To, Dr Shekhar Salkar
Recd your following email, which is forwarded by Mr. Prakash Munshi, who
has asked me for comments.
In reply to Question NO. 3of Mr. Prakash Munshi
Do you know what our Honourable Prime Minister says of on radiation from
Mobile Towers? He has written under his signature that Radiation from
Mobile Towers has proved killers to the creatures and bees. Do you feel
that the Honourable Prime Minister’s opinion is false?
*You have mentioned in your Answer *
*"Yes, I feel the honourable Prime Minister’s opinion is false because he
is neither a scientist nor a medical doctor. He has never done any
experiments on any creatures."*
So much disrespect to India's PM is not good. I fully agree with him that
Radiation from Mobile Towers has proved killers to the creatures and bees.
You should know that PM has access to all the scientists and medical
doctors of India.
There are 4000 scientific papers, which are written by 100's of scientists
of the world and peer reviewed and published in the best possible journal
of the world. How can you neglect these papers? I know that there are
25,000 papers, which say there is no health hazard or there is no
conclusive evidence but scientists have found that nearly 75% of these
papers are funded by industry.
I have interacted with 100's of people who have developed several health
problems, such as, headache to cancer.
I have myself done experiments on rats using electromagnetic radiation and
noted severe health hazards due to EM radiation.
IARC classified RF radiation as Possibly Carcinogen (Class 2B) but
unfortunately WHO classified only Cell Phone as Possibly Carcinogen (Class
2B).
Nearly 200 scientists have urged WHO to classify RF radiation as Probable
Carcinogen (Class 2A) and even Known Carcinogen (Class 1).
Even IMC report of Jan. 2011 and Environment Ministry Report of Nov. 2011
have documented 100's of papers, which show health hazards.
If you want, I can give you plenty of papers, people who are affected by
radiation, birds, bees, trees which are getting affected and so on.
I am copying this email to several others who have interacted with me in
the past.
*
Girish Kumar
Professor, Electrical Engineering Department
I.I.T. Bombay, Powai, Mumbai - 400076, INDIA
Tel. - (022) 2576 7436, Fax - (022) 2572 3707
email - gku...@ee.iitb.ac.in, prof.gku...@gmail.com
*
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Prakash Munshi wrote:
> For comments please
>
> Prakash Munshi
> Raj Niketan
> Opp. Sahyadri State Guest House
> B G Kher Marg
> Mumbai 46
> Tel 022 23685256 , 23672115
> Cell 9820400053
> Email prmun...@gmail.com
> Web. www.controlradiation.org
> FB. www.facebook.com/prmunshi
> FB. www.facebook.com/reduceemfradiation
> YouTube ReduceEMFRadiation
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Prakash Munshi
> *Date:* 22 September 2016 at 12:55:11 IST
> *To:* shekhar salkar
> *Subject:* *Re: Why not tell us what research have you done?*
>
> Thank you so much for your reply .
>
> Prakash Munshi
> Raj Niketan
> Opp. Sahyadri State Guest House
> B G Kher Marg
> Mumbai 46
> Tel 022 23685256 , 23672115
> Cell 9820400053
> Email prmun...@gmail.com
> Web. www.controlradiation.org
> FB. www.facebook.com/prmunshi
> FB. www.facebook.com/reduceemfradiation
> YouTube ReduceEMFRadiation
>
> On 22-Sep-2016, at 12:24, shekhar salkar wrote:
>
> Dear Munshiji,
> Here are answers to your questions:
>
> Question Number 1:
> Have you done any research in laboratories with Antennae shooting out
> power at 20 watts / 40 >watts each and rats at 5 >meters distance? Did they
> survive? How will you know if Answer Number 1:
> My U.S.-based medical colleague, Dr. Santosh Helekar (Dr. SH) and his
> colleagues have done research with high strength magnetic fields ranging
> from 14,800 Gauss (1.48 Tesla) to 30,000 Gauss (3 Tesla), and with the
> non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation emanating from them in normal adult
> human beings and neurological patients. They have never suffered from
> cancer as a result of that. The National Toxicology Laboratory (NTP) has
> done the research quoted in your question above. That research showed not
> only that those rats survived but that they lived longer than the rats that
> were NOT exposed to those antennae. Dr. SH has done many experiments, so he
> knows.
>
> Question Number 2:
> Do you know what the NTP study of USA 2016 says (Please refer to the NTP
> Toxicologist Reply)? Do >you know of people who >have died and suffered of
> Cancer with antennae at hand shake distances from their residences?
>
> Answer Number 2:
> The NTP study says that the rats exposed to antennae survived longer than
> the rats that were not exposed to them. Please read the prematurely
> circulated results of that study