Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 00:09 +0100, Thomas Rösner wrote: > Fredrik Tolf wrote: > > Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI > > FAM with Gnome 2.16, and, if not, how to make emerge not do that? > > gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.16.1.ebuild doesnt dep on either of them, and > contains: > [...] Indeed, the gnome ebuild itself does not depend on gamin, but it seems that with the ldap USE flag, it depends on sabayon, and sabayon depends on gamin. Why Sabayon would be related to LDAP, I have no idea whatsoever. I guess this means that I can just remove the ldap USE flag from gnome and it will work, though. Furthermore, it seems that Ekiga is only dep'd with USE=ldap as well. Has anyone an idea why? Fredrik Tolf -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM
Fredrik Tolf wrote: I just noticed that Gnome 2.16 wants Gamin instead of SGI FAM. I don't, though, since I use NFS and, last I looked, Gamin doesn't support monitoring NFS exports, unlike SGI FAM. AFAIK it polls. Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI FAM with Gnome 2.16, and, if not, how to make emerge not do that? gnome-base/gnome/gnome-2.16.1.ebuild doesnt dep on either of them, and contains: einfo "To take full advantage of GNOME's functionality, please emerge" einfo "gamin, a File Alteration Monitor." einfo "Make sure you have inotify enabled in your kernel ( >=2.6.13 )" einfo einfo "Make sure you rc-update del famd and emerge unmerge fam if you" einfo "are switching from fam to gamin." einfo einfo "If you have problems, you may want to try using fam instead." Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16 and FAM
I just noticed that Gnome 2.16 wants Gamin instead of SGI FAM. I don't, though, since I use NFS and, last I looked, Gamin doesn't support monitoring NFS exports, unlike SGI FAM. Does anyone know if it's really necessary to use Gamin instead of SGI FAM with Gnome 2.16, and, if not, how to make emerge not do that? Fredrik Tolf -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker
At Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:52:18 -0600 Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Rösner wrote: >> Allan Gottlieb wrote: >>> My normal >>>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >>> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >>> >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: >>> >>> Calculating world dependencies... done! >>> [blocks B ] >> dev-python/pygobject-2.12.3) >>> >> >> Did you see the > >>> I know that when A blocks B, you emerge --unmerge A (or do without B). >>> >> >> In this case it's enough to update A ;-). >> >> >> Regards, >>T. > > emerge -C pygtk then do a emerge -uvD world. Add in a -p if you need to. > > That worked for me last night. It actually installs a newer version of > pygtk if I recall correctly. > > Hope that helps. Yes it does. thanks, allan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker
Thomas Rösner wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> My normal >>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: >> >> Calculating world dependencies... done! >> [blocks B ] > dev-python/pygobject-2.12.3) >> > > Did you see the >> I know that when A blocks B, you emerge --unmerge A (or do without B). >> > > In this case it's enough to update A ;-). > > > Regards, >T. emerge -C pygtk then do a emerge -uvD world. Add in a -p if you need to. That worked for me last night. It actually installs a newer version of pygtk if I recall correctly. Hope that helps. Dale :-) :-) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker
At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:22:20 +0100 Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> My normal >>emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world >> showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with >> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: >> >> Calculating world dependencies... done! >> [blocks B ] > dev-python/pygobject-2.12.3) >> > > Did you see the >> I know that when A blocks B, you emerge --unmerge A (or do without B). >> > > In this case it's enough to update A ;-). Thanks, allan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker
Allan Gottlieb wrote: My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ] Did you see the I know that when A blocks B, you emerge --unmerge A (or do without B). In this case it's enough to update A ;-). Regards, T. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] gnome 2.16 block by non-installed blocker
My normal emerge --tree --ask --verbose --newuse --update --deep world showed that gnome 2.16 is now stable. The output starts with These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [blocks B ] >> These are the packages that would be unmerged: --- Couldn't find 'dev-python/pygtk-2.9' to unmerge. >>> No packages selected for removal by unmerge. ajglap gottlieb # eix pygtk * dev-python/pygtk Available versions: [M]0.6.11:1.2 [M]0.6.11-r1:1.2 2.6.1:2 ~2.6.2:2 2.8.2:2 ~2.8.4:2 2.8.6:2 ~2.10.1:2 *2.10.1-r1:2 2.10.3:2 Installed: 2.8.6 Should I be unmerging pygtk-2.8.6 and am I wrong to expect that the specific version mention in the block msg will be installed on my system? thanks in advance, allan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:51:00 +0100 (BST), Peter Campion-Bye wrote: > >> I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ >> Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? > > http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=gnome-base shows ebuilds > for most of the packages already, but they are still hard-masked. you > could install them now if you added them to /etc/portage/package.unmask. Yes I saw that, but I thought it would be wise to wait until there's a 2.16 meta-package for gnome-base/gnome itself, hopefully it won't be too long. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 14:51:00 +0100 (BST), Peter Campion-Bye wrote: > I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ > Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=gnome-base shows ebuilds for most of the packages already, but they are still hard-masked. you could install them now if you added them to /etc/portage/package.unmask. -- Neil Bothwick Sir! Romulan warbird decloaki»®õ÷üÁ NO CARRIER signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Gnome 2.16?
I see Gnome 2.16 is released - http://www.gnome.org/start/2.16/ Anyone got a timescale for when it will be in ~x86? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:39 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Ow Mun Heng wrote: >>> Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows >>> 2.14. >>> >> Well, >> According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is >> the development build. 2.16 doesn't exist, that is probably why its not >> in portage ;-) >> >> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning > > > Arrgh.. Crap.. Sorry for the noise. (Bad Hair day today) > > So.. I believe the correct question is .. when will Gentoo unmask > Gnome-2.14? When is the timeline? > > (I know I can unmask it myself, but that's not something I want to do) > Packages get marked stable 30 days after the last resolved bug (unofficial knowledge, but I believe it is correct) There are quite afew bugs so I bet it will be awhile yet before it is marked stable: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=product&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=gnome&field0-0-1=component&type0-0-1=substring&value0-0-1=gnome&field0-0-2=short_desc&type0-0-2=substring&value0-0-2=gnome&field0-0-3=status_whiteboard&type0-0-3=substring&value0-0-3=gnome&field1-0-0=product&type1-0-0=substring&value1-0-0=2.14&field1-0-1=component&type1-0-1=substring&value1-0-1=2.14&field1-0-2=short_desc&type1-0-2=substring&value1-0-2=2.14&field1-0-3=status_whiteboard&type1-0-3=substring&value1-0-3=2.14 - -- Jeremy Olexa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Office: EE/CS 1-201 CS/IT Systems Staff University of Minnesota -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEgQssFN7pD9kMi/URAh9ZAJwK63VEfUdfhrIoP0hyP5Q91sCdHACaAr3y 18p6SSPWS+13TAiBCXGIQ5c= =Nz5y -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 22:39 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows > > 2.14. > > > > Well, > According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is > the development build. 2.16 doesn't exist, that is probably why its not > in portage ;-) > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning Arrgh.. Crap.. Sorry for the noise. (Bad Hair day today) So.. I believe the correct question is .. when will Gentoo unmask Gnome-2.14? When is the timeline? (I know I can unmask it myself, but that's not something I want to do) -- Cheers, Ow Mun Heng Head Media Engineering -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ow Mun Heng wrote: > Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows > 2.14. > Well, According to GNOME's homepage, 2.14 is the stable release and 2.15 is the development build. 2.16 doesn't exist, that is probably why its not in portage ;-) http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning - -- Jeremy Olexa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Office: EE/CS 1-201 CS/IT Systems Staff University of Minnesota -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEgQR/FN7pD9kMi/URAlDNAJ4xVtJ+9IKYkj9bxLuyBMq7OKZN/ACZAXXx hXGyAWfpuXcsV0xT3qh6U1Q= =SHE5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 20:20 -0700, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows > 2.14. Since 2.16 doesn't exist, that seems appropriate. :) -- Keith Kastorff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Gnome-2.16
Where is gnome-2.16? It's not in portage? eix gnome-desktop only shows 2.14. -- Cheers, Ow Mun Heng -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
