Re: Re : [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
it would be nice. btw, how far is the gegl development? when we can expect gegl based release of gimp to be made? 2005? ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: Re : [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: As I understand, gegl has been planned as a core for GIMP 2.0 :). Looking at gegl pages shows it's at beginning of development. Am I right? Hmm, the pages, are horribly horribly out of date. This is my fault. The pages do not accurately reflect the state of gegl development. I should update those. . . -- Dan pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Re : [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
Dave Neary wrote: This is something which we will get for some cost (mostly interface issues) when we have fully migrated to gegl. People are currently debating a migration plan for getting gegl into the GIMP. Currently nothing has been decided. In one of these plans it's possible we will have higher bitdepths within a year in a stable release. In another, it will be a little longer. Given our experiences with 2.0, I suspect that the plan which will be chosen is the one which allows us to keep a more or less stable CVS tree during the migration. I'd guess if you twisted my arm that we'll have both more colourspaces and increased bitdepth within 18 months. But that guess is worth about the same as anyone else's. Cheers, Dave. As I understand, gegl has been planned as a core for GIMP 2.0 :). Looking at gegl pages shows it's at beginning of development. Am I right? -- With respect Alexander Rabtchevich ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: Re : [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: Le 19.01.2004 14:32, Dave Neary a écrit : Hi, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Can GIMP handle raw images from digital camera (without downsizing to 8 bits per channel) as Photoshop can? No. For the moment, the GIMP is limited to 8 bits per channel. Dave. Hi, Does « for the moment » means there are some plan to change this in rhe (near) future ? ;-) This is something which we will get for some cost (mostly interface issues) when we have fully migrated to gegl. People are currently debating a migration plan for getting gegl into the GIMP. Currently nothing has been decided. In one of these plans it's possible we will have higher bitdepths within a year in a stable release. In another, it will be a little longer. Given our experiences with 2.0, I suspect that the plan which will be chosen is the one which allows us to keep a more or less stable CVS tree during the migration. I'd guess if you twisted my arm that we'll have both more colourspaces and increased bitdepth within 18 months. But that guess is worth about the same as anyone else's. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re : [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
Le 19.01.2004 14:32, Dave Neary a écrit : Hi, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Can GIMP handle raw images from digital camera (without downsizing to 8 bits per channel) as Photoshop can? No. For the moment, the GIMP is limited to 8 bits per channel. Dave. Hi, Does « for the moment » means there are some plan to change this in rhe (near) future ? ;-) -- Regards - Jean-Luc pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Gimp-user] Digital cameras RAW images
Hi, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: Can GIMP handle raw images from digital camera (without downsizing to 8 bits per channel) as Photoshop can? No. For the moment, the GIMP is limited to 8 bits per channel. Dave. -- Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
