[gentoo-user] Can't get ULI-Raid1 to work
Hi,
i already searched all over the internet, but couldn't find anything
yet...
I'm having a hard time getting my onbard raid1 back to work with a new
mainboard. The old one had an nforc4 chip and worked fine, but the new
one (Asus A8R-MVP) has an ULI m5288 chipset.
I can use both SATA drives, but not together as a raid1, i was using
dmraid, but this doesn't support the ULI chipset.
So i was wondering if anyone else got it working or has any
suggestions to get it working?
PS: on the mainboard-cd there were only drivers for Fedora, RH and
Suse but those don't work;\
thx!
greetings,
Roman v. Gemmeren
--
Ask not what's inside your head, but what your head's inside of.
-- J.J. Gibson
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Tomcat5 + Apache2: Deploying
sorry, typo in the mail-address... should have been sent to the german mailinglist. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Tomcat5 + Apache2: Deploying
Hallo, nachdem ich nun Apache2 + Tomcat5 mittels mod_jk eingermassen ans laufen bekommen habe, stellt sich mir nur noch ein Problem dar: Wie kann ich WAR-Archive die ich über die Web-Schnittstelle deployed habe, direkt über den Apache verfügbar machen? Momentan hab ich Tomcat+mod_jk frisch gemerged, und nur unter /etc/apache2/modules.d/88-mod_kj.conf folgendes hinzugefügt: Alias /tomcat.gif /var/www/localhost/htdocs/img/tomcat.gif Alias /tomcat-power.gif /var/www/localhost/htdocs/img/tomcat-power.gif Alias /jakarta-banner.gif /var/www/localhost/htdocs/img/jakarta-banner.gif #jkMount /manager ajp13 jkMount /manager/* ajp13 #jkMount /manager/*.jsp ajp13 jkMount /admin/* ajp13 jkMount /jsp-examples/* ajp13 jkMount /tomcat-docs/* ajp13 jkMount /servlets-examples/* ajp13 - Das funktioniert auch, aber ich will nicht für jede neue Anwendung die Datei neu editieren müssen.. Ist das irgendwie machbar? vielen Dank schonmal im voraus! -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] apache2 update
Am 23.9.2005 schrieb "q-parser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >Hi. > >I've just updated my apache2 and I found out there were several changes >done. I mean replacing apache2/conf/apache2.conf with apache2/httpd.conf >and stuff. But it's not the issue. I have a problem with getting php >back to work. In /etc/conf.d/apache2 there's that APACHE2_OPTS="-D >DEFAULT_VHOST". I've added -D PHP4 there, restarted server, but it does >still not parse any php file. > >q-parser hi, did you move your php.ini (and the other files) to /etc/apache2? I had a hard time figuring this out.. With the new 'streamlined' layout, as far as i know, all config-file were moved from /etc/apache2/conf/ to /etc/apache2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] strowi # ls /etc/apache2/ apache2-builtin-mods httpd.conf.bak mime.types php.ini vhosts.d httpd.confmagic modules.d ssl If that does not work you should have a look at the startup-errorlog from apache2. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Postfix/Cyrus + Spam/ClamAV
hi,
yesterday i converted my sever from courier-imap -> cyrus-imap. After
struggling with the messed ebuild in portaeg ( for others with the problem:
change "emake" -> "make", there is already a thread at bugzilla), it already
checks for spam transfers mail to the correct mail-folders. And btw: It's so
much faster than courier...)
Fot this i've setup postfix like this:
main.cf
Code:
..
mailbox_transport = spamcyr
..
master.cf
Code:
spamcyr unix - n n - - pipe
user=cyrus argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e /usr/lib/cyrus/deliver -r ${sender} -m
${extension} ${user}
But how can i integrate clamassassin? is it possible to run it from
sieve-filter-script?
Or do i need to run maildrop and pipe the mail through the filters?
What would be the best way to do this?
Thx!
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
Roman
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge can't create lock in NFS exported distfiles directory
Alexander Skwar wrote: Hi! How can I use a NFS exported distfiles directory? Hi, this is part of my /etc/exports, where sleipnir is the name of the computer: /usr/portage/ sleipnir(rw,sync,no_root_squash,nohide,no_subtree_check) works fine here. -- Ciao, Roman v. Gemmeren -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] First time Nvidia user - help required
Mark Knecht wrote: Hi Roman, No immediate need. I seem to have solved the problem, at least as a starting point. My bad for not trying the ~x86 version of the nvidia driver. Once installed I now get into Gnome, get Direct Rendering and get about 1600 FPS out of glxgears so I think things look at least OK. What is a reasonable glxgears FPS for an AGP 4X GeForce4 card running on an Athlon XP 1600+? Anyway, I seem to be in good shape now. Thanks for writing back. Hi, i'm glad you solved your problem. I had a Geforce 5200 until i purchased a ATI Card 3 weeks ago. glxgears gave me ~1500fps without any special tweaking. (BUT PLS don't use glxgears for benchmarking stuff, it gives very inconsistent results i on different systems). It's better to use sth like ut2004-demo. PS: My new ATI x800 (i know, little overkill, but after my exams...;)) gives me also 1600fps in glxgears (there are some very strange problems with the drivers on amd64).;( But hey, gaming is, what windows was made for. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] First time Nvidia user - help required
MX 4000 AGP 8x] (rev c1) godzilla ~ # I've almost never read an NVidia thread on this list some I'm starting from nowhere here. I hope this is some stupid mistake some nice person out there will recognize and save me from yet another bad Linux adapter weekend. Thanks, Mark hi, looks almost fine to me. I would guess the error is in /etc/X11/xorg.conf. Could you post your /etc/X11/xorg.conf ? -- Ciao, Roman v. Gemmeren -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] use flags (once more)
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:24:29 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: yes, it is cascading. And your make.conf is read last. Which means whatever in the defaults will hold unless your make.conf gives a different one... Except for the environment, which is processed after make.conf. And /etc/portage/package.use, which is processed between the two? Hi, /etc/portage/package.use is processed last. Because you set package-specific flags in there. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
