Re: [Goanet]No apology required from Santosh

2005-04-09 Thread Mervyn Lobo
Cecil Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Santosh, you need never apologise to me. Even if you
 spell apologise the American way with a 'z'.



Cecil,
Spelling is always important.
This week I had a posting rejected with the 
instructions to run a spell check on the posting.

Then the re-posting, with the one corrected spelling,
was rejected because the posting would be funny only
to some...


Mervyn2.0


__ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca



Re: [Goanet]No apology required from Santosh

2005-04-08 Thread Mario Goveia
Dear Cecil,
In response to your comments shown below, it is
amazing to me that you seem bent on continuing this
line of personal invective, in a discussion in which
you added nothing, and after the main protagonists
have stopped.

You should at least let readers know that I have
challenged you, on Goanet and privately, to send me
some specific examples of where I have STARTED a line
of personal abuse, as opposed to retaliating to the
abuse of others, or where I have defended or
perpetuated a hoax.  

I also asked you to comment on the precise examples
that Santosh cited to show that I had abused him, and
I showed that he had been mistaken, obviously in the
heat of his frustration at me for asserting that the
risk from needle pricks was indeed LOW, but not NO. 

Not only have you done none of the above, you are
continuing the calumny and insinuation that I alone
have been personally abusive.

Cheers,
Mario.

--- Cecil Pinto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes that 'infected needles' debate had been going on
much too long, but I think it also was beneficial in
the sense that people will think twice before simply
forwarding panic-creating hoaxes in future. The long
drawn debate also brought a few worms out of the
woodwork to comment. Hopefully they will continue to
interact and contribute and not just complain. As for 
leaving Mr. Goveia alone, I don't know what to
say. If anyone continues to be personally abusive I
think he/she has to be told off by other subscribers.
We can't always expect the Admin Team to step in and
play Big Momma.
 
 Cheers!
 
 Cecil





Re: [Goanet]No apology required from Santosh

2005-04-08 Thread vrangelrib
To all my fellow Goanetters,
 You and I are far less likely to be pricked by an infected needle 
left on a train seat than we are to be pricked by a verbal needle in a 
Goanet post. Somehow, many of us cannot resist inserting an insulting 
word into an apparently innocent message.
 For example, the recent extended debate on abuse is said to have 
brought some worms out of the woodwork! Rebecca O'Leary (no cousin or 
godchild of mine) got involved, and had some things to say that needed 
saying; I got involved as well. Neither Ms. O'Leary nor I are regular 
posters on Goanet, so the two of us must count ourselves among the 
worms. Or is one to be considered more wormlike than the other?
 On a related matter: Private messages are meant to be private. I 
sent a private message to Santosh that suggested alternative ways of 
conducting a debate; he chose to  make public the fact that I had 
communicated with him in private, but stated that I had reprimanded 
him. I hadn't, for the simple reason that I do not feel I have either 
the right or the authority to reprimand another human being. I had 
merely suggested another approach. And I did not suggest he apologize; 
I especially do not think any apology is an apology, if it is worded in 
a way that leads to further recrimination.
 The point that I am trying to make is that there should be 
civility in all our debates. In ALL of them, and in every part of each 
debate. I don't care who started the mudslinging---the person who has 
mud flung at him, and then flings mud back, also winds up having mud on 
his hands.


  



[Goanet]No apology required from Santosh

2005-04-08 Thread Cecil Pinto
Santosh Helekar wrote:
In any case, I want to apologize to Bevinda, Cecil,
Mervyn, Seb and Rebecca for using their names without
their permission to poke some fun, and use them as
examples of brain-washed people.
Cecil:
Santosh, you need never apologise to me. Even if you spell apologise the 
American way with a 'z'. Feel free to call me brain washed, brain damaged, 
brain dead, brain less or whatever you wish as long as it is meant in jest 
or as a sarcastic tool, as was obvious in your posting.

--
Santosh:
I also want to saythat Mario Goveia is most likely a good man who just
cannot resist being hostile and hyper-defensive in
debate. I have my faults as well. So I want to
apologize to him and others for any excesses that I
might have committed. From now on I will leave Mr.
Goveia alone.
Cecil:
Yes that 'infected needles' debate had been going on much too long, but I 
think it also was beneficial in the sense that people will think twice 
before simply forwarding panic-creating hoaxes in future. The long drawn 
debate also brought a few worms out of the woodwork to comment. Hopefully 
they will continue to interact and contribute and not just complain. As for 
leaving Mr. Goveia alone, I don't know what to say. If anyone continues 
to be personally abusive I think he/she has to be told off by other 
subscribers. We can't always expect the Admin Team to step in and play Big 
Momma.

Cheers!
Cecil
=