Re: [Gimp-user] Font help

2006-09-06 Thread Owen Berry

On 9/5/06, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:51:58PM -0400, Owen Berry wrote:
 I'm using The Gimp to try to recreate some images containing only text
 for a web site that I maintain for my company. The site was originally
 created by a web design company using Dreamweaver and some other
 tools. Unfortunately all I could get out of them regarding the fonts
 used in the images is that they used Univers Condensed (47,57,67)
 fonts from Adobe. I've purchased the fonts, and have managed to
 recreate some of the images to a point that's visually acceptable. Now
 I'm stuck on a particular image.

 The problem is that the look of the font within The Gimp is similar
 but not the same as what is in the original image. The main problem is
 that the lower case letters are about half the size of the upper case
 letters, whereas in the original image they are about 2 thirds of the
 upper case letters. I've played around with turning hinting on and
 off, and forcing the auto-hinter, but not much luck, as expected.

 I thought a font was a font was a font. Well, as long as you're
 working with the same font. Am I not right? Is it possible that the
 font is being rendered differently on my system compared to the
 original designers'?

unfortunately, this is not the case.  many applications will stretch and
make into italic fonts that were not designed that way.

i spent sometime considering this, if i were a font artist.  i
determined that i would probably not like this after i had spent so much
time making a font.  so this was always one of the things i liked about
the way that GIMP managed fonts.  there is so much respect for the font
artist.

i hear that now fonts are considered 'software' and not art officially.
not to me though.  so the official terminology/definition disagrees with
mine.  if what i heard is accurate.

 Any suggestions on what I could do? I need to be able to recreate
 these images so that I can provide a translation of the site.

the gimp freetype plug-in can probably do this.  it still will take a
little determination on your part, however.

http://freetype.gimp.org

and if you make the graphics this way, understand that you will be
recreating the same problem for your successor as you are having now,
maybe.

the adobe software, naturally, will be able to exchange the information
about the font mangling from application to application.

it is font mangling, however.

carol


Yes, I've decided that there is some font mangling going on, and it's
particularly obvious with smaller font sizes, which is why I'm having
trouble with this image with a font size of 12px. I tried the freetype
plugin, and I can make the text look much closer by stretching it
vertically. Cool! Now I just need to increase the opacity.

I'm taking careful notes of what I'm doing, for myself as well as
anybody else who works on this. Hopefully that will help, especially
as all the software is freely available.

Thanks for the help.

Owen
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Font help

2006-09-05 Thread Owen Berry

I'm using The Gimp to try to recreate some images containing only text
for a web site that I maintain for my company. The site was originally
created by a web design company using Dreamweaver and some other
tools. Unfortunately all I could get out of them regarding the fonts
used in the images is that they used Univers Condensed (47,57,67)
fonts from Adobe. I've purchased the fonts, and have managed to
recreate some of the images to a point that's visually acceptable. Now
I'm stuck on a particular image.

The problem is that the look of the font within The Gimp is similar
but not the same as what is in the original image. The main problem is
that the lower case letters are about half the size of the upper case
letters, whereas in the original image they are about 2 thirds of the
upper case letters. I've played around with turning hinting on and
off, and forcing the auto-hinter, but not much luck, as expected.

I thought a font was a font was a font. Well, as long as you're
working with the same font. Am I not right? Is it possible that the
font is being rendered differently on my system compared to the
original designers'?

Any suggestions on what I could do? I need to be able to recreate
these images so that I can provide a translation of the site.

Technical details:
 OS: Linux - Fedora Core 4
 gimp: 2.2.12
 freetype: 2.1.9
 fontconfig: 2.2.3
 xorg-x11: 6.8.2

TIA.
Owen
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Font help

2006-09-05 Thread Carol Spears
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:51:58PM -0400, Owen Berry wrote:
 I'm using The Gimp to try to recreate some images containing only text
 for a web site that I maintain for my company. The site was originally
 created by a web design company using Dreamweaver and some other
 tools. Unfortunately all I could get out of them regarding the fonts
 used in the images is that they used Univers Condensed (47,57,67)
 fonts from Adobe. I've purchased the fonts, and have managed to
 recreate some of the images to a point that's visually acceptable. Now
 I'm stuck on a particular image.
 
 The problem is that the look of the font within The Gimp is similar
 but not the same as what is in the original image. The main problem is
 that the lower case letters are about half the size of the upper case
 letters, whereas in the original image they are about 2 thirds of the
 upper case letters. I've played around with turning hinting on and
 off, and forcing the auto-hinter, but not much luck, as expected.
 
 I thought a font was a font was a font. Well, as long as you're
 working with the same font. Am I not right? Is it possible that the
 font is being rendered differently on my system compared to the
 original designers'?
 
unfortunately, this is not the case.  many applications will stretch and
make into italic fonts that were not designed that way.

i spent sometime considering this, if i were a font artist.  i
determined that i would probably not like this after i had spent so much
time making a font.  so this was always one of the things i liked about
the way that GIMP managed fonts.  there is so much respect for the font
artist.

i hear that now fonts are considered 'software' and not art officially.
not to me though.  so the official terminology/definition disagrees with
mine.  if what i heard is accurate.

 Any suggestions on what I could do? I need to be able to recreate
 these images so that I can provide a translation of the site.
 
the gimp freetype plug-in can probably do this.  it still will take a
little determination on your part, however.

http://freetype.gimp.org

and if you make the graphics this way, understand that you will be
recreating the same problem for your successor as you are having now,
maybe.

the adobe software, naturally, will be able to exchange the information
about the font mangling from application to application.

it is font mangling, however.

carol


___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user