Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Uibinder parser api

2010-09-09 Thread Ray Ryan
It's not about the lack of a plugin mechanism, it's about discomfort with an
api that requires people to emit lines of java too much, and lack of time to
clean it up.

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Thomas Broyer t.bro...@gmail.com wrote:



 On Sep 9, 1:45 pm, Konstantin.Scheglov
 konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com wrote:
   If anyone wants to submit a patch to make it possible to subclass
   UiBinderGenerator and tweak its parsers that way, s.t. you can provide
 an
   alternative replace-with rule for your custom subclass, I'd be in
 favor of
   that. Presuming Joel doesn't shoot me down.
 
Hm...
Replacing UiBinderGenerator means that at same time only one
  replacement can be used.
So, for example if I use some widgets toolkit and it provides
  generator for its widgets, then I can not use generator of second
  toolkit.

 If you weren't dumbing down to Java 5, I'd suggest using
 java.util.ServiceLoader to simply load plugins from the classpath:
 http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/ServiceLoader.html
 But sure it could be done with a new element in gwt.xml module
 descriptors.

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Re: [gwt-contrib] Re: Uibinder parser api

2010-09-08 Thread Ray Ryan
The 2.1 release branch will be cut from trunk. Trunk does not include a
public api to add new parsers to UiBinder.

If anyone wants to submit a patch to make it possible to subclass
UiBinderGenerator and tweak its parsers that way, s.t. you can provide an
alternative replace-with rule for your custom subclass, I'd be in favor of
that. Presuming Joel doesn't shoot me down.

rjrjr

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:54 AM, T tomek.maty...@gmail.com wrote:

 2.1 GA is not going to be built from trunk?

 On Sep 3, 3:38 pm, Ray Ryan rj...@google.com wrote:
  We'd like it to, but we haven't set a date.
 
  On Sep 3, 2010 12:15 AM, Johan Rydberg johan.rydb...@edgeware.tv
 wrote:
 
 
 
   On 9/1/10 10:01 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
   Sorry, still not public. However, we're landing a patch that will
   eliminate a lot of the need for it:
   OK. But will it become public at some point in time?
 
   --
  http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

 --
 http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors


-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors