc4ohTYH8hgfj1W24TRfp9ACeMPW6
N2dwSK8acbis01JZSNLiqbg=
=TZqz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] unmerge with deps

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:35, Marcello Mezzanotti wrote:
 i would like to know, if its possible to unmerge a package with all
 packs that depends or any way it warns about a package that depends of
 it

If you merge it with 'emerge package', then once you've unmerged it you should 
be able to clean it's dependancies with 'emerge depclean'.
If you merge it with 'emerge depdancy1 dependacy 2 package', the each package 
will either need to be unmerge specifically, or take a look 
at /var/cache/edb/world, remove the entries you no longer want, and try 
'emerge depclean' again.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIRMpInuLMrk7bIwRAmNBAKCmI3BDWGfhB3s0u8HNUg3FrCklwACfe5di
dn3JfLeG/tVFNDz9IoS1iDI=
=+vl+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] unmerge with deps

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:59, Nickolay Savchenko wrote:
 No! Don't do it! _NEVER_ use emerge depclean, it can corrupt your
 system. At first do 'emerge -p depclean' and then unmerge unwanted
 packages.

The big fat warning when you run depclean should scare enough :)

If the list is fine, then just let it do it's work.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIRoJInuLMrk7bIwRAopyAJsGJozmsVthMyYqEwoGHfLSXiW5jACgp3xm
36uTiHznT3oGCCjbqAElvEg=
=tY9n
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] how are the eth's created

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 22:08, Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 The result from lspci on my laptop shows two
 ethernet interfaces. One is on the port replicator,
 and the other (functional) is on the laptop chassi.

 02:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev
 78) 08:04.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100]
 (rev 08)

 I've been trying to configure the interface on the port replicator
 but no luck. I do have eth0 to configure but eth1 does not exist.
 How are those created anyway?  Anybody with past experience on that?

I wish I *knew* how the interfaces are numbered, but if you keep the drivers 
as modules (or 1 of), you can force the order.
i.e. compile the 3x59x into the kernel, and the eepro100 as a module. The 
kernel will have support for the 3com during boot assigning it eth0, loading 
eepro100 later will give it eth1.

Alternatively, leave both drivers as modules, and in /etc/modules.d/aliases 
add:
alias eth0 3c59x
alias eth1 eepro100

Once you've 'update-modules''d, don't try to automatically load the modules, 
as when something tries to access either eth0 or eth1 the module will 
automatically be loaded.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIXYnInuLMrk7bIwRAngPAKCQqVUzTRvR3MdZ9/wHxdnmLOgm2ACfenJ1
r/oQCSP+yTEmyg5NPq6TADM=
=93eb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ~x86 emerge: broke emerge

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 22:06, Kurt Guenther wrote:
 tumbleweed root # emerge
 /usr/bin/python: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++.so.5:
 cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
 tumbleweed root #


 Is there a way to fix emerge?

The file 'missing' is part of gcc!
What does your '/etc/ld.so.conf' contain? And what version of gcc are you 
running?

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIXfkInuLMrk7bIwRAjyTAJ9aocgScim2+Cdn4/aL31d6uUhbmACdFees
WrziQ2ZMqQTTYZd6k6JCn1o=
=PfN0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6.1/2 and Alsa Question

2004-02-04 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 05 February 2004 00:08, Mark Knecht wrote:
 Hi,
If I emerge a 2.6.1 kernel, but then compile it with sound support but
 do NOT enable any Alsa options, will emerge believe I have Alsa installed?

I NEED to upgrade Alsa and run with 2.6.1. I caught a post on a
 different list where someone said they did this on a non-Gentoo system. It
 would seem to me that portage/emerge doesn't keep track of what options I
 enable in the kernel, so as long as I build Alsa on the side using the
 newest CVS and run it with my non-Alsa Gentoo 2.6.1 kernel it should work.

Does anyone see any problems?

Do I need to emerge anything else to make this work?

2.6 sources PROVIDE virtual/alsa, so you'll probably have to 
edit /var/cache/edb/virtuals
Unless the alsa-driver ebuild has some other method to prevent you from 
installing while running a 2.6 kernel, go for it.

You mention alsa from cvs, if that means you'll be building it manually, 
ignore what I just said and just go for it.
As you'll be working outside of portage, what portage does or does not know 
about isn't relevant.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIZP8InuLMrk7bIwRAo4SAJ9Z2NaBFAw+O3/0v7OKKFTuVeDNYQCgovWQ
tEttwZIi2h2g2yX4e8kqThc=
=o3WC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] grep rotated-log ?

2004-02-03 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 16:08, raptor wrote:
 is there a easy way to grep rotated logs... when they are gziped...
 I mean a quick way.. i.e. ready console tool..

bzgrep for bzip2
zgrep for gzip

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAH9LvInuLMrk7bIwRAvO+AKCF9vpToGA+GimX0lueMGKeN3EkeQCffDS8
CIiLMUvmAwcwgzcXZPNBPj0=
=HXxA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ~x86 ?

2004-02-03 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 19:34, Rick [Kitty5] wrote:
 Anyone running with ~x86 set system wide?

 Good, bad, simply broken?

2 boxes, neither less than 2-3 days out of date, running fine.
(1 is a dell p4 with nvidia card, 5336 drivers, but no graphic heavy apps).

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAH/rFInuLMrk7bIwRAkSNAJwKPNLwfDGog4owySQ1Ed15cIIhLgCfRKKL
jKuS0c9U6s05wrTlFgaLkic=
=DyHb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] horrible mysql performance on gentoo

2004-02-03 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 03 February 2004 23:25, Alan wrote:
 Hi guys... still in the middle of getting a server cut over from debian
 to gentoo and I just found some serious performance problems with mysql.

 My new hardware is a dual p3 1.13Ghz system with 2G of ECC ram running
 kernel 2.6.1 (gentoo-dev-sources) with preempt compiled.

I stopped reading here.
Get rid of preempt, it's only useful on a desktop and makes a right mess of a 
server.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIC6AInuLMrk7bIwRAiQbAJ9+cdCUjzAiabh4ZCOZcEYoCoj7vQCcDfeR
GGUYGyGP20dSEZXuD1GoLRk=
=0YAK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] qmail-scanner and spamassassin config

2004-02-01 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 01 February 2004 08:10, LJN wrote:

  I now use qpsmtpd which with fairly simple modification allows you to add
  the headers you want.

 Ok,is the current spamassassin config ok for that?

Possibly.
The spamassassin plugin talks directly to spamd, by default sending it 
'REPORT_IFSPAM SPAMC/1.0' which will basically make it answer yes or no.
I changed it to send 'SYMBOLS SPAMC/1.0', then split the output up to give me:
X-Comodo-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00

The subject is modified to what is specified in the plugin, NOT spamassassins 
config.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHNY1InuLMrk7bIwRAkjnAJoC5XblyDgq+17AmLpt3eGzrjdxZwCeJsck
Rim1hexiZjQR3QbVgZDhYOg=
=FroJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] viruses

2004-02-01 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 01 February 2004 16:01, Peter Wu wrote:
  Google doesn't.  A couple of mailing list archivers archive the gentoo
  lists, and google harvests the data just like it does any other data on
  the web. Anything in the archives, of course, can be harvested by
  malicious spammers.  I'm surprised that my address is not harvested more
  often than it is.

 Can anyone from Gentoo.org to talk to Gentoo so that the email address is
 masked when gated to the newsgroup archive on Google?

Gentoo.org IS gentoo.
And no, they can't, they don't operate the mail - news gateway.
It's also totally irrelevant anyway, as there is little doubt that spammers 
are subscribed to the group. There are also at least 2 mail - web gateways 
archiving the list, and not munging addresses.

I hate spam as much as the next guy, but once they've got your address there 
is little you can do, either ignore it, or filter it.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHSZ2InuLMrk7bIwRAkswAJ91qYntbHuhe6KqVaLtnqvUJS2IQwCfa/wY
WE6lUO0DR3C2r1EBW+itl0w=
=XYeD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] dual Xeon setup

2004-02-01 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 01 February 2004 23:10, Robert G. Waycott wrote:
 Hey Gentoo Users. I am sure that there are some dual-Xeon users out there,
 so I'd like your input. I am putting together a dual 2.0GHz Xeon rig
 here--Foster core--with 1Gb RDRAM on an IWill DP400 mainboard. Anybody have
 experience with these? 

For sure, but not me :)

 Do they run well on Gentoo? 

Gentoo is Linux, and Linux has had SMP support for donkeys years.
I do have 2 dual Xeon boxes at work, unfortunantly the company distro of 
choice is Suse. Luckily this choice is only for web platform boxes I don't 
admin (which the dual xeons are), the firewalls, mailservers, and other 
office bound servers are mine so run gentoo as I get time to reinstall them.
Getting back to the point, the dual Xeons perform nicely and due to HT the OS 
sees 4 CPU's.

 Right now, my system is  
 a dual Pentium-III 933MHz rig, so everything on my system has been built
 with -march=pentium3. I am assuming that I will need to change to
 -march=pentium4, since these are Pentium4 Xeons, right? 

They are, but pentium3 is fine.

 Anything else I 
 should think about? 

Nope.

 Any suggestions for the CFLAGS? 

May aswell leave them as is.

 Just to double check  
 myself, I will need to rebuild the whole system, right?

Nope, just add SMP (and whatever other new hardware) support, and you are good 
to go.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHYiWInuLMrk7bIwRAofjAKCMP4ZwZN1ZGvsCk7ex32MAVUhrCgCffFl2
bCgp6xhpFdEuVbx0ZQJxASc=
=G2er
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Software raid

2004-01-31 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 31 January 2004 05:37, Ted Ozolins wrote:
 Before I totally mess things up, in order to use software raid (raid 1)
 do I have to select the partitions as a raid before the install? I have
 two identical drives with 50 megs at the begining of each drive for
 /boot . Do I have to start over with fdisk and redo the install? Do I
 sound rather confused, that s because right now I am:) Any pointers info
 rtfm welcome

Read the HOWTO first:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO.html
Specifically this page:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Software-RAID-HOWTO-7.html#ss7.6
I converted /home to a raid1 array using basically that method.

http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Boot+Root+Raid+LILO.html should help with info on 
booting / off RAID (continue to use grub though)

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAG/MGInuLMrk7bIwRAgVBAJ0bykEZDdWqF4Y89ATVcwJjHFT9GwCgmSr3
rn82cD3wiALKCaNEvEINInw=
=TAoO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] qmail-scanner and spamassassin config

2004-01-31 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 31 January 2004 21:03, LJN wrote:
 ok am i wrong or shouldn't this config add the extra header tags to all
 mail(not just spam)? if so, do you have any idea why it's not working?

Yes, no.
qmail-scanner only asks for the score from spamd, so heading settings in 
spamassassin config don't have any effect.
I now use qpsmtpd which with fairly simple modification allows you to add the 
headers you want.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAHCWfInuLMrk7bIwRAsz1AJ9eSDaRCGmYUgZZQAzwZcT1OksQegCff5od
kKrsHLRkEh5WbIlIRhJFG2w=
=dnYI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DNS setup

2004-01-29 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 29 January 2004 19:54, Andrew Gaffney wrote:

 How can I verify this is working from the box running dnsmasq? All of the
 other boxes are Windows and I'm not onsite. Is there a tool that will query
 a DNS server directly? If I use ping or something, it consults the
 /etc/hosts first, which defeats the purpose.

host host.to.lookup server.to.lookup.on
dig @server.to.lookup.on host.to.lookup

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGWzmInuLMrk7bIwRAqRBAJ460ISRriRfLKBaNDnA0r3pp/xB9ACffyeh
goIgnHuKbk/YcHosUuSlnUw=
=mjLk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] browsing windows network shares

2004-01-29 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 29 January 2004 03:49, David H. Askew wrote:
 I've setup lisa and started it.  Lisa finds the win2k host, but when I go
 to browse it, it asks for a username and password.  Ok you might say, enter
 your username and password, but nothing I enter works.

 the work-laptop is part of my work domain, and my gentoo laptop is not

 what else might I need to do ?  the gentoo laptop sees the smb service
 running on the win2k laptop but is unable to browse ..

 .. any help would be appreciated

Tell lisa that the workgroup is your domain.
- From samba's point of view, certainly as a client, workgroups and domains are 
the same.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGW3fInuLMrk7bIwRAkrqAJ41au0qZyyv67NQhCaa+s9p+ziY8QCgnasM
VKCXfyXlTfHHgyV1Bi3jtlQ=
=2Y+d
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] recommended SATA controllers

2004-01-28 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 27 January 2004 23:16, Ajay Sharma wrote:

 I would go with a 3ware SATA card.  My gentoo install went smooth with
 my WD SATA drive because the 3ware card was detected on boot.  Get that,
 no funky patches or anything as the 3ware drivers have been in the
 default kernel for quite some time.  This is my second 3ware card that I
 put Linux on and I'm just amazed at how easy it was.

- From what I've heard about 3ware I can concur with Ajay's recommendation.

Here comes the hijack, sorry :)
Does anyone know a good online retailer in the UK who sells these things?
I once found a crappy looking re-seller, but was put off by the terrible 
website and lack of information.

Cheers

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF4cUInuLMrk7bIwRAo80AJ4r9a5n+FebYZAsTGcP2hXAKdE3OwCgrzag
fty3clE17enOgmnBgcBfIKQ=
=U/x1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] New way to finance OSS development

2004-01-28 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 09:59, Leonid Podolny wrote:

 The auction _was_ cancelled. Someone care to tell what it was?

A windows xp 'New Folder'

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF4uwInuLMrk7bIwRAtL/AJ9bs5W1Bs2WI3dV7iqjz/zd+achZgCffPW+
wgkBJ6Spv/NrbNJhwABLL5I=
=ESCG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Virus protection for Evolution users

2004-01-28 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 15:29, Mark Knecht wrote:
 Hi,
Although I'm not going to be personally infected by this new Windows
 worm, it would be nice not to forward it on to others and have them mad at
 me for the fact they use Windows. What package should I look at emerging to
 add virus protection to Evolution?

Why would you forward the virus onto anyone, when you are immune?

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF9YpInuLMrk7bIwRAk9CAJ9YtLofPmyWCPOUJQk9FTQs+MC/vgCgipOJ
EUHhbl7v2HtJtD5nQ+ruZf0=
=Cne7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] i686 Live CD does not run i686 binaries?

2004-01-26 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 26 January 2004 11:15, Ronald Pijnacker wrote:
 Hi!

 Yesterday I tried out the i686 LiveCD for my laptop with a K6 processor.

 First of all, I am a bit confused on whether or not the K6 will run i686
 correctly. Some sources on the internet say yes, others no.
 However, the LiveCD boots fine, so I thought all was OK.

 However after installing stage3 and the prebuild backages, I did

 $ chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash

 and I got an Illegal instruction.
 So, apparently my K6 processor has problems with i686 anyway.

 This surprised me a bit, since I expected the LiveCD to also run i686
 compiled binaries. Ergo: if it boots, it will also run after installing
 from the harddrive. No such luck, though.

 Any comments?

IIRC the K6 IS an i586, but is so close to an i686 somethings will work.
Also, the LiveCD's could be compiled -mcpu=i686 so optimized for i686 but not 
breaking compatability with old arches, but I'm just guessing on that.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAFPpHInuLMrk7bIwRArTXAJ9s9MIxDBiRG/iEcq1MwXgEkPq+kgCdErOe
xGANes2HInJk2ZpbUe5P2Uc=
=CxlE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] iptables error

2004-01-26 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 26 January 2004 11:28, Catalin Constantin wrote:
 i get the following error when trying to add an iptables rule.

 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: unresolved
 symbol nf_unregister_sockopt
 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: unresolved
 symbol nf_register_sockopt
 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod
 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o failed
 /lib/modules/2.4.22/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.o: insmod ip_tables
 failed iptables v1.2.8: can't initialize iptables table `filter': iptables
 who? (do you need to insmod?) Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be
 upgraded.

 gentoo root # epm -qf /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/
 vanilla-sources-2.4.22

 any hints ?

Something b0rked in your kernel compile.
I'd backup your .config, make mrproper. copy back the .config and re-'make dep 
 make bzImage  make modules modules_install', copy new kernel and reboot.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAFPyJInuLMrk7bIwRAp6EAJ94K9uciK2R8KxqI3u42rRSNpBvbgCfaWVW
gkVFoXj1CJmwHIc1DsSXbmc=
=cJ17
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gzip compressed gnome sources

2004-01-25 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 25 January 2004 12:09, Yannick Le Saint (kyncani) wrote:

  You could recompress them as bzip2

  for f in /usr/portage/distfiles/*.gz; do
gzip -d $f  bzip2 ${f%.gz} || echo failed $f
  done

The MD5sums will almost certainly not match now, so portage still won't be 
able to use them.
For each ebuild you have source for you'll need to regenerate the digest.
ebuild /usr/portage/gnome-stuff/gnomebuild1/gnomebuild1-2.0.4.ebuild digest

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFAE7JFInuLMrk7bIwRAiRJAJ9kTtbI0QSqAESsL8CFB3ly6sX5OACXUpl2
nV8XIQ/WwCE91gChCfJCOg==
=2Bme
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo and iptables

2004-01-25 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 25 January 2004 16:52, Roy Kidder wrote:
 I'm having a hard time figuring out how Gentoo loads its iptables rules
 via the init script. I've edited /var/lib/iptables/rules-save (adding
 rules allowing inbound DHCP, inboubt tcp with the established bit set,
 etc, etc) and then run /etc/init.d/iptables start which looks like it
 runs just fine (it loads the modules ip_tables and iptable_filter). But
 when I look at the tables (iptables-save), all I get is this:


 If I add the same rules from hand via the command line, it works just
 fine, however.

 Anyone have any idea?

iptables-save/restore don't use the command line syntax exactly.
Start iptables, add the rules you want, then /etc/init.d/iptables save, and 
next time you start it your rules will be put back.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAE/VgInuLMrk7bIwRAhxpAJ9vxmbq4JIa8AN6ola5fm5kkXFbQACeISBo
2HgoONDQIWVd8cI2PJ7HhiU=
=34e6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] alsa sound not great

2004-01-25 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 25 January 2004 17:49, Tom Martin wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
 Charset: ISO-8859-1
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Erm, Tom ... ? :)

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAFAIYInuLMrk7bIwRAuqCAJ9QI+mTouguKfHrv3FXyTZj/e9/jgCeMQfc
RqpSZmKr2Lg44sKuoiQZuv4=
=R0/7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Searching OpenOffice documents

2004-01-23 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 23 January 2004 19:43, Norbert Kamenicky wrote:

 Since all the text is in one xml formated line, grep will
 print complete text (if matches).
 Some workaround is needed before grep ...

 these steps are needed:



Or just add -o to grep :)

   -o, --only-matching
  Show only the part of a matching line that matches PATTERN.


- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAEXxiInuLMrk7bIwRAlRmAJ0aaGp45LT3GXO/pymct1qKoSGKvACfZi1A
HUg+NCsbKlcDdfZo4fcYSAM=
=itvY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.4 starting at level 3

2004-01-23 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 23 January 2004 19:35, Kurt Guenther wrote:
 My inittab is set to just come up as level 3, so I don't incure the
 overhead of an X session that I don't use.  However, after the latest
 sync, the system boots into a beautiful Gentoo Login screen.   How do I
 switch levels on this?

Gentoo doesn't start, or not-start, X by init runlevels.
If the xdm init script is set to start it will start.
rc-update del xdm/rc-update add xdm default

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAEXwQInuLMrk7bIwRAgSoAJ448fONbQ/wML2yoaptzMBEVqI7jwCfVSCi
sPnVv79uwMQiBPYqgl+NzDc=
=GaIH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] depencie problem

2004-01-23 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 23 January 2004 16:49, Christophe Daguin wrote:
 Hi,

   When I use the command revdep-rebuild I have a problem with
 dependencies :

 emerge: there are no masked or unmasked ebuilds to satisfy
 =x11-libs/openmotif-2.2.2-r1

 I've look in my portage tree and effectively there is no package with that
 name.

 How can I fix this problem ?

Delete all the .revdep* files, and run 'revdep-rebuild -X', it now should just 
try to re-merge the packages instead of the exact version.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAEWKhInuLMrk7bIwRAua8AJ9k5tiuqjOHdCA8+cmjqI0fCPZ05gCfbH9D
ocvxVgZg1TtXSC/t3l9cCA4=
=NeIi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge updating world

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 January 2004 00:33, Thomas Degris wrote:
 Hello,

 I would like to know if there is some way for asking to emerge to
 continue to update the packages for the target world, even if one of
 them failed to build.

'emerge --resume', or if the error continues to occur 'emerge --resume 
- --skipfirst'. Both these will work for any updates or installs.
There is no way to do it automatically, and I doubt there ever will be.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAC8f/InuLMrk7bIwRAjEuAJoD4IdiWTPzlMcHoZXES0d2oSCY2wCfQame
uY/vY+7d7zBrE5Ixq3dLjug=
=pwxV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] where is /proc/config

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 January 2004 00:59, Norbert Kamenicky wrote:
 Hi,

 I tried to get configuration param's from running
 2.4.22-gentoo-r5 kernel, but /proc/config do not exist.

 modprobe config  fails with can't locate ...

 Do somebody know where is the responsible item
 for /proc/config in menuconfig ? I can't find it ...

It's in General Setup, but hasn't been around for long.
My 2.4.23-ck1 kernel doesn't have the option, a 2.6.0-test6 does though. Don't 
have any in between available to check.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAC8emInuLMrk7bIwRAntAAJ9+I8kC6aC1Wkt8kYbSVdq8gYq/wACghqq2
7e3VlJSYQHfZmF8zq3DIsro=
=nJRF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] regenerating messages from emerge

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 January 2004 15:09, Mark Knecht wrote:
 Hi,
I did an emerge of perl on my home box this morning. There was a message
 on my screen about running some program to look for packages that needed to
 be rebuilt or relinked with this new version. I'm at work now and want to
 regenerate that message. How can I do that without re-emerging perl again?

Look at the ebuild in /var/db/pkg/dev-perl/perlsomething/perlsomething.ebuild

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAC/bmInuLMrk7bIwRArp5AKCPiBtluMA8x2gCBYAhJUV5p6kDPACeMd2M
gIg5cMLWOKcvByjCb6z5usY=
=A+1K
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] alsa and kernel 2.6 question

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 January 2004 19:37, Ian Truelsen wrote:
 With the alsa modules now built into 2.6, should I load the snd_*
 modules with the alsasound init script or via the modules.autoload?

The init script.
- From a module perspective nothing has changed. The modules are still named the 
same, and end up in roughly the same place (depmod sorts out the actual 
location)

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFADDZQInuLMrk7bIwRAlPkAKCnRLkPH/7ewtVqmbygNOUBU8lwhgCdGMed
lVpwOJyFnoomEM6EL7AJGJQ=
=hBNc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DRBD Version

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 January 2004 20:19, Frank R Callaghan wrote:
 Thanks Mike,

 Still one little problem !

 - ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY -
 LOG FILE = /tmp/sandbox-drbd-0.6.10-29575.log

 open_wr:   /lib/modules/2.4.22/modules.dep
 -

 plinux sys-cluster # ls -al /lib/modules/2.4.22/modules.dep
 -rw-r--r--1 root root62336 Jan 19 14:22
 /lib/modules/2.4.22/modules.dep

 Any clues what my problem is now ?

Out of my league I'm afraid :)
The Makefile is trying to open /lib/modules/2.4.22/modules.dep which is 
outside the sandbox, so it can't.
I suspect the Makefile needs modifying to either not attempt to 
access /lib/modules/2.4.22/modules.dep, access a fake version inside the 
sandbox, or simply disable the sandbox (FEATURES=-sandbox emerge ...).

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFADELVInuLMrk7bIwRAqS1AJ9mRySir7ObpLjp/B3i77NFucpdxgCeMK8r
3ZwBVPOxiJ42dN1W7h6jd2M=
=dvIJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] DRBD Version

2004-01-16 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 16 January 2004 17:29, Frank R Callaghan wrote:
 Ok two questions,
 1) how do we get this version included in the portage tree ?

Add a bug to http://bugs.gentoo.org/

 2) I did as you suggested but the build failed :-
 plinux # cp /usr/portage/sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-0.6.6-r2.ebuild
 /usr/local/portage/sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-0.6.10.ebuild
 plinux # ebuild /usr/local/portage/sys-cluster/drbd/drbd-0.6.10.ebuild
 digest

/usr/portage/sys-cluster/drbd/files/0.6.10-Makefile.vars.patch is attached

Then change the ebuild like:

src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd ${S}
epatch ${FILESDIR}/0.6.10-Makefile.vars.patch
#   epatch ${FILESDIR}/0.6.6-drbd-Makefile.patch
epatch ${FILESDIR}/0.6.6-scripts-Makefile.patch
}

I only fixed the errors during unpacking, I've no way to test it!

Good luck.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFACEP1InuLMrk7bIwRAqOBAJ0U/jRwx5ImaNfaTl93+rOK4+qqMACeNffh
uTRYmo1fPUlgiLXrIOftgiI=
=9U30
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- Makefile.vars.orig	2004-01-16 19:48:31.196580304 +
+++ Makefile.vars	2004-01-16 19:54:29.963039512 +
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 # export all variables not explicitly _un_exported
 export
 
-PREFIX  := /
+#PREFIX  := /
 
 CC   	:= gcc
 USERFLAGS	:= -Wall $(DEBUGFLAGS)
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@
   $(if $(wildcard /etc/redhat-release),redhat,\
   $(if $(wildcard /etc/slackware-version),slackware,\
   $(if $(wildcard /etc/ROCK-VERSION),rock,\
-  $(if $(wildcard /var/lib/YaST*),suse,))
+  $(if $(wildcard /var/lib/YaST*),suse,\
+  $(if $(wildcard /etc/gentoo-release),gentoo,)))
 
 SUBDIRS = user documentation scripts benchmark drbd #testing
 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] DRBD Version

2004-01-16 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 16 January 2004 17:29, Frank R Callaghan wrote:

  emerge (1 of 1) sys-cluster/drbd-0.6.10 to /
  md5 src_uri ;-) drbd-0.6.10.tar.gz
  Unpacking source...
  Unpacking drbd-0.6.10.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/drbd-0.6.10/work

 /usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: line 20: cd:
 /var/tmp/portage/drbd-0.6.10/work/drbd-0.6.10: No such file or directory

Doh
The 0.6.10 tarball from linbit is b0rked, changed the SRC_URI to 
http://www.drbd.org/uploads/media/drbd-${PV}.tar.gz, delete the old file, and 
redo the digest.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFACEbFInuLMrk7bIwRAk8rAJ48UBtqgvdScEbytP5LLggjrv7RzgCglwD6
WXxij3dtCddMHFXEfrhqF30=
=CZ52
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading KDE

2004-01-15 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 15 January 2004 20:58, Simon Prosser wrote:
 On Thursday 15 January 2004 20:42, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
  Anybody having any luck with 3.2 beta?

 I use the kde-cvs ebuilds and have no probs at all...

Same here, last week konqy would crash if loading 2 or more big images in 
separate tabs, the email section in control centre would crash too.
That's about the worst I've ever had, and I try to update once a week or so.

- -- 
Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABwB9InuLMrk7bIwRAlxsAJ9je9qDN+k74DLHbQDw2Ms8tjNvbgCfcYer
2mbD41uaNkP6W4/TNW7ysZA=
=9Jp1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



  1   2   3   4   5   >