On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:07:25AM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Hi Roman -
> when you talk about a "3.0" manual version in "3.0" - I am with the
> impression that the purposed changes would take place before GIMP 3.0
> itself (as the next version shall be 2.10)
> So - it looks like the purposed version numbering would dissociate the
> manual version from GIMP's version - is that so? I think that might
> be confusing - although on a second thought it could be
> a manageable confusion, if it is clearly specified, inv arious places, that,
> for example, gimp-help-2 "3.0" refers to "gimp-2.10" .
> (As for the idea of going github I am of the same opinion as Jehan.
> We could put a mirror ("fork" in github parlor) there - but the
> authoritative repository
> should, by the reasons listed and maybe some more,
> be kept in the gnome infrastructure).
I too agree. IMHO gimp-help should follow the gimp versioning convention
for avoid confusion, i.e. the new gimp-help-2 should be gimp-2.10.
"L'utopia sta all'orizzonte. Mi avvicino di due passi, lei si allontana
di due passi. Faccio dieci passi e l'orizzonte si allontana di dieci
passi. Per quanto cammini, non la raggiungerò mai. A cosa serve
l'utopia? A questo: serve a camminare." Eduardo Galeano
| Linux User #78271 |
| FSFE fellow #364 |
gimp-docs-list mailing list