Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-15 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jacob Keller  wrote:
> Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
> line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
> syntax.

Kinda off topic, but I wish we could show these default overriding
settings when GIT_TRACE is set. E.g. if this knob is set, GIT_TRACE
would show 'git' 'tag' '--version=' even though --version is not
specified from command line. Or some other way to know which knobs are
active when a command is run.
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:29 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Keller, Jacob E"  writes:
> 
> > This is not how the rest of the current tests work. I will submit a
> > patch which fixes up the current --sort tests (but not every test, for
> > now) as well.
> 
> I do not want to pile more work that is unrelated to the task at
> hand on your plate, i.e. clean-up work, so I would assign a very low
> priority to "fix up the current tests".  At the same time, existing
> mistakes are not excuses to introduce new similar ones, hence my
> suggestions to the added code in the patch I saw.
> 

It was trivial to fix at least the --sort tests, so I submitted a patch
that goes before this one to fix those as well.

Thanks,
Jake


Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Keller, Jacob E"  writes:

> This is not how the rest of the current tests work. I will submit a
> patch which fixes up the current --sort tests (but not every test, for
> now) as well.

I do not want to pile more work that is unrelated to the task at
hand on your plate, i.e. clean-up work, so I would assign a very low
priority to "fix up the current tests".  At the same time, existing
mistakes are not excuses to introduce new similar ones, hence my
suggestions to the added code in the patch I saw.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jacob Keller  writes:
> 

> > +
> > +   if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
> > +   die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);
> 
> Hmm.  I _thought_ we try to catch unsupported option value coming
> from the command line and die but at the same time we try *not* to
> die but warn and whatever is sensible when the value comes from the
> configuration, so that .git/config or $HOME/.gitconfig can be shared
> by those who use different versions of Git.
> 
> Do we already have many precedences where we see configuration value
> that our version of Git do not yet understand?
> 
> Not a very strong objection; just something that worries me.

Based on a cursory glance at how the config is parsed, we actually
die_on_error for most options. Does it makes sense to warn or not? I am
not really sure here.. At any rate I updated this to be a bit cleaner
and use error( instead of die, so that it will work within how config is
supposed to.. Plus, this also makes it so that --sort shows the usage if
it's invalid.

Please comment more on the new set I am sending so we can really
determine what the correct course of action is here.

Regards,
Jake


Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jacob Keller  writes:
> 
> > Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
> > line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
> > syntax.
> >
> > Cc: Jeff King 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller 
> > ---
> > - v4
> > * base on top of suggested change by Jeff King to use skip_prefix instead
> >
> >  Documentation/config.txt  |  6 ++
> >  Documentation/git-tag.txt |  1 +
> >  builtin/tag.c | 46 
> > --
> >  t/t7004-tag.sh| 21 +
> >  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
> > index 1d718bdb9662..ad8e75fed988 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/config.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/config.txt
> > @@ -2354,6 +2354,12 @@ submodule..ignore::
> > "--ignore-submodules" option. The 'git submodule' commands are not
> > affected by this setting.
> >  
> > +tag.sort::
> > +   This variable is used to control the sort ordering of tags. It is
> > +   interpreted precisely the same way as "--sort=". If --sort is
> > +   given on the command line it will override the selection chosen in the
> > +   configuration. See linkgit:git-tag[1] for more details.
> > +
> 
> This is not technically incorrect per-se, but the third sentence
> talks about "--sort" on "the command line" while this applies only
> to "the command line of the 'git tag' command" and nobody else's
> "--sort" option.
> 
> Perhaps rephrasing it like this may be easier to understand?
> 
>   When "git tag" command is used to list existing tags,
> without "--sort=" option on the command line,
>   the value of this variable is used as the default.
> 
> This way, it would be clear, without explicitly saying anything,
> that the value will be spelled exactly the same way as you would
> spell the value for the --sort option on the command line.
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > index b424a1bc48bb..2d246725aeb5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ include::date-formats.txt[]
> >  SEE ALSO
> >  
> >  linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
> > +linkgit:git-config[1].
> 
> It is not particularly friendly to readers to refer to
> "git-config[1]" from any other page, if done without spelling out
> which variable the reader is expected to look up.  Some addition
> to the description of the "--sort" option is needed if this SEE ALSO
> were to be any useful, I guess?
> 
>   --sort=::
> ... (existing description) ...
> When this option is not given, the sort order
> defaults to the value configured for the `tag.sort`
> variable, if exists, or lexicographic otherwise.
> 
> or something like that, perhaps?
> 
> > diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
> > index 7ccb6f3c581b..a53e27d4e7e4 100644
> > --- a/builtin/tag.c
> > +++ b/builtin/tag.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> >  #include "sha1-array.h"
> >  #include "column.h"
> >  
> > +static int tag_sort = 0;
> 
> Please do not initialize variables in bss segment to 0 by hand.
> 
> If this variable is meant to take one of these *CMP_SORT values
> defined as macro later in this file, it is better to define this
> variable somewhere after and close to the definitions of the macros.
> Perhaps immediately after the "struct tag_filter" is declared?
> 
> > @@ -346,9 +348,33 @@ static const char tag_template_nocleanup[] =
> > "Lines starting with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
> > " yourself if you want to.\n");
> >  
> > +static int parse_sort_string(const char *arg)
> > +{
> > +   int sort = 0;
> > +   int flags = 0;
> > +
> > +   if (skip_prefix(arg, "-", &arg))
> > +   flags |= REVERSE_SORT;
> > +
> > +   if (skip_prefix(arg, "version:", &arg) || skip_prefix(arg, "v:", &arg))
> > +   sort = VERCMP_SORT;
> > +
> > +   if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
> > +   die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);
> 
> Hmm.  I _thought_ we try to catch unsupported option value coming
> from the command line and die but at the same time we try *not* to
> die but warn and whatever is sensible when the value comes from the
> configuration, so that .git/config or $HOME/.gitconfig can be shared
> by those who use different versions of Git.
> 
> Do we already have many precedences where we see configuration value
> that our version of Git do not yet understand?
> 
> Not a very strong objection; just something that worries me.
> 
> > +   sort |= flags;
> > +
> > +   return sort;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int git_tag_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> >  {
> > -   int status = git_gpg_config(var, value, cb);
> > +   int status;
> > +
> > +   if (!strcmp(var, "tag.sort")) {
> > +   tag_sort = parse_sort_string(value);
> >

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
"Keller, Jacob E"  writes:

> On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>> > +static int tag_sort = 0;
>> 
>> Please do not initialize variables in bss segment to 0 by hand.
>> 
>> If this variable is meant to take one of these *CMP_SORT values
>> defined as macro later in this file, it is better to define this
>> variable somewhere after and close to the definitions of the macros.
>> Perhaps immediately after the "struct tag_filter" is declared?
>
> I put it just above the struct tag_filter now, as this puts it right
> below the #defines regarding it's value.

Either would be fine, but just to clarify.

Because these macro definitions are for the .sort field of that
structure, and the new tag_sort variable is the second user of that
macro, my suggestion to put it _after_ was to be in line with "add
new things at the end, when there is no compelling reason not to"
below.

>> When there is no reason to have things in a particular order, it is
>> customary to add new things at the end, not in the front, unless the
>> new thing is so much more important than everything else---but then
>> we are no longer talking about the case where there is no reason to
>> have things in a particular order ;-).

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jacob Keller  writes:
> 
> > Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
> > line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
> > syntax.
> >
> > Cc: Jeff King 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller 
> > ---
> > - v4
> > * base on top of suggested change by Jeff King to use skip_prefix instead
> >
> >  Documentation/config.txt  |  6 ++
> >  Documentation/git-tag.txt |  1 +
> >  builtin/tag.c | 46 
> > --
> >  t/t7004-tag.sh| 21 +
> >  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
> > index 1d718bdb9662..ad8e75fed988 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/config.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/config.txt
> > @@ -2354,6 +2354,12 @@ submodule..ignore::
> > "--ignore-submodules" option. The 'git submodule' commands are not
> > affected by this setting.
> >  
> > +tag.sort::
> > +   This variable is used to control the sort ordering of tags. It is
> > +   interpreted precisely the same way as "--sort=". If --sort is
> > +   given on the command line it will override the selection chosen in the
> > +   configuration. See linkgit:git-tag[1] for more details.
> > +
> 
> This is not technically incorrect per-se, but the third sentence
> talks about "--sort" on "the command line" while this applies only
> to "the command line of the 'git tag' command" and nobody else's
> "--sort" option.
> 
> Perhaps rephrasing it like this may be easier to understand?
> 
>   When "git tag" command is used to list existing tags,
> without "--sort=" option on the command line,
>   the value of this variable is used as the default.
> 
> This way, it would be clear, without explicitly saying anything,
> that the value will be spelled exactly the same way as you would
> spell the value for the --sort option on the command line.
> 

Makes sense.

> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > index b424a1bc48bb..2d246725aeb5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> > @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ include::date-formats.txt[]
> >  SEE ALSO
> >  
> >  linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
> > +linkgit:git-config[1].
> 
> It is not particularly friendly to readers to refer to
> "git-config[1]" from any other page, if done without spelling out
> which variable the reader is expected to look up.  Some addition
> to the description of the "--sort" option is needed if this SEE ALSO
> were to be any useful, I guess?
> 
>   --sort=::
> ... (existing description) ...
> When this option is not given, the sort order
> defaults to the value configured for the `tag.sort`
> variable, if exists, or lexicographic otherwise.
> 
> or something like that, perhaps?
> 

Alright, this sounds good too.

> > diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
> > index 7ccb6f3c581b..a53e27d4e7e4 100644
> > --- a/builtin/tag.c
> > +++ b/builtin/tag.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
> >  #include "sha1-array.h"
> >  #include "column.h"
> >  
> > +static int tag_sort = 0;
> 
> Please do not initialize variables in bss segment to 0 by hand.
> 
> If this variable is meant to take one of these *CMP_SORT values
> defined as macro later in this file, it is better to define this
> variable somewhere after and close to the definitions of the macros.
> Perhaps immediately after the "struct tag_filter" is declared?
> 

I put it just above the struct tag_filter now, as this puts it right
below the #defines regarding it's value.

> > @@ -346,9 +348,33 @@ static const char tag_template_nocleanup[] =
> > "Lines starting with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
> > " yourself if you want to.\n");
> >  
> > +static int parse_sort_string(const char *arg)
> > +{
> > +   int sort = 0;
> > +   int flags = 0;
> > +
> > +   if (skip_prefix(arg, "-", &arg))
> > +   flags |= REVERSE_SORT;
> > +
> > +   if (skip_prefix(arg, "version:", &arg) || skip_prefix(arg, "v:", &arg))
> > +   sort = VERCMP_SORT;
> > +
> > +   if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
> > +   die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);
> 
> Hmm.  I _thought_ we try to catch unsupported option value coming
> from the command line and die but at the same time we try *not* to
> die but warn and whatever is sensible when the value comes from the
> configuration, so that .git/config or $HOME/.gitconfig can be shared
> by those who use different versions of Git.
> 
> Do we already have many precedences where we see configuration value
> that our version of Git do not yet understand?
> 
> Not a very strong objection; just something that worries me.
> 

I like this change, and I think I have a way to handle it. I will
re-work this so that the die is handled by the normal block.

> > +   sort |= flags;
> > +
> > 

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jacob Keller  writes:

> Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
> line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
> syntax.
>
> Cc: Jeff King 
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller 
> ---
> - v4
> * base on top of suggested change by Jeff King to use skip_prefix instead
>
>  Documentation/config.txt  |  6 ++
>  Documentation/git-tag.txt |  1 +
>  builtin/tag.c | 46 --
>  t/t7004-tag.sh| 21 +
>  4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
> index 1d718bdb9662..ad8e75fed988 100644
> --- a/Documentation/config.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/config.txt
> @@ -2354,6 +2354,12 @@ submodule..ignore::
>   "--ignore-submodules" option. The 'git submodule' commands are not
>   affected by this setting.
>  
> +tag.sort::
> + This variable is used to control the sort ordering of tags. It is
> + interpreted precisely the same way as "--sort=". If --sort is
> + given on the command line it will override the selection chosen in the
> + configuration. See linkgit:git-tag[1] for more details.
> +

This is not technically incorrect per-se, but the third sentence
talks about "--sort" on "the command line" while this applies only
to "the command line of the 'git tag' command" and nobody else's
"--sort" option.

Perhaps rephrasing it like this may be easier to understand?

When "git tag" command is used to list existing tags,
without "--sort=" option on the command line,
the value of this variable is used as the default.

This way, it would be clear, without explicitly saying anything,
that the value will be spelled exactly the same way as you would
spell the value for the --sort option on the command line.

> diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> index b424a1bc48bb..2d246725aeb5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ include::date-formats.txt[]
>  SEE ALSO
>  
>  linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
> +linkgit:git-config[1].

It is not particularly friendly to readers to refer to
"git-config[1]" from any other page, if done without spelling out
which variable the reader is expected to look up.  Some addition
to the description of the "--sort" option is needed if this SEE ALSO
were to be any useful, I guess?

--sort=::
... (existing description) ...
When this option is not given, the sort order
defaults to the value configured for the `tag.sort`
variable, if exists, or lexicographic otherwise.

or something like that, perhaps?

> diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
> index 7ccb6f3c581b..a53e27d4e7e4 100644
> --- a/builtin/tag.c
> +++ b/builtin/tag.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  #include "sha1-array.h"
>  #include "column.h"
>  
> +static int tag_sort = 0;

Please do not initialize variables in bss segment to 0 by hand.

If this variable is meant to take one of these *CMP_SORT values
defined as macro later in this file, it is better to define this
variable somewhere after and close to the definitions of the macros.
Perhaps immediately after the "struct tag_filter" is declared?

> @@ -346,9 +348,33 @@ static const char tag_template_nocleanup[] =
>   "Lines starting with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
>   " yourself if you want to.\n");
>  
> +static int parse_sort_string(const char *arg)
> +{
> + int sort = 0;
> + int flags = 0;
> +
> + if (skip_prefix(arg, "-", &arg))
> + flags |= REVERSE_SORT;
> +
> + if (skip_prefix(arg, "version:", &arg) || skip_prefix(arg, "v:", &arg))
> + sort = VERCMP_SORT;
> +
> + if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
> + die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);

Hmm.  I _thought_ we try to catch unsupported option value coming
from the command line and die but at the same time we try *not* to
die but warn and whatever is sensible when the value comes from the
configuration, so that .git/config or $HOME/.gitconfig can be shared
by those who use different versions of Git.

Do we already have many precedences where we see configuration value
that our version of Git do not yet understand?

Not a very strong objection; just something that worries me.

> + sort |= flags;
> +
> + return sort;
> +}
> +
>  static int git_tag_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
>  {
> - int status = git_gpg_config(var, value, cb);
> + int status;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(var, "tag.sort")) {
> + tag_sort = parse_sort_string(value);
> + }
> +

Why doesn't this return success after noticing that the variable is
to be interpreted by this block and nobody else?

When there is no reason to have things in a particular order, it is
customary to add new things at the end, not in the front, unless the
new t

[PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

2014-07-10 Thread Jacob Keller
Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
syntax.

Cc: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller 
---
- v4
* base on top of suggested change by Jeff King to use skip_prefix instead

 Documentation/config.txt  |  6 ++
 Documentation/git-tag.txt |  1 +
 builtin/tag.c | 46 --
 t/t7004-tag.sh| 21 +
 4 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
index 1d718bdb9662..ad8e75fed988 100644
--- a/Documentation/config.txt
+++ b/Documentation/config.txt
@@ -2354,6 +2354,12 @@ submodule..ignore::
"--ignore-submodules" option. The 'git submodule' commands are not
affected by this setting.
 
+tag.sort::
+   This variable is used to control the sort ordering of tags. It is
+   interpreted precisely the same way as "--sort=". If --sort is
+   given on the command line it will override the selection chosen in the
+   configuration. See linkgit:git-tag[1] for more details.
+
 tar.umask::
This variable can be used to restrict the permission bits of
tar archive entries.  The default is 0002, which turns off the
diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
index b424a1bc48bb..2d246725aeb5 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt
@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ include::date-formats.txt[]
 SEE ALSO
 
 linkgit:git-check-ref-format[1].
+linkgit:git-config[1].
 
 GIT
 ---
diff --git a/builtin/tag.c b/builtin/tag.c
index 7ccb6f3c581b..a53e27d4e7e4 100644
--- a/builtin/tag.c
+++ b/builtin/tag.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
 #include "sha1-array.h"
 #include "column.h"
 
+static int tag_sort = 0;
+
 static const char * const git_tag_usage[] = {
N_("git tag [-a|-s|-u ] [-f] [-m |-F ]  
[]"),
N_("git tag -d ..."),
@@ -346,9 +348,33 @@ static const char tag_template_nocleanup[] =
"Lines starting with '%c' will be kept; you may remove them"
" yourself if you want to.\n");
 
+static int parse_sort_string(const char *arg)
+{
+   int sort = 0;
+   int flags = 0;
+
+   if (skip_prefix(arg, "-", &arg))
+   flags |= REVERSE_SORT;
+
+   if (skip_prefix(arg, "version:", &arg) || skip_prefix(arg, "v:", &arg))
+   sort = VERCMP_SORT;
+
+   if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
+   die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);
+   sort |= flags;
+
+   return sort;
+}
+
 static int git_tag_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
 {
-   int status = git_gpg_config(var, value, cb);
+   int status;
+
+   if (!strcmp(var, "tag.sort")) {
+   tag_sort = parse_sort_string(value);
+   }
+
+   status = git_gpg_config(var, value, cb);
if (status)
return status;
if (starts_with(var, "column."))
@@ -522,17 +548,9 @@ static int parse_opt_points_at(const struct option *opt 
__attribute__((unused)),
 static int parse_opt_sort(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
 {
int *sort = opt->value;
-   int flags = 0;
 
-   if (skip_prefix(arg, "-", &arg))
-   flags |= REVERSE_SORT;
+   *sort = parse_sort_string(arg);
 
-   if (skip_prefix(arg, "version:", &arg) || skip_prefix(arg, "v:", &arg))
-   *sort = VERCMP_SORT;
-
-   if (strcmp(arg, "refname"))
-   die(_("unsupported sort specification %s"), arg);
-   *sort |= flags;
return 0;
 }
 
@@ -546,7 +564,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
struct create_tag_options opt;
char *cleanup_arg = NULL;
int annotate = 0, force = 0, lines = -1;
-   int cmdmode = 0, sort = 0;
+   int cmdmode = 0;
const char *msgfile = NULL, *keyid = NULL;
struct msg_arg msg = { 0, STRBUF_INIT };
struct commit_list *with_commit = NULL;
@@ -572,7 +590,7 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
OPT__FORCE(&force, N_("replace the tag if exists")),
OPT_COLUMN(0, "column", &colopts, N_("show tag list in 
columns")),
{
-   OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "sort", &sort, N_("type"), N_("sort 
tags"),
+   OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "sort", &tag_sort, N_("type"), 
N_("sort tags"),
PARSE_OPT_NONEG, parse_opt_sort
},
 
@@ -628,9 +646,9 @@ int cmd_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
copts.padding = 2;
run_column_filter(colopts, &copts);
}
-   if (lines != -1 && sort)
+   if (lines != -1 && tag_sort)
die(_("--sort and -n are incompatible"));
-   ret = list_tags(argv, lines == -1 ? 0 : lines, with_commit, 
sort);
+