Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Selma

2006-10-01 Thread Sunith Velho

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

Dear Selma(or the person holding her ransom!),

Should single mothers also be denied this right to raise children? They 
too do not fall in the category of a two-gender family. Is the government 
then going to legislate and control fundamental biological processes? Why 
don't us Indians just invite the Chinese to take us over and save us all 
this trouble of the democracy experiment?

What about divorce then. Once a couple has children, should divorce be 
banned? Since obviously it is not best for the emotional well being of a 
child to be brought up in shared/single custody.

If a murderer marries a drug dealer, they are allowed to have and raise 
kids, are we going to deny that right to well intentioned same sex couples. 
Many of these kids will come from adoption homes(in the case of male 
homosexuals). Are adoption homes better for a child's emotional well being 
than two loving parents? Heterosexual couples can have kids and leave them 
at adoption homes, but homosexuals can't adopt and raise them?

Where is the consistency in your argument? What are you actually trying to 
say? Are you just portraying yourself as a defender of equal rights because 
it is fashionable or because you truly believe in equality regardless of 
race, gender or sexual orientation? You strongly object to the word 
bonkmaro and then to come out with these views that are clearly 
homophobic(not withstanding your legendary faghag status). There is a 
difference between being politically correct and being liberal in thought.

Regards
Sunith Velho

P.S. Please do not accuse me of distorting your views. They are clearly 
mentioned under.


Selma writes:
However, the right to raise children
 is another matter. I for one, hope that India does
 not encourage any such moves. Not because I think
 homosexuals are incapable of raising good moral
 human beings, but because I earnestly feel that the
 emotional well being of a child is best served in a
 two-gender family. 


___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


[Goanet] Section 377/reply to Selma Sunil

2006-09-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

Aristo xaristo at gmail.com
Mon Sep 25 22:05:59 PDT 2006

Now that we've stopped with the Stuffing of Atheism in front of
certain faces, its now time for Stuffing homosexualty! Of course,
Cecil will soon remind us that this is GoaNet and not GayNet.

Dear Aristo,

GayNet notwithstanding, many on this list might be wondering why I am such
a vocal proponent of gay rights and same-sex marriage on conservative
GoaNet.  It probably relates to the ability to 'come out' with a revelation
which goes againt conventional attitudes and thinking.  

In my case, it was the realization that atheism was a valid world view and
Humanism a morally ethical philosophy which did not rely on any
supernatural powers to make it a valid choice.  But it was also due to a
message (below) that I had heard before but really didn't impress me until
I had to make that difficult choice between the comfort of the immediate
and extended social structure I had developed and the internal disconnect I
felt between my rational knowledge and irrational beliefs.  

Having grown up in Goa, studying Science in Britto's, Botany and Zoology in
Xavier's, the proper teaching of evolution was conveniently glossed over at
these Jesuit institutions.  Veterinary studies in Bombay were more specific
to existing species and although the common anatomical and physiological
features were apparent, I continued my belief that humanity was created
specifically to hold dominion over the rest.  Graduate studies in Canada
delved more into the origins of life and the common underpinnings we have
with all life in general.  That was my first major disconnect with
religious notions which I effectively compartmentalised for over 20 years. 
However, further comparative veterinary studies confirmed the biological
nature of our behaviour including homosexuality.  That notion was
confronted head on by the Church position a few years ago when Canada was
going through it's legalization of gay rights and same-sex marriage.  The
Church lost that battle and me.

What I couldn't understand is how, in all good faith, so many teachers and
spiritual leaders over the years could mislead their wards to think that
the word of God was the last word on social issues which have been refuted
by scientific investigation.  I decided that I would not stand by idly if
there was a valid fight to be won.  The message I alluded to earlier was to
empower others, specially minorities, that they have a voice and if they
use it, others will eventually listen.  I think it was about speaking up
for others

They came first for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me,
and by that time no one was left to speak up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came...

For the record, I am happily(?) married to a beautiful and intelligent
woman and have two teenage children, a 19y old son and a 15y old daughter,
who seem well adjusted.  My attention is diverted very easily by an
attractive woman but not necessarily by a handsome man, unless he is able
to engage me with an intelligent conversation.  I will swoon over any
gender who can engage my mind rather than my hormones.

Kevin Saldanha
Mississauga, ON.


mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .


___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org


Re: [Goanet] Section 377/reply to Selma Sunil

2006-09-26 Thread Aristo

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

Now that we've stopped with the Stuffing of Atheism in front of
certain faces, its now time for Stuffing homosexualty! Of course,
Cecil will soon remind us that this is GoaNet and not GayNet.

Anyways, I just wanted to add some perspective from the cause of
homosexuality - Nature or Nurture? Whether they are indeed freaks as
Selma puts it.  Wikipedia sums it up best:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality
Nature versus nurture
Considerable debate exists over whether predominantly biological or
psychological factors produce sexual orientation in humans. Candidate
factors include genes and the exposure of fetuses to certain hormones
(or lack thereof). Historically, Freud and many others psychologists,
particularly in psychoanalytic or developmental traditions, speculated
that formative childhood experiences helped produce sexual
orientation; as an example Freud believed that all human teenagers are
predominantly homosexual and transition to heterosexuality in
adulthood; those who remain homosexual as adults he believed had
experienced some traumatic event that arrested their sexual
development; however, he did believe all adults, even those who had
healthy sexual development still retained latent homosexuality to
varying degrees. Although there is currently no general medical
consensus, one theory is that biological factors — whether genetic or
acquired in utero — produce characteristically homosexual childhood
experiences (such as atypical gender behaviour experiences), or at the
least significantly contribute to them.

Evidence for both Nature as well as Nurture theories exist: In nature,
we see the (very limited) instances of Homsexuality in the animal
kingdom in Dolphins, Penguins, Sheep and Bulls. Higher instances of
homosexuality in (one of the) twins or younger brothers support the
genetic/hormonal theory. From Nurture point of view, we see higher
instances of homosexuality which manifests due to  situational
conditions like prisons, military and priesthood.  In conclusion,
biological, psychological OR social factors (or a combination) shape
sexual identity, the mix being different in each case.

Also, does the figure of 4% of the population being homosexual qualify
homosexuals to be considered as freaks? Are the 2.5% of Indian
Christians freaks? (just trying to give some perspective of what 4%
means)

This debate reminds me of a short film made by an amateur Goan
filmmaker Rishad D'Cruz, (who happens to be a very close friend) which
was shone during the IFFI 2004 called The Filmmaker. It had to do
with Nature  Nurture with regards to Homosexuality and Violence. The
movie was made for a competition with the theme of Nature and
Violence where it won a Special Jury award. Anyone seen it?
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/955610.cms

And finally, a small note to Sunil Monteiro, although the above is
just a discussion with no promise of any action from my end, its
intention is to change the MINDSET of a small percentage of the open
minded goans among the 7000 goanetters.  The media is a very useful
tool to alter perceptions and mindsets. For example, I believe that
Hollywood had an affirmative action obligation to feature at least one
African American in every production, and in many cases it potrayed a
Black (I'm not a stickler for political correctness) saving a White,
and somewhere in Central America, a bigoted couch potato was
sub-consciously affected. Of course, there's the negative side to
this, like the demagoguery exhibited by CNN and a couple of goanetters
;-). Something of this kind should be done here too, to encourage Gay
rights. My Brother Nikhil was one such attempt, as was my friends
The Filmmaker. Only when mindsets change does change set in.

Cheers,
Aristo.


On 9/24/06, sunil monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Ms Selma,

 Consistency means, apart taking an  issue/topic  for discussions which is a
 good source of information to all the we have to continously follow it up
 until we feel are satisfied that finally we have solved the problem .

 I do not want the hetrosexual community to do anything on its own , it has
 to be a combined effort by all those who feel why section 377 be
 abolished/amended and giving equal rights to same sex in Goa. I was just
 sharing the idea that discussions/forums, opinions ,arguments, debates are
 healthy but there has to be an end solution. Take for example GOA DAY
 celebrations or any other event 

[Goanet] Section 377/reply to Selma

2006-09-24 Thread sunil monteiro

* G * O * A * N * E * T  C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *

Enjoy your holiday in Goa. Stay at THE GARCA BRANCA from November to May
 There is no better, value for money, guest house.
  Confirm your bookings early or miss-out

  Visit http://www.garcabranca.com for details/booking/confirmation.

Ms Selma,

Consistency means, apart taking an  issue/topic  for discussions which is a 
good source of information to all the we have to continously follow it up 
until we feel are satisfied that finally we have solved the problem .

I do not want the hetrosexual community to do anything on its own , it has 
to be a combined effort by all those who feel why section 377 be 
abolished/amended and giving equal rights to same sex in Goa. I was just 
sharing the idea that discussions/forums, opinions ,arguments, debates are 
healthy but there has to be an end solution. Take for example GOA DAY 
celebrations or any other event there was an initiator it started and the 
end result is successful, in the same way this present topic we have been 
discussing , what is the way forward to have this section amended? How can 
we succeed the Goal? Who will be at the forefront to initiate this crusade?

I have not made any mention of the Gay community being exempt from their 
battles, all i wanted to know and many would want to know , this topic was 
raised on the net ,was it just for discussion , exchange of ideas, or 
finding a solution to the minority community and for that who will lead this 
struggle?

Sunil

_
One and only Ash. Find out all about her. Only on MSN Search 
http://server1.msn.co.in/profile/aishwarya.asp

___
Goanet mailing list
Goanet@lists.goanet.org
http://lists.goanet.org/listinfo.cgi/goanet-goanet.org