Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:05:14 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 This may help, may not.  When I was playing with this a year or so
 ago, I found a HD test video on the internet somewhere.  I'm pretty
 sure it was 1080p.  I set smplayer to play and repeat the video and
 then I watched the CPU and temps on the video card.  I would try each
 setting and see how much CPU load there was and watched the temps on
 the video card.  I figure if the card temps are warmer, it is giving
 the card a work out instead of my CPU. 

Personally I use a local Bluray 1080p rip of Transformers3 for that.

I figure if the scene with Optimus and Sentinel bashing hunks off each
other doesn't give a GPU a decent work-out, then nothing will

and it's a fun movie, much more interesting to watch than temp guages

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-19 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 19.12.2012 00:20, schrieb Walter Dnes:
 1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
 wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
 Intel GPU in my HTPC machine.  I've applied the same fix to my desktop.
 mplayer now has 5 video output modes that actually show a picture...
 
 xv  X11/Xv

This doesn't use any GPU features. Good compatibility but otherwise not
recommended.

 gl_nosw OpenGL no software rendering

Same as gl just that it fails when you have driver issues that prevent
it from using the GPU. More like a debugging tool.

 x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm )

Practically outdated.

 gl  OpenGL

Recommended. Should work okay without further tuning but offers a lot of
them. Just play around.

 gl2 X11 (OpenGL) - multiple textures version

Unmaintained. Use gl.

 
 Which one has the best playback ability?  Is there a test program or a
 torture test video file I can use for testing?
 
 
 2) When I start up mplayer, the diagnostics include...
 MMX2 supported but disabled
 
 There is no mmx2 in the USE flags or in /proc/cpuinfo
 

That should be USE=mmxext. No clue what's its name in cpuinfo but
since you are running something newer than a P3 it should be a safe bet.

PS: Have to tried mplayer2? It's mostly compatible but offers no
mencoder support but you can install mplayer to get that. It has better
threading support and some other minor improvements.

Regards,
Florian Philipp



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-19 Thread Walter Dnes
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 03:38:15PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote

  gl  OpenGL
 
 Recommended. Should work okay without further tuning but offers a lot of
 them. Just play around.

  [...deletia...]

  2) When I start up mplayer, the diagnostics include...
  MMX2 supported but disabled
  
  There is no mmx2 in the USE flags or in /proc/cpuinfo
  
 
 That should be USE=mmxext. No clue what's its name in cpuinfo but
 since you are running something newer than a P3 it should be a safe bet.

  Thanks for the feedback.

-- 
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
I don't run desktop environments; I run useful applications



Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-18 Thread Dale
Walter Dnes wrote:
 1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
 wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
 Intel GPU in my HTPC machine.  I've applied the same fix to my desktop.
 mplayer now has 5 video output modes that actually show a picture...

 xv  X11/Xv
 gl_nosw OpenGL no software rendering
 x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm )
 gl  OpenGL
 gl2 X11 (OpenGL) - multiple textures version

 Which one has the best playback ability?  Is there a test program or a
 torture test video file I can use for testing?


 2) When I start up mplayer, the diagnostics include...
 MMX2 supported but disabled

 There is no mmx2 in the USE flags or in /proc/cpuinfo

 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 6
 model   : 15
 model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600  @ 2.40GHz
 stepping: 13
 
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
 constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl
 est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm

 ...and I have -march=native in my CFLAGS.  Any explanations?



This may help, may not.  When I was playing with this a year or so ago,
I found a HD test video on the internet somewhere.  I'm pretty sure it
was 1080p.  I set smplayer to play and repeat the video and then I
watched the CPU and temps on the video card.  I would try each setting
and see how much CPU load there was and watched the temps on the video
card.  I figure if the card temps are warmer, it is giving the card a
work out instead of my CPU. 

I ended up using gl (fast) for mine but this may not work at all for
your system.  This may give you a way to test the settings and sort of
know if the right hardware is doing its job or not. 

Here is two links if you want to try my weird way of doing this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Innx3puNI

I use downloadhelper to grab those then play them locally.  Both of
those are available in 1080p tho.  Should warm up something.  ;-) 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how 
you interpreted my words!




Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-18 Thread Bruce Hill
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:05:14PM -0600, Dale wrote:
 Walter Dnes wrote:
  1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
  wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
  Intel GPU in my HTPC machine.  I've applied the same fix to my desktop.
  mplayer now has 5 video output modes that actually show a picture...
 
  xv  X11/Xv
  gl_nosw OpenGL no software rendering
  x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm )
  gl  OpenGL
  gl2 X11 (OpenGL) - multiple textures version
 
  Which one has the best playback ability?  Is there a test program or a
  torture test video file I can use for testing?
 
 
  2) When I start up mplayer, the diagnostics include...
  MMX2 supported but disabled
 
  There is no mmx2 in the USE flags or in /proc/cpuinfo
 
  vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
  cpu family  : 6
  model   : 15
  model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600  @ 2.40GHz
  stepping: 13
  
  flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
  mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
  constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl
  est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm
 
  ...and I have -march=native in my CFLAGS.  Any explanations?
 
 
 
 This may help, may not.  When I was playing with this a year or so ago,
 I found a HD test video on the internet somewhere.  I'm pretty sure it
 was 1080p.  I set smplayer to play and repeat the video and then I
 watched the CPU and temps on the video card.  I would try each setting
 and see how much CPU load there was and watched the temps on the video
 card.  I figure if the card temps are warmer, it is giving the card a
 work out instead of my CPU. 
 
 I ended up using gl (fast) for mine but this may not work at all for
 your system.  This may give you a way to test the settings and sort of
 know if the right hardware is doing its job or not. 
 
 Here is two links if you want to try my weird way of doing this:
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Innx3puNI
 
 I use downloadhelper to grab those then play them locally.  Both of
 those are available in 1080p tho.  Should warm up something.  ;-) 
 
 Dale

Rather than downloadhelper and a web browser, try:

mingdao@workstation ~/test $ youtube-dl  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI
[youtube] Setting language
[youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Downloading video webpage
[youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Downloading video info webpage
[youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Extracting video information
[download] Destination: XITHbsUUlYI.mp4
[download]  30.5% of 107.04M at1.43M/s ETA 00:52
-- 
Happy Penguin Computers   ')
126 Fenco Drive   ( \
Tupelo, MS 38801   ^^
supp...@happypenguincomputers.com
662-269-2706 662-205-6424
http://happypenguincomputers.com/

Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting



Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about optimal mplayer settings

2012-12-18 Thread Dale
Bruce Hill wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 07:05:14PM -0600, Dale wrote:
 Walter Dnes wrote:
 1) In the past couple of days I finally figured out what I was doing
 wrong with hardware acceleration (causing lack thereof) with an onboard
 Intel GPU in my HTPC machine.  I've applied the same fix to my desktop.
 mplayer now has 5 video output modes that actually show a picture...

 xv  X11/Xv
 gl_nosw OpenGL no software rendering
 x11 X11 ( XImage/Shm )
 gl  OpenGL
 gl2 X11 (OpenGL) - multiple textures version

 Which one has the best playback ability?  Is there a test program or a
 torture test video file I can use for testing?


 2) When I start up mplayer, the diagnostics include...
 MMX2 supported but disabled

 There is no mmx2 in the USE flags or in /proc/cpuinfo

 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
 cpu family  : 6
 model   : 15
 model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4600  @ 2.40GHz
 stepping: 13
 
 flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
 mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx lm
 constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl
 est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm

 ...and I have -march=native in my CFLAGS.  Any explanations?


 This may help, may not.  When I was playing with this a year or so ago,
 I found a HD test video on the internet somewhere.  I'm pretty sure it
 was 1080p.  I set smplayer to play and repeat the video and then I
 watched the CPU and temps on the video card.  I would try each setting
 and see how much CPU load there was and watched the temps on the video
 card.  I figure if the card temps are warmer, it is giving the card a
 work out instead of my CPU. 

 I ended up using gl (fast) for mine but this may not work at all for
 your system.  This may give you a way to test the settings and sort of
 know if the right hardware is doing its job or not. 

 Here is two links if you want to try my weird way of doing this:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2Innx3puNI

 I use downloadhelper to grab those then play them locally.  Both of
 those are available in 1080p tho.  Should warm up something.  ;-) 

 Dale
 Rather than downloadhelper and a web browser, try:

 mingdao@workstation ~/test $ youtube-dl  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITHbsUUlYI
 [youtube] Setting language
 [youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Downloading video webpage
 [youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Downloading video info webpage
 [youtube] XITHbsUUlYI: Extracting video information
 [download] Destination: XITHbsUUlYI.mp4
 [download]  30.5% of 107.04M at1.43M/s ETA 00:52

Some videos are available in different resolutions.  Some have as many
as 6 or 8 different ones.  With downloadhelper, you can pick which one
you want.  I'm not sure if youtube-dl does or not.  Also, I download
videos from lots of sites.  I don't actually use youtube a lot. 

Good idea for folks that use youtube a lot tho. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how 
you interpreted my words!