[Gimp-user] Stitching Photos

2019-07-10 Thread Scott Jacobs via gimp-user-list
>I can't seem to make this work; I don't see any option for enlarging the
>workspace.  I can enlarge the canvas as much as I want, but this doesn't change
>the size of the "window" through which my content is visible.  As I paste in 
>the
>second image and slide it over--in this case to the right, it disappears.  It's
>almost like the second image is sliding under the blank background that was
>created when I enlarged the canvas.

I'm not sure what the official way to solve this is, but when I am putting 
several imagestogether, I look at each in an image viewer to see what the width 
and height are in pixels, add those figures together as is appropriate to how 
the images will be placed in the final image (if I am not sure, I just make it 
bigger than I think I will need - I can always crop it down later), and then 
open GIMP.I immediately do a File->New> and set the width and height to the 
figures I calculated,and under Advanced Options set the initial content to Fill 
With whatever color you want.I usually pick white, but you could use the fore- 
or background color, or transparency.(You may wish to set the x- and y- 
resolution, but I don't know if it is really necessary - mine is set to 300 
ppi, but I don't know if that is default, or because I set it some time...)
Now that I have a background layer that is (at least) large enough, I then 
File->Open as Layersall of the images that will be used to make the final image 
(remember, you can save time byCtrl-Clicking multiple individual files in the 
same directory, and shift-clicking the first and lastfile of multiple files 
that are located right next to each other in the same directory).
Now, just move things around as you like, and/or cut/paste parts of one layer 
onto otherlayers, etc.
Sometimes, when I know that I only want a little from each image, I will just 
cut/paste bitsof each layer onto the background, and play around with exact 
placement there, later...
-
When I go on a trip, I will often use this technique to open pages of a 
downloaded .pdffile of a complete bus schedule, knowing that I only need a few 
lines on a few pages.I'll cut and paste those lines, and probably the page 
headings, on what will end up asonly one printed page, which I can then take 
with me.
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


Re: [Gimp-user] Stitching Photos

2019-07-10 Thread Rick Kline
Did you name the pasted layer? If not, the layer will appear as Floating 
Selection (Pasted Layer).

Double click on the pasted layer’s name and give it any other name. 

Move the newly named layer to its new position - ~50% layer opacity can help 
with this.

Under the Image menu, click on Fit Canvas to Layers. 

That should give you the canvas size you need and you should be able to see all 
of your pasted layer.

Don’t forget to change layer opacity back to 100%, or whatever your project 
calls for.

Hope this helps.

Rick
 * * ** *** *  * * 
It’s better to wave at a stranger than to ignore a friend
 * * ** *** *  * * 



> On Jul 10, 2019, at 8:09 PM, Gothmog  wrote:
> 
> I can't seem to make this work; I don't see any option for enlarging the
> workspace.  I can enlarge the canvas as much as I want, but this doesn't 
> change
> the size of the "window" through which my content is visible.  As I paste in 
> the
> second image and slide it over--in this case to the right, it disappears.  
> It's
> almost like the second image is sliding under the blank background that was
> created when I enlarged the canvas.
> 
>> There are automated tools to facilitate this, but I have not used
>> them.
>> 
>> The manual process is not terribly complicated.
>> 
>> First, open one of the photos in the GIMP, then import the second
>> photo
>> as a layer.  Drag and drop the second image to the image canvas, quick
>> &
>> easy.
>> 
>> Next, do Image > Canvas size, and make the 'workspace' available big
>> enough to accommodate both photos side by side, with some room left
>> over
>> to move them around.
>> 
>> Then align the photos so their edges fit together accurately.  How to
>> do
>> this depends on the individual photos; some rotation and scaling (in
>> that order) of the layer you are moving around may be required to make
>> them match, and maybe a little tweaking with the Perspective tool,
>> which
>> enables one to arbitrarily stretch a layer by repositioning its
>> corners.
>> 
>> Note that when using the Rotate tool, you can move the center of
>> rotation by dragging the cross hair icon in the middle of the grid to
>> wherever you want it.  Making one detail near the top or bottom edge
>> of
>> your upper layer match the lower one exactly, and putting the center
>> of
>> rotation there, will save a lot of time and effort.
>> 
>> Adjusting the transparency of the upper layer to about 50% will
>> greatly
>> assist in lining it up with the base layer.  When your alignment,
>> rotation, scaling etc. are
>> 
>> Once the two photos / layers are aligned and look right, "save" your
>> work as XCF, then save it again with a new name, i.e. add "-1" or
>> something to the name.  This is so you can go back and tweak your
>> first
>> effort if and as needed.
>> 
>> To make a seamless transition from one image to another, it may be
>> helpful to add a layer mask to the upper image and use a very soft
>> edged
>> brush (or the gradient tool) on the mask to fade the edge of the upper
>> image out a little.
>> 
>> Finally, crop the aligned photos to square up their edges, make any
>> necessary color, light, etc. adjustments, save that result as XCF and
>> export the image to your format of choice as a finished product.
>> 
>> Functions you may want to look up, if any are unfamiliar:  The Move
>> tool, Scale tool, Rotate tool, Perspective tool, layer opacity
>> adjustment, Crop tool.
>> 
>> I have made panoramas this way, and it worked out quite nicely.  I
>> cheated, though, by taking the original pictures with a camera on a
>> tripod, which make the assembly /way/ easier than hand held results
>> permit.
>> 
>> :o)
> 
> -- 
> Gothmog (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
> ___
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list

___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] Stitching Photos

2019-07-10 Thread Gothmog
I can't seem to make this work; I don't see any option for enlarging the
workspace.  I can enlarge the canvas as much as I want, but this doesn't change
the size of the "window" through which my content is visible.  As I paste in the
second image and slide it over--in this case to the right, it disappears.  It's
almost like the second image is sliding under the blank background that was
created when I enlarged the canvas.

>There are automated tools to facilitate this, but I have not used
>them.
>
>The manual process is not terribly complicated.
>
>First, open one of the photos in the GIMP, then import the second
>photo
>as a layer.  Drag and drop the second image to the image canvas, quick
>&
>easy.
>
>Next, do Image > Canvas size, and make the 'workspace' available big
>enough to accommodate both photos side by side, with some room left
>over
>to move them around.
>
>Then align the photos so their edges fit together accurately.  How to
>do
>this depends on the individual photos; some rotation and scaling (in
>that order) of the layer you are moving around may be required to make
>them match, and maybe a little tweaking with the Perspective tool,
>which
>enables one to arbitrarily stretch a layer by repositioning its
>corners.
>
>Note that when using the Rotate tool, you can move the center of
>rotation by dragging the cross hair icon in the middle of the grid to
>wherever you want it.  Making one detail near the top or bottom edge
>of
>your upper layer match the lower one exactly, and putting the center
>of
>rotation there, will save a lot of time and effort.
>
>Adjusting the transparency of the upper layer to about 50% will
>greatly
>assist in lining it up with the base layer.  When your alignment,
>rotation, scaling etc. are
>
>Once the two photos / layers are aligned and look right, "save" your
>work as XCF, then save it again with a new name, i.e. add "-1" or
>something to the name.  This is so you can go back and tweak your
>first
>effort if and as needed.
>
>To make a seamless transition from one image to another, it may be
>helpful to add a layer mask to the upper image and use a very soft
>edged
>brush (or the gradient tool) on the mask to fade the edge of the upper
>image out a little.
>
>Finally, crop the aligned photos to square up their edges, make any
>necessary color, light, etc. adjustments, save that result as XCF and
>export the image to your format of choice as a finished product.
>
>Functions you may want to look up, if any are unfamiliar:  The Move
>tool, Scale tool, Rotate tool, Perspective tool, layer opacity
>adjustment, Crop tool.
>
>I have made panoramas this way, and it worked out quite nicely.  I
>cheated, though, by taking the original pictures with a camera on a
>tripod, which make the assembly /way/ easier than hand held results
>permit.
>
>:o)

-- 
Gothmog (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] When Color Managed Display is turned on in Windows?

2019-07-10 Thread AndyJP
>Does having the monitor profile on/off in either of Gimp / MS system
>affect the way out-of-gamut colors are shown?
>
>Otherwise, if there is no difference I would keep the monitor icm
>enabled in Gimp  (just on the basic of no-visible-difference).
>
>Want a better answer?  Best ask on https://discuss.pixls.us/

As I said, the profile is loaded in Windows 7 for correcting the monitor. And
yes, it affects the output significantly. So, I afraid of double correction,
because the exact mechanism is not explained in terms of source1,
source2->operation->output.

-- 
AndyJP (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list


[Gimp-user] When Color Managed Display is turned on in Windows?

2019-07-10 Thread rich404
>What happens when "Color Managed Display" is turned on in Windows?
>(and what about try to use system monitor profile checkbox?)
>
>I have a software-corrected sRGB-gamma .icc profile loaded in Windows
>7.
>So the monitor displays more or less correct colors and relatively
>fine intensity by default.
>
>So should I define the same monitor profile in GIMP? When the colors
>are already correct? If it adds to the image only difference of the
>mentioned profile with OS-managed profile? so the correction is zero?
>
>I guess,
>If GIMP calculates difference of the mentioned profile with sRGB, then
>probably colors should go out of control?
>
>So should I set there my real monitor's profile, or sRGB, when the
>color is managed by Windows?

Does having the monitor profile on/off in either of Gimp / MS system affect the
way out-of-gamut colors are shown?

Otherwise, if there is no difference I would keep the monitor icm enabled in
Gimp  (just on the basic of no-visible-difference).

Want a better answer?  Best ask on https://discuss.pixls.us/

-- 
rich404 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list