Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
Le samedi 27 février 2016 à 21:17 +0530, Raghavendra Talur a écrit : > On Feb 27, 2016 9:04 PM, "Amye Scavarda" wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur > wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> - Original Message - > > >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > > >>> > > > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look > at > > >>> > it. > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > > >> > > >> > > >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. > > > > > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding > misc > > > hoping to catch his attention. > > > > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? > (When > > >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) > > >> > > >> > > >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in > > >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put > across > > >> pros and cons for that. > > >> Personally, > > >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 > > >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do > so with > > >> our current setup.) > > >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we > mean > > >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. > > >> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) > > >> > > >> > > >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in > > >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. > > >> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> Kaleb > > >>> ___ > > >>> Gluster-infra mailing list > > >>> Gluster-infra@gluster.org > > >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > ___ > > > Gluster-infra mailing list > > > Gluster-infra@gluster.org > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > > > Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday. > > > > In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented > > infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so > > that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the > > challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting > > people to volunteer to assist is not helpful. > > > > The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way > > do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em > > coming. > > +1 to everything. > > Update : the site is working now. Not sure about who fixed it or what fixed > it. I did, once someone mentioned this was not working on a place where I was looking (ie, the irc channel #gluster). It seems that indeed, after last power cut, I didn't rejoin #gluster-dev from my 2nd irc client. -- Michael Scherer Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure and Platform, OSAS signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
On Feb 27, 2016 9:04 PM, "Amye Scavarda" wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> - Original Message - > >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > >>> > > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at > >>> > it. > >>> > > >>> > >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > >> > >> > >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. > > > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding misc > > hoping to catch his attention. > > > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? (When > >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) > >> > >> > >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in > >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put across > >> pros and cons for that. > >> Personally, > >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 > >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do so with > >> our current setup.) > >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we mean > >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. > >> > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) > >> > >> > >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in > >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. > >> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Kaleb > >>> ___ > >>> Gluster-infra mailing list > >>> Gluster-infra@gluster.org > >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > >> > >> > > > > > > ___ > > Gluster-infra mailing list > > Gluster-infra@gluster.org > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday. > > In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented > infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so > that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the > challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting > people to volunteer to assist is not helpful. > > The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way > do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em > coming. +1 to everything. Update : the site is working now. Not sure about who fixed it or what fixed it. > - amye > > -- > Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" >>> > >>> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at >>> > it. >>> > >>> >>> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? >> >> >> I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. > > I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding misc > hoping to catch his attention. > >> >>> >>> >>> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? (When >>> we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) >> >> >> That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in >> gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put across >> pros and cons for that. >> Personally, >> 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 >> monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do so with >> our current setup.) >> 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we mean >> by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. >> >> >>> >>> >>> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) >> >> >> Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in >> gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. >> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Kaleb >>> ___ >>> Gluster-infra mailing list >>> Gluster-infra@gluster.org >>> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra >> >> > > > ___ > Gluster-infra mailing list > Gluster-infra@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra Misc is indeed out of the office, but he will return on Monday. In the meantime, can we put this on the list of documented infrastructure pieces that more than one person needs access to - so that we can start forming that effective infra team? Part of the challenge is that the responsibilities haven't been clear, so getting people to volunteer to assist is not helpful. The conversation about CentOS's CI/CD is still ongoing, and in no way do I want to dissuade Kaleb's snarky yet helpful suggestions. Keep 'em coming. - amye -- Amye Scavarda | a...@redhat.com | Gluster Community Lead ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
On Feb 26, 2016 11:23 PM, "Raghavendra Talur" wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> > From: "Raghavendra Talur" >> > >> > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at it. >> > >> >> Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > > > I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. I spoke to Kaushal over phone. He does not have access either. Adding misc hoping to catch his attention. > >> >> >> Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? (When we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) > > > That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put across pros and cons for that. > Personally, > 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do so with our current setup.) > 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we mean by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. > > >> >> >> (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) > > > Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. > >> >> -- >> >> Kaleb >> ___ >> Gluster-infra mailing list >> Gluster-infra@gluster.org >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > > ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > > > > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at it. > > > > Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > I think it is only Vijay and Kaushal other than misc who have access. > > Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? (When > we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) > That discussion did happen in Devconf and will be discussed in gluster-devel is what I understand. We should wait for people to put across pros and cons for that. Personally, 1. I would want infra which has a large enough team to have a 24/7 monitoring.(As ndevos suggested, if we form a bigger group we can do so with our current setup.) 2. Have control over gerrit settings so that we can decide what do we mean by trivial patches, and what patches carry over review comments etc. > > (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) > Understandable, given how easily our infra breaks. We who are in gluster-infra group have to come up with a solution too. > -- > > Kaleb > ___ > Gluster-infra mailing list > Gluster-infra@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra > ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:59:14AM -0500, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > > > > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at it. > > > > Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? > > Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? > (When we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) s/CentOS gerrit/gerrithub.io/ :) And yeah, that was the first thing that I felt on responding about too, but refrained from doing so because I'm sure others would bring it up. Niels signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
Re: [Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
- Original Message - > From: "Raghavendra Talur" > > Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at it. > Someone who? Misc is on holiday IIRC. Who else has access? Why do we think running our own gerrit and jenkins is a good thing? (When we could be using the CentOS gerrit and jenkins?) (Yes, I am feeling snarky.) -- Kaleb ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
[Gluster-infra] review.gluster.org not working
Most likely it looks like disk is full. Someone please have a look at it. ___ Gluster-infra mailing list Gluster-infra@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-infra
