Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?

2009-04-25 Thread Martin Nordholts
Owen wrote:
> Well, looking at the my Makefile (recent git build, line 873) it reads;
> uninstall: uninstall-recursive
>
> Which doesn't seem to go anywhere. Just another mystery for me
>   

The uninstall-recursive target is enumerated in the RECURSIVE_TARGETS 
variable. All recursive targets are defined in one place, look for 
$(RECURSIVE_TARGETS):. It basically calls subdirs and invokes the 
uninstall-am target, which is defined as uninstall-am: 
uninstall-binSCRIPTS uninstall-pkgconfigDATA.

HTH

- Martin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP & git - example workflows from some of our longer-term git users?

2009-04-25 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 17:17 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:34 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 12:03 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > > > Von: Nils Philippsen 
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 19:56 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > > > > I don't think there is a need to reiterate a how-to on this mailing 
> > > > > list
> > > > > for how to work with git. It should be quite enough to read:
> > > > > http://live.gnome.org/Git/Developers
> > > > > 
> > > > > and other git resources on the web. GIMP will not have a 
> > > > > super-special 
> > > > > workflow with regards to git. In fact, there is no workflow set in 
> > > > > stone
> > > > > yet, we will have to experiment to wee what works and what doesn't.
> > > > 
> > > > Just a caveat since this isn't mentioned on the web page: Rebasing
> > > > changes on a branch modifies history, so don't rebase changes that are
> > > > publicly visible. Use rebasing only for your private changes which you
> > > > haven't pushed yet.
> > > 
> > > See, it's things like that that I would like to see mentioned more
> > > frequently and accompanied by the actual git commands (if possible).
> > 
> > So where do you want it documented, I'll gladly write this up (with
> > actual commands).
> 
> Let's keep it all in one place: http://live.gnome.org/Git and subpages
> are where this kind of stuff belongs.

Okay, let's hope I can get something done until mid next week, I'll be
on vacation from then on for 3 weeks and will likely have low to no net
access.

Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen / Wilhelmstraße 22 / D-71229 Leonberg 
n...@tiptoe.de / n...@redhat.com
PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
Ever noticed that common sense isn't really all that common?
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?

2009-04-25 Thread Owen

> Owen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to
>>> uninstall a gimp cvs build.
>>>
>>> make uninstall
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not that good at reading Makefiles, but I don't think uninstall
>> does anything and you are just doing a make?
>>
>> Hence the requirement for a newer babl
>>
>
> Thanks Owen, that would explain the error but I thought make reported
> something like "no rule for target uninstall" if it got fed crap.
>
> maybe there's some default target in the gimp Makefiles that matches a
> non existent target. :?



Well, looking at the my Makefile (recent git build, line 873)  it reads;

uninstall: uninstall-recursive

Which doesn't seem to go anywhere. Just another mystery for me



-- 



Owen

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?

2009-04-25 Thread gg
Owen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to
>> uninstall a gimp cvs build.
>>
>> make uninstall
> 
> 
> 
> I am not that good at reading Makefiles, but I don't think uninstall
> does anything and you are just doing a make?
> 
> Hence the requirement for a newer babl
> 

Thanks Owen, that would explain the error but I thought make reported 
something like "no rule for target uninstall" if it got fed crap.

maybe there's some default target in the gimp Makefiles that matches a 
non existent target. :?




___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?

2009-04-25 Thread Owen

> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to
> uninstall a gimp cvs build.
>
> make uninstall



I am not that good at reading Makefiles, but I don't think uninstall
does anything and you are just doing a make?

Hence the requirement for a newer babl

-- 



Owen

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] why do I need babl to UNINSTALL gimp?

2009-04-25 Thread gg
Hi,

I just wanted to clean out multiple gimp installations and went to  
uninstall a gimp cvs build.

make uninstall



checking for gmsgfmt... (cached) /usr/bin/gmsgfmt
checking for xgettext... (cached) /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for iso-codes... yes
checking for BABL... configure: error: Package requirements (babl >=  
0.0.23) were not met:

Requested 'babl >= 0.0.23' but version of babl is 0.0.22

Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively, you may set the environment variables BABL_CFLAGS
and BABL_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config.
See the pkg-config man page for more details.

make: *** [config.status] Error 1


Do I really need to pull babl , build and install it just to UNINSTALL  
Gimp ??

TIA.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP & git - example workflows from some of our longer-term git users?

2009-04-25 Thread Ruben Vermeersch
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:34 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 12:03 +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > > Von: Nils Philippsen 
> > 
> > > On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 19:56 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > > > I don't think there is a need to reiterate a how-to on this mailing list
> > > > for how to work with git. It should be quite enough to read:
> > > > http://live.gnome.org/Git/Developers
> > > > 
> > > > and other git resources on the web. GIMP will not have a super-special 
> > > > workflow with regards to git. In fact, there is no workflow set in stone
> > > > yet, we will have to experiment to wee what works and what doesn't.
> > > 
> > > Just a caveat since this isn't mentioned on the web page: Rebasing
> > > changes on a branch modifies history, so don't rebase changes that are
> > > publicly visible. Use rebasing only for your private changes which you
> > > haven't pushed yet.
> > 
> > See, it's things like that that I would like to see mentioned more
> > frequently and accompanied by the actual git commands (if possible).
> 
> So where do you want it documented, I'll gladly write this up (with
> actual commands).

Let's keep it all in one place: http://live.gnome.org/Git and subpages
are where this kind of stuff belongs.

Cheers,
   Ruben


--
Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv)
http://www.savanne.be/
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Background color property for GIMP images

2009-04-25 Thread peter sikking

Peter (yahvuu) wrote:

> there's one solution i haven't seen yet:
>
> assign a background color to GIMP images. Not a layer, just a single  
> color.
> This way, the eraser can always work on alpha, and all layers  
> consistently can have an alpha channel.


I like the innovative nature of the idea.

but,

I am not sure about how general purpose this idea is.

- I would like to see some more thinking on how this influences the
   simplest case: importing an image without any transparency.
   how would that look like without introducing complication.
   simple things (in users' eyes) have to remain simple in the UI.

- I would like to see some more thinking on how this is related to
   the background color in the color chooser. coupled/decoupled?

 --ps

 founder + principal interaction architect
 man + machine interface works

 http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture



___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer