Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED teamspeak-client-bin-3.0.13
On 10/14/2013 10:42 PM, Jens Pelzetter wrote: Hello James, yes, I've also had this problem. Check the permissions of the TeamSpeak3-Client-linux_amd64-3.0.13.run file you downloaded and moved to /usr/portage/distfiles. This file is maybe still owned by your user. After I changed the owner and group of the file to portage and set the permissions like the other files in /usr/portage/distfiles the package installs without problems. Owner, group and permissions look like this on my system: -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage portage 33205868 8. Okt 08:33 TeamSpeak3-Client-linux_amd64-3.0.13.run Best regards, Jens That worked like a charm! Thanks. What i don't understand is 3.0.12 being owned by my user and having installed without a problem. I get a few of these upon completion of installation: scanelf: rpath_security_checks(): Security problem with relative DT_RPATH '.' (path to files) I don't have any reason to suspect they have anything to do with anything, I've just never seen those before. -- This is my signature. Please don't steal it.
Re: [gentoo-user] New mobo change
Pandu Poluan wrote: On Oct 15, 2013 10:51 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, I ordered the new mobo as much as I needed to wait. The mobo is the same brand but a different chipset and a couple other things are different. I have already built a kernel for those changes. I plan to put everything on the old mobo on the new mobo. That includes the CPU. I'm pretty sure this will not be needed but want to ask to be sure. Do I need to do a emerge -e world or should it just work like it is? Since the CPU is going to be the exact same CPU, I'm thinking it is not needed. I do have march=native set in make.conf. Thoughts? Thanks. Personally, I think all you need to do is to ensure that the kernel has all the drivers it needs to speak to the new mobo. Other members of the @world set relies on the drivers in the kernel. But I don't use any GUI or audio; if you're using a GUI and/or audio, you might also have to re-emerge the relevant bits. BSTS: just re-emerge @world :-) Rgds, -- It uses the same audio chip so that should be OK but that is something that I hadn't thought of tho. I have a seperate video card which will be moving over as well. So that *should* work. We hope. I'm hoping this will be as painless as I hope it will be. I just got to remember how to hook the drivers up. Especially the first one. I certainly want sda to be correct. ;-) Thanks. You thought of something I hadn't thought of. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
[gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? - Grant
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
On 15/10/2013 10:38, Grant wrote: Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? - Grant ps with the f option ? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] RAID help
Hi All, I haven't had to set up a software RAID for years and now. I want to set up two RAID 1 arrays on a new file server to serve SBM to MSWindows clients. The first RAID1 having two disks, where a multipartition OS installation will take place. The second RAID1 having two disks for a single data partition. From what I recall I used mdadm with --auto=mdp, to create a RAID1 from 2 disks, before I used fdisk to partition the new /dev/md0 as necessary. All this is lost in the fog of time. Now I read that these days udev names the devices/partitions, so I am not sure what the implication of this is and how to proceed. What is current practice? Create multiple /dev/mdXs for the OS partitions I would want and then stick a fs on each one, or create one /dev/md0 which thereafter is formatted with multiple partitions? Grateful for any pointers to resolve my confusion. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? ps with the f option ? I always do 'ps -ef|grep name' but should that indicate whether midori is to blame? - Grant
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? ps with the f option ? I always do 'ps -ef|grep name' but should that indicate whether midori is to blame? Check the parent process id (PPID) to see what's responsible for starting nsplugin.
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
On 15/10/2013 12:39, Grant wrote: Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? ps with the f option ? I always do 'ps -ef|grep name' but should that indicate whether midori is to blame? - Grant No, that will grep nsplugin only, that string is unlikely to appear in the line of ps output of it's parent. Rather pipe ps -ef into less and search for nsplugin. Less efficient but a) you should care about that and b) you will get everything and none of it chucked away by grep -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] Re: Continuous beeping with kernel 3.10 and 3.11
On 2013-09-26 14:42, Peter Weilbacher wrote: On one of my machines, I get continuous beeping from the internal loudspeaker when I boot a newer kernel (I'm using vanilla-sources). I first had that with 3.10.8 and also with 3.10.10, and it continues with 3.11.1. [...] In the meantime I left the machine on long enough to discover that it stops beeping whenever it is idle long enough and blanks the display. Well, this is embarrassing: Since this began I switched the machine on even less often than before, but yesterday I found out by chance that the sound did not come from the internal speaker but from the speakers built into my screen. Now I traced it to the snd-hda-intel kernel module (noise there if loaded, sound gone when removed with |modprobe -r|). Why was the sound never heard on bootup in 3.8.x kernels but is starting with 3.10.1? Peter. P.S.: At least now I know that the easy workaround is to tune the (hardware) speaker volume down to 0...
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Continuous beeping with kernel 3.10 and 3.11
On 15/10/2013 14:44, Peter Weilbacher wrote: On 2013-09-26 14:42, Peter Weilbacher wrote: On one of my machines, I get continuous beeping from the internal loudspeaker when I boot a newer kernel (I'm using vanilla-sources). I first had that with 3.10.8 and also with 3.10.10, and it continues with 3.11.1. [...] In the meantime I left the machine on long enough to discover that it stops beeping whenever it is idle long enough and blanks the display. Well, this is embarrassing: Since this began I switched the machine on even less often than before, but yesterday I found out by chance that the sound did not come from the internal speaker but from the speakers built into my screen. Now I traced it to the snd-hda-intel kernel module (noise there if loaded, sound gone when removed with |modprobe -r|). Why was the sound never heard on bootup in 3.8.x kernels but is starting with 3.10.1? 3.8.x defaults to $VOL=$MINIMUM while 3.10.x defaults to $VOL=$SOMETHING_NOT_MINIMAL ?? or maybe the audio feed to snd-hda-intel was busted for years and some kind soul fixed it in 3.10? Diff the drivers in the kernel sources to find out more :-) Peter. P.S.: At least now I know that the easy workaround is to tune the (hardware) speaker volume down to 0... -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
[gentoo-user] Re: USB disk automatically mounting: how does it work
Chris Stankevitz chrisstankevitz at gmail.com writes: Would you please explain (or refer me to a place that explains) the mechanism by which an USB drive appears on my desktop? I'm looking for a level of detail like this: Which desktop are you running, Kde, Gnome, or ? The answer depends on your desktop environment. If you are looking for the low level part of this, start by talking to the appropriate desktop groups as to what their (app-gui) uses, for a precise, detailed account. hth, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:38:19AM -0700, Grant wrote: Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? Is pstree useful at all? -- Happy Penguin Computers ') 126 Fenco Drive ( \ Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^ supp...@happypenguincomputers.com 662-269-2706 662-205-6424 http://happypenguincomputers.com/ A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
Re: [gentoo-user] New mobo change
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:49:54AM -0500, Dale wrote:
Pandu Poluan wrote:
Personally, I think all you need to do is to ensure that the kernel
has all the drivers it needs to speak to the new mobo. Other members
of the @world set relies on the drivers in the kernel.
But I don't use any GUI or audio; if you're using a GUI and/or audio,
you might also have to re-emerge the relevant bits.
BSTS: just re-emerge @world :-)
It uses the same audio chip so that should be OK but that is something
that I hadn't thought of tho. I have a seperate video card which will
be moving over as well. So that *should* work. We hope.
I'm hoping this will be as painless as I hope it will be. I just got to
remember how to hook the drivers up. Especially the first one. I
certainly want sda to be correct. ;-)
Thanks. You thought of something I hadn't thought of.
Dale
Run blkid on your present mobo, and you will see where your filesystem(s)
are located in regards to /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}.
When you plug your SATA drive(s) to your new mobo, look for labels on the mobo
to indicate SATA{1,2,3,4,5,6} or whatever. Generally they are going to use sda
on 1, sdb on 2, etc. What can throw that off is the ATAPI drive (DVD/CD). I'd
put it on the highest SATA#, at least for that first boot.
Also look at your /var/log/dmesg output. NB: less /var/log/dmesg is NOT the
same as dmesg. Do the former and it will show you only that part from boot
to Linux login (or whatever).
As previously stated, be sure to have all the drivers you need built into your
new kernel. You may or may not be able to ascertain that w/out the board in
your possession. You can look it up by make/model on
http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/ but they are using an old kernel, therefore,
caveat emptor. One way you can check that is to boot with SystemRescueCd
first, select their kernel version closest to the one you'll be using, and run
lspci -k from it. If you don't have something you need in your kernel, go
ahead and chroot into the new system.
I've moved stuff around like this...sold the wife's computer sans hard drive a
few weeks ago, and it booted fine. So long as you have the new board's / fs
and it's controller built into the new kernel, you'll get into the system.
From there you can make nconfig on the running kernel and change/add
whatever you missed.
Don't forget that grub (if you use it for bootloader, not just fishing), has
an editable line when you boot up. So if /dev/sda1 is not valid, edit it and
try booting with /dev/sd{b,c,d}1 or whatever until you get it. Then once
you're into the system, you can change it.
Trivial, Homie! Call if you need help...you have my number. :-)
--
Happy Penguin Computers ')
126 Fenco Drive ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't kill /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin
Multiple instances of /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/nsplugin keep spawning even after I kill them. I suspect midori although I have the libreoffice plugin disabled. Has anyone else seen this? How can I confirm my suspicions? ps with the f option ? I always do 'ps -ef|grep name' but should that indicate whether midori is to blame? No, that will grep nsplugin only, that string is unlikely to appear in the line of ps output of it's parent. Rather pipe ps -ef into less and search for nsplugin. Less efficient but a) you should care about that and b) you will get everything and none of it chucked away by grep Yep, it's midori. pstree was no good for this. Thanks everyone. - Grant
[gentoo-user] slim-1.3.5-r3 bug
slim-1.3.5-r3 was recently stabilized but after installation on my x86 upon login there is a logo but no user/password text and when I type anything nothing is echoed to the screen not ever user name. The login works. -- Joseph
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Continuous beeping with kernel 3.10 and 3.11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/15/13 16:44, Peter Weilbacher wrote: On 2013-09-26 14:42, Peter Weilbacher wrote: On one of my machines, I get continuous beeping from the internal loudspeaker when I boot a newer kernel (I'm using vanilla-sources). I first had that with 3.10.8 and also with 3.10.10, and it continues with 3.11.1. [...] In the meantime I left the machine on long enough to discover that it stops beeping whenever it is idle long enough and blanks the display. Well, this is embarrassing: Since this began I switched the machine on even less often than before, but yesterday I found out by chance that the sound did not come from the internal speaker but from the speakers built into my screen. Now I traced it to the snd-hda-intel kernel module (noise there if loaded, sound gone when removed with |modprobe -r|). Why was the sound never heard on bootup in 3.8.x kernels but is starting with 3.10.1? Peter. P.S.: At least now I know that the easy workaround is to tune the (hardware) speaker volume down to 0... nice joke -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSXYgFAAoJEK64IL1uI2haeSMIAJbsbjekIbOGvAtKyPKl/8s9 QEtMdQnzFZNPI4TbqgXHR8Qqms/8mA8JHUgY0RkuuLoXoGzInhQi5elkUujloLgY QlW8uYoneLWFljmgapseNtn+HE2hZTSB4fcSzAx0jwu4fEMVV4YpkiltA/1gSp7m hX76pMLKcTRjMz7w9rh75pebHY94HzD+x8BX02Jq1VsaD9xzfXlhFj4Aerl5E6s3 E1RGhZ39b15AbBidkJwxSXK5f/4g4EDWOL69JiVRNycc2gz/NBJGSJYFjdD107Xo GpmNxqs02M0EJGh4xLoe1y+icFlkB65PDC9DwR2gHOyoBm5E4KkLuTkonsrdJoo= =cMwT -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-user] RAID help
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I haven't had to set up a software RAID for years and now. I want to set up two RAID 1 arrays on a new file server to serve SBM to MSWindows clients. The first RAID1 having two disks, where a multipartition OS installation will take place. The second RAID1 having two disks for a single data partition. From what I recall I used mdadm with --auto=mdp, to create a RAID1 from 2 disks, before I used fdisk to partition the new /dev/md0 as necessary. All this is lost in the fog of time. Now I read that these days udev names the devices/partitions, so I am not sure what the implication of this is and how to proceed. What is current practice? Create multiple /dev/mdXs for the OS partitions I would want and then stick a fs on each one, or create one /dev/md0 which thereafter is formatted with multiple partitions? Grateful for any pointers to resolve my confusion. One of the best resources is the kernel RAID wiki: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/
[gentoo-user] re: no dot profile/bashrc for root user
I've noticed there's no .profile or .bash_profile or .bashrc in /root. Is that normal? What if I want to set/modify some environment variables? How would I do that? Thanks.
Re: [gentoo-user] re: no dot profile/bashrc for root user
On Oct 15, 2013 12:35 PM, Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed there's no .profile or .bash_profile or .bashrc in /root. Is that normal? What if I want to set/modify some environment variables? How would I do that? Thanks. IIRC there's a default profile in /etc or /usr somewhere. Sorry I can't be more specific.
Re: [gentoo-user] re: no dot profile/bashrc for root user
On 15/10/2013 21:34, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've noticed there's no .profile or .bash_profile or .bashrc in /root. Is that normal? What if I want to set/modify some environment variables? How would I do that? create the file and edit it There's no magic to those files, they were copied there from the install tarball, or from /etc/skel, or from any number of places. They are just files -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] re: no dot profile/bashrc for root user
On Tuesday 15 Oct 2013 22:34:15 Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've noticed there's no .profile or .bash_profile or .bashrc in /root. Is that normal? What if I want to set/modify some environment variables? How would I do that? I just adapt my ordinary user's files for use by root. -- Regards, Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] re: no dot profile/bashrc for root user
On 10/15/2013 10:57 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 15/10/2013 21:34, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I've noticed there's no .profile or .bash_profile or .bashrc in /root. Is that normal? What if I want to set/modify some environment variables? How would I do that? create the file and edit it There's no magic to those files, they were copied there from the install tarball, or from /etc/skel, or from any number of places. They are just files Simple as that, huh? Understood. Thanks.
Re: [gentoo-user] slim-1.3.5-r3 bug
Re , Joseph said: slim-1.3.5-r3 was recently stabilized but after installation on my x86 upon login there is a logo but no user/password text and when I type anything nothing is echoed to the screen not ever user name. Are you using systemd? -- Keith -- ~ Keith Dart ke...@dartworks.biz public key: ID: 19017044 http://www.dartworks.biz/ =
Re: [gentoo-user] RAID help
On Tuesday 15 Oct 2013 20:28:46 Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I haven't had to set up a software RAID for years and now. I want to set up two RAID 1 arrays on a new file server to serve SBM to MSWindows clients. The first RAID1 having two disks, where a multipartition OS installation will take place. The second RAID1 having two disks for a single data partition. From what I recall I used mdadm with --auto=mdp, to create a RAID1 from 2 disks, before I used fdisk to partition the new /dev/md0 as necessary. All this is lost in the fog of time. Now I read that these days udev names the devices/partitions, so I am not sure what the implication of this is and how to proceed. What is current practice? Create multiple /dev/mdXs for the OS partitions I would want and then stick a fs on each one, or create one /dev/md0 which thereafter is formatted with multiple partitions? Grateful for any pointers to resolve my confusion. One of the best resources is the kernel RAID wiki: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/ Thanks Paul! It seems that after a cursory look, both ways of partitioning a RAID-1 are still available: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Partitioning_RAID_/_LVM_on_RAID # df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md2 3.8G 640M 3.0G 18% / /dev/md1 97M 11M 81M 12% /boot /dev/md5 3.8G 1.1G 2.5G 30% /usr /dev/md6 9.6G 8.5G 722M 93% /var/www /dev/md7 3.8G 951M 2.7G 26% /var/lib /dev/md8 3.8G 38M 3.6G 1% /var/spool /dev/md9 1.9G 231M 1.5G 13% /tmp /dev/md10 8.7G 329M 7.9G 4% /var/www/html = and: mdadm --create --auto=mdp --verbose /dev/md_d0 --level=mirror --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda /dev/sdb which is thereafter partitioned with fdisk. This is the one I have used in the past. Which one is preferable, or what are the pros cons of each? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)
Am 27.09.2013 12:36, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: Am 25.09.2013 01:38, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: systemd-analyze blame to see what is taking so long. systemd-delta to see what changes from upstream do you have. Thanks ... I cleaned up some cruft already and will test some boot-process soon. Still on the road ... sorry for the delay ... quite some non-gentoo-things happening here lately ;-) My systemd-delta is down to zero ... and my LVs are activated fine in the last few boots. Fine! sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 # cat /proc/version Linux version 3.11.5-gentoo Greets, regards, Stefan
Re: [gentoo-user] using lvm without a partition of type linux LVM
On Mon, Oct 14 2013, Gregory Shearman wrote: In linux.gentoo.user, allan wrote: On Sat, Oct 12 2013, thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote: on 10/12/2013 05:40 PM gottl...@nyu.edu wrote the following: copy the lvm partitions to directories on an external disk (ext3) What command did you use for copying? cp -ax rsync not is on the minimal install. rsync is on my 2013 amd-x64 minimal install CD. Do you have an amd-x64 install and do you have the latest version of the minimal install CD? I do have amd64, but not 2013. allan
