Re: [gentoo-user] Xorg Performance, on Intel Graphics
> > Well 2.5.3 is not in the tree anymore and 2.5.1 results in X crashing on Sorry, I made a mistake: I wanted to write 2.5.1-r1.. > start with garbled screen. But I will avoid the upgrade after checking > that bug :) Thanks for warning You are welcome. I got a hint and I successfully removed all links to the old .la lib, but I got a lot of new problems :) So, I think I will rebuild X.. Cheers, IStván
Re: [gentoo-user] Xorg Performance, on Intel Graphics
eredeti üzenet- Feladó: "Thomas Kahle" tom...@gmx.de Címzett: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, linux-think...@linux-thinkpad.org Dátum: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:32:32 +0200 - > Hi everyone, > > I use the thinkpad X61s with Intel Graphics Mobile GM965/GL960 running > Gentoo. > > Since an update on Monday I cannot get my X to work the smooth way it > was working before. > Hi Thomas, Downgrade your xf86-video-intel to 2.5.3.x I tried to upgrade my system with overlay x11 and USE="xcb" and I got a totally messed system. See these, before do anything: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248743 http://bugs.gentoo.org/158476 Cheers, István
Re: [gentoo-user] FYI: xf86-video-intel 2.6.x Bad opengl performance
Hi Mike, Thank you very much for your help, it is really detailed :) More than I expect :) I already read some (short) documents about GEM and now I have a tiny picture about it. Following your way I try to rebuild my X. I missed the x11 overlay eredeti üzenet- Feladó: "Mike Kazantsev" mike_kazant...@fraggod.net Címzett: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Dátum: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:48:52 +0600 - > > As you can see mesa and libdrm are live ebuilds, but from my experience > they are fairly stable. Still prehaps it's best to stick to the main > tree if it'll suffice. Usually I use bleeding edge/unstable things, so, this is not a problem :) > > With that I get about 60 FPS, but that seems to be expected behavior - > you also need to set up dri for more. Now I have ~20 or less in action. > And that's probably all I did to set it up, but I might miss something > out, because of unreliable memory. Try to use better RAM, like this: BrainExtender v0.98b LongLife XT6725-IU-70 for 70 years warranty ;) > Hope that helps. Absolutely, thank you very much again. > I didn't really went into low-level specifics of "how it all works" > myself, but planning to examine the topic a bit more closely, someday. This is not necessary, I am better in reading English than writing :) Have a nice day, István
Re: [gentoo-user] FYI: xf86-video-intel 2.6.x Bad opengl performance
> Did you try to use it with GEM in .28/.29 kernels? > I believe GEM technology of the latest kernels should be the focus of > latest releases. > Hi Mike, Could you explain this GEM technology a little bit more? I installed gentoo-sources-2.6.29 + lates (2.6.3) intel driver, but I get half performance than with 2.5.x intel driver. Now I call my friend, google to see, what he will tell me :) Thank you, István
Re: [gentoo-user] FYI: xf86-video-intel 2.6.x Bad opengl performance
eredeti üzenet- Feladó: "Mike Kazantsev" mike_kazant...@fraggod.net Címzett: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Dátum: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 20:56:59 +0600 - > Did you try to use it with GEM in .28/.29 kernels? > I believe GEM technology of the latest kernels should be the focus of > latest releases. > > Works pretty good (for IGP) here on both: > > r...@coercion:~# glxinfo | g renderer > OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20090114 x86/MMX/SSE2 > Hi Mike, You should right, I use gentoo-sources-2.6.27. So, in this case, it is a PEBCAK :) Thank you for the information! Cheers, István
[gentoo-user] FYI: xf86-video-intel 2.6.x Bad opengl performance
Hello Everybody, I have a laptop with Intel 945GM videochip. I use ~x86 and I expected a very bad opengl performance afte I switched to intel driver from 2.5.x to 2.6. The compiz and playing video were very slow, independently of the CPU usage. So, after all I downgraded the xf86-video-intel to the latest 2.5.x version and I got a good performance again. If one has this kind of issue, try to downgrade to 2.5.x. Regards, István -- István PONGRÁCZ http://www.startit.hu http://www.osbusiness.hu
Re: [gentoo-user] OT (ish): What are the average requirements of a small business server?
2007. 04. 3, kedd keltezéssel 17.34-kor Joel Merrick ezt írta: > Hello list!! > . > Anyway, here is some of the list that we are thinking about implementing: > Thanks! > Joel and Mark Hi, Probably you should like to give a try to my livecd. With that livecd I try to build up a working server solution, based on gentoo. I tried it several times in Virtualbox (qemu also good, only a little bit slower). Somewhere my previous email is travelling at this moment, I hope it will arrive to the list :) Regards, István -- Nyílt forráskód azokra az igazán nehéz napokra. BSA Open source for those really hard days. BSA http://www.osbusiness.hu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Diary tool?
Hi, 2007. 03. 27, kedd keltezéssel 11.37-kor buffalo ezt írta: > > Using vim seems somewhat not the best way for organizing everyday's > information together. Depends on you :) Normal desktop user prefers the comfortable way, that is why I recommend Tomboy for you :) I also use it for ad-hoc notes, etc. Others prefer vim, joe, mcedit etc :) For console, these are probably the best :) Bye, István -- Nyílt forráskód azokra az igazán nehéz napokra. BSA Open source for those really hard days. BSA http://www.osbusiness.hu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: Re: [gentoo-user] Diary tool?
What about Tomboy? Easy to use etc. IStván 2007. 03. 27, kedd keltezéssel 00.06-kor [EMAIL PROTECTED] ezt írta: > Thank you Jurgen! But I did not mean the web based blogging system. I > want just a tool, or a software. > > Best, > Buffalo > > > __ > > 2007-03-27 > > __ > 发件人： JrgenGeuter > 发送时间： 2007-03-26 23:47:06 > 收件人： gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > 抄送： > 主题： Re: [gentoo-user] Diary tool? > > On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 16:32 +0800, buffalo wrote: > > Hossa > > > Hi all! Does anybody know whether there exist some good diary tools > > under gentoo linux? I appreciate your help very much! > > Well you could always setup your own blogging software, there are quite > a few available in portage (www-apps/pyblosxom, > www-apps/b2evolution ...). > > Weblogs are of course available free of charge in many places online, > but if it's just for you and not top be public you could just setup your > own little blog that only you can access. > > Jürgen > -- > ICQ #81510866 - http://the-gay-bar.com - MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Occam's Razor: >-"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem."- -- Nyílt forráskód azokra az igazán nehéz napokra. BSA Open source for those really hard days. BSA http://www.osbusiness.hu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] 100% CPU usage with no processes to blame?
2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 13.28-kor Jerry McBride ezt írta: > I tracked my 100% cpu usage to FAMD... Killing it instantly freed the cpu... Change to gamin. The same function in much better. I did it about a year ago. (Or less, I don't remember). It solved me some other problems (CD lock down etc.) In the gentoo documents you can find article about how to change it. Regards, István -- Nyílt forráskód azokra az igazán nehéz napokra. BSA Open source for those really hard days. BSA http://www.osbusiness.hu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel randomly locking up, no error messeges, no panics nothing.
I had the same experience, when I turned on the 'DMA engine' option in the kernel config (from 2.6.18.x) I disabled it and after it everything are working fine. István 2007. 02. 14, szerda keltezéssel 15.30-kor Ivan Lucian Aron ezt írta: > > > On 2/14/07, Hemmann, Volker Armin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, Ivan Lucian Aron wrote: > > On 2/14/07, Duane Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > SysRq-t? Sorry can't find it in portage, can you explain > please? > > less /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysrq.txt > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > > > Thanks. So wait for it to lock again, and check the kernel tasks with > sysrq-t / echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger. > Will get back as soon as I get more info. > > > > > -- Nyílt forráskód azokra az igazán nehéz napokra. BSA Open source for those really hard days. BSA http://www.osbusiness.hu -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
