[Gimp-developer] SoC - only four weeks left

[Michael Schumacher]

Hi there,

this is a gentle reminder that the deadline for SoC code is August 21st,
four weeks from now. A more precise countdown is available at
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?day=21&month=8&year=2006&hour=08&min=00&sec=00&p0=224

It would be nice if everyone who is involved in SoC could provide a
short status report - the overall progress, maybe some results (screen
shots are usually very useful :). Or problems, if any.


Let's start with the project I'm mentoring, the

GIMP resources repository

Progress: good until a short time before the midterm evaluation - a
database layout and some initial code, a registry export script, ...

Current status: unknown, I don't get any response to my mails and Lauris
doesn't show up on IRC.

If I don't hear anything soon, I'll have to declare this project dead -
which would be very unfortunate, given the effort that has been spent on
it already.


That's the bad news so far. I hope someone else has better news about
his project.


Regards,
Michael

-- 
GIMP > http://www.gimp.org  | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de
Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org |
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] fact roundup

[Dave Neary]

Bratsche said:
> Since nobody has provided that information yet, consider these two
> possibilities:

Correction, I gave that information.

http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/msg11430.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/msg11432.html

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
David Neary
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Re: [Gimp-developer] [PATCH] About dialog shows unstable status

[Mukund]

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:23 +0100, Mukund wrote:
> I have made the required changes (removed newlines; moved message into a
> label) except I kept the descriptive text. If you think it's a bad idea
> still, I'll remove it. Otherwise, if you are okay with the patch
> (attached), I'll commit it.
> 
> http://www.mukund.org/temp/about-4.png


Is this patch fine?

Mukund





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer