Re: [Gimp-docs] [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:49:56PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 12:26:11PM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote: IMHO gimp-help should follow the gimp versioning convention for avoid confusion, i.e. the new gimp-help-2 should be gimp-2.10. May I rewrite the wiki in this respect? Sure, sure! Please do! It's not only me who can work on the roadmap... Cheers, -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanof...@gimp.org ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:07:25AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: Hi Roman - when you talk about a 3.0 manual version in 3.0 - I am with the impression that the purposed changes would take place before GIMP 3.0 itself (as the next version shall be 2.10) So - it looks like the purposed version numbering would dissociate the manual version from GIMP's version - is that so? I think that might be confusing - although on a second thought it could be a manageable confusion, if it is clearly specified, inv arious places, that, for example, gimp-help-2 3.0 refers to gimp-2.10 . (As for the idea of going github I am of the same opinion as Jehan. We could put a mirror (fork in github parlor) there - but the authoritative repository should, by the reasons listed and maybe some more, be kept in the gnome infrastructure). I too agree. IMHO gimp-help should follow the gimp versioning convention for avoid confusion, i.e. the new gimp-help-2 should be gimp-2.10. -- Marco Ciampa L'utopia sta all'orizzonte. Mi avvicino di due passi, lei si allontana di due passi. Faccio dieci passi e l'orizzonte si allontana di dieci passi. Per quanto cammini, non la raggiungerò mai. A cosa serve l'utopia? A questo: serve a camminare. Eduardo Galeano ++ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal
On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost romanof...@gimp.org wrote: Hi, I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's feasibility. If there are no objections or comments I'd basically call the roadmap silently as accepted. For each point I think it'll be good to create bugs so we can track progress. I've not read it in details and mostly skimmed through. I got intrigued by a specific point though: moving the manual to github. Really? I know several (all?) of GNOME's repos have already been *mirrored* to github. Personally I find it acceptable if repos are just mirrored (that's after all one of the point of git as a distributed revision control), but not if it is to be considered the new main repository of the project. github is just another of these platforms led by a company, just like was Sourceforge (and now look, with time, all projects are fleeing it, just as we did), and like will be some other fashionable platform in the future. So I say, we keep control of the main repo. And if a github mirror had to be created, that would only be to profit of its network effect (why not), but it must be soon clear to new contributors that they must sync with the GNOME repo in the end, not the github one. Was that what you were proposing? If so, ok. If you really propose to move the main repo to github (as it is worded on the wiki), then I personally vote against. +1 from me. Why would you move to github? I agree with everything Jehan said. Regards, --Mitch ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
Re: [Gimp-docs] [Gimp-developer] Gimp Manual Roadmap proposal
Στις 06/02/2014 10:16 πμ, ο/η Michael Natterer έγραψε: On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 17:07 +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Roman Joost romanof...@gimp.org wrote: Hi, I've put together a Roadmap proposal under: http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Documentation:Main Any feedback is welcome. Some of the points are not to be read as: go ahead and implement, but rather look into it for it's feasibility. If there are no objections or comments I'd basically call the roadmap silently as accepted. For each point I think it'll be good to create bugs so we can track progress. I've not read it in details and mostly skimmed through. I got intrigued by a specific point though: moving the manual to github. Really? I know several (all?) of GNOME's repos have already been *mirrored* to github. Personally I find it acceptable if repos are just mirrored (that's after all one of the point of git as a distributed revision control), but not if it is to be considered the new main repository of the project. github is just another of these platforms led by a company, just like was Sourceforge (and now look, with time, all projects are fleeing it, just as we did), and like will be some other fashionable platform in the future. So I say, we keep control of the main repo. And if a github mirror had to be created, that would only be to profit of its network effect (why not), but it must be soon clear to new contributors that they must sync with the GNOME repo in the end, not the github one. Was that what you were proposing? If so, ok. If you really propose to move the main repo to github (as it is worded on the wiki), then I personally vote against. +1 from me. Why would you move to github? I agree with everything Jehan said. Regards, --Mitch ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list +1 from me ___ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
