Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes: [snip] I can see where this is confusing, but can also see how it's useful information to have. On clone, it's probably not that useful since you're looking right at the url, but I could see that information being more useful on a pull or push with the default arguments (when the source and destination aren't quite as obvious). The extra error messages is not the first one, but the last one, and the suggested revert is a proposal to remove the latter, not the repository $URL not found. Sorry for the confusion. I realize they were talking about removing the remote helper line. What I meant was that with the url there, it's a bit easier to determine which part of git failed (http, hg, or bzr remote helper, for instance). What I was trying to say was perhaps there are paths through here where it's really helpful to know that things failed in the remote helper, so we may not want to wholesale remove it. Some of remote helpers, such as ones that talk to foreign VCSes, do quite a bit more than just transfer data, so it might be helpful to know that it's not core git that's failing but the remote helper. Seeing the URL is a reminder that you're interacting with a remote helper, and it may not be helpful there. But other commands don't necessarily show that to you, and it may be more helpful to have that reminder that it was a remote helper that failed. I hope that makes more sense. -John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
Jeff King wrote: So I'm not sure if there is a better option than reverting 81d340d4 and living with the lesser of two evils (no good message when the helper dies silently). I dug around, but I still can't justify that there is no better option. Could you write a commit message for this? -- 8 -- diff --git a/transport-helper.c b/transport-helper.c index 06c08a1..db9bd18 100644 --- a/transport-helper.c +++ b/transport-helper.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf if (strbuf_getline(buffer, helper, '\n') == EOF) { if (debug) fprintf(stderr, Debug: Remote helper quit.\n); - die(Reading from helper 'git-remote-%s' failed, name); + exit(128); } if (debug) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: diff --git a/transport-helper.c b/transport-helper.c index 06c08a1..db9bd18 100644 --- a/transport-helper.c +++ b/transport-helper.c Oh, and we have to remove test 23 - proper failure checks for pushing from t5801-remote-helpers.sh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:14:33PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: Jeff King wrote: So I'm not sure if there is a better option than reverting 81d340d4 and living with the lesser of two evils (no good message when the helper dies silently). I dug around, but I still can't justify that there is no better option. Could you write a commit message for this? I think it is something like this: -- 8 -- Subject: [PATCH] transport-helper: be quiet on read errors from helpers Prior to commit 81d340d4, we did not print any error message if a remote transport helper died unexpectedly. If a helper did not print any error message (e.g., because it crashed), the user could be left confused. That commit tried to rectify the situation by printing a note that the helper exited unexpectedly. However, this makes a much more common case worse: when a helper does die with a useful message, we print the extra Reading from 'git-remote-foo failed message. This can also end up confusing users, as they may not even know what remote helpers are (e.g., the fact that http support comes through git-remote-https is purely an implementation detail that most users do not know or care about). Since we do not have a good way of knowing whether the helper printed a useful error, and since the common failure mode is for it to do so, let's default to remaining quiet. Debuggers can dig further by setting GIT_TRANSPORT_HELPER_DEBUG. Signed-off-by: Jeff King p...@peff.net --- Note that I haven't thought too hard about this; there may be a way to detect for specific operations that we were expecting more data from the helper and didn't get it. But even if we do want to go that route, I think reverting the change to recvline_fh is probably going to be the first step. t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh | 4 +--- transport-helper.c| 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh b/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh index 4899af3..8c4c539 100755 --- a/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh +++ b/t/t5801-remote-helpers.sh @@ -210,9 +210,7 @@ test_expect_success 'proper failure checks for pushing' ' (GIT_REMOTE_TESTGIT_FAILURE=1 export GIT_REMOTE_TESTGIT_FAILURE cd local - test_must_fail git push --all 2 error - cat error - grep -q Reading from helper .git-remote-testgit. failed error + test_must_fail git push --all ) ' diff --git a/transport-helper.c b/transport-helper.c index 06c08a1..db9bd18 100644 --- a/transport-helper.c +++ b/transport-helper.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int recvline_fh(FILE *helper, struct strbuf *buffer, const char *name) if (strbuf_getline(buffer, helper, '\n') == EOF) { if (debug) fprintf(stderr, Debug: Remote helper quit.\n); - die(Reading from helper 'git-remote-%s' failed, name); + exit(128); } if (debug) -- 1.8.3.rc2.14.g7eee6b3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, So this should explain the problem: # using v1.8.3.1 $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found # using master $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found fatal: Reading from helper 'git-remote-https' failed I can see where this is confusing, but can also see how it's useful information to have. On clone, it's probably not that useful since you're looking right at the url, but I could see that information being more useful on a pull or push with the default arguments (when the source and destination aren't quite as obvious). -John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: Note that I haven't thought too hard about this; there may be a way to detect for specific operations that we were expecting more data from the helper and didn't get it. But even if we do want to go that route, I think reverting the change to recvline_fh is probably going to be the first step. Yeah, I agree with that assessment. Will queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
John Szakmeister j...@szakmeister.net writes: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, So this should explain the problem: # using v1.8.3.1 $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found # using master $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found fatal: Reading from helper 'git-remote-https' failed I can see where this is confusing, but can also see how it's useful information to have. On clone, it's probably not that useful since you're looking right at the url, but I could see that information being more useful on a pull or push with the default arguments (when the source and destination aren't quite as obvious). The extra error messages is not the first one, but the last one, and the suggested revert is a proposal to remove the latter, not the repository $URL not found. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[BUG] clone: regression in error messages in master
Hi, So this should explain the problem: # using v1.8.3.1 $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found # using master $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: repository 'https://google.com/' not found fatal: Reading from helper 'git-remote-https' failed To figure out where the regression was coming from, I ran a bisect with this script: #!/bin/sh make clean make -j 8 cd t sh -v -i clone-message.sh where clone-message.sh is: test_description=clone-message . ./test-lib.sh test_expect_success setup ' rm -fr .git test_create_repo src ( cd src file git add file git commit -m initial echo 1 file git add file git commit -m updated ) ' test_expect_success 'clone invalid URL' ' rm -fr dst test_must_fail git clone https://google.com 2msg test_i18ngrep repository .* not found msg ! test_i18ngrep git-remote-https msg ' test_done The bisect pointed me to: 81d340d4 (transport-helper: report errors properly, 2013-04-10). $ git clone https://google.com Cloning into 'google.com'... fatal: https://google.com/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack not found: did you run git update-server-info on the server? fatal: Reading from remote helper failed What?! Okay, the last Reading from remote helper failed was introduced by this commit; my clone-message.sh has a bug. So I commented out the first test_i18ngrep and ran it. Result: c096955 (transport-helper: mention helper name when it dies, 2013-04-10). This is not the real culprit: it just changed the message string that 81d340d4 originally introduced. Okay, so am I reporting a valid bug? Going through remote-curl, I can see that it dies in remote-curl.c:213 if HTTP_TARGET_MISSING. If that is the case, what is the point of printing the second message about the remote helper program not being present? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html