[Gimp-developer] Re: Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Dov Grobgeld
While we are at it. The two characters "Fu" to represent "A uniform
interface that allows setting parameters for the execution of a sequence
of gimp functions where each type of parameter has a fixed GUI mapping"
is much weirder, imho. And that is exposed to the user, which Prevue
would not be...

Regards,
Dov

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 05:48:44PM -0600, Brian Mullin wrote:
> I do see those sorts of spellings from time to time, yes. The same thing
> with "prevu".
> 
> But, to answer your question... Yes, "GimpPrevue" does look kind of
> weird. It does to me, at any rate. :)
> 
> Brian Mullin
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Ernst Lippe
> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:24 PM
> To: Gimp-developer
> Subject: Preview widget name
> 
> 
> My Webster's lists prevue as a synonym for preview (to me this appears
> to be the original French root of the word).
> 
> Does GimpPrevue sound very weird for native English speakers?
> 
> greetings,
> 
> Ernst Lippe
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
> 
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

-- 
___   ___
  /  o  \   o \
Dov Grobgeld ( o  o  ) o   |
The Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel \  o  /o  o /
"Where the tree of wisdom carries oranges"  | |   | |
   _| |_ _| |_
 
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Tool API [LONG!]

2003-04-02 Thread Nathan Carl Summers
Here is a list of all the symbols currently used by the current tools,
courtesy of
nm tools/*.o paint/*.o | cut -b 10- | grep ^T | cut -b 3- | sort | uniq

stdlib, glib, gdk, pango, and gtk calls have been eliminated from this
list.

The big things that stand out are accessing the global "the_gimp", and
calling tile and tile manager functions.  "the_gimp" should not be
accessed directly, and tile_manager is probably too ugly for tool
developers with weak stomachs.

Rockwalrus


active_color
add_alpha_region
apply_mask_to_region
blend_region
brightness_contrast_lut_setup
brush_scale_mask
brush_scale_pixmap
color_balance
color_balance_create_lookup_tables
color_balance_init
color_balance_range_reset
color_pixels
color_region
combine_mask_and_region
convolve_region
copy_region
curves_calculate_curve
curves_channel_reset
curves_init
curves_lut_func
find_mask_boundary
floating_sel_anchor
floating_sel_relax
floating_sel_rigor
gdisplays_check_valid
gimp_base_config_get_type
gimp_bezier_stroke_extend
gimp_bezier_stroke_get_type
gimp_bezier_stroke_new
gimp_brush_get_spacing
gimp_brush_get_type
gimp_brush_select_brush
gimp_brush_want_null_motion
gimp_bucket_fill_mode_get_type
gimp_channel_add_segment
gimp_channel_invalidate_bounds
gimp_channel_new_mask
gimp_channel_ops_get_type
gimp_channel_value
gimp_color_area_get_type
gimp_color_area_new
gimp_color_area_set_color
gimp_color_panel_get_type
gimp_color_panel_set_context
gimp_config_connect
gimp_config_copy_properties
gimp_config_deserialize
gimp_config_disconnect
gimp_config_duplicate
gimp_config_reset
gimp_config_serialize
gimp_container_add
gimp_container_add_handler
gimp_container_get_child_by_name
gimp_container_remove_handler
gimp_container_thaw
gimp_context_copy_properties
gimp_context_define_properties
gimp_context_get_brush
gimp_context_get_display
gimp_context_get_gradient
gimp_context_get_opacity
gimp_context_get_paint_mode
gimp_context_get_pattern
gimp_context_get_tool
gimp_context_get_type
gimp_context_new
gimp_context_set_background
gimp_context_set_display
gimp_context_set_foreground
gimp_context_set_parent
gimp_context_set_tool
gimp_context_tool_changed
gimp_crop_type_get_type
gimp_cursor_new
gimp_devices_get_current
gimp_dialog_create_action_area
gimp_dialog_factory_dialog_raise
gimp_dialog_get_type
gimp_directory
gimp_display_config_get_type
gimp_display_coords_in_active_drawable
gimp_display_flush
gimp_display_flush_now
gimp_display_get_type
gimp_display_shell_draw_guide
gimp_display_shell_get_type
gimp_display_shell_scale_by_values
gimp_display_shell_selection_visibility
gimp_display_shell_set_cursor
gimp_display_shell_set_override_cursor
gimp_display_shell_transform_xy
gimp_display_shell_transform_xy_f
gimp_display_shell_unset_override_cursor
gimp_display_shell_untransform_xy
gimp_dock_get_type
gimp_double_adjustment_update
gimp_drawable_blend
gimp_drawable_bucket_fill
gimp_drawable_bytes
gimp_drawable_calculate_histogram
gimp_drawable_data
gimp_drawable_get_color_at
gimp_drawable_get_type
gimp_drawable_has_alpha
gimp_drawable_height
gimp_drawable_is_indexed
gimp_drawable_is_rgb
gimp_drawable_mask_bounds
gimp_drawable_offsets
gimp_drawable_push_undo
gimp_drawable_transform_cut
gimp_drawable_transform_matrix_perspective
gimp_drawable_transform_matrix_rotate_center
gimp_drawable_transform_matrix_scale
gimp_drawable_transform_matrix_shear
gimp_drawable_transform_paste
gimp_drawable_transform_tiles_affine
gimp_drawable_transform_tiles_flip
gimp_drawable_type
gimp_drawable_width
gimp_enum_option_menu_new
gimp_enum_radio_frame_new
gimp_get_current_context
gimp_get_mod_name_alt
gimp_get_mod_name_control
gimp_get_type
gimp_get_user_context
gimp_gradient_get_color_at
gimp_gradient_type_get_type
gimp_gui_config_get_type
gimp_help_connect
gimp_help_set_help_data
gimp_histogram_box_get_type
gimp_histogram_box_new
gimp_histogram_calculate
gimp_histogram_channel_get_type
gimp_histogram_free
gimp_histogram_get_count
gimp_histogram_get_mean
gimp_histogram_get_median
gimp_histogram_get_std_dev
gimp_histogram_nchannels
gimp_histogram_new
gimp_histogram_view_get_channel
gimp_histogram_view_get_type
gimp_histogram_view_new
gimp_histogram_view_set_channel
gimp_histogram_view_set_histogram
gimp_histogram_view_set_range
gimp_hls_to_rgb_int
gimp_image_active_drawable
gimp_image_add_guide
gimp_image_add_hguide
gimp_image_add_layer
gimp_image_add_vectors
gimp_image_add_vguide
gimp_image_apply_image
gimp_image_contiguous_region_by_seed
gimp_image_crop
gimp_image_crop_auto_shrink
gimp_image_delete_guide
gimp_image_find_guide
gimp_image_floating_sel
gimp_image_flush
gimp_image_get_active_layer
gimp_image_get_background
gimp_image_get_color
gimp_image_get_foreground
gimp_image_get_type
gimp_image_map_abort
gimp_image_map_apply
gimp_image_map_clear
gimp_image_map_commit
gimp_image_map_get_color_at
gimp_image_map_new
gimp_image_mask_boundary
gimp_image_mask_bounds
gimp_image_mask_clear
gimp_image_mask_float
gimp_image_mask_is_empty
gimp_image_mask_select_by_color
gimp_image_mas

Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Nathan Carl Summers
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003, Ernst Lippe wrote:

> On the contrary, there appear to be lots of acceptable
> names.
> I am suprised that nobody has suggested YetAnotherGimpPreview :)

How about GimpPluginView?
GimpSample?
GimpTheWidgetFormerlyKnownAsPreview?
GimpFancyPreview?
GimpMcPreview?
GimpExample?
GimpView?

Actually, GimpThumbnail is more reasonable for the core widget's name than
it is for the plugin widget's name.

Rockwalrus

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 16:05:52 -0800
Jeshua Lacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Kevin Myers wrote:
> 
> > Personally I don't think that it sounds too bad at all, especially
> > considering the lack of other decent alternatives suggested so far...
> 
> Hello Kevin,
> 
> I think the average American will think it was translated funky and 
> assume it is the work of an amateur. Of course, this is just my humble 
> opinion.

But it is the work of an amateur, up till now nobody has
offered me any payment for it.

What's worse I now realize that it is possible that some
literate americans (yes, they do exist) might assume that
it was written by some Frenchman, which might be dangerous
in the present circumstances.

greetings,

Ernst
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Thu, 03 Apr 2003 02:15:42 +0200
"David Necas (Yeti)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote:
> > P.S. I just modified my preview so that the re-entrancy problem has
> > been eliminated.
> 
> Excuse me, but which reentrancy problem has been eliminated?
> Does it mean the render function no longer needs to be
> reentrant?

Yes, just added some book-keeping to preview, and it seems
to work.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Yeti
> 
> 
> P.S.: Regarding the name, when I've seen the last
> suggestions, GimpWWAAN (Widget Without Any Acceptable Name)
> seem to be the most accurate... :-)

On the contrary, there appear to be lots of acceptable
names.
I am suprised that nobody has suggested YetAnotherGimpPreview :)

greetings,

Ernst

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread David Necas (Yeti)
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Ernst Lippe wrote:
> P.S. I just modified my preview so that the re-entrancy problem has
> been eliminated.

Excuse me, but which reentrancy problem has been eliminated?
Does it mean the render function no longer needs to be
reentrant?

Regards,

Yeti


P.S.: Regarding the name, when I've seen the last
suggestions, GimpWWAAN (Widget Without Any Acceptable Name)
seem to be the most accurate... :-)

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Jeshua Lacock
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Kevin Myers wrote:

Personally I don't think that it sounds too bad at all, especially
considering the lack of other decent alternatives suggested so far...
Hello Kevin,

I think the average American will think it was translated funky and 
assume it is the work of an amateur. Of course, this is just my humble 
opinion.

Whatever the name, it will be welcomed functionality.

How about:

  GimpPredo
  GimpThumb
  GimpPeek
  GimpProView
  GimpSneak
(Just what popped into my head based on the description)

Cheers,

Jeshua Lacock __
Programmer/OwnerPhone:   760.935.4736
http://OpenOSX.com   Fax:760.935.4845
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


RE: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Brian Mullin
I do see those sorts of spellings from time to time, yes. The same thing
with "prevu".

But, to answer your question... Yes, "GimpPrevue" does look kind of
weird. It does to me, at any rate. :)

Brian Mullin

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ernst Lippe
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Gimp-developer
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name


My Webster's lists prevue as a synonym for preview (to me this appears
to be the original French root of the word).

Does GimpPrevue sound very weird for native English speakers?

greetings,

Ernst Lippe
___
Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Kevin Myers
Personally I don't think that it sounds too bad at all, especially
considering the lack of other decent alternatives suggested so far...

Kevin M.
Round Rock, Texas


- Original Message -
From: "Jeshua Lacock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name


>
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Ernst Lippe wrote:
>
> > My Webster's lists prevue as a synonym for preview (to me this appears
> > to be the original French root of the word).
> >
> > Does GimpPrevue sound very weird for native English speakers?
>
> Yes - it sounds quite Euro.   : )
>
> Kind of like Shoppe or Colour...
>
>
> Jeshua Lacock __
> Programmer/OwnerPhone:   760.935.4736
> http://OpenOSX.com   Fax:760.935.4845
> -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
>


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Jeshua Lacock
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 03:24 PM, Ernst Lippe wrote:

My Webster's lists prevue as a synonym for preview (to me this appears
to be the original French root of the word).
Does GimpPrevue sound very weird for native English speakers?
Yes - it sounds quite Euro.   : )

Kind of like Shoppe or Colour...

Jeshua Lacock __
Programmer/OwnerPhone:   760.935.4736
http://OpenOSX.com   Fax:760.935.4845
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Preview widget name

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
My Webster's lists prevue as a synonym for preview (to me this appears
to be the original French root of the word).

Does GimpPrevue sound very weird for native English speakers?

greetings,

Ernst Lippe
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp 1.2.4 Final?

2003-04-02 Thread Jeshua Lacock
Greetings,

If there is anything we can do to help with these issues, please just 
let me know and I will get my guy on it.

On Thursday, March 20, 2003, at 08:28 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:

Hi,

Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Well, yes this is a ridiculous bug.  However, the license problems
are now publicly known.  And there is a Debian bug report related to
that.  So I assume that any distribution that is aware of these
issues and cares about being able to distribute packages legally
would consider this bug to be a blocker.  Otherwise, they would be
liable in the (unlikely) case that some copyright holder complains
about the licenses.  Not very likely, maybe, but some distributors
are probably taking these legal issues seriously.
Well, we already took care about a couple of affected files. Let's
look at the remaining files:
plug-ins/common/edge.c

This file has about 500 lines from which at least 400 are completely
GIMP specific. The algorithm used boils down to a few lines and could
probably be "discovered" by any high-school student who made his/her
maths homework from time to time. I'd like to cite RMS here: "You
don't need to worry about copyrights or licenses for just a few lines
of code."
plug-ins/common/gif.c

This one is difficult since its a mix of some older code for which the
license is not perfectly clear and lots of new code that has been
added while this file lived in the GIMP source tree under a GPL
license. Definitely a difficult choice with rather unpleasant
consequences since other projects have long adapted this code under
GPL and LGPL licenses.
plug-ins/common/mail.c

This plug-in contains a few lines that perform base64 encoding. The
authors of this code should feel honored for being mentioned since
anyone could take the base64 spec and rewrite this from scratch.
plug-ins/common/nlfilt.c

The algorithms here are not really trivial and it would make sense to
try to contact the author. If he doesn't agree to relicense his code,
we could just drop the plug-in.
plug-ins/common/tiff.c

I don't see where this plug-in uses any non-GIMP-specific code that is
worth being mentioned. The TIFF file format is handled by libtiff and
I doubt there's anything in this plug-in that can not be determined
from reading the libtiff docs.
plug-ins/webbrowser/webbrowser.c

The algorithm used here is rather trivial and can be redone using the
docs provided by Netscape. The original authors should feel honored
for being mentioned. We want to get rid of this plug-in for GIMP-1.4
anyway.
plug-ins/script-fu/interp_slib.c

I'd rather not have to rewrite this one. But then we have always very
clearly stated the source of the SIOD interpreter that runs Script-Fu.
Just go and try 'gimp-1.3 -i -b -'. You will see the following lines:
 Welcome to SIOD, Scheme In One Defun, Version 3.2x 12-MAR-96
 (C) Copyright 1988-1994 Paradigm Associates Inc. Help: (help)
IMO this is exactly what the SIOD license asks for. I don't see any
problems.
Salut, Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
Even though I fully agree that the only serious problem in my API
proposal is the name of the widget, I'd really like to get more input
from more people about my API proposal.

Especially, I would like to hear remarks from other plug-in developers,
because they are after all the intended audience for this widget.
(I somehow have the feeling that Sven is not really an average
plug-in developer:).
So for all average (and especially the below-average) plug-in developers:
* Do you miss any features?
* Is the documentation sufficient?
* Would you use it?

Of course I would also like some inputs about the discussion
about using iterators in the rendering function.

greetings,

Ernst

P.S. I just modified my preview so that the re-entrancy problem has
been eliminated.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread Ernst Lippe
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 15:30:04 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >anyway. Now if only we could come up with a good name for the core
> >widget ...
> 
> May I suggest "GimpMiniview"?

Yes, you may :)
But it sounds like something tiny. Actually when you zoom in and
use a large preview it can be much bigger than the original
image.

greetings,

Ernst Lippe
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread gimp-devel
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2 Apr 2003:

> May I suggest "GimpMiniview"?
GimpMiniMe would be shorter, and probably more in the gimp tradition.
A filter just as diabolical but at 1/8th the size!

Michael
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Plug-in preview API proposal

2003-04-02 Thread usr352

Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>anyway. Now if only we could come up with a good name for the core
>widget ...

May I suggest "GimpMiniview"?

-- 
  Pedro Gimeno
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Keybindings

2003-04-02 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On 02 Apr 2003 12:40:37 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at 31 Mar
> 
> there's one more thing you might want to change. Your version states
> that keybindings can be dynamically reassigned. This is not any longer
> possible by default. You need to explicitely turn this feature on in
> the preferences dialog (labelled as "Dynamic Keyboard Shortcuts").
> 
> The idea behind this change is that this prevents users from
> accidentally reassigning shortcuts. The user should be advised that in
> order to change the keybindings, she should enable Dynamic Keyboard
> Shortcuts in the prefs, do the changes and redisable the feature
> afterwards.

ObBugzilla:  http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106991

While you are updating the text, please fix the spelling mistake at the
end of the second paragraph: "it's binding" should be "its binding".

Suggestion for re-writing that paragraph:

  The GIMP allows menu keybindings to be dynamically re-assigned.
  So if you don't like these, they are easy enough to change.  To
  do this, you should first activate the "Dynamic Keyboard
  Shortcuts" in the preferences dialog.  Then you can just
  highlight the menu item of your choice, and press the desired new
  key combination.  If that combination is already assigned, the
  old command will lose its binding.

And please use a fixed-width font while editing the text file.
This will ensure that all shortcuts are correctly aligned.  You
can check this by viewing the text file in a web browser, for
example.  It looks like the paragraphs in the text file were
wrapped at line 65 (instead of the default 70 or 72).  If you are
using Emacs for editing the text file, you can use M-: followed
by (setq fill-column 65) to wrap the text to the same column as
in the original file.

-Raphaël
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Keybindings

2003-04-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at 31 Mar

there's one more thing you might want to change. Your version states
that keybindings can be dynamically reassigned. This is not any longer
possible by default. You need to explicitely turn this feature on in
the preferences dialog (labelled as "Dynamic Keyboard Shortcuts").

The idea behind this change is that this prevents users from
accidentally reassigning shortcuts. The user should be advised that in
order to change the keybindings, she should enable Dynamic Keyboard
Shortcuts in the prefs, do the changes and redisable the feature
afterwards.


Salut, Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Keybindings

2003-04-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I've updated keybindings.txt,tex and pdf to match the cvs as at 31 Mar
> 
> http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.pdf
> http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.tex
> http://www.webone.com.au/~oc/gimp/keybindings.txt

The PDF looks rather nice and I think we should include it with the
tarball. Is there a reason the .txt version is so horribly aligned if
viewed with a fixed-width font? Would you mind if I fix it before I
commit to CVS?


Salut, Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer