Re: network monitoring of firewalled/NAT'd systems

2010-05-18 Thread Joshua Judson Rosen
"Michael ODonnell"  writes:
>
> I wrote:
> > We want to monitor (from a central server at HQ) the health and
> > performance status of multiple machines [mostly Windows >-( ] at
> > each of multiple customer sites despite them being NAT'd/firewalled.
> 
> ...and then mentioned a bunch of features we're dreaming about.
> 
> A more specific question: does anybody even know of a package that
> can do "passive monitoring"?  IOW, in our scenario some sort of
> agent on each workstation would be responsible for initiating a
> connection to HQ and pushing its own monitoring data back to our
> central server since we'd not be able to initiate connections in
> the other direction as they'd be blocked at the customer's firewall.

Anything that uses SNMP traps?

-- 
"Don't be afraid to ask (λf.((λx.xx) (λr.f(rr."

___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: network monitoring of firewalled/NAT'd systems

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Eisenbraun
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 05:48:15PM -0400, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> 
> I wrote:
> >We want to monitor (from a central server at HQ) the health and
> >performance status of multiple machines [mostly Windows >-( ] at
> >each of multiple customer sites despite them being NAT'd/firewalled.
> 
> ...and then mentioned a bunch of features we're dreaming about.
> 
> A more specific question: does anybody even know of a package that
> can do "passive monitoring"?

Nagios can do this.  We monitor a dozen or so remote sites at work where
they are small networks NAT'ed behind a single IP.  Nagios runs out of cron
on the workstations/servers at those locations and reports back to our main
Nagios server.

-b

--
half a man's life is devoted to what he calls improvements, yet the 
original had some quality which is lost in the process.
   
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: network monitoring of firewalled/NAT'd systems

2010-05-18 Thread Drew Van Zandt
Intellipool can run in distributed mode, where you have one monitoring
server inside each firewall that reports back home to the mothership.
http://www.intellipool.se/

Not *quite* what you asked for, but may serve.

--DTVZ

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:

>
>
> I wrote:
> >We want to monitor (from a central server at HQ) the health and
> >performance status of multiple machines [mostly Windows >-( ] at
> >each of multiple customer sites despite them being NAT'd/firewalled.
>
> ...and then mentioned a bunch of features we're dreaming about.
>
> A more specific question: does anybody even know of a package that
> can do "passive monitoring"?  IOW, in our scenario some sort of
> agent on each workstation would be responsible for initiating a
> connection to HQ and pushing its own monitoring data back to our
> central server since we'd not be able to initiate connections in
> the other direction as they'd be blocked at the customer's firewall.
>
> ___
> gnhlug-discuss mailing list
> gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
> http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
>
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/


Re: network monitoring of firewalled/NAT'd systems

2010-05-18 Thread Michael ODonnell


I wrote:
>We want to monitor (from a central server at HQ) the health and
>performance status of multiple machines [mostly Windows >-( ] at
>each of multiple customer sites despite them being NAT'd/firewalled.

...and then mentioned a bunch of features we're dreaming about.

A more specific question: does anybody even know of a package that
can do "passive monitoring"?  IOW, in our scenario some sort of
agent on each workstation would be responsible for initiating a
connection to HQ and pushing its own monitoring data back to our
central server since we'd not be able to initiate connections in
the other direction as they'd be blocked at the customer's firewall.
 
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/