Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-03 Thread Justin
Albert Hopkins schrieb:
 On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 23:38 +0100, Michele Schiavo wrote:
   
 on me, it aet 413.9 of virtual and 44.9 of resident..

 

 Ok, here's is what I found.  Both my 32-bit GNOME boxes show about
 70-80MB VIRT for gnome-panel.

 My x64 box shows 303MB.  Moreover, top shows the following top memory
 munchers:

 Process  VIRT RES
 -
 epiphany  747MB   104MB
 pidgin502MB47MB
 evolution 597MB43MB
 nautilus  483MB41MB
 gnome-panel   303MB32MB
 ---
 Total  2632MB   267MB

 However free shows only 643MB in total used (including buffers/cache)
 with no swap.  According to the top man page VIRT = SWAP + RES, but
 obviously that doesn't add up.  But the RES for gnome-panel is similar
 on both my 32- and 64-bit machines.  So I'm guessing something on the
 64bit machines is getting reported/translated differently.

 Maybe someone smarter than me can comment on this.





   
for me 38.5 and 18.5 Mb with an uptime and locked in desktop for 58 days.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-02 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Is it normal? I'm on ~amd64.



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-02 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 22:10 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
 Is it normal? I'm on ~amd64.

I don't know what is normal but my gnome-panel is using about 71MB
virtual memory (16MB resident).

Perhaps you've got a leaky panel applet?





Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-02 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 23:05:13 Albert Hopkins wrote:
 On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 22:10 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
  Is it normal? I'm on ~amd64.

 I don't know what is normal but my gnome-panel is using about 71MB
 virtual memory (16MB resident).

 Perhaps you've got a leaky panel applet?

Thanks, perhaps. Will try to remove this or that one and see...



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-02 Thread Michele Schiavo
on me, it aet 413.9 of virtual and 44.9 of resident..



Il giorno mar, 02/12/2008 alle 23.30 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko ha scritto:

 On Tuesday 02 December 2008 23:05:13 Albert Hopkins wrote:
  On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 22:10 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
   Is it normal? I'm on ~amd64.
 
  I don't know what is normal but my gnome-panel is using about 71MB
  virtual memory (16MB resident).
 
  Perhaps you've got a leaky panel applet?
 
 Thanks, perhaps. Will try to remove this or that one and see...
 


signature.asc
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio	firmata digitalmente


Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel eats 350-400 MB

2008-12-02 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 23:38 +0100, Michele Schiavo wrote:
 on me, it aet 413.9 of virtual and 44.9 of resident..
 

Ok, here's is what I found.  Both my 32-bit GNOME boxes show about
70-80MB VIRT for gnome-panel.

My x64 box shows 303MB.  Moreover, top shows the following top memory
munchers:

Process  VIRT RES
-
epiphany747MB   104MB
pidgin  502MB47MB
evolution   597MB43MB
nautilus483MB41MB
gnome-panel 303MB32MB
---
Total  2632MB   267MB

However free shows only 643MB in total used (including buffers/cache)
with no swap.  According to the top man page VIRT = SWAP + RES, but
obviously that doesn't add up.  But the RES for gnome-panel is similar
on both my 32- and 64-bit machines.  So I'm guessing something on the
64bit machines is getting reported/translated differently.

Maybe someone smarter than me can comment on this.







[gentoo-user] gnome-panel-2.14.2 ACCESS VIOLATION

2006-09-25 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi,

I've found a strange thing.

During an emerge --update --deep --newuse world
I've got

Leaving directory `/var/tmp/portage/gnome-panel-2.14.2/work/gnome-panel-2.14.2'
 Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gnome-panel-2.14.2-13019.log

This file contains

unlink:/usr/share/xml2po/docbook.pyc

An ad hoc work around was to chmod /usr/share/xml2po to be 
world writeable
which isn't the right solution.
Since this emerge was running as root the installation process seems
to drop priviledges temporarily.

Am I missing something or is it a bug?

Many thanks for a hint,

Helmut Jarausch

Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik
RWTH - Aachen University
D 52056 Aachen, Germany


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel-2.14.2 ACCESS VIOLATION

2006-09-25 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 25 September 2006 13:22, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
 I've found a strange thing.

 During an emerge --update --deep --newuse world
 I've got

 Leaving directory
 `/var/tmp/portage/gnome-panel-2.14.2/work/gnome-panel-2.14.2'

  Source compiled.

 --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
 --- LOG FILE =
 /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gnome-panel-2.14.2-13019.log

 This file contains

 unlink:/usr/share/xml2po/docbook.pyc

 An ad hoc work around was to chmod /usr/share/xml2po to be
 world writeable
 which isn't the right solution.

You can say that again!

 Since this emerge was running as root the installation process seems
 to drop priviledges temporarily.

Not quite. [1] explains it better that I could... If you really wanted to 
ignore a sandbox violation you should run:

# FEATURES=-sandbox emerge --oneshot gnome-panel

I wouldn't do that though...

 Am I missing something or is it a bug?

You are definitely missing something. Apparantly this is some kind of 
regression of bug #104088 [2]. I guess the fix is in comment #8.

[1] http://bugday.gentoo.org/sandbox.html
[2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104088

-- 
Bo Andresen


pgpPz61npyfVx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-22 Thread Spoiala Cristian
On 6/19/05, LostSon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello
  Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
 comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
 menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
 takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
 --

I think the problem is that icons of aplications aren't cached or smth.

-- 
- Spoiala Cristian
http://scristian.blogspot.com
http://planet.linux360.ro/arhiva/author/scristian/

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-20 Thread Tres Melton
I use enlightenment 16.7.2 but have a gnome panel running.  I am
experiencing the same issue of about a ten second delay as that which
was mentioned on the list.  I didn't used to have this problem until the
recent upgrade.  So Antonio, add one more to your list.


On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 22:05 -0700, Alan wrote:
 Same here.  Not sure if this is a gnome issue or a gnome on gentoo
 issue though.
 
 On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:24:40PM +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
  
   Yes, I've noticed that too. Seems to be happening here with gnome 2.10.
   Previous versions seem to be fine. Is something not loading when gnome
   comes up? or is it taking forever reading the menu config, etc?
  
  
   On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 01:23 +, LostSon wrote:
   Hello
Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
   comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
   menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
   takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
   -- 
   Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
  
  If there are two or three people more who have this problem, i'm going
  to file a bug ... So if this sounds familiar to you please reply to this
  mail ...
  Antonio
  
  -- 
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 -- 
 Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://arcterex.net
 
 Backups are for people who don't pray. -- big Mike
 -- 
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-- 
Tres

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-20 Thread Chris
I also experience the delay. I don't experience the delay with other
distros however. I was considering filing a bug myself but you folks can
go nuts.

Chris

On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 11:40 -0600, Tres Melton wrote:
 I use enlightenment 16.7.2 but have a gnome panel running.  I am
 experiencing the same issue of about a ten second delay as that which
 was mentioned on the list.  I didn't used to have this problem until the
 recent upgrade.  So Antonio, add one more to your list.
 
 
 On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 22:05 -0700, Alan wrote:
  Same here.  Not sure if this is a gnome issue or a gnome on gentoo
  issue though.
  
  On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:24:40PM +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
   gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
   
Yes, I've noticed that too. Seems to be happening here with gnome 2.10.
Previous versions seem to be fine. Is something not loading when gnome
comes up? or is it taking forever reading the menu config, etc?
   
   
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 01:23 +, LostSon wrote:
Hello
 Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for 
the
menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first 
time
takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
-- 
Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
   
   If there are two or three people more who have this problem, i'm going
   to file a bug ... So if this sounds familiar to you please reply to this
   mail ...
   Antonio
   
   -- 
   gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
  
  -- 
  Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://arcterex.net
  
  Backups are for people who don't pray. -- big Mike
  -- 
  gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 -- 
 Tres
 

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-20 Thread Iain Buchanan
   On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 01:23 +, LostSon wrote:
   Hello
Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
   comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
   menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
   takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
   -- 

I noticed the same thing - and I found a cause to it:

I had the Dictionary Lookup applet on one of my panels, and for some
reason, loading that applet made all my panels lockup until it had
loaded (about 10 seconds) during which time I could click on other
applets, but the clicks were stored up for this period of time.

So you could try watching your panels, looking for an applet that may be
taking time to load.

HTH,
-- 
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-19 Thread Antonio Coralles
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org wrote:

 Yes, I've noticed that too. Seems to be happening here with gnome 2.10.
 Previous versions seem to be fine. Is something not loading when gnome
 comes up? or is it taking forever reading the menu config, etc?


 On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 01:23 +, LostSon wrote:
 Hello
  Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
 comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
 menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
 takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
 -- 
 Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:

If there are two or three people more who have this problem, i'm going
to file a bug ... So if this sounds familiar to you please reply to this
mail ...
Antonio

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-19 Thread Holly Bostick
Janne Johansson schreef:
 On su, 2005-06-19 at 20:24 +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
 Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.

If there are two or three people more who have this problem, i'm going
to file a bug ... So if this sounds familiar to you please reply to this
mail ...
 
 
 I'm experiencing this also.
 

Ditto.

Holly
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-19 Thread Alan
Same here.  Not sure if this is a gnome issue or a gnome on gentoo
issue though.

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:24:40PM +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
 
  Yes, I've noticed that too. Seems to be happening here with gnome 2.10.
  Previous versions seem to be fine. Is something not loading when gnome
  comes up? or is it taking forever reading the menu config, etc?
 
 
  On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 01:23 +, LostSon wrote:
  Hello
   Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
  comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
  menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
  takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
  -- 
  Statux [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
 
 If there are two or three people more who have this problem, i'm going
 to file a bug ... So if this sounds familiar to you please reply to this
 mail ...
 Antonio
 
 -- 
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

-- 
Alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://arcterex.net

Backups are for people who don't pray. -- big Mike
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-19 Thread LostSon
 

On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 22:05 -0700, Alan wrote:
 Same here.  Not sure if this is a gnome issue or a gnome on gentoo
 issue though.

 I dont think its a gentoo issue i installed Ubuntu and Fedora this
weekend goofing around and in Fedora i had the same thing but in Ubuntu
it worked perfectly. Hopefully this will get resolved shortly.

LostSon

http://www.lostsonsvault.org

Public Key 
http://www.lostsonsvault.org/dls/lostson.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-user] gnome-panel

2005-06-18 Thread LostSon
Hello 
 Has anyone noticed quite a delay after starting gnome after the panel
comes up and i go to click on the menu it takes about 10 seconds for the
menu to come up. After the initial clicking its fine but that first time
takes forever. Has anyone else noticed this or is it just me, thanks.
-- 
LostSon

http://www.lostsonsvault.org

Public Key 
http://www.lostsonsvault.org/dls/lostson.asc


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part