Re: [gentoo-user] old cyrus-imapd from overlay

2012-02-29 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2012-02-29 08:23, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
 Stefan,
 
 I haven't had problems with upgrading, but I didn't wait this long.
 Eg. I didn't migrate from 2.1 to 2.4 directly.

*SIGH* ;-)

 I would suggest you check on the cyrus-imap mailing list (see bottom of
 email) for tips. Installing it is simple, but there are a few changes with
 some of the files.
 
 A safer method would be running the 2 versions in parallel and using
 imapsync or something similar to copy the email over to the new version.

Sure, yes. I have to research how to do that for hundreds of mailboxes
in one command ...

I have 2.4.12 on the newer box already, will look that up asap.

Thanks, Stefan



Re: [gentoo-user] old cyrus-imapd from overlay

2012-02-29 Thread J. Roeleveld

On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:10 am, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
 Am 2012-02-29 08:23, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
 Stefan,

 I haven't had problems with upgrading, but I didn't wait this long.
 Eg. I didn't migrate from 2.1 to 2.4 directly.

 *SIGH* ;-)

 I would suggest you check on the cyrus-imap mailing list (see bottom of
 email) for tips. Installing it is simple, but there are a few changes
 with
 some of the files.

 A safer method would be running the 2 versions in parallel and using
 imapsync or something similar to copy the email over to the new version.

 Sure, yes. I have to research how to do that for hundreds of mailboxes
 in one command ...

There is an example for this on the project homepage:
http://imapsync.lamiral.info/
All you need is the usernames/passwords for the different users.

 I have 2.4.12 on the newer box already, will look that up asap.

If you want to still try to copy the mail over, you need to look into
converting the *.db files.

-- 
Joost




Re: [gentoo-user] old cyrus-imapd from overlay

2012-02-29 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 2012-02-29 09:35, schrieb J. Roeleveld:
 
 On Wed, February 29, 2012 9:10 am, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
 Sure, yes. I have to research how to do that for hundreds of
 mailboxes in one command ...
 
 There is an example for this on the project homepage: 
 http://imapsync.lamiral.info/ All you need is the usernames/passwords
 for the different users.

hmm, found it already, thanks ... a bit uncomfortable.
I would have to extract user/pws from the mysql-DB ... but they are
crypted there afaik ... will look at my DB-backups now.


 I have 2.4.12 on the newer box already, will look that up asap.
 
 If you want to still try to copy the mail over, you need to look
 into converting the *.db files.

Thanks for the hint.
S





Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:38:13 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Alex Schuster wrote:
  Dale writes:
  
  I have a question on this.  I have a drive that I use for movies
  and such.  There is nothing OS related on that drive.  Would it be
  safe to set this to say 1% or even 0? 
  
  I'd say 1% is okay. For 0% I'm not sure, I avoid that, but maybe
  there will be no noticeable difference at all. 
  
  Also, it is already set up with LVM and
  ext4.  Can I change it even while there is data on there?
  
  Sure! Cool, isn't it. Just call lvresize -L
  +1G /dev/mapper/whatever or something, and then
  resize2fs /dev/mapper/whatever.
 
 
 I was talking about the command to change the superuser reserves.  I
 know how to make LVM bigger but wanted to make sure this can be run
 even when there is data on there.  Basically, can I run:
 
 tune2fs -m 1 /dev/data/data1
 
 Which is where the ext4 file system is on the LVM.  After I run that
 then I can expand LVM from there, I hope it works that easy.

They don't interfere with each other.

LVM and the size of the filesystem is one thing. Reserved space is
something else, completely unrelated.


 
 
  Wonko
  
  
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 



-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:10:05 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Neil Bothwick wrote:
  On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:38:13 -0600, Dale wrote:
  
  tune2fs -m 1 /dev/data/data1
 
  Which is where the ext4 file system is on the LVM.  After I run
  that then I can expand LVM from there, I hope it works that easy.
  
  It does.
  
  
 
 
 Apparently I am missing something then.  I looked at cfdisk for the
 drive. It reported  right at 750Gb as it should with the change.
 Thing is, I can't get anything else to add it or to even show it is
 available. Some results somewhat shortened:
 
 From cfdisk
 
  750156.38Mb
 
 root@fireball / # pvs
   PV VG   Fmt  Attr PSize   PFree
   /dev/sdc1  data lvm2 a--  698.63g0
 root@fireball / # vgs
   VG   #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize   VFree
   data   1   1   0 wz--n- 698.63g0
 root@fireball / # lvs
   LVVG   Attr   LSize   Origin Snap%  Move Log Copy%  Convert
   data1 data -wi-ao 698.63g
 root@fireball / #
 
 
 So, cfdisk is happy with the change but nothing else seems to see it.
 What am I missing here?  Where did the 50Gbs go to?
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)
 

Nowhere.

Disk manufacturers measure kilos of data as 1000
Everyone else measures it in 1024

They do this because it fudges disk sizes to appear 2.4% bigger than
they really are. 

When you get into TB drives, it gets worse as 1024*1024*1024*1024
differs from 1000*1000*1000*1000 bu a lot more than 2.4%

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:00 +0100
Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:

 Neil Bothwick writes:
 
  On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:01:50 +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
  
   If you instantly need more space, reduce the amount of reserved
   space for the superuser, which is 5% as default:
   tune2fs -m 2 /dev/your/partition
   Don't reduce it to 0, the lower this value is, the more
   fragmentation you will get.
  
  Why is that? I would have expected more usable space to reduce the
  need for fragmentation. I routinely use 0 on non-system filesystems.
 
 I read this often, and to me it seems to make sense. When a file
 system is nearly full, writing a last big file will make the file
 being cluttered along all those tiny places where some free space is
 still left. And this probably already happens to some extent before
 the filesystem is completely full. 
 
 Now, which values for reserved percentage are good, I don't know.

The 5% figure is completely arbitrary and dates back many years. There
was no good reason then for it to be exactly 5%, it just happened to
mostly work fine. Remember that was a time when 250M was a BIG drive. 5%
is 2.5K and that is about the size of the largest single file people
realistically were using.

So 5% wiggle room for root lets you manipulate the last single file
you were using when the drive filled up, and hence save the day. These
days 2TB file systems are common and 5% means 20G.

How many 20G files do you routinely have on a single file system? Media
drives aside, a few meg is still about the broad average file size. It
is just not realistic to reserve emergency wiggle room for root that
amounts to 20,000 average files.

It means there's no single sane default anymore. On my servers I set
reserved space to 100M or so as that's what I need. I reckon the
average person should keep it to somewhat larger than the biggest
single file you expect to store on that file system.


 
 This probably depends much on the typical size of files on that
 partition, and usage patterns. For large movies on your data
 partition, it probably does not matter, but for my system partitions
 (/root, /usr, /var, /tmp, portage stuff) I just keep it at 5%.
 
 With the benefit that I can instantly free some space in /var when
 it's just become full, without needing to decide what to delete.
 Okay, in practice this does not matter much because resizing the LVM
 and resizing the FS is also a matter of seconds only.
 
   Wonko
 



-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:10:05 -0600, Dale wrote:

  tune2fs -m 1 /dev/data/data1
 
  Which is where the ext4 file system is on the LVM.  After I run that
  then I can expand LVM from there, I hope it works that easy.  
  
  It does.

 Apparently I am missing something then.  I looked at cfdisk for the
 drive. It reported  right at 750Gb as it should with the change.  Thing
 is, I can't get anything else to add it or to even show it is available.

cfdisk deals with disk partitions, not filesystems. That's like buying
bigger socks and complaining that your shoes are still too tight.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

WITLAG: The delay between delivery and comprehension of a joke.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:29:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

 It means there's no single sane default anymore. On my servers I set
 reserved space to 100M or so as that's what I need. I reckon the
 average person should keep it to somewhat larger than the biggest
 single file you expect to store on that file system.

Do you mean the biggest single file you expect root to store on that
filesystem? Is there any point in reserving space for root on a
filesystem root does not need to write to, such as /home?


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Very funny Scotty.. now beam down my pants!


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:57:19 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:29:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
 
  It means there's no single sane default anymore. On my servers I set
  reserved space to 100M or so as that's what I need. I reckon the
  average person should keep it to somewhat larger than the biggest
  single file you expect to store on that file system.
 
 Do you mean the biggest single file you expect root to store on that
 filesystem? Is there any point in reserving space for root on a
 filesystem root does not need to write to, such as /home?
 
 

No, I mean the biggest file.

When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user
that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the
$LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
probably by shuffling stuff around.

There are other cases where root might want some reserved space too,
but fixing full drives is the only case I've ever encountered. 

-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:40:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

 When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user
 that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the
 $LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
 probably by shuffling stuff around.

I've never failed to fix that by deleting a file as the user that created
it, usually the partial file that caused the problem, but I can see why
you may want to keep a small amount reserved for that.

However, I still don't get the -m 0 increases fragmentation thing.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

My friends went to alt.california, and all they brought
me was this lousy sig.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Help! HP625 WLAN is driving me nuts

2012-02-29 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi,

I'm trying to get WLAN working on my HP625 laptop.
I've checked several web pages but I'm lost.

I'm using a recent kernel  (3.3-rc5+).
I configured CONFIG_BRCMUTIL=m CONFIG_BRCMSMAC=m CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m  and 
I installed the coresponding firmware in /lib/firmware/brcm

Now, lspci -k  shows
06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n 
Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01)
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 145c
Kernel driver in use: bcma-pci-bridge


and even

iwconfig shows
wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn  ESSID:off/any  
  Mode:Managed  Access Point: Not-Associated   Tx-Power=0 dBm   
  Retry  long limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
  Encryption key:off
  Power Management:on


I have net.wlan0 symlinked to net.lo.

Now, when I try  
/etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start 

the screen gets blanked on a console as well as from an XTerm
and the kernel crashes totally, i.e. the emergency reboot doesn't work 
either.  And trying to do an strace with output to a file shows that 
even this output file doesn't exist (i.e. hasn't been closed)

So, what can I try next?

Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.



Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:08:49 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:40:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
 
  When $LUSER fills up his drive it can be that root is the only user
  that can properly mount and access the filesystem. So whatever the
  $LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by
  root, probably by shuffling stuff around.
 
 I've never failed to fix that by deleting a file as the user that
 created it, usually the partial file that caused the problem, but I
 can see why you may want to keep a small amount reserved for that.
 
 However, I still don't get the -m 0 increases fragmentation thing.
 
 

Yeah, that sounds like an old wives tale urban myth to me too

I'll be wanting to be seeing the output of real diagnostic programs


-- 
Alan McKinnnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Daddy



On February 29, 2012 at 2:43 AM J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:


 On Wed, February 29, 2012 2:01 am, Alex Schuster wrote:
  Dale writes:
 
  Alex Schuster wrote:
 

 snipped

  Also, it is already set up with LVM and
  ext4.  Can I change it even while there is data on there?
 
  Sure! Cool, isn't it. Just call lvresize -L +1G /dev/mapper/whatever or
  something, and then resize2fs /dev/mapper/whatever.

 I don't use ext4 (yet), so not sure about this. But, isn't resize2fs
for
 ext2/3 only?

 --
 Joost



From the man page:




On February 29, 2012 at 2:43 AM J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:


 On Wed, February 29, 2012 2:01 am, Alex Schuster wrote:
  Dale writes:
 
  Alex Schuster wrote:
 

 snipped

  Also, it is already set up with LVM and
  ext4.  Can I change it even while there is data on there?
 
  Sure! Cool, isn't it. Just call lvresize -L +1G /dev/mapper/whatever or
  something, and then resize2fs /dev/mapper/whatever.

 I don't use ext4 (yet), so not sure about this. But, isn't resize2fs
for
 ext2/3 only?

 --
 Joost



From the man page:

The resize2fs program will resize ext2, ext3, or ext4 file systems.

Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote:

 They don't interfere with each other.
 
 LVM and the size of the filesystem is one thing. Reserved space is
 something else, completely unrelated.
 
 


Ahhh, light bulb moment.  Gotcha !!

Dale

:-)  :-)


-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n



Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Dale
J. Roeleveld wrote:
 
 On Wed, February 29, 2012 2:01 am, Alex Schuster wrote:
 Dale writes:

 Alex Schuster wrote:

 
 snipped
 
 Also, it is already set up with LVM and
 ext4.  Can I change it even while there is data on there?

 Sure! Cool, isn't it. Just call lvresize -L +1G /dev/mapper/whatever or
 something, and then resize2fs /dev/mapper/whatever.
 
 I don't use ext4 (yet), so not sure about this. But, isn't resize2fs for
 ext2/3 only?
 


It works for ext4 too.  At least I been using it so I hope it is the
right tool.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n



Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-29 Thread Alex Schuster
Peter Humphrey writes:

 On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
  Peter Humphrey writes:
   Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
   opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
  
  Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
 
 Well I just hope the team get it sorted out soon.

I'm waiting since KDE 4.2. And I believe it will never happen. Yes,
things are getting better, and more things get fixed than break by
updates. But still KDE4 has so many bugs and annoyances, nearly every day
some weird things happen.

 I can't stand any of
 the Gnomes and the lighter desktops are just too thin on features.

Me too. I _like_ KDE. If only things were more stable. I do not need any
new features, I'd prefer the existing ones to work as they should.
Look at Dolphin for example, the file manager. I expect such a thing to
just work. But until 4.8 it didn't, it had some bugs that made it nearly
unusable for me. Like the effect that after dragging files to a 2nd
panel, Dolphin acted as if the mouse button was pressed, marking all
files, and scrolling till the end when the mouse leaves the Dolphin
window. Believe me, this is very annoying when copying/moving many files
around. And don't press del to delete the files you copied, you might
put all files in that directory to the trash.
The scrolling behaviour was also annoying, I drag a file to the
destination folder, which is near the top, and just when I release, the
folder started to scroll away and the file is moved into another folder.
Both bugs seem to be fixed in 4.8, and now Dolphin is better than the
Windows XP explorer, finally.
Of course, there was another bug introduced, couldn't reproduce it yet,
and it does not happen often. All stuff scrolls down to the bottom then,
I cannot scroll up, but with wild clicking on all mouse buttons it
finally stops.

Another example of these weird problems, just because it happened today:
I copied 100 MB via FTP using Dolphin. Then I got an error dialog, there
was a problem writing the file. Dolphin did not update the content, so I
could not see how far the upload went. After some F5 pressing, it said
internal error, please send a detailed bug report.
Seems there was a problem renaming the file after download, I had to
remove the '.part' suffix manually.

No big deal, but such problems happen all over the time when I use KDE
applications. Some errors are reproduceable, and I can avoid them, but
many things just happen once.

If you are an experienced user, you can live with that - as I said, I
still like KDE, and its great features. But for the inexperienced user
like my mom KDE is totally unusable, as very basic features often do not
work. Like, logging out. I put Gnome on her notebook, so I do not have to
help her every day when yet another problem arises.

   I can't see any material difference between the two links.
  
  Yes, there is none.
  
  This doesn't happen here, but I'm using the new KMail.
 
 I'm not going to that version until it works. It was only careful
 backing up that avoided losing half my e-mails. As it was, the basic
 functions of an e- mail client were almost completely absent.

I'm using Claws mainly, and KMail2 for stuff like encryption or local
mail folders that I did not (yet?) spend the time to set up with Claws. I
migrated KDEPIM stuff for three times, and it never worked well, and
always took me hours at least to get a working setup. This is just
unbelieveable. And I can be happy, because I did not lose any mails -
probably because I use IMAP only.

And this is so sad. Generally, I like the idea of Akonadi. And I see
some advantages - for example, Claws does not respond while it is checking
for new mails, and it seems to do this so very often just when I want to
see a new mail. KDE does this in the background. But there are far too
many problems with this. So many people were bitten by this. And email is
such an important issue. BTW, since 4.8, at every login I get messages
that some calendar stuff did not get configured, migrated or whatever.
Good thing I don't use it much, so I just do not care. But would I really
entrust my important personal data to KDEPIM applications? Probably not.

Wonko



Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-29 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 16:27:50 Alex Schuster wrote:
 Peter Humphrey writes:
  On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:23:40 Alex Schuster wrote:
   Peter Humphrey writes:
Now can anyone tell me why clicking the first link in this e-mail
opened it in Konqueror and the second in Firefox?
   
   Because KDE is so weird all over the place.
  
  Well I just hope the team get it sorted out soon.
 
 I'm waiting since KDE 4.2. And I believe it will never happen. Yes,
 things are getting better, and more things get fixed than break by
 updates. But still KDE4 has so many bugs and annoyances, nearly every day
 some weird things happen.
 
  I can't stand any of
  the Gnomes and the lighter desktops are just too thin on features.
 
 Me too. I _like_ KDE. If only things were more stable. I do not need any
 new features, I'd prefer the existing ones to work as they should.
 Look at Dolphin for example, the file manager. I expect such a thing to
 just work. But until 4.8 it didn't, it had some bugs that made it nearly
 unusable for me. Like the effect that after dragging files to a 2nd
 panel, Dolphin acted as if the mouse button was pressed, marking all
 files, and scrolling till the end when the mouse leaves the Dolphin
 window. Believe me, this is very annoying when copying/moving many files
 around. And don't press del to delete the files you copied, you might
 put all files in that directory to the trash.
 The scrolling behaviour was also annoying, I drag a file to the
 destination folder, which is near the top, and just when I release, the
 folder started to scroll away and the file is moved into another folder.
 Both bugs seem to be fixed in 4.8, and now Dolphin is better than the
 Windows XP explorer, finally.
 Of course, there was another bug introduced, couldn't reproduce it yet,
 and it does not happen often. All stuff scrolls down to the bottom then,
 I cannot scroll up, but with wild clicking on all mouse buttons it
 finally stops.
 
 Another example of these weird problems, just because it happened today:
 I copied 100 MB via FTP using Dolphin. Then I got an error dialog, there
 was a problem writing the file. Dolphin did not update the content, so I
 could not see how far the upload went. After some F5 pressing, it said
 internal error, please send a detailed bug report.
 Seems there was a problem renaming the file after download, I had to
 remove the '.part' suffix manually.
 
 No big deal, but such problems happen all over the time when I use KDE
 applications. Some errors are reproduceable, and I can avoid them, but
 many things just happen once.
 
 If you are an experienced user, you can live with that - as I said, I
 still like KDE, and its great features. But for the inexperienced user
 like my mom KDE is totally unusable, as very basic features often do not
 work. Like, logging out. I put Gnome on her notebook, so I do not have to
 help her every day when yet another problem arises.
 
I can't see any material difference between the two links.
   
   Yes, there is none.
   
   This doesn't happen here, but I'm using the new KMail.
  
  I'm not going to that version until it works. It was only careful
  backing up that avoided losing half my e-mails. As it was, the basic
  functions of an e- mail client were almost completely absent.
 
 I'm using Claws mainly, and KMail2 for stuff like encryption or local
 mail folders that I did not (yet?) spend the time to set up with Claws. I
 migrated KDEPIM stuff for three times, and it never worked well, and
 always took me hours at least to get a working setup. This is just
 unbelieveable. And I can be happy, because I did not lose any mails -
 probably because I use IMAP only.
 
 And this is so sad. Generally, I like the idea of Akonadi. And I see
 some advantages - for example, Claws does not respond while it is checking
 for new mails, and it seems to do this so very often just when I want to
 see a new mail. KDE does this in the background. But there are far too
 many problems with this. So many people were bitten by this. And email is
 such an important issue. BTW, since 4.8, at every login I get messages
 that some calendar stuff did not get configured, migrated or whatever.
 Good thing I don't use it much, so I just do not care. But would I really
 entrust my important personal data to KDEPIM applications? Probably not.
 
   Wonko

I could echo most of what you raised here and add to it (because kmail will 
just not work for me without major failures on POP3  IMAP4 and korganizer is 
seriously broken when trying to import and merge calendars) - but I won't.

What I don't understand is why couldn't we stay with 4.2 or which ever version 
was broadly working and keep all these dev wet-dreams for testing purposes 
only.  If it takes them 3 years to arrive at a stable (read = functioning) 
product then we can start then and only then bringing it slwly in the 
stable tree.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally 

Re: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody have kdebluetooth working?

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:

 Please don't send html emails to the list

I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was in 
two parts: one plain text and one HTML. I have never set an option to write 
in HTML so I shut kmail down and checked its config file. It said html-
markup=true for some reason. So I changed it to false and I hope that's 
cleared the problem.

-- 
Rgds
Peter   Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23


Re: [gentoo-user] Help! HP625 WLAN is driving me nuts

2012-02-29 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 11:28:34 Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to get WLAN working on my HP625 laptop.
 I've checked several web pages but I'm lost.
 
 I'm using a recent kernel  (3.3-rc5+).
 I configured CONFIG_BRCMUTIL=m CONFIG_BRCMSMAC=m CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=m  and
 I installed the coresponding firmware in /lib/firmware/brcm
 
 Now, lspci -k  shows
 06:00.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 802.11b/g/n
 Wireless LAN Controller (rev 01)
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Device 145c
   Kernel driver in use: bcma-pci-bridge
 
 
 and even
 
 iwconfig shows
 wlan0 IEEE 802.11bgn  ESSID:off/any
   Mode:Managed  Access Point: Not-Associated   Tx-Power=0 dBm
   Retry  long limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
   Encryption key:off
   Power Management:on
 
 
 I have net.wlan0 symlinked to net.lo.
 
 Now, when I try
 /etc/init.d/net.wlan0 start
 
 the screen gets blanked on a console as well as from an XTerm
 and the kernel crashes totally, i.e. the emergency reboot doesn't work
 either.  And trying to do an strace with output to a file shows that
 even this output file doesn't exist (i.e. hasn't been closed)
 
 So, what can I try next?
 
 Many thanks for a hint,
 Helmut.

I assume that you have not read this yet:

http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/brcm80211
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED: old cyrus-imapd from overlay

2012-02-29 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger
Am 29.02.2012 09:35, schrieb J. Roeleveld:

 If you want to still try to copy the mail over, you need to look into
 converting the *.db files.

Just as a closing(?) feedback here:

people at the cyrus-ml were a great support, I am nearly done with my
conversion.

And, yes, I run (gentoo stable) 2.4.12 now.

Thanks, Stefan





Re: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody have kdebluetooth working?

2012-02-29 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 21:08:41 Peter Humphrey wrote:
 On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:
  Please don't send html emails to the list
 
 I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was in
 two parts: one plain text and one HTML. I have never set an option to write
 in HTML so I shut kmail down and checked its config file. It said html-
 markup=true for some reason. So I changed it to false and I hope that's
 cleared the problem.


Hmmm  which Kmail are you using?
===
References: 201202272329.35343.robin.atw...@attglobal.net 
201202280039.35660.pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org 
CA+hid6Hu5NJz7cr=j_o6phu8a+vrcz-nj8hlcnss+mzfob8...@mail.gmail.com
In-Reply-To: CA+hid6Hu5NJz7cr=j_O6Phu8A+vrCZ-
nj8hlcnss+mzfob8...@mail.gmail.com
X-KMail-Markup: true
==
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Recovering MySQL Database from EXT4 Formatted Hard Disk ...

2012-02-29 Thread Christopher Koeber
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wednesday 08 Feb 2012 11:33:42 Hinnerk van Bruinehsen wrote:
  On 08.02.2012 12:02, Michael Mol wrote:
   On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Christopher Kurtis Koeber
  
   ckoe...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hello,
  
   I am trying to recover MySQL databases (which were properly shut
   down) from an EXT4 formatted hard disk.
  
   What happened to require the recovery? Which parts of the database
   server shut down properly, and which didn't?
  
   I loaded the SystemRescueCD distro that you can get online and
   when running TestDisk I can see the partitions but I cannot
   recover said partitions because it tells me the structure is bad
   (any options here, by the way?)


  You could try Autopsy  sleuthkit[1].
  Before you do anything to the drive it would be wise to copy it via dd
  so that no accidental write makes anythoing worse...
 
 
 
  [1] http://www.sleuthkit.org/autopsy/desc.php


 Definitely create an image of the partition first, rather than keep
 accessing
 the real thing.  At this moment you don't know what caused the corruption
 - it
 could well be a warning of worse things to come as far as this drive is
 concerned ...  ;-)

 It is much better if you create the image with dd-rescue/ddrescue (can't
 recall which of the two packages is claimed to be better).  You may also
 want
 to make a backup copy of the image in case you embark on any destructive
 operations on it.

 Multiple passes with ddrescue may recover more bits/bytes so hopefully
 you'll
 have a more complete set of data to work with.


   With PhotoRec, I can recover parts of the MySQL Database but I
   cannot get the important *.MYD files because I guess PhotoRec
   doesn't have the signatures for that type of file.
  
   So, any options I have at this point?

 You can use dd or hexdump to pick up some blocks at the start of a known
 good
 *.MYD file, create a signature for PhotoRec and add it on the list of
 files to
 check for.

 See the instruction of how to go about this here:

 http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/Add_your_own_extension_to_PhotoRec
 --
 Regards,
 Mick


Never had a chance to reply back but this was very helpful.

Now to search online to see if people created signatures for IBD files
(where the actual data for a MySQL database lives) as the headers are
different for every sample IBD I tried from working databases.

Regards,
Christopher Koeber


[gentoo-user] Somewhat OT - Grandtech PC to TV component and X

2012-02-29 Thread Michael Sullivan
I recently bought a new Gradtec PC To TV component because my old Grand
Pro Ultimate XP that I bought in 2004 was on its last legs.  We used the
Ultimate XP so that we could use the living room TV as a monitor, so
that we could watch MythTV in the living room.  The Ultimate XP was
having a problem where after I logged into X the video would go all
screwy; it was all static-y and the top half of the video output would
appear at the top half of the screen and again at the bottom half.  I
dragged a real monitor in there and attached it to the end of the
external monitor plug on the component and everything displayed normally
on the monitor, but still screwy on the TV.  I bought a new component
and it's doing the same thing.  But it only does it in X.  This setup
worked fine until about a month ago.  I'm completely at a loss as to how
to fix this.  Here's my search for errors in /etc/Xorg.0.log:


carter log # grep EE Xorg.0.log
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[42.372] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER


Does anyone have any idea of what's going on?  It only happens in X;
it's fine until X loads...
-Michael Sullivan-



[gentoo-user] Re: Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread walt
On 02/29/2012 02:40 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:

 So whatever the
 $LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
 probably by shuffling stuff around.

That's a shocking statement for a wannabe BOFH to make.  A *real* BOFH
would delete the entire $LUSER account and blame the nuclear tests in
North Korea for causing an unfortunate power surge at his data center.





Re: [OT] Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody have kdebluetooth working?

2012-02-29 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 21:28:07 Mick wrote:
 On Wednesday 29 Feb 2012 21:08:41 Peter Humphrey wrote:
  On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:57:36 James Broadhead wrote:
   Please don't send html emails to the list
  
  I wrote a test message and saved it, then examined it with less. It was
  in two parts: one plain text and one HTML. I have never set an option
  to write in HTML so I shut kmail down and checked its config file. It
  said html- markup=true for some reason. So I changed it to false and
  I hope that's cleared the problem.
 
 Hmmm  which Kmail are you using?

4.7.4.

-- 
Rgds
Peter   Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Mar 1, 2012 7:02 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 02/29/2012 02:40 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:

  So whatever the
  $LUSER was doing that filled up the drive needs to be undone by root,
  probably by shuffling stuff around.

 That's a shocking statement for a wannabe BOFH to make.  A *real* BOFH
 would delete the entire $LUSER account and blame the nuclear tests in
 North Korea for causing an unfortunate power surge at his data center.


Naah, North Korea explanation already used 2 days ago... time to use a new
reason...

Today would be: surge caused by harmonic oscillation between rotating
electric motors, you know, like the... building air conditioner!

... followed by some conversation with the management with the end effect
of shutting down the building AC but letting the data center AC still
operational ...

Rgds,


[gentoo-user] Re: Somewhat OT - Grandtech PC to TV component and X [SOLVED]

2012-02-29 Thread Michael Sullivan
On 02/29/12 16:41, Michael Sullivan wrote:
 I recently bought a new Gradtec PC To TV component because my old Grand
 Pro Ultimate XP that I bought in 2004 was on its last legs.  We used the
 Ultimate XP so that we could use the living room TV as a monitor, so
 that we could watch MythTV in the living room.  The Ultimate XP was
 having a problem where after I logged into X the video would go all
 screwy; it was all static-y and the top half of the video output would
 appear at the top half of the screen and again at the bottom half.  I
 dragged a real monitor in there and attached it to the end of the
 external monitor plug on the component and everything displayed normally
 on the monitor, but still screwy on the TV.  I bought a new component
 and it's doing the same thing.  But it only does it in X.  This setup
 worked fine until about a month ago.  I'm completely at a loss as to how
 to fix this.  Here's my search for errors in /etc/Xorg.0.log:
 
 
 carter log # grep EE Xorg.0.log
   (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
 [42.372] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
 
 
 Does anyone have any idea of what's going on?  It only happens in X;
 it's fine until X loads...
 -Michael Sullivan-

I read on Google how one user was having trouble getting X to work with
her new monitor.  Another user suggested renaming xorg.conf (so it no
longer existed under that name.)  I tried it, and it worked.



Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:11:41PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

  I've never failed to fix that by deleting a file as the user that
  created it, usually the partial file that caused the problem, but I
  can see why you may want to keep a small amount reserved for that.
  
  However, I still don't get the -m 0 increases fragmentation thing.
  
  
 
 Yeah, that sounds like an old wives tale urban myth to me too
 
 I'll be wanting to be seeing the output of real diagnostic programs

All that does, as far as I understand it, is to fool $user into having less
space available. So if the partition only has as much space left as is
reserved for root, he just can't write anymore.

It just means that before the drive gets physically full (which means that
files will fragment more), it will get logically full earlier. This is why
there can be expected less fragmentation under extreme circumstances (i.e. an
almost full FS).
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

When the going gets tough, the tough get going.
... and so do I. – Alf


pgpVtfejU5VBQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Freeing up disk space problem!!

2012-02-29 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:23:11AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:

  So, cfdisk is happy with the change but nothing else seems to see it.
  What am I missing here?  Where did the 50Gbs go to?
  
  Dale
  
  :-)  :-)
  
 
 Nowhere.
 
 Disk manufacturers measure kilos of data as 1000
 Everyone else measures it in 1024

Well, to nitpick, they say it correctly, as for their kilo, 10^3 bytes is
correct. We, the binary folk, assert kilo to be 2^10 bytes which is actually
called kibi, but we still use kilo in our everyday language thanks to
historical ballast (and because, as I recently heard, the -bi units aren't
around that long yet). First time I heard of them was in uni lecture ~2003±1.

 They do this because it fudges disk sizes to appear 2.4% bigger than
 they really are. 
 
 When you get into TB drives, it gets worse as 1024*1024*1024*1024
 differs from 1000*1000*1000*1000 bu a lot more than 2.4%

By 1.024^4, which is 1.0995 to be precise. Those swines are stealing almost
10% from us. :o)
-- 
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services.

“Don't put multiple statements on a single line unless you have something
to hide.” – Linux Torvalds, Linux kernel coding style documentation


pgpSL7QsyvpZS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-29 Thread John

  Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file 
systems and 
what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the 
different 
arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here in 
a Gentoo 
list is more or less conjecture, at least what I've read from most posts. 
Wouldn't the 
people who make up, design and take care of the file systems in discussion be 
the best 
ones to simply ask?

  Not meaning to 'end' the discussion, just curious as to why no one has gone 
to those who 
would know best and brought it up and seeked out the answer(s) from them 
instead of people 
who only can guesstimate here. So don't get mad, get glad, heh heh.



Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-29 Thread Dale
John wrote:
 
   Wouldn't this particular topic be best answered by the dev's of said file 
 systems and 
 what, if any, fragmentation etc, could and can and will happen with the 
 different 
 arguments ie -m 0, etc.? All it is now between everyone discussing this here 
 in a Gentoo 
 list is more or less conjecture, at least what I've read from most posts. 
 Wouldn't the 
 people who make up, design and take care of the file systems in discussion be 
 the best 
 ones to simply ask?
 
   Not meaning to 'end' the discussion, just curious as to why no one has gone 
 to those who 
 would know best and brought it up and seeked out the answer(s) from them 
 instead of people 
 who only can guesstimate here. So don't get mad, get glad, heh heh.
 
 


I think one reason may be this, there are people on this list that have
more experience than a lot of devs.  By that, I mean real life
experience.  Sometimes what devs expect doesn't actually happen in real
life situations.  For example, when testing a file system and how it
frags, large files, small files or medium size files?  Are these files
changing or once saved they never change?

So, sometimes asking a person who actually uses something can have
better advice than the person that created it.

Just saying.

Dale

:-)  :-)

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n