Re: [GRASS-dev] Cloud optimized GeoTIFF support
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Markus Netelerwrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Markus Metz > wrote: > > What do you mean with "a more direct GRASS GIS integration" regarding cloud > > storage and/or Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF? > > Well, I tought of r.external and r.external.out. OK, rephrasing my question: What do you mean with "a more direct GRASS GIS integration" regarding cloud storage and/or Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF, and regarding reading and writing such data? Markus M > > Markus Metz wrote: > > Have you tried GDAL's virtual network based file systems [0]? > > ... I didn't yet since traveling all the time. Maybe simple and solved > but I have no stable connections at time to try out. > > Will study it soon :-) > > markusN ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Cloud optimized GeoTIFF support
On dimanche 15 octobre 2017 21:28:24 CEST Markus Neteler wrote: > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Markus Metz > >wrote: > > What do you mean with "a more direct GRASS GIS integration" regarding > > cloud > > storage and/or Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF? > > Well, I tought of r.external and r.external.out. > > Markus Metz wrote: > > Have you tried GDAL's virtual network based file systems [0]? > > ... I didn't yet since traveling all the time. Maybe simple and solved > but I have no stable connections at time to try out. > Also note that the performance of network accesses depends a lot of how close the machine is from the server. For example if you use the VMs of a cloud provider in the same region as the bucket you access, the timing measuremetns will be 10 times or more better than if you try from a consumer ADSL connection. For Linux & Mac, there are also various projects that use FUSE to mount buckets in the file system https://github.com/kahing/goofys https://github.com/googlecloudplatform/gcsfuse I tried quickly goofys and it worked pretty well. It tends to have a more aggressive read-ahead strategy than GDAL /vsis3/, which makes reading a lot of sequential data faster than with /vsis3/. In latest GDAL trunk, the GeoTIFF driver is aware of the network nature of the files and thus can better optimize windowed access, so this makes it a bit faster in cases where you only access part of the imagery (for example with MapServer that must satisfy a WMS request on a BBOX, which was the use case for this recent round of optimization, or if you have a processing spread over several VMs with a spatial subdivision) Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Cloud optimized GeoTIFF support
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Markus Metzwrote: > What do you mean with "a more direct GRASS GIS integration" regarding cloud > storage and/or Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF? Well, I tought of r.external and r.external.out. Markus Metz wrote: > Have you tried GDAL's virtual network based file systems [0]? ... I didn't yet since traveling all the time. Maybe simple and solved but I have no stable connections at time to try out. Will study it soon :-) markusN ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Cloud optimized GeoTIFF support
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Markus Netelerwrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Blumentrath > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I assume you have seen this: > > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-October/047349.html > > > > and subsequently this: > > https://erouault.blogspot.no/2017/10/gdal-and-cloud-storage.html > > Sure, that's where I got it from and got interested in a more direct > GRASS GIS integration. What do you mean with "a more direct GRASS GIS integration" regarding cloud storage and/or Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF? Markus M ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] Cloud optimized GeoTIFF support
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Stefan Blumentrathwrote: > Hi, > > I assume you have seen this: > https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-October/047349.html > > and subsequently this: > https://erouault.blogspot.no/2017/10/gdal-and-cloud-storage.html Sure, that's where I got it from and got interested in a more direct GRASS GIS integration. Markus ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] community sprint before Xmas? :)
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Helmut Kudrnovskywrote: > >>very good idea! we are accumulating things to discuss like >> >>- specs for GRASS GIS 8 >>- what's missing for 7.4.0 >> >>Outreach: >>- maybe run a survey to know who uses GRASS GIS >>- offer more GRASS GIS courses >>- more online material, use Sphinx >>- set up a new web site (asap) with responsive design >>- generate tons of 1min videos > > what about review and (possible) integration of GSoC 2017 work? Good idea! I'd suggest to start a Wiki page for the meeting... Markus (in a train with occasional net connection) ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
[GRASS-dev] Landsat MTL files
Dear all, in improving https://github.com/NikosAlexandris/i.landsat.import, new is, for example (assuming a 'Landsat8' directory that contains 87 decompressed and unpacked Landsat acquisitions), i.landsat.import pool=Landsat8 -t which will return 87 timestamps LO81920282015061LGN00|2015-03-02 09:58:07.5566043 + LC81920282013135LGN01|2013-05-15 10:00:20.1682888 + .. LC81920282013279LGN00|2013-10-06 10:00:15.3022235 + LC81920282014218LGN00|2014-08-06 09:58:23.0169101 + useful to feed t.register (a suffix option yet to implement so as to define the part). Not all MTL files have identical strings for what concerns the DATE and TIME of acquisition. So far, the module treats TIME_STRINGS = ['SCENE_CENTER_TIME', 'SCENE_CENTER_SCAN_TIME'] DATE_STRINGS = ['DATE_ACQUIRED', 'ACQUISITION_DATE'] Would you know of other strings, let me please know. Any module-related ideas welcome. Thank you, Nikos signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
Re: [GRASS-dev] community sprint before Xmas? :)
Hi Vero On October 12, 2017 1:42:58 PM Veronica Andreowrote: Hi devs, What do you think about a short community sprint before Xmas? Well, indeed before December 17th would be better because I travel to Argentina for Xmas :) Ok seriously, even though there's the OSGeo code sprint in March, that's still a looong way to go and there are topics that have been on the agenda for quite some time already...e.g. new website, git migration, include more core devs and so on... we should also keep planning ahead for GRASS 8... The idea of meeting is not only because of that, but above all because it is always so nice and fun to meet :D Great idea Anyway, I have created a doodle [0] with friday+weekends until December 10th inclusive. Other options are also possible, I just put that because friday+weekend(+monday alternatively) is the most convenient in my case. If you are interested/available, please fill in the doodle or suggest other preferred dates. The idea is to see if we may coincide in our availability and meet. Regarding the place, I can offer my house to accomodate 5-6 persons (we would need 2-3 inflatable mattresses and sleeping bags). Or we can rent an airbnb here or somewhere else (btw, I live in Enschede, Netherlands). First, let's see if we can coincide in timing. What do you say? I'm interested to participate. Not yet sure what dates I'll have time (probably end of November or in December. Cheers, Vero [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/p4a8wmtcpw6c9m9s -- ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev ___ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev