Re: [Gluster-users] nfs-ganesha/samba vfs and replica redundancy

2015-06-08 Thread Ted Miller

On 6/3/2015 3:15 AM, Benjamin Kingston wrote:
Can someone give me a hint on the best way to maintain data availability to 
a share on a third system using nfs-ganesha and samba?


I currently have a round-robbin dns entry that nfs ganesha/samba uses, 
however even with a short ttl, there's brief downtime when a replica node 
fails. I can't see in the samba VFS or ganesha fsal syntax where a 
secondary address can be provided.


I've tried comma seperated, space seperated, with/without quotes for 
multiple IP's and only seen issues.
Any reason you aren't using a floating IP address?  This isn't the newest 
talk, but the concepts have not changed: 
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/lcjpcojp13_nakai.pdf


Ted Miller
Elkhart, IN, USA

___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Gluster-users] nfs-ganesha/samba vfs and replica redundancy

2015-06-03 Thread Benjamin Kingston
Can someone give me a hint on the best way to maintain data availability to
a share on a third system using nfs-ganesha and samba?

I currently have a round-robbin dns entry that nfs ganesha/samba uses,
however even with a short ttl, there's brief downtime when a replica node
fails. I can't see in the samba VFS or ganesha fsal syntax where a
secondary address can be provided.

I've tried comma seperated, space seperated, with/without quotes for
multiple IP's and only seen issues.
___
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users