Re: [gentoo-user] sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6 dies!

2007-12-30 Thread purple
i solved such bummer following the next procedure 
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
hope you will too, good luck :)

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

2007-12-27 Thread purple
still no solution? :\


-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

2007-12-20 Thread purple
i tried what Neil suggested:

 put this in your make.conf:
 SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/opt /home
 This should really go in /etc/revdep-rebuild/99revdep-rebuild nowadays.

same thing continue to bugs me even with this :\
dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.16 rebilds again :|


-- 
purple..


[gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

2007-12-19 Thread purple
after a while a built new desktop with xfce and since than i have issues
with sun-jdk-1.4.2.16 when running revdep-rebuild because revdep constandly
rebuild sun-jdk-1.4.2.16 over and over again every time i run it..
sample output from revdep-rebuild:
http://rafb.net/p/0HuBCG36.nln.html

seems its filed bug  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177925 but
still isn't resolved obviously, anyone else, with solution maybe?
thanks

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

2007-12-19 Thread purple
i dont find that soulution as the elegant one, must be some logical solution
for that on java developer side.. everything worked excellent on KDE, and
just after i did a clean install with XFCE this problem popped up..
btw revdep-rebuild never caused me a trouble, ever..
-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] X.Org 1.4 with Nvidia?

2007-10-03 Thread purple
On 10/3/07, Harley Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Alexander Skwar wrote:
  Does anyone know, if it's now safe to use xorg 1.4 with
 nvidia-drivers?


 there's really _no need_ for you to star using new X at this time because
of its oftenly reported instabilty, lockups and crashes with any nvidia
driver, make your self mature and stop thinking so bleeding edge way..
X 7.2 runs perfectly at the moment so why to switch from something that
works to something new and unstable yet just for sake being up 2 date..
wait some time, it'll all going to be ok soon, so be patient and clever :)


-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-27 Thread purple
ummm, anyone there who tried to help, just to let you know problem is solved
with this morning's emerge -NDuva world where new udev release (115)
apeared..i just casualy pluged stick and it was instanty automounted on
fstab defined point (/mnt/usb) as well as a cdrom with same instant mounting
few seconds from putting it in a rom..

im glad to have such power community willing to help individual under any
circumstances, once again thank yaall :)

long live gentoo :)



purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-26 Thread purple
anyway, remerged a whole world, same again, no mounted devices after pluging
in usb stick or cd..
verry unhappy..

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-26 Thread purple
yeah, everything is ok: kernel, fstab, permissions, mounting by
hand..everything is ok and device is recognized nicely in dmesg when pluged
in..the problem is only that it wont automount on point already defined in
fstab..
neither ivman works with its automounting feature, im desperate :|

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-26 Thread purple
heh, look guys, mounting by hand works but thats not the thing i want at the
moment..
i need every single usb stick or cd automounted on they mount points, that
simple..

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-22 Thread purple
Maxim, my drive is sda. vfat is compiled in the kerneland working excelent
as i already have a vfat partition on other driver which is mounted in the
boot time, and 'auto' does not automount neither my cdrom nor usb but any of
aforementioned devices are normaly mounted by hand but thats not the thing i
want..
i guess i need to have a fully plugplay desktop so problem still remains :|
thnxx anyone for help, really appreciate it..


-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
/etc/fstab:

/dev/hdb1   /   ext3  noatime,data=journal
0 1
/dev/hdb5noneswap
sw  0 0
/dev/hda1   /mnt/c   ntfs
defaults,uid=500,gid=500,nls=utf8 0 0
/dev/hda5   /mnt/d   ntfs
defaults,uid=500,gid=500,nls=utf8 0 0
/dev/hdb6   /mnt/e   vfat
defaults,uid=500,gid=500  0 0
/dev/hdc /mnt/cdromiso9660wheel,auto,ro,uid=500,gid=500
  0 0
/dev/sda1   /mnt/usbvfat
wheel,defaults  0 0

proc   /procproc
defaults   0 0
shm   /dev/shm  tmpfs
nodev,nosuid,noexec0 0
none  /var/tmp/portage   tmpfs
size=1400,nr_inodes=1M,noauto   0 0
-- 
_
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
nope, same thing..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
when usb plugged in dmesg says:

 usb 2-3: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2
 usb 2-3: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
 scsi0 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
 usb-storage: device found at 2
 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
 scsi scan: INQUIRY result too short (5), using 36
 scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access USB2.0   (FS) FLASH DISK  1.00 PQ: 0 ANSI:
 0 CCS
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 503521 512-byte hardware sectors (258 MB)
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 c0 00 00
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 503521 512-byte hardware sectors (258 MB)
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 c0 00 00
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write through
  sda: sda1
 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
 usb-storage: device scan complete


and tail -f /var/log/messages:

 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 c0 00 00
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write
 through
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 503521 512-byte hardware sectors
 (258 MB)
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 c0 00 00
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Assuming drive cache: write
 through
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sda: sda1
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI removable disk
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
 Aug 21 20:11:49 daemon usb-storage: device scan complete


so device _IS_ recognized apperently but not automounted on fstab predefined
place nor any other and thats what really bugs me :|

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
you are right, it is basic question and yes, i am in plugdev :)



-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
and another basic answer, yes both are added to default rulevel thus working
all the time..

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-21 Thread purple
i using gentoo for a year and i know when daemons are working and whent they
're not..
pls gove me something constructive, im not begginer ok?

-- 
purple..


[gentoo-user] cdrom and usb automounting problem..

2007-08-20 Thread purple
for some reason automounting on a new gentoo install with KDE don't work..
i tried numerous forums but didnt found the right answer, even tried ivman
and autofs but neither of'em don't work as i expect them too.
hal-0.5.9.1-r1, dbus-1.0.2-r2, udev-114-r1 are installed and maybe trouble
can be in kernel config so i meant to ask which kernel options need to be
enabled to take adventage of cdrom and usb automounting?
thnxx all

-- 
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] Updating the system fails

2007-06-06 Thread purple

well,you could unmerge all those crappy blocking packages if they arent in
toolchain group and then update your system with new packages and after that
adding packages you need..
that procedure worked for me numerous times so i dont see the reason why it
shouldnt do the same for you..

just apply ne 2007.0 profile,manage your make.conf and start fixing the
godamn thing :)


Re: [gentoo-user] lilo device-mapper warning

2007-04-27 Thread purple

1. Enable DM support in the kernel:
Device Drivers
Multi-device support (RAID and LVM)
[*] Multiple devices driver support (RAID and LVM)
[*] Device mapper support

source :::
http://ronan.lepage1.free.fr/repository/Linux/Linux.Kernel.in.a.nutshell.pdf

enjoy :)


Re: [gentoo-user] lilo device-mapper warning

2007-04-27 Thread purple

1. Enable DM support in the kernel:
Device Drivers
Multi-device support (RAID and LVM)
[*] Multiple devices driver support (RAID and LVM)
[*] Device mapper support

source :::
http://ronan.lepage1.free.fr/repository/Linux/Linux.Kernel.in.a.nutshell.pdf

enjoy :)


Re: [gentoo-user] Stage tarballs

2007-04-16 Thread purple

installing with stage3 and 2x emerge -e system and 2x emerge -e world will
give you exact performance as it was installed from stage1..

On 4/16/07, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Monday 16 April 2007, Jesús Guerrero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
'Re:
[gentoo-user] Stage tarballs':
 El Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:54:49 +0300

 Stratos Psomadakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
  can anyone explain to me what are the differences between the stage
  1,2 and 3 installation tarballs?ç

 They are three different stages of the same thing. Stage1 is a tarball
 which contains a basic minimal C compiler.

And, unless a fix has been discovered and applied, stage1 tarball doesn't
contain any information about what packages own what files, so starting
from stage 1 will leave a minimal amount of cruft in /usr (?and /var?).

IIRC, I started from stage 1 on my first install (2004.3), but I wouldn't
recommend anything other than stage 3 to anyone at this point, since
there's now an established procedure for changing your CHOST if need be,
and packages in system will eventually pick up any CFLAGS customizations
gradually.

--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy   `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.org/  \_/





--
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: create an installable custom distro with gentoo?

2007-04-14 Thread purple

in this case you need a second drive or boot your cd with
the option to load the whole image to memory (I d'ont remember the name
for it

in boot prompt of livecd type:

# gentoo docache

greets :)

--
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] RE: layman overlays

2007-03-23 Thread purple

there is no gtk2 USE flag any longer,it was substituted with gtk..

On 3/23/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


John covici wrote:
 checking which gecko to use... firefox
 checking for compiler -fshort-wchar option... yes
 checking whether to enable C++ RTTI... no
 checking whether we have a gtk 2 gecko build... configure: error: This
 program needs a gtk 2 gecko build

Seems to be saying ff wasn't built with gtk2 use flag (which i thought was
set by default.)

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list





--
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with no gnome 2.18 in portage?

2007-03-21 Thread purple

well,i asked here that question as well and i sent mail to one of guys
maintaining that part of portage,Daniel Gryniewicz and got very quick
response from him telling me that they will include gnome  2.18 in portage
when they achive minimum testing point of it..

maybe this can help,i did it and running gnome 2.18 in no time,enjoy..

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage_Overlay_Listing#Gnome_Experimental_Overlay

On 3/21/07, John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


on Tuesday 03/20/2007 Daevid Vincent([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
 http://www.gnome.org/start/2.18/

 http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gnome

 Latest listed is 2.16.2
 There isn't even a 2.18 masked or anything.

 ??
I am interested if that were possible -- I heard there is already a
feature freeze on gnome 2.18, so if it can be done, it would be
appreciated here.

--
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list





--
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with no gnome 2.18 in portage?

2007-03-21 Thread purple

emerge -NDuva world??

On 3/21/07, John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


on Wednesday 03/21/2007 purple([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
 well,i asked here that question as well and i sent mail to one of guys
 maintaining that part of portage,Daniel Gryniewicz and got very quick
 response from him telling me that they will include gnome  2.18 in
portage
 when they achive minimum testing point of it..

 maybe this can help,i did it and running gnome 2.18 in no time,enjoy..


http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage_Overlay_Listing#Gnome_Experimental_Overlay

OK, excuse me for being an idiot, but I now have the gnome
experimental overlay installed, how do I now update all gnome packages
to their experimental versions?

Thanks.


 On 3/21/07, John covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  on Tuesday 03/20/2007 Daevid Vincent([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
   http://www.gnome.org/start/2.18/
  
   http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gnome
  
   Latest listed is 2.16.2
   There isn't even a 2.18 masked or anything.
  
   ??
  I am interested if that were possible -- I heard there is already a
  feature freeze on gnome 2.18, so if it can be done, it would be
  appreciated here.
 
  --
  Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
  How do
  you spend it?
 
   John Covici
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  --
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 


 --
 purple..
 well,i asked here that question as well and i sent mail to one of guys
maintaining that part of portage,Daniel Gryniewicz and got very quick
response from him telling me that they will include gnomenbsp; 2.18 in
portage when they achive minimum testing point of it..
 brbrmaybe this can help,i did it and running gnome 2.18 in no
time,enjoy..brbra href=
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage_Overlay_Listing#Gnome_Experimental_Overlay

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage_Overlay_Listing#Gnome_Experimental_Overlay
 /abrbrdivspan class=gmail_quoteOn 3/21/07, b
class=gmail_sendernameJohn covici/b lt;a href=mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/agt;
wrote:/spanblockquote class=gmail_quote style=border-left: 1px solid
rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;
 on Tuesday 03/20/2007 Daevid Vincent(a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a) wrotebr gt; a href=
http://www.gnome.org/start/2.18/;http://www.gnome.org/start/2.18//abr
gt;br gt; a href=http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gnome;
 http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=gnome/abr gt;br gt;
Latest listed is 2.16.2br gt; There isn#39;t even a 2.18 masked or
anything.br gt;br gt; ??brI am interested if that were possible -- I
heard there is already a
 brfeature freeze on gnome 2.18, so if it can be done, it would
bebrappreciated here.brbr--brYour life is like a
penny.nbsp;nbsp;You#39;re going to lose it.nbsp;nbsp;The question
is:brHow dobryou spend
it?brbrnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; John Covici
 brnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; a href=mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/abr--bra href=mailto:
gentoo-user@gentoo.orggentoo-user@gentoo.org/a mailing
listbrbr/blockquote/divbrbr clear=allbr-- br
 purple..

--
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list





--
purple..


Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with no gnome 2.18 in portage?

2007-03-21 Thread purple

do you have such line in make.conf?


PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage
/usr/local/overlays/gnome-experimental



all you need is to read a manual from link i posted first time and
everything's going to be just fine..


Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with no gnome 2.18 in portage?

2007-03-21 Thread purple

well,if you want it do it for your self..


Re: [gentoo-user] What's the deal with no gnome 2.18 in portage?

2007-03-21 Thread purple

i talk to guy started this list..


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge xen-tools -- asm/page.h: No such file or directory

2007-03-20 Thread purple

hi man..
i got simular problem and did this one:

ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm/page.h /usr/include/asm

it worked for me,enjoy



On 3/20/07, Yuriy Popyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello
i'm trying to
emerge xen-tools

but it fails with asm/page.h: No such file or directory
(it searching for a file in /usr/include/... ?) how to specify to look for
it in kernel source ?
can anybody help me ?

make[2]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/xen-
tools-3.0.2-r4/work/xen-3.0.2/tools/misc/mbootpack'
gcc -Wp,-MD,.mbootpack.o.d -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m32
-march=i686 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement
-D__XEN_INTERFACE_VERSION__=0x00030101 -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-qual
-Wno-unused -Wno-format -Wmissing-prototypes -pipe -I. -I-  -c mbootpack.c-o
mbootpack.o
cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead
mbootpack.c:45:22: error: asm/page.h: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** [mbootpack.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/xen-
tools-3.0.2-r4/work/xen-3.0.2/tools/misc/mbootpack'
make[1]: *** [build] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/xen-
tools-3.0.2-r4/work/xen-3.0.2/tools/misc'
make: *** [all] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/xen-tools-3.0.2-r4
/work/xen-3.0.2/tools'





--
purple..