Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread David Gowers

I am hereforth asking you to apologise, if possible, both in private

and on the list for this message. We are runing a project needing



I cannot sincerely do so, in this instance. I do not apologize for
expressing my amusement, unless I judge that the situation was genuinely
worsened by my behaviour.

It's certainly true that my message can be misinterpreted -- on the net,
it's probably wisest to just assume no hidden meanings -- if it looks like a
fish, assume it is a fish (and nothing more).

much of new developers and contributors, and are in no position of

theating anyone like this. Please perceive I am no  "police"  - I am
asking this personally, but I also have promised the people
organizing the LGM I'd tlak to gimp developers to try to make the
enviroment more frindly to newcomers.



In my observation, friendly sometimes is not  polite -- for instance,
answering as I did rather than giving a detached commentary free of any
emotional context at all.
This is why I view the way I replied as better (and certainly more friendly)
than most previous mails of mine on this list.

(btw, having to  explicitely delete  a python object __is__ a bug -

objects that are seeing in python should be garbage collected when
they are no longer referecenced. )



I avoided commenting on that because it wasn't clear whether they actually
were no longer referenced. I certainly agree that there is something wrong
with the gimp.delete convention here -- it only behaves how I'd expect
sometimes.

I'd definitely like to see more PyGimp developers myself -- hardly anyone
seems to make as extensive use of it as I do. Perhaps a standard module path
for pygimp plugins could be worked out (arguably, the PDB removes this need,
but the PDB is cranky to use compared to Python modules)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread gg
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:54:56 +0100, D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Speculating about why it claimed it was out of memory, I'm wondering if
> the hard drive simply was too slow responding. It's a laptop, running
> with core duo, entirely in ram. The drive is thus much slower than the
> ability to consume ram. How does gimp determine that there is no space
> left on the device...is it a timeout in addition to other means?


I saw something a little like this recently. I cant document it thoroughly  
but here's a resumé in case it's related.

I tried to open about eight multi-megabyte jpeg images in one open  
operation not wanting to go through the labourious open dialogue eight  
times and not noticing quite how big they were. I was half expecting some  
error after a few were opened but expected error trapping to handle it  
correctly.

What I ended up with was a completely unstable mess which I had to clean  
up with xkill , restart the xserver and a bit of ps and kill to clean up  
the residue.

Now this could be regarded as extreme conditions and represents a good  
stress test. It seems running out of RAM and/or swap is not properly error  
trapped.

I just throw this info in in case it relates the this script issue posted.


gg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread Michael Schumacher
Von: "David Gowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I am hereforth asking you to apologise, if possible, both in private
> > and on the list for this message. We are runing a project needing
> 
> I cannot sincerely do so, in this instance. I do not apologize for
> expressing my amusement, unless I judge that the situation was genuinely
> worsened by my behaviour.

We could make it the policy that anyone who does shout "RTFM!" has to:

- make sure that there is a FM
- make sure that it is up-to-date
- provide the URL

In this case, this would be like:

"RTFM! http://www.gimp.org/docs/python/index.html";

I'll leave the check whether this is up-to-date for David as an exercise :)


HTH,
Michael
-- 
"Feel free" - 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX ProMail testen: www.gmx.net/de/go/mailfooter/promail-out
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] have a look in our kitchen...

2007-03-12 Thread peter sikking
guys + gals,

thanks to Sven, the GIMP UI redesign team has now a wiki
where everybody can follow our progress:

http://gui.gimp.org

Right now we are filling it with our raw evaluation notes.
Some of the latest added stuff is so raw that you can track
us clarifying it a couple of days afterwards.

The wiki is an exiting experiment (for me) in collaboration and
communication. It functions as our documentation and for your
insight and entertainment. It is not meant to start a flame war.

Enjoy reading about our journey,

 --ps

 principal user interaction architect
 man + machine interface works

 http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture



___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
Pals,

I realized that gimp 2.3.15 (and some versions before) comes with
zoom for previews. A very useful feature for what I want to develop
(a noise reduction plugin).

I added a line 'gimp_zoom_preview_new (drawable);' that I got from
http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/libgimp/GimpZoomPreview.html
The plugin complies just fine, but when trying to run it in
gimp 2.3.15 the plugin crashes with a message in the console:

: symbol lookup error: : undefined 
symbol: gimp_zoom_preview_new
(gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3: plug_in_flush(): 
error: Broken pipe

So, what am I doing wrong?

Thanks!

Luis.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread William Skaggs

I think you have hit an actual bug, and that it doesn't have anything
to do with python, because I have encountered a similar thing in a
modified version of gimpressionist that I worked up, written purely
in C.  I believe that there is some sort of memory leak that causes
gimp in some situations to maintain reference to tiles that are no
longer being used in any way, and it is something that shows up when
you create and delete layers over and over again, in a certain way.  
So it would probably be useful for you to file a bug report about this, 
if you would.

The memory that is being exhausted, by the way, is the "swap" area
that gimp allocates on the hard disk each time you run it.  The
tile manager moves tile data there if space is needed.

  -- Bill
 

 
__ __ __ __
Sent via the CNPRC Email system at primate.ucdavis.edu


 
   
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread gg
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:  
> plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe

This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked  
toilet !! I should call out a plumber , this could get messy. This often  
happens in older properties due to subsidence or nearby tree roots.

LOL !


sorry , had to laugh at the way that error came out. ;)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 11:22 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:

> I added a line 'gimp_zoom_preview_new (drawable);' that I got from
> http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/libgimp/GimpZoomPreview.html
> The plugin complies just fine, but when trying to run it in
> gimp 2.3.15 the plugin crashes with a message in the console:
> 
> : symbol lookup error: : 
> undefined symbol: gimp_zoom_preview_new

Looks like the plug-in is not picking up recent enough versions of
libgimpui. Try ldd on the executable.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:
> > plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe
>
> This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a
> blocked toilet!! I should call out a plumber, this could get messy.
> This often happens in older properties due to subsidence or nearby
> tree roots.
>
> LOL !
>
> sorry, had to laugh at the way that error came out. ;)

Sorry, I didn't understand your answer...

I just want to add zoom buttons to the preview window.
I saw that many plugins use this. How to do it?

Thanks,

Luis.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 03:56 -0800, Saul Goode wrote:
> I have a rough draft of some of the differences between SIOD-fu. It is
> not yet comprehensive but perhaps it might be useful as a starting point.
> 
> http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/Script-fu-2/Reference/SIODdifferences-0.1.txt

I get an error "403 Forbidden" when trying to reach this address? Did
you take the document down or is there just a permission problem? Is
there a newer version I should try?


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread Chris Seaton
I've been on this mailing list for two days and this is the second  
time I've seen someone arrogantly laughing at someone's very  
reasonable questions.

Chris Seaton

On 12 Mar 2007, at 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:
>> plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe
>
> This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked
> toilet !! I should call out a plumber , this could get messy. This  
> often
> happens in older properties due to subsidence or nearby tree roots.
>
> LOL !
>
>
> sorry , had to laugh at the way that error came out. ;)
> ___
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
> https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 11:22 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> > I added a line 'gimp_zoom_preview_new (drawable);' that I got from
> > http://developer.gimp.org/api/2.0/libgimp/GimpZoomPreview.html
> > The plugin complies just fine, but when trying to run it in
> > gimp 2.3.15 the plugin crashes with a message in the console:
> >
> > : symbol lookup error: :
> undefined symbol: gimp_zoom_preview_new
>
> Looks like the plug-in is not picking up recent enough versions of
> libgimpui. Try ldd on the executable.

Mmmm... I see...

# ldd .gimp-2.3/plug-ins/anulardenoise
linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00cf4000)
libgimpui-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpui-2.0.so.0 (0x004f1000)
libgimpwidgets-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpwidgets-2.0.so.0 (0x003db000)
libgimp-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimp-2.0.so.0 (0x0034d000)
libgimpcolor-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpcolor-2.0.so.0 (0x002cc000)
libgimpmath-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpmath-2.0.so.0 (0x00101000)
libgimpbase-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpbase-2.0.so.0 (0x0033c000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x04fa)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x053b)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x02aaa000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x029d8000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00d4a000)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x0543f000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x0533f000)
libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x02a3c000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x02979000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x029d3000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00d73000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x028d9000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0011)
libgimpmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgimpmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x00297000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00ae4000)
libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x0278c000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x0274f000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00d9b000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x00de9000)
libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x00dfa000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x02a32000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x00df4000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x0278)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00bea000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x0538)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x026a5000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x00d79000)
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x02727000)
libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x00d8e000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00d93000)
libexpat.so.0 => /lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x00dc6000)

I compiled gimp with './configure --prefix=/opt/gimp'
for it not to touch my stable gimp 2.2 RPM install.
I am compiling the plug-in with

/opt/gimp/bin/gimptool-2.0 --install 

Thanks,

Luis.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:11 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:

> I compiled gimp with './configure --prefix=/opt/gimp'
> for it not to touch my stable gimp 2.2 RPM install.
> I am compiling the plug-in with
> 
> /opt/gimp/bin/gimptool-2.0 --install 

You will probably have to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to get this right.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp_zoom_preview_new

2007-03-12 Thread Michael Schumacher
Chris Seaton wrote:

> I've been on this mailing list for two days and this is the second  
> time I've seen someone arrogantly laughing at someone's very  
> reasonable questions.

Took me some time to get the joke, but it is one, IMO:

> On 12 Mar 2007, at 17:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:22:49 +0100, Luis A. Florit
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> (gimp-2.3:21083): Gimp-Plug-In-WARNING **: gimp-2.3:

The "punchline" is the following:

>>> plug_in_flush(): error: Broken pipe

>> This is nothing to do with the zoom preview mate, you've got a blocked
>> toilet !! I should call out a plumber , this could get messy.

flush() does get the toilet reference, broken pipe to the "blocked"
(although it is debatable if "broken" and be read as "blocked" in this case)

>> sorry , had to laugh at the way that error came out. ;)

The last line should show how this message was meant to be understood -
and it does hint towards the reason as well.


HTH,
Michael

-- 
GIMP > http://www.gimp.org  | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp
Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de
Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org |
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 23:13 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:

> You will probably have to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to get this right.

Thinking about it, perhaps gimptool-2.0 should do this for you. We could
add something like

 PKG_CONFIG_PATH=$libdir/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH

to gimptool-2.0.in. Would this be a good idea or am I missing something?


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
Hi Sven,

> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:11 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:
>
> > I compiled gimp with './configure --prefix=/opt/gimp'
> > for it not to touch my stable gimp 2.2 RPM install.
> > I am compiling the plug-in with
> >
> > /opt/gimp/bin/gimptool-2.0 --install 
>
> You will probably have to set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to get this right.

I am doing something wrong... I tried with this command:

export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig ; /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3

and I still having the same error.

Thanks,

Luis.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Ori Bernstein
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:36:42 -0300, "Luis A. Florit"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

> I am doing something wrong... I tried with this command:

Yes, yes you are.

> export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig ; /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3
> 
> and I still having the same error.

PKG_CONFIG_PATH only affects where stuff looks as it gets compiled. Also, you'd
want to use PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH, to keep
the old stuff in there (assuming it's non-empty).

IIRC, you'd want to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/ for runtime.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
gg,

I didn't get your joke at a first sight.
English is not my language...

BTW, it was funny. :)

L.

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Luis A. Florit
Hi Ori,

* El 12/03/07 a las 19:55, Ori Bernstein chamullaba:

> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:36:42 -0300, "Luis A. Florit"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I am doing something wrong... I tried with this command:
>
> Yes, yes you are.
>
> > export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig ; /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3
> >
> > and I still having the same error.
>
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH only affects where stuff looks as it gets compiled. Also, 
> you'd
> want to use PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH, to keep
> the old stuff in there (assuming it's non-empty).
>
> IIRC, you'd want to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/ for runtime.

Interesting.
In fact, I didn't recompile GIMP, I only did a

export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH

and the zoom preview worked! :)

However, I am getting many errors. One of them is due to the
fact that I don't know how to retrieve the origin of the preview.
For non-zoom previews, the funcion 'gimp_preview_get_position'
gives you the origin. I wasn't able to find the correspoding one
for zoom_preview (gimp_zoom_preview_get_position does not exist?!).
Another one is that I don't know which is the equivalent to
'gimp_drawable_preview_draw_region' for zoom_preview.

Thanks for the help, and the prompt answers!!!

Luis.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] memory manage in python-fu

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 06:51 -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
> I think you have hit an actual bug, and that it doesn't have anything
> to do with python, because I have encountered a similar thing in a
> modified version of gimpressionist that I worked up, written purely
> in C.  I believe that there is some sort of memory leak that causes
> gimp in some situations to maintain reference to tiles that are no
> longer being used in any way, and it is something that shows up when
> you create and delete layers over and over again, in a certain way.  
> So it would probably be useful for you to file a bug report about this, 
> if you would.

It would only be useful if that bug report included a way to reproduce
the problem. And it would probably be helpful to discuss that code
example beforehand.

I am not saying that there are no memory leaks in GIMP. But we are
frequently testing the software for this and I am not aware of any major
memory leaks such as the one that Bill describes here.

> The memory that is being exhausted, by the way, is the "swap" area
> that gimp allocates on the hard disk each time you run it.  The
> tile manager moves tile data there if space is needed.

Actually, it doesn't do that when space is needed, but when the memory
allocated for tiles exceeds the limit configured as 'tile-cache-size'.


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:36 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:

> I am doing something wrong... I tried with this command:
> 
> export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/opt/gimp/lib/pkgconfig ; /opt/gimp/bin/gimp-2.3
> 
> and I still having the same error.

Are you actually using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variables as
explained in the release notes for the development version?


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] about gimp zoom preview new

2007-03-12 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi,

On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 23:13 -0300, Luis A. Florit wrote:

> However, I am getting many errors. One of them is due to the
> fact that I don't know how to retrieve the origin of the preview.
> For non-zoom previews, the funcion 'gimp_preview_get_position'
> gives you the origin. I wasn't able to find the correspoding one
> for zoom_preview (gimp_zoom_preview_get_position does not exist?!).

GimpZoomPreview is derived from GimpPreview so you can use all methods
from GimpPreview.

> Another one is that I don't know which is the equivalent to
> 'gimp_drawable_preview_draw_region' for zoom_preview.

Perhaps have a look at one of the many plug-ins in the source
distribution that use a GimpZoomPreview...


Sven


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer