hello every one,
can any one tell me when a map is tiled, what is the extent of zoom we
can specify which does not create any problem for us as developers and users to
view the map. please reply to this.. its urgent
sudha.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send Gimp-developer mailing list submissions to
gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Gimp-developer digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Is it too late to send a l10n patch for GIMP 2.4.0?
(Michael Natterer)
2. Re: New option Use custom quality settings for JPEG files
(Rapha?l Quinet)
3. Re: GSOC (was: brush manager) (Rapha?l Quinet)
4. Re: Extending GIMP Plugins (Amit Kumar Saha)
5. Re: Extending GIMP Plugins (Michael Schumacher)
6. Re: Extending GIMP Plugins (Rapha?l Quinet)
7. Re: Extending GIMP Plugins (David Marrs)
8. Re: Extending GIMP Plugins (Rapha?l Quinet)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:56:43 +0200
From: Michael Natterer
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Is it too late to send a l10n patch for
GIMP 2.4.0?
To: Choi, Ji-Hui
Cc: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 10:40 +0900, Choi, Ji-Hui wrote:
Hi. I'm new in gimp development.
few day ago, I checked gimp 2.4 rc1 source, and then I noticed the
l10n file for korean was so terrible. it means translation was not
apply almostly.
so I contacted our tongue translator, and got an answer. it's for you. :-(
BTW, so I fixed, reassigned, etc..
now I wonder, can I apply this patch on 2.4.0?
if I'm not late, where and what do I send?
I worked with po file using poedit on windows XP
please, give me advice
It is never too late for translations, however all translations
of GNOME SVN modules are handled by the gnome-i18n mailing
list. Please contact them, somebody there will give you the
right advice or sommit your patches.
ciao,
--mitch
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:55:25 +0200
From: Rapha?l Quinet
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] New option Use custom quality settings
for JPEG files
To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:20:48 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Robert L Krawitz :
The problem is that custom tables seems very confusing -- it sounds
like the user's going to be asked to input something she knows nothing
about. One could argue that Use existing image quality settings [...]
My only comment on this issue is that the term image is consistently
employed within the GIMP vocabulary to mean the in-memory copy of
the picture being edited [...]
I think that using the terms original image would avoid this problem.
We are basically left with two options:
1) Use custom quality settings
- Hard to understand for most users
- Technically correct description
- No need to change the code; this is what we have now
2) Use quality settings from original image
- Easier to understand for most users
- Correct description for the most common usage scenario
- Requires some small changes to the code
- Breaks the string freeze before 2.4
It seems that going for (2) would be better for the users but would
annoy some translators. But I got several requests to go for something
like option (2), so I would like to know if it is worth breaking the
string freeze. Opinions?
-Rapha?l
P.S.: please do not mention bikesheds.
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:24:10 +0200
From: Rapha?l Quinet
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] GSOC (was: brush manager)
To: gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 19:28:13 +0200, Karine Delvare wrote:
There was a 2006 Google Summer of Code project for this. If it had been
completed, there would be a brush manager in GIMP 2.4, but it wasn't
(the student is not to blame, he focused on something completely
different instead).
Maybe the same project can be proposed for the 2008 GSOC?
Side note regarding the Google Summer of Code: let's hope that we can
be selected in 2008. Although we do not know the reasons why other
projects were selected instead of GIMP for GSoC 2007, it seems that
most GSoC projects focus on quick wins. It is likely that we could
improve our chances of being selected next year by working on the
following things:
- Having at least one stable GIMP release per year.
- Merging GSoC results faster in the
