Somehow, I remember this conversation coming up recently, and I thought it was
decided to remove these. Indeed, I'm surprised they're still around. Strike
them down!
Thanks,
Richard
> On Jan 8, 2020, at 10:38 PM, Alan & Kim Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I have got back into some GHC dev, and noticed that the various ForallXXX
> type synonyms in Extension.hs are unused in GHC.
>
> In the early iteration, they were needed, but it seems not any more.
>
> Is there any reason they should not be removed?
>
> Alan
> ___
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
___
ghc-devs mailing list
ghc-devs@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
