Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-04 Thread Marc2000
Hallo,

thank you for your responses.

It seems, that the bug has been fixed (Revision r10360, date Jun 21, 2011 ) 
even before the Issue 6551 report from Jul 4, 2011, but did not make it 
into GWT 2.4 release.

So that's not as scary as I thought, just the Bug-tracking was not updated 
;-)

As to the bad coding point:

Good practice or not, implementing or overriding classical abstract methods 
like 'isValid()' may result in methods always returning 'true', if there is 
nothing to validate. A Compiler should produce working code, even with bad 
coding ( or throw a warning). To ignore a method's side-effect is a clear 
bug.

Problem is, that this was my first GWT project and I was very pleased with 
the workflow and great functionality ( I'm using it with Ext GWT 2.2.5).

I had to convince my client to use this technique, who was very skeptical 
about the Java / JavaScript cross compiling part. So stumbling over an 
optimizer bug in the first project was not helpful ;-)

I must admit, the GWT team fixed that quite fast. Now I'm looking forward 
to the GWT 2.5 release.

Best regards

Marc

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/WcsUG-38aAkJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-03 Thread Richard
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 12:22:57 AM UTC+2, Manuel Carrasco wrote:


 But any gwt developer knows that the gwt compiler has a set of 
 limitations which are widely admitted and documented (regex, number 
 arithmetic, etc), I have spent a lot of time trying to figure out why some 
 tests passed in dev and not in production though. 



Number arithmetic? Is this still an issue, even though we can now use 
BigDecimal?  Is the relevant JS not reliable? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/-1Ki9SdziY0J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Marc2000
Hallo,

After finishing development on my GWT (2.4) project, I found out, that the 
compiled version does not work exactly as in the development mode.

Some method ( isValid() ) seems not to be called. 

Calling code (simplified):

boolean valid=true;
if(! mypanel.isValid())
   valid=false;

method:

public boolean isValid()
{
updateSomeData();
return true;
}

This works well in development mode, but in compiled code, isValid() was 
never called. From this point things got strange. I've added a log-command 
to the method:

public boolean isValid()
{
updateSomeData();
logger.info(method called);
return true;
}

The method was called and the log entry written.

I removed the log entry and changed the calling part to:

boolean valid=true;
boolean x=mypanel.isValid();
if(!x)
   valid=false;

Now again the method was called. This seems to be some problem in the 
compiler optimizer. After switching off the optimizer, the compiled code 
did work as expected.

After searching the web, I found an issue report, DESCRIBING THE EXACT SAME 
PROBLEM !

See: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6551

So this is a know issue since over a year and present since GWT 2.3 !!!

I have not problem with bugs, but I can't understand, why no one seems to 
care. Can there be something more serious, than a compiler-bug ?

If you search the database, there are some compiler / optimizer issues, 
that seem not to have been fixed.

Example:

http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5739 

This is scary ! If you can't trust the compiler, you'll never know, if your 
code works in production as I did under development. Adding / removing a 
single line may change the whole behavior. Testing will become a nightmare !

Some one should care.

regards

Marc




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/K3Zt9B3sxW8J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
I think it is a good idea to get rid of methods which always return
true/false/true because it saves a lot of code in the final js, and it
gives the option to the developer to remove code programatically.

In my opinion the example you show and the examples in the issue page are
not examples of good codding, but maybe there are edge cases where it could
make sense.

I trust in the compiler and I have several projects in production and never
I faced this problem, so IMHO knowing a couple of good practices to follow
with gwt  should be enough.

Anyway, in the case it were difficult to fix, I think the compiler should
be more verbose and fail with methods which have any line apart from the
return true one,

- Manolo


On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc2000 whipma...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Hallo,

 After finishing development on my GWT (2.4) project, I found out, that the
 compiled version does not work exactly as in the development mode.

 Some method ( isValid() ) seems not to be called.

 Calling code (simplified):

 boolean valid=true;
 if(! mypanel.isValid())
valid=false;

 method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 return true;
 }

 This works well in development mode, but in compiled code, isValid() was
 never called. From this point things got strange. I've added a log-command
 to the method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 logger.info(method called);
 return true;
 }

 The method was called and the log entry written.

 I removed the log entry and changed the calling part to:

 boolean valid=true;
 boolean x=mypanel.isValid();
 if(!x)
valid=false;

 Now again the method was called. This seems to be some problem in the
 compiler optimizer. After switching off the optimizer, the compiled code
 did work as expected.

 After searching the web, I found an issue report, DESCRIBING THE EXACT
 SAME PROBLEM !

 See: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6551

 So this is a know issue since over a year and present since GWT 2.3 !!!

 I have not problem with bugs, but I can't understand, why no one seems to
 care. Can there be something more serious, than a compiler-bug ?

 If you search the database, there are some compiler / optimizer issues,
 that seem not to have been fixed.

 Example:

 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5739

 This is scary ! If you can't trust the compiler, you'll never know, if
 your code works in production as I did under development. Adding / removing
 a single line may change the whole behavior. Testing will become a
 nightmare !

 Some one should care.

 regards

 Marc




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/K3Zt9B3sxW8J.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Chimene
+1 on Manolo's point.

However, in the interests of debugging: what happens if you use the boxed
version of boolean?


On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino
man...@apache.orgwrote:

 I think it is a good idea to get rid of methods which always return
 true/false/true because it saves a lot of code in the final js, and it
 gives the option to the developer to remove code programatically.

 In my opinion the example you show and the examples in the issue page are
 not examples of good codding, but maybe there are edge cases where it could
 make sense.

 I trust in the compiler and I have several projects in production and
 never I faced this problem, so IMHO knowing a couple of good practices to
 follow with gwt  should be enough.

 Anyway, in the case it were difficult to fix, I think the compiler should
 be more verbose and fail with methods which have any line apart from the
 return true one,

 - Manolo


 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc2000 whipma...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Hallo,

 After finishing development on my GWT (2.4) project, I found out, that
 the compiled version does not work exactly as in the development mode.

 Some method ( isValid() ) seems not to be called.

 Calling code (simplified):

 boolean valid=true;
 if(! mypanel.isValid())
valid=false;

 method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 return true;
 }

 This works well in development mode, but in compiled code, isValid() was
 never called. From this point things got strange. I've added a log-command
 to the method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 logger.info(method called);
 return true;
 }

 The method was called and the log entry written.

 I removed the log entry and changed the calling part to:

 boolean valid=true;
 boolean x=mypanel.isValid();
 if(!x)
valid=false;

 Now again the method was called. This seems to be some problem in the
 compiler optimizer. After switching off the optimizer, the compiled code
 did work as expected.

 After searching the web, I found an issue report, DESCRIBING THE EXACT
 SAME PROBLEM !

 See: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6551

 So this is a know issue since over a year and present since GWT 2.3 !!!

 I have not problem with bugs, but I can't understand, why no one seems to
 care. Can there be something more serious, than a compiler-bug ?

 If you search the database, there are some compiler / optimizer issues,
 that seem not to have been fixed.

 Example:

 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5739

 This is scary ! If you can't trust the compiler, you'll never know, if
 your code works in production as I did under development. Adding / removing
 a single line may change the whole behavior. Testing will become a
 nightmare !

 Some one should care.

 regards

 Marc




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/K3Zt9B3sxW8J.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Juan Pablo Gardella
+1 too

2012/10/2 Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com

 +1 on Manolo's point.

 However, in the interests of debugging: what happens if you use the boxed
 version of boolean?


 On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino man...@apache.org
  wrote:

 I think it is a good idea to get rid of methods which always return
 true/false/true because it saves a lot of code in the final js, and it
 gives the option to the developer to remove code programatically.

 In my opinion the example you show and the examples in the issue page are
 not examples of good codding, but maybe there are edge cases where it could
 make sense.

 I trust in the compiler and I have several projects in production and
 never I faced this problem, so IMHO knowing a couple of good practices to
 follow with gwt  should be enough.

 Anyway, in the case it were difficult to fix, I think the compiler should
 be more verbose and fail with methods which have any line apart from the
 return true one,

 - Manolo


 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc2000 whipma...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Hallo,

 After finishing development on my GWT (2.4) project, I found out, that
 the compiled version does not work exactly as in the development mode.

 Some method ( isValid() ) seems not to be called.

 Calling code (simplified):

 boolean valid=true;
 if(! mypanel.isValid())
valid=false;

 method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 return true;
 }

 This works well in development mode, but in compiled code, isValid() was
 never called. From this point things got strange. I've added a log-command
 to the method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 logger.info(method called);
 return true;
 }

 The method was called and the log entry written.

 I removed the log entry and changed the calling part to:

 boolean valid=true;
 boolean x=mypanel.isValid();
 if(!x)
valid=false;

 Now again the method was called. This seems to be some problem in the
 compiler optimizer. After switching off the optimizer, the compiled code
 did work as expected.

 After searching the web, I found an issue report, DESCRIBING THE EXACT
 SAME PROBLEM !

 See: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6551

 So this is a know issue since over a year and present since GWT 2.3 !!!

 I have not problem with bugs, but I can't understand, why no one seems
 to care. Can there be something more serious, than a compiler-bug ?

 If you search the database, there are some compiler / optimizer issues,
 that seem not to have been fixed.

 Example:

 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5739

 This is scary ! If you can't trust the compiler, you'll never know, if
 your code works in production as I did under development. Adding / removing
 a single line may change the whole behavior. Testing will become a
 nightmare !

 Some one should care.

 regards

 Marc




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/K3Zt9B3sxW8J.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread kim young ill
+1 too

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Juan Pablo Gardella 
gardellajuanpa...@gmail.com wrote:

 +1 too


 2012/10/2 Jeff Chimene jchim...@gmail.com

 +1 on Manolo's point.

 However, in the interests of debugging: what happens if you use the boxed
 version of boolean?


 On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino 
 man...@apache.org wrote:

 I think it is a good idea to get rid of methods which always return
 true/false/true because it saves a lot of code in the final js, and it
 gives the option to the developer to remove code programatically.

 In my opinion the example you show and the examples in the issue page
 are not examples of good codding, but maybe there are edge cases where it
 could make sense.

 I trust in the compiler and I have several projects in production and
 never I faced this problem, so IMHO knowing a couple of good practices to
 follow with gwt  should be enough.

 Anyway, in the case it were difficult to fix, I think the compiler
 should be more verbose and fail with methods which have any line apart from
 the return true one,

 - Manolo


 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc2000 whipma...@googlemail.comwrote:

 Hallo,

 After finishing development on my GWT (2.4) project, I found out, that
 the compiled version does not work exactly as in the development mode.

 Some method ( isValid() ) seems not to be called.

 Calling code (simplified):

 boolean valid=true;
 if(! mypanel.isValid())
valid=false;

 method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 return true;
 }

 This works well in development mode, but in compiled code, isValid()
 was never called. From this point things got strange. I've added a
 log-command to the method:

 public boolean isValid()
 {
 updateSomeData();
 logger.info(method called);
 return true;
 }

 The method was called and the log entry written.

 I removed the log entry and changed the calling part to:

 boolean valid=true;
 boolean x=mypanel.isValid();
 if(!x)
valid=false;

 Now again the method was called. This seems to be some problem in the
 compiler optimizer. After switching off the optimizer, the compiled code
 did work as expected.

 After searching the web, I found an issue report, DESCRIBING THE EXACT
 SAME PROBLEM !

 See: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6551

 So this is a know issue since over a year and present since GWT 2.3 !!!

 I have not problem with bugs, but I can't understand, why no one seems
 to care. Can there be something more serious, than a compiler-bug ?

 If you search the database, there are some compiler / optimizer issues,
 that seem not to have been fixed.

 Example:

 http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5739

 This is scary ! If you can't trust the compiler, you'll never know, if
 your code works in production as I did under development. Adding / removing
 a single line may change the whole behavior. Testing will become a
 nightmare !

 Some one should care.

 regards

 Marc




  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/K3Zt9B3sxW8J.
 To post to this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 

Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Chris Lercher
Sorry, but definitely no. Admittedly, I've never actually encountered such 
a GWT bug in my own code. But that's irrelevant. Imagine you're changing a 
method temporarily to debug some code (in a way, that it always returns 
true), and in compiled mode it will simply not do what you expect - you'll 
search thousands of places before thinking that it could be a compiler bug.

1. Such bugs are avoidable. 2. It's a compiler's job to make sure you can 
rely on the basics - everything builds upon that, and errors at that level 
may amplify, leading to completely unpredictable results. This has nothing 
to do with good coding on the GWT developer's side (BTW, unit tests are 
often examples of intentional bad coding. What if they fail - or worse: 
pass - unpredictably?)



On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 7:21:47 PM UTC+2, jchimene wrote:

 +1 on Manolo's point.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/GkEDfwGo3PcJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Daniel Kurka
I will raise some attention to this.

-Daniel


Am 02.10.2012 um 22:45 schrieb Chris Lercher cl_for_mail...@gmx.net:

 Sorry, but definitely no. Admittedly, I've never actually encountered such a 
 GWT bug in my own code. But that's irrelevant. Imagine you're changing a 
 method temporarily to debug some code (in a way, that it always returns 
 true), and in compiled mode it will simply not do what you expect - you'll 
 search thousands of places before thinking that it could be a compiler bug.
 
 1. Such bugs are avoidable. 2. It's a compiler's job to make sure you can 
 rely on the basics - everything builds upon that, and errors at that level 
 may amplify, leading to completely unpredictable results. This has nothing to 
 do with good coding on the GWT developer's side (BTW, unit tests are often 
 examples of intentional bad coding. What if they fail - or worse: pass - 
 unpredictably?)
 
 
 
 On Tuesday, October 2, 2012 7:21:47 PM UTC+2, jchimene wrote:
 +1 on Manolo's point.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Google Web Toolkit group.
 To view this discussion on the web visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/GkEDfwGo3PcJ.
 To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.



Re: Scary: GWT Team does not fix serious GWT Compiler Bugs

2012-10-02 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino

 1. Such bugs are avoidable. 2. It's a compiler's job to make sure you can
 rely on the basics - everything builds upon that, and errors at that level
 may amplify, leading to completely unpredictable results. This has nothing
 to do with good coding on the GWT developer's side (BTW, unit tests are
 often examples of intentional bad coding. What if they fail - or worse:
 pass - unpredictably?)


Agree 100%: compiled code should behave the same than debug mode, and
should match all java language specifications.

But any gwt developer knows that the gwt compiler has a set of limitations
which are widely admitted and documented (regex, number arithmetic, etc), I
have spent a lot of time trying to figure out why some tests passed in dev
and not in production though.

So, the point here is what to do with the issue, IMO it should be fixed if
possible, otherwise it should be documented or make the compiler print an
error, but I wouldn't revert the optimization strategy.

Related with the huge gwt issues list, I think that the gwt team should
face them seriously (I hope this is a priority for the steering committee).

- Manolo








-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Google Web Toolkit group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.